Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt: FDR Was The ‘Greatest President’ Of The 20th Century
Breibart TV ^ | December 12, 2011 | Staff

Posted on 12/13/2011 7:56:38 AM PST by lbryce

Newt: FDR Was The ‘Greatest President’ Of The 20th Century
http://www.breitbart.tv/newt-fdr-was-the-greatest-president-of-the-20th-century/


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 20thcentury; fdr; gingrich; greatest; greatestpresident; newt; newtgingrich; president; progressivism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-96 next last
Some more kool aid, Newt? Until yesterday, I thought he was someone who deserved tremendous credit for telling it like it is, someone who spat in the eye of political correctness. Today, I'm not so sure what he's up to.
1 posted on 12/13/2011 7:56:41 AM PST by lbryce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I heard a montage on his praise of FDR. Pretty pathetic.

I think Newt will get elected. I think, however, we’ll see the same Rasmussen poll number trends as Obama’s. They will quickly go negative, and the causes will be poor performance in the eyes of Conservatives and Independents.


2 posted on 12/13/2011 7:59:51 AM PST by AlmaKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Sadly most days I wouldn’t choose Freepers to be in the trenches with.

To all the FDR haters. WWII was not a minor dust up. 4 terms. Unfortunately most people don’t accept our analysis that FDR prolonged the depression.

Whatever. Newt is brilliantly positioned for the general election. I love it.


3 posted on 12/13/2011 8:01:28 AM PST by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Reagan voted for FDR.


4 posted on 12/13/2011 8:01:38 AM PST by Boardwalk (FUBO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I guess the name Ronald Reagan slipped his mind.


5 posted on 12/13/2011 8:02:48 AM PST by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Newt, that one statement convinced me that you not a conservative, even slightly.
You will now NEVER get my vote.


6 posted on 12/13/2011 8:02:54 AM PST by BuffaloJack (Defeat Obama. End Obama's War On Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

It depends on what “great” is. FDR’s domestic policies were not great. His leadership skills in wartime were.


7 posted on 12/13/2011 8:04:18 AM PST by Genoa (Starve the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boardwalk

Exactly I have an 85 y/o aunt, do not try telling her FDR was anything but a hero. I think Reagan said he was an FDR dem, then the party left him, etc.


8 posted on 12/13/2011 8:04:44 AM PST by Williams (Honey Badger Don't Care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Countdown to NewtBots telling us how this is a BRILLIANT Newt “strategy” to appeal to Democrats to defeat Obama, in 3.....2.....1.....


9 posted on 12/13/2011 8:05:41 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

“I most admired him for ability to juggle his serial adultery.”


10 posted on 12/13/2011 8:06:15 AM PST by freedomson (Tagline comment removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
FDR was the greatest consolidator of power of all times.

That's what Noot realy admires.

11 posted on 12/13/2011 8:07:12 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Holding our flawed politicians to higher standards than the enemyÂ’s politicians guarantees they win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

http://www.firstprinciplesjournal.com/articles.aspx?article=1082&loc=r


12 posted on 12/13/2011 8:07:46 AM PST by Utmost Certainty (Our Enemy, the State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

One can learn a lot about a man according to who his heroes are/ain’t!
;)

Semper Watching!
*****


13 posted on 12/13/2011 8:07:58 AM PST by gunnyg ("A Constitution changed from Freedom, can never be restored; Liberty, once lost, is lost forever...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

"Sticks and stones may break my bones...but FRANKLIN DELANO ROOSEVELT!"

14 posted on 12/13/2011 8:07:58 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Geez.
Following Gingrich is like a roller coaster. Once say he says something good (”Palestinians are an invented people”) the next he dishes out crap like this FDR worship.


15 posted on 12/13/2011 8:08:35 AM PST by Little Ray (FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huskrrrr
"I guess the name Ronald Reagan slipped his mind."

According to Newt, the era of Reagan is over.

16 posted on 12/13/2011 8:09:20 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
I heard the clips on Beck on the way to work.

It's looking more and more like Santorum is the only adult in this race. I don't particularly enjoy Little Ricky's lectures, but I'm leaning his direction.

17 posted on 12/13/2011 8:09:44 AM PST by Glenn (iamtheresistance.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Newt will be a total disaster for Conservatism (and the GOP), if we are foolish enough to choose him.

He is in it for himself. He has a flawed character and personalilty. He is unelectable.

He is a Big Government adherent. He got personally wealthy by milking his public sector activities, not in the private sector.

He changes positions frequently. He is a narcissist. He believes he is smarter than anyone else. He is dangerous.

He was not liked by any of his colleagues, and they know him far better than we do, and it’s not because he was more conservative than them. In fact, he has no core principles except whatever is good for Newt.

Don’t drink the Newt Koolaid.


18 posted on 12/13/2011 8:10:04 AM PST by LowTaxesEqualsProsperity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Sorry Newt, that distinction goes to Ronald Reagan, hands down.

FDR fought the war...no doubt. But his policies during the war, and particularly his affinity to “Uncle Joe”, who was as big a butcher to his own people as Hitler or Mao, directly led to the enslavement of 200 million people in eatern Europe under the brutal COmmunist Russian boot after the war as a result of his sell out at Yalta.

It also led to the slaughter of any who opposed it in Hungary, Czeckslovakia, etc.

On the other hand, Reagan through his America first, strong military, star wars, and a citry on a hill policies led to the downfall of the Soviet Empire and the freedom of those 200 million people.

Not to mention what Reagan did for a seriously ailing US economy at the time...producing the biggest bnoom of the century.

Such comments continue to lead me to have more and more angsat about Newt and his candidacy...though in the end he will be light years ahead of Obama and we simply must stop Obama’s re-election and put in place a House and Senate who will ensure that our President holds the line.


19 posted on 12/13/2011 8:13:24 AM PST by Jeff Head (Liberty is not free. Never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
One of the most dishonest presentations in the history of the internet by any so-called "conservative." If you can't report the facts, then don't bother reporting at all. At no time did he say he admired the man's policies. He admired his effectiveness as a leader.

If you are incapable of distinguishing the difference between the two, then I suggest that you are, at best, a sophomoric, immature intellect and at worst simply intellectually incapable of being honest.

Trying to smear Newt with this kind of half-truth, out of context set of excerpts is what I would expect from a liberal, what I would expect from Obama's campaign, not what I would expect from conservatives (or at least who claim to be conservatives).

I thought Andrew was better than this. I guess not. He's no better than the guy he likes to rag on, Beck. Beck does this same thing, Andrew.
20 posted on 12/13/2011 8:14:07 AM PST by Sudetenland (Anybody but Obama!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomson

Oh, you baaaad Mist’ Rhett...

LOL!


21 posted on 12/13/2011 8:14:29 AM PST by silverleaf (common sense is not so common- voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Williams; lbryce

Historian Geoffrey C. Ward titled his biography of FDR “A First-Class Temperament.” I think that perfectly sums up FDR. Many of his policies were absolutely misguided, but he had that certain something, a confidence that makes a leader inspiring. He established the standard for what is presidential in terms of temperament. Reagan had it too, but not like FDR.


22 posted on 12/13/2011 8:14:42 AM PST by Genoa (Starve the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Reagan praised FDR, too.


23 posted on 12/13/2011 8:15:17 AM PST by RockinRight (If you're waiting to drink until you find pure water, you're going to die of dehydration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Genoa
It depends on what “great” is. FDR’s domestic policies were not great. His leadership skills in wartime were.

Exactly. Considering that FDR ushured us through the greatest economic crises in US history (the Great Depression)(even though badly...), AND the greatest war in world history (WWII), AND that he was in power for over 12 years.... one can call him the "greatest" (certainly the most influential) president of the 20th Century.

Of course in the "influential" sense, Hitler, Stalin, and Mao were "great" too.

Besides all that, FDR's biggest wartime leadership skill--was his military ignorance--and leaving the war up to the generals.

Blessedly, Marshall, MacArthur, Eisenhower, et al., were real pros.

24 posted on 12/13/2011 8:15:17 AM PST by AnalogReigns (because REALITY is never digital...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Williams
Unfortunately most people don’t accept our analysis that FDR prolonged the depression.

It's not that FDR prolonged the depression. It's just that, like the current resident of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, he used pointy-headed academicians who had no real-world experience to theorize us out of the doldrums. And he had an even MORE fawning press corps to tell the unwashed masses how brilliant he was.

Been reading "A Patriot's History of the US" by Larry Schweikert, and the parallels between BHO's policies and those of FDR are downright scary.

25 posted on 12/13/2011 8:15:50 AM PST by ssaftler ("John Galt, we need you!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

according to or thanks to?


26 posted on 12/13/2011 8:16:06 AM PST by WOBBLY BOB (Congress: Looting the future to bribe the present.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

Great means something different to a historian than everyone else.

Think of historical figures who have “the Great” appended to their names. They weren’t all rainbows and skittles, some of them were tyrants. “Great” in this definition means powerful, effective, not necessarily someone you agree with.

Do I know that’s what Newt meant? Not at all, but it’s possible.

BTW, Reagan praised FDR too, and he turned out OK.


27 posted on 12/13/2011 8:17:20 AM PST by RockinRight (If you're waiting to drink until you find pure water, you're going to die of dehydration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Williams

I just shrug at them.

They are pimping another candidate, and this is how they think they will help them rise in the polls.


28 posted on 12/13/2011 8:21:04 AM PST by VanDeKoik (1 million in stimulus dollars paid for this tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Boardwalk; All
FDR Goes to War: How Expanded Executive Power, Spiraling National Debt, and Restricted Civil Liberties Shaped Wartime America
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2786836/posts

Reviews:"FDR Goes to War is a page-turning tour de force -- and a scholarly one, at that -- of the politics and economics of America's involvement in WWII. Be prepared to rethink much of what you think you know about FDR, the war, and the post-Depression U.S. economy." --Don Bordreaux, Chairman of the Department of Economics at George Mason University "In New Deal or Raw Deal? Burt Folsom exposed FDR's failed policies during the Great Depression. Now, in FDR Goes to War, he pulls the curtain back even further. Burt and Anita Folsom have produced a book that should be read by all Americans. This is the real history you do not find in textbooks." -- James P. Duffy, author of Lindbergh Vs. Roosevelt

"Few in the history profession have done more to shed light on the real Franklin Delano Roosevelt than Burt Folsom. With FDR Goes to War, Folsom and his wife Anita educate Americans on the facts we should have known but were never taught.

You will find this book both shocking and refreshing." -- Lawrence W. Reed, president, Foundation for Economic Education

"A compelling look at a fascinating man in a devastating war. This is the FDR concealed for over half a century by liberal academics and biased journalists. You will learn a lot from this engaging and readable book." -- Paul Kengor, professor of political science, Grove City College, and author of Dupes Product Description From the acclaimed author of New Deal or Raw Deal?, called “eye-opening” by the National Review

29 posted on 12/13/2011 8:21:26 AM PST by lbryce (BHO:The bastard offspring of Satan and Medusa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

I can’t believe a Conservative would vote for Newt. And multiple marriages made freepers go nuts when Rudy ran.

I’m supporting Perry. I think he has a second round in him.


30 posted on 12/13/2011 8:22:18 AM PST by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
Here is a link to a pretty concise article on whom I consider the 20th century's greatest president speaking about FDR:

Here

Here is a snippet:

“Roosevelt, according to Reagan, was a strong leader, one to emulate in certain respects. He had taken over the presidency during a time of unprecedented crisis and implemented a plan of action to bring the nation out of its doldrums. Reagan fondly recalled FDR’s Fireside Chats, which were designed to give hope to the people. “His strong, gentle, confident voice resonated across the nation with an eloquence that brought comfort and resilience to a nation caught up in a storm and reassured us that we could lick any problem. I will never forget him for that.” As governor of California later, Reagan had to deal with a Democratic legislature. “It occurred to me that I had an opportunity to go over their heads.” How? He used radio and television to communicate directly with the people of California, a tactic he traced back to FDR’s Fireside Chats, which, he commented, “made an indelible mark on me during the Depression.”
As president, Reagan often mentioned his admiration for FDR’s spirit of leadership. On a trip back to his alma mater, Eureka College, in 1984, he reminded his listeners what it was like to experience the Great Depression, and how the Fireside Chats had been so reassuring. “All of us who lived through those years,” he instructed them, “remember the drabness the depression brought. But we remember, too, how people pulled together, that sense of community and shared values, that belief in American enterprise and democracy that saw us through. It was that engrained American optimism, that sense of hope Franklin Roosevelt so brilliantly summoned and mobilized.” In his view, FDR was instrumental in reviving an inherent American optimism that was endangered by the economic crisis.”

Myself...I don't care for FDR much except giving him credit for most of his conduct in WWII...but not all..(Yalta, work up to Potsdam)

But older folks often have misty views on the FDR legacy...my dad didn't but my mom did..both were GOP from Ike on as young parents

I bet you can mine comments of even Buckley and Barry saying something nice about FDR ...

if Beck (a loon to me) or any of you guys wish to go 3rd...then that is nothing but a vote for Obama

and Beck going for Mr Weird about Jews Ron Paul is absurd and ain't gonna happen

there is no man on the planet who wishes he were Jewish by birth more than Glenn Beck...except maybe a few freepers

31 posted on 12/13/2011 8:23:46 AM PST by wardaddy (Michelle, Sarah, Perry now Newt over Mitt.....that is how I've seen it and it's where we are)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
I would really like to like Newt, but his counterattack on Mittens scares me to death. First Mitt was working in the free market, and sometimes companies like Bain have to come in and take over troubled companies, or would you prefer that the Federal Government do it? Sometimes there is no happy ending, but Mittens earned his money honestly.

Mittens made a valid point that after politicians leave office they hang around and do consultant work, like banks hiring thieves to help them combat theft.

It concerns me when a so called conservative attacks private industry while calling on government solutions for the rest of us to pay for. Not much difference between a progressive liberal democrat and a progressive republican except for the D or R after their name. Conservatives here better wake up and rediscover what Conservatism is.

32 posted on 12/13/2011 8:24:20 AM PST by JohnD9207 (John McCain is a proud Ted Kennedy conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

In one respect both FDR and Truman were great. Their bungling resurrected interest in the Republican alternative.


33 posted on 12/13/2011 8:24:20 AM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

I’d like to see the Newt’s speeches where these clips were derived in full. I worry about Newt being “effective”. I think that is the main thing that he admires about FDR. (although FDR was very effective at socialism) I don’t want to rely on congress to keep Newt in check if he is elected. It needs to be the other way around. We need an effective president, but he needs to be effective in eliminating government - entire departments.


34 posted on 12/13/2011 8:26:23 AM PST by ConservativeInPA (Maxine, I'll see you there. I'm not changing my ways.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LowTaxesEqualsProsperity
Newt will be a total disaster for Conservatism (and the GOP), if we are foolish enough to choose him.

I seem to remember the period from 1995 - 1998 working out pretty well for conservatism despite Slick Willie being President...Newt deserves credit for that.

35 posted on 12/13/2011 8:26:59 AM PST by RockinRight (If you're waiting to drink until you find pure water, you're going to die of dehydration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Newt is a progressive, liberal, republican. He will “newk” the conservatives once he gets anywhere close to the nomination, and certainly if he ever wins the Presidency (almost no chance he beats Obama).


36 posted on 12/13/2011 8:31:43 AM PST by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Nail. Coffin. Final.


37 posted on 12/13/2011 8:34:27 AM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight
Think of historical figures who have “the Great” appended to their names. They weren’t all rainbows and skittles, some of them were tyrants. “Great” in this definition means powerful, effective, not necessarily someone you agree with.

My high school history teacher noted that most of those rulers who have "the great" appended to their names killed a lot of people.

38 posted on 12/13/2011 8:35:22 AM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
I can’t believe a Conservative would vote for Newt. And multiple marriages made freepers go nuts when Rudy ran.

...

Yet these same FReepers ignore Limbaugh's multiple nuptials

39 posted on 12/13/2011 8:36:07 AM PST by j.argese (Newt ... the Nixon of our time ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Newt is a BIG Government guy. His wealth, fame and book sales are a direct result of his fondness, and unshakable belief in the goodness of a Big Brother Style US Federal Government.

The US Nanny-State got a big boost when Teddy Roosevelt urged the creation of the US Department of Education (1912), and National education levels have been going downward ever since.

TR’s cousin, FDR, rammed through the Socialist Security Ponzi System, and it went bankrupt in 2010.

FDR’s fair-haired boy was LBJ, and he and Martin Luther King, Jr. gave us Medicare and Medicaid, which bankrupted the US Federal Government decades ago.

Not to be outdone, the Republicans became RINOS and gave us Food Stamps (Nixon), and “No child Left Behind” (GWB).

Thus, Chairman Obama found it easy to Nationalize the Medical and Insurance segments of our bankrupt economy, when he rammed through Obama”care” on Christmas Eve, 2009.

Who was the GREATEST President as:

a.) Contributor to today’s Welfare/Entitlement Plantation?

b.) Leader of the Free World in time of military crisis?

c.) Defender of the US Constitution?

d.) An inspiration to future generations of American Citizens?

On the basis of the above quiz, I’d say that Nanny-State Newt would choose “a” and “d” for FDR, possibly “b”, but not “c.”

Nanny-Newt say: “Big Government has been belly, belly goood to me!”


40 posted on 12/13/2011 8:37:04 AM PST by Graewoulf (( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
Trying to keep up with Newt and believe that he is a conservative!


41 posted on 12/13/2011 8:37:44 AM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boardwalk

My mom was a very conservative person. But she also admired FDR. I suspect that Ronald Reagan also had great respect for FDR. The Newt bashers are really desperate.


42 posted on 12/13/2011 8:38:10 AM PST by sand lake bar (You have not converted a man because you have silenced him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

How is that Kool-aid?

Gingrich praises Teddy, Franklin and admits on the radio he is a progressive...

What exactly are you waiting for?

Do you really want to vote another progressive in the WH?


43 posted on 12/13/2011 8:38:21 AM PST by surfer (To err is human, to really foul things up takes a Democrat, don't expect the GOP to have the answer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

Like Newt, I was brain washed as a child about what a wonderful President FDR was. As I grew older and learned more about politics and politicians, I saw him in a much different light. I totally disagree with Newt in regards to FDR and do not want a President who believes that BS.


44 posted on 12/13/2011 8:38:21 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Merry Christmas to you all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
Attempting to believe in Newt...


45 posted on 12/13/2011 8:39:08 AM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce
Newt can't be expected to know the history of the the socialism-introducing, Constitution-shredding, Depression-prolonging, Stalin-coddling Roosevelt.

Oh, wait, Newt fancies himself an historian...

46 posted on 12/13/2011 8:40:35 AM PST by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams
I'm going to post this in honor of my Daddy who was born in 1918, enlisted in the U.S. Navy shortly after Pearl Harbor and saw action at Iwo Jima, Okinawa and other hot spots. Dad figured out FDR in time for his first election (1940).

Rejected

FDR at the gates of Hell

A stranger stood at the Gates of hell
And the Devil himself answered the bell.
He looked him over from head to toe
And said: My friend, I'd like to know
What you have done in the line of sin
To entitle you to come within?

Then Franklin D, with his usual guile
Stepped forth with his toothy smile and said:

"When I took charge in '33
A nations faith was mine," said he
"I promised them this and I promised them that
And I calmed them down with a fireside chat.
I spent their money in fishing trips
And fished from the decks of their battleships.

I gave them jobs in the WPA
Then raised their taxes and took it away.
I raised their wages and closed their shops
I killed their pigs and buried their crops
I double-crossed both old and young
And still the folks my praises sung.

I brought back beer, and what do you think?
I taxed it so high they couldn't drink.
I furnished 'em money with Government loans
When they missed a payment I took their homes.
When I wanted to punish the folks, you know
I'd put my wife on the radio.

I paid them to let their farms lie still
And imported foodstuffs from Brazil.
I curtailed crops when I felt real mean
And shipped in crops from the Argentine.

When they started to worry, stew and fret
I got them to chant the alphabet
With the AAA and the NLB
The WPA and the CCC.

With these many units I got their goats
And still I crammed it down their throats.
My workers worked with the speed of snails
While the taxpayers chewed their fingernails.

When the organization needed dough
I closed their plants with the CIO.
I ruined jobs, I ruined health
And I put the screws on the rich man's wealth.

And some who couldn't stand the gaff
Would call on me and how I'd laugh.
When they got too strong on certain things
I'd pack and head for "Ole Warm Springs."
I ruined their country, their homes and then
I placed the blame on "Nine Old Men."

Now Franklin talked both long and loud
And the devil stood and his head he bowed.
At last he said: "Lets make it clear
You'll have to move, you can't stay here
For once you mingle with this mob,
I'll have to find another job."

47 posted on 12/13/2011 8:40:45 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ssaftler

“Unfortunately most people don’t accept our analysis that FDR prolonged the depression.

It’s not that FDR prolonged the depression. It’s just that, like the current resident of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, he used pointy-headed academicians who had no real-world experience to theorize us out of the doldrums.”


It is true that FDR was a disaster economically. However, he did admit many times to the public that he didnt know what he was doing with his economic programs, and that he was just trying to do as many things as he could think of, knowing that lots of things he was doing was not going to work. He said many times he is going to try something, and if it doesnt work then he will try again. I give credit to FDR for at least admitting that he was just guessing about what to do with the Great Depression. Lots of people back then and even today dont know what to do to keep us out of economic depressions. Even some of today’s economists don’t know what they are talking about.

OTOH, FDR handled WW2 brilliantly! The more I study WW2 the more credit I have to give FDR for making all the right decisions, for choosing people like Halsey, McAurther, and Eisenhower for his military leaders, for building an alliance with England and Russia to effectively squeeze germany, invading Europe via Normandy so that the Soviets would not take over Europe, the A-bomb, the way FDR created mind-numbing war time production. From Normandy to V-E Day it took FDR less than a year to defeat Hitler. Most people dont realize that WW2 could have easily been lost.

FDR was the last president to get a Congressional declaration to go to war, the last president to earnestly completely fight to win, and the last American President to win a war.


48 posted on 12/13/2011 8:43:35 AM PST by CGalen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: lbryce; P-Marlowe; wmfights

You are thinking in terms of politics, and Gingrich is thinking in terms of history.

Everything in the 20th century was touched by FDR after he won his first election.

The Great Depression has his mark (good or ill) on it.

He actually was a GREAT war-time president, and he had the good sense to allow generals to fight his wars, and won WWII in a 3rd of the time we’ve been in Iraq and Afghanistan throwing away a military victory on the ground in favor of a long-term loss due to nation rebuilding.

He will be perhaps forever the only president to win 4 terms.

His mark is so firmly on the nation’s intelligence community that I doubt it will ever be forgotten.

Reagan is the only other president to compete with FDR, and his contribution was HUGE! His vision and clarity brought down the Soviet Union and ended the cold war.

Unfortunately, he was limited to 2 terms, and was hampered toward the end with the machinations of Congress and political enemies as well as by his own weakening skills.

I agree with the Gingrich history lesson.


49 posted on 12/13/2011 8:45:17 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CGalen

A lot of FDR’s policies were merely continuations of policies established under Hoover, but given new names.


50 posted on 12/13/2011 8:46:49 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson