Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt Gingrich: Selling Access (Ron Paul video attack)
YouTube ^ | 12/13/11 | Ron Paul Campaign

Posted on 12/13/2011 9:47:14 AM PST by Nachum

The Ron Paul 2012 Presidential campaign announced today the release of its latest ad, 'Selling Access', another two-minute web video aimed at former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, calling him out as a corrupt Washington insider who got rich through influence-peddling.

The video, which the campaign plans to promote prominently on conservative web sites, includes a clip of Gingrich calling himself an 'insider' and another in which the former Speaker brags about getting paid $60,000-a-speech. The video comes after the viral success of Paul's earlier web ad, 'Serial Hypocrisy', which criticizes Gingrich for many of the same issues.

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: access; ad; gingrich; newt; newtromney; ronpaul; selling; shrimpboats
I was wondering when it would start. Vid at link.
1 posted on 12/13/2011 9:47:19 AM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

I’m not a Paul supporter, but everything in the add is true.


2 posted on 12/13/2011 9:59:04 AM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marty60

One of my measures for politicians is how much wealth did they have at the beginning of their DC career and how much did they have leaving after politics? It appears Newt has done very well for himself. Does the old saying “Don’t bite the hand that feeds you” apply here?


3 posted on 12/13/2011 10:07:51 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

When is Wrong Paul going to run an ad about all the pork money he gets for his district?


4 posted on 12/13/2011 10:08:31 AM PST by RockinRight (If you're waiting to drink until you find pure water, you're going to die of dehydration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marty60; Nachum

Selling access?

That’s from the guy who’s been in the government for 40 years, raking in millions of dollars running for President, and setting up his son as a Senator?

Access to what? What exactly is corrupt in getting paid for making speeches that organizations are willing to pay for?

Is this an episode of “Dumb, Dumber, Dumberer and Dumbest”?


5 posted on 12/13/2011 10:11:56 AM PST by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

“When is Wrong Paul going to run an ad about all the pork money he gets for his district?”

Must have missed the message that Ron Paul is perfect.


6 posted on 12/13/2011 10:14:22 AM PST by Goldie Lurks (professional moonbat catcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Newt Gingrich = the ultimate D.C. insider.

Let’s face the facts here.


7 posted on 12/13/2011 10:17:47 AM PST by GOP_Harley_Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Goldie Lurks

>> Must have missed the message that Ron Paul is perfect. >>

No way to miss that message. :)


8 posted on 12/13/2011 10:18:48 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Moderator of Florida Tea Party Convention Presidential Debate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Where is Ron Paul’s video on Mitt Romney ?
Oh yeah, he’s hasn’t been going after Romney.


9 posted on 12/13/2011 10:20:05 AM PST by PMAS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
One of my measures for politicians is how much wealth did they have at the beginning of their DC career and how much did they have leaving after politics?

Newt was pretty much almost broke after leaving Congress and leaving most of his money, made from writing books, in the divorce to his second wife, Marianne, who he has been supporting despite their separation in 1987.

He wrote more than 20 books, was a highly sought speaker at political and educational events, and with his wife Callista, built several companies and conservative organizations from scratch (as WSJ article described it, "Newt, Inc.")

For more details see: "Cain/Gingrich 2012"? - FR, post #64, 2011 October 06

10 posted on 12/13/2011 10:23:26 AM PST by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marty60; All

You state: “I’m not a Paul supporter, but everything in the add is true.”

...sliming half truths. Tells more about Paul than Gingrich. Totally disgusting individual.

For example - Of these scheighty eight ethics charges - how many was he found guilt of? You MUST know if you can pontifically pronounce Paul’s charges all true, right?
Let me refresh your memory, tho’, just in case.

After 3 years of feverish digging, they only were able to find in ‘guilty’ of only ONE - for which he was fined $300,000. It has to do with a charge of using tax dollar funds to teach a college course including politics.

He took their word for it - apologized and paid the fine.

OOPS! Funny thing happened. Later, as a result of the IRS looking these all over, they found he was INNOCENT of that charge - perfectly legal college course - no politics.

but did Newt get his $300,000 back? No. Did he get an apology? No. Did the media spend even 1/100ths time and ink of his exoneration as three years on his ‘disgrace?”

NO.

Was the lefts usual attack and destroy methods successful?

Yes.

http://www.rightgrrl.com/carolyn/newt.html

Do clueless Sheeple dutifully swallow their lies without doing independent research?

YES. (look in the mirror)


11 posted on 12/13/2011 10:26:45 AM PST by maine-iac7 (A prudent man foreseeth the evil,... but the simple pass on, and are punished. Prov 23:3 KJV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

Yes exactly. Newt met with Rupert Murdoch on a Park Bench concerning problems Murdoch was having with Congress. (foreign ownership of Media outlet) Then Newt got a 4 million dollar book deal from Murdochs Harper-Collins. When even Republicans started screaming about the legality, Newt AND Murdoch CHANGED THE TERMS OF THE DEAL. Newt had to pay a $300,000 fine to the Congress for that.

But guess what Rupert Murdochs problems went away.

Murdoch is NOW having SERIOUS problems with investigations of his News Corps. Who do you think Fox wants to be President. That has got to be worth more than a measly 4 mill.
This is the way Newt has always worked money talks BS walks.

Maybe we’ll have a new term...To Big To Investigate.


12 posted on 12/13/2011 10:27:40 AM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

Started out worth $10,000 and left worth 7 million. Wow and all that on a Congressman’s salary /s


13 posted on 12/13/2011 10:29:53 AM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; All

Yes, indeed, Ron Paul - the truth peddler - or ‘truther’

Indeed this is a man I can believe -

quote:
“Do you know who the latest Zionist on the block is? It’s the man who called Israel, “an aggressive, national socialist state” and suggested that the original World Trade Center bombing may have really been carried out by Israel.”

http://frontpagemag.com/2011/12/13/ron-paul-not-anti-foreign-aid-anti-israel/

I can believe he’s a disgusting, lying nut case.


14 posted on 12/13/2011 10:35:26 AM PST by maine-iac7 (A prudent man foreseeth the evil,... but the simple pass on, and are punished. Prov 23:3 KJV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

What is untrue about this video.


15 posted on 12/13/2011 10:36:35 AM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

I have been politically active all of my life (starting at 17)

Newt is not new to me. So save it. Paul will not get the nomination. He seems more interested in getting his ideology out.

When the Republicans kicked Newt out of Congress. (he resigned due to NO support. What happened to the guy that became Speaker. Within days an ANONYMOUS source told the media that the new speaker had an affair many years ago. He and his wife were still together and it was history. But everyone at the time knew full well it was a Newt dirty trick.

BTW did you know Newt started out as a campaign official for Rockefeller. (Of Rockefeller Republican fame)


16 posted on 12/13/2011 10:38:05 AM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; albertp; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; amchugh; ...

Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here.

17 posted on 12/13/2011 10:39:25 AM PST by rabscuttle385 (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marty60
What happened to the guy that became Speaker. Within days an ANONYMOUS source told the media that the new speaker had an affair many years ago. He and his wife were still together and it was history. But everyone at the time knew full well it was a Newt dirty trick.

Bob Livingston, I presume?

The point I was making back to the Cain issues, was that the only person who lost his job because of "Monica Gate" was Bob Livingston.....While I wish our candidates could be pure as the driven snow, it's just not reality, and playing this game only benefits the Democrats.

18 posted on 12/13/2011 10:40:43 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: marty60; All

marty marty maty - you’re beginning to sound like a Wrong Paul sycophant.

And the $300,000 was NOT for what you state - and what he did pay it for - the IRS found him not guilty...

once more - if you continue using Paul’s tactics of half/twisted truths, people will know what to think about you - as well as the nut case.

http://www.rightgrrl.com/carolyn/newt.html


19 posted on 12/13/2011 10:42:33 AM PST by maine-iac7 (A prudent man foreseeth the evil,... but the simple pass on, and are punished. Prov 23:3 KJV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

The latest Let’s play nice mantra with Gingrich’s accompanying smirk makes me want to puke.

I can’t stand Paul. His positions are totally off the wall.


20 posted on 12/13/2011 10:45:32 AM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: marty60; All
there ya go again.

He made his money, as you have been apprised, writing books. He's still writing books - best sellers.

The 'pay' is good for good writers - and Newt - DR. Gingrich - has a brilliant, educated mind.

and he scares the bejeebers out the REAL Insiders - the Establishment Ivy League Republican Cabal - that have been running all things republican for many decades...the ONLY president in the last 40 years NOT a card carrying member of the Establishment Cabal was Reagan.

Newt is a Reaganite - was carrying out Reaganomics when in office {which is how he balanced the budget, historically, 4 years in row, for one example.] The Establishment Cabal and the Media and the Socialists see now, as they did in the mid-90's, a NON-insider who threatens their very existence as the rulers of the party who have installed their Ivy Leagers for decades.

The REAL INSIDER is is their boy Romney, whose otherwise plastic face is now registering the look of a deer-in-the-headlights, wondering what went wrong because "it's MY TURN!"

The Triumvirate: Establishment pubbies, media & Socialist know that he will also pick his leaders from OUTSIDE the INSIDE and he has also stated that he will not keep ONE holdover now in position. For ex: Ben Bernake - "You're Fired!"

So the Triumvirate is beginning to howl and froth like the Hounds of Baskerville.

Which group do YOU belong in?

21 posted on 12/13/2011 11:01:34 AM PST by maine-iac7 (A prudent man foreseeth the evil,... but the simple pass on, and are punished. Prov 23:3 KJV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7
I can't believe that you won't believe your own eyes and ears.

Newt is a Progressive Republican, part of the old Rockefeller wing. Don't believe it?

Look up the case of Dede Scozzafava -- Pro-abort, pro-gay marriage, ties to Acorn, "Progressive Republican" Scozzafava was endorsed by Newt Gingrich --- over the Conservative Candidate Hoffman who had been backed by everyone from Palin to De Mint to Pawlenty. Hoffman was winning until Gingrich threw the race to Scozzafava -- and then she backed out and quit -- throeing the race to the Democrat Owens, who won! What kind of "Conservatism" is that? What kind of "Conservative cooperation" is that?

22 posted on 12/13/2011 11:08:43 AM PST by Bokababe (Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: marty60; All
I have been politically active all of my life (starting at 17...Newt is not new to me. So save it.

And your age makes you the know all, end all arbiter of truth?

I've also been politically active all my life as well(and an investigative reporter - I do research before spouting off). I'm also a great grandmother. So using your own criteria, Save it.

You're outing yourself...as a parser of truth, same as Paul.

23 posted on 12/13/2011 11:09:06 AM PST by maine-iac7 (A prudent man foreseeth the evil,... but the simple pass on, and are punished. Prov 23:3 KJV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Bokababe

Not everyone sucks up the talking points of you Paulistinians.

You should go back to defending Ron Paul for his statement that the Bush administration was in “glee” over 9/11. He still needs help on those threads. Or perhaps you can go back and try and prove Paul is right in believing that Israel was actually behind the 9/11 attacks.

It took about 5 minutes for educated Freepers to point out the fundamental and purposeful dishonesty of Ron Paul in this video - such as the ethics charges which were dismissed. Paul always seemed astray on many Conservative issues, but he’s pretty much blown the “at least Ron Paul is honest” talking point to hell. Clearly he’s not above stooping to lying and complete dishonesty.

Shame on Ron Paul for his lies, shame on him!


24 posted on 12/13/2011 11:41:16 AM PST by TitansAFC (Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry are not your enemies, my fellow Freepers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Not everyone sucks up the talking points of you Paulistinians....Clearly he’s not above stooping to lying and complete dishonesty."

And what does this have to do with Newt Gingrich on video in his own words? What does this have to do with Newt Gingrich repeatedly admiring FDR as "one of our greatest presidents"? What does this have to do with Newt ultimately throwing an election of a Conservative to a Liberal Democrat? Nothing.

It wouldn't matter if I supported Perry, Bachmann or Cain. It's about Newt. And if you think that this has been hard on him, just wait until the media savvy Democrats get a hold of him if he wins the nomination.

25 posted on 12/13/2011 12:06:01 PM PST by Bokababe (Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: marty60
Yes exactly. Newt met with Rupert Murdoch on a Park Bench concerning problems Murdoch was having with Congress. (foreign ownership of Media outlet) ... But guess what Rupert Murdochs problems went away.

... on a "Park Bench"?

Rupert Murdoch became American citizen (and IIRC, lost his Australian citizenship because of that) in 1985. He did not need Newt to get him out of non-existent problem.

Then Newt got a 4 million dollar book deal from Murdochs Harper-Collins. When even Republicans started screaming about the legality

A lot of Michel-Dole-Bush-McCain Republicans hated Newt's guts and his Second Republican Revolution and his Contract with America. When Republicans' coup against Gingrich failed in 1997, they joined Democrats in blaming all the problems on Newt.

Dems filed 84 ethics charges against Gingrich, he was cleared on 83 of them, including the Harper-Collins book. IRS cleared him on the 84th charge later.

The $300K payoff was the price Newt personally paid to stop becoming a target of fraudulent ethics charges and a distraction to more pressing things, including later botched by Senate Republicans impeachment trial of Bill Clinton.

See more details here at "Cain/Gingrich 2012"? - FR, post #64, 2011 October 06

Really, we should do better than repeat liberal lies about other candidates, just because "our" candidate is not a front-runner.

26 posted on 12/13/2011 12:13:11 PM PST by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bokababe
No, it's about Ron Paul's dishonesty and creative editing. With your FDR comment, I can see why videos like this appeal to you. The ends justify the means, right?

As far as “in their own words,” this should be the last thing you Paulistinians want as a standard. Who was it who said there should be no immigration policy and that everyone should be free to come and go as they please? Oh yeah, that was Ron Paul!

Who blamed Israel for 9/11? Ron Paul

Who said the Bush Administration had glee because of the 9/11 attacks? Ron Paul

Who blasted Reagan in 1987, implying he was worse than Carter, and left the GOP because of his disgust for Ronnie? Ron Paul.

27 posted on 12/13/2011 12:15:32 PM PST by TitansAFC (Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry are not your enemies, my fellow Freepers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Did or did not Newt recommend Toffler's "Future Shock", "The Third Wave" as reading for every member of Congress, and even write a forward to the sequel, " "Creating a New Civilization: The Politics of the Third Wave"? Yes! Let me give you the back piece and a quote from that book:

So in 1995 Newt Gingrich, the Speaker of the US House of Representatives, was directly advocating books by authors who write about how the Constitution "must die"? And you don't have a problem with that?

28 posted on 12/13/2011 12:43:34 PM PST by Bokababe (Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Bokababe
Or a real expose on what happened with Newt, the Tofflers and Congress back in the mid 1990's that tells you exactly who Newt is. Gingrich, Toffler, and Gore: A Peculiar Trio
29 posted on 12/13/2011 12:58:21 PM PST by Bokababe (Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

Well-played.


30 posted on 12/13/2011 1:08:34 PM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bokababe

Leave it to Paulistinians to use an opinion piece by “The Moral Liberal” website as their authentic source of truth.

You should be posting at the Huffington Post, not here.


31 posted on 12/13/2011 1:13:20 PM PST by TitansAFC (Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry are not your enemies, my fellow Freepers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Leave it to Paulistinians to use an opinion piece by “The Moral Liberal” website as their authentic source of truth.

Oops, made the mistake that you might actually read and dispute the evidence, instead of going the easy ad hominem route -- my mistake -- forgot who I was talking to.

Here's more on it, pure Tea -- same conclusion.

32 posted on 12/13/2011 1:21:02 PM PST by Bokababe (Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Leave it to Paulistinians to use an opinion piece by “The Moral Liberal”

And BTW, you might want to read a bit and discover the real meaning of the word "Liberal" before the communists stole it -- much like communists are also stealing the word "Conservative" to mean anything that they want it to mean.

33 posted on 12/13/2011 1:30:09 PM PST by Bokababe (Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Bokababe

Opinion pieces and claims to pretend to know what Newt Gingrich is thinking isn’t “evidence” to be “disputed.”

You Paulistinians and your Conspiracy theories!

—Israel behind 9/11
—Bush gleeful at 9/11 attacks
—Newt a secret Communist

What a bunch of crackpot theories you Paulistinians advocate!


34 posted on 12/13/2011 1:30:21 PM PST by TitansAFC (Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry are not your enemies, my fellow Freepers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
Newt is a Rockefeller Republican globalist. That's what all this "Third Wave' stuff is about -- "Global Democracy" -- the dissolution of the US sovereignty in favor of global governance. That concept is well-documented. Newt openly advocated authors who called for the US Constitution to die -- and you can ignore that, but you can't get around it.

When I say Rockefeller Republican (Newt was Nelson Rockefeller's campaign manager), let's look at what David Rockefeller (founder of the CFR of which Newt is a member) had to say:

For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as "internationalists" and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it. -David Rockefeller

And Rockefeller Republicans were the enemies of the Goldwater Conservative Republicans within the Republican Party from the 1950's-1970's. They only allowed Goldwater Conservative Ronald Reagan become the GOP nominee as long as Reagan accepted Rockefeller Republican George H Bush as his running mate.

Newt doesn't have to be an all out "communist" to keep moving the concept of a (supposed) "Conservative" so far Left that it becomes virtually unrecognizable to the general public and means nothing. That's what Newt, McCain, Graham, etc have been doing in Congress for the last 30 years.

35 posted on 12/13/2011 2:25:03 PM PST by Bokababe (Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

Sorry it’s facts. It always amazes me when people think that everything about an incident is played out in public.
Consider this:
When Newt was kicked out of Congress by
Repubs et al due to his lack of ethics BS. Why did Livingston after taking over as Speaker. Livingston actively campaigned to get Newt out and ran openly to replace him. anyway, Within a week or two someone leaked to the media that Livingston had had an affair many years before. did not destroy his marriage. Was done to make him resign. We know that Murdoch has a penchant for dirty Laundry ops. Cain was a shoe in for the nomination. oops all of a sudden anonymous leaks Cain sex harassment claims.
When THAT did work. Well H*** bring out the “other” woman.
That worked and ole Newt was on his way.Makes you wonder why he didn’t feel the need to get an organisation together.

I waiting to get an answer if all of the Fox support of Newt and the numerous debates are considered campaign donations since Murdoch has a history of supporting Newt since at least 1984.

Yeah Park Bench Newt admitted it and so did Murdoch. Also Newts editor Ms. Chu confirmed all of it.

So this is not Dem stuff. This is ALL NEWTS stuff.

But I’m sure the Dummie ops room is having a field day rummaging through Newts dirty laundry.


36 posted on 12/13/2011 2:29:07 PM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Bokababe

Ron Paul is a Reagan-hating, non-Conservative Libertarian who thinks the U.S. is the reason behind everything that’s wrong with the world.

He cited his hatred of the Reagan presidency as the reason he left the GOP in 1987, implying Reagan was worse than Carter. He openly called Reagan corrupt.

He has tried the “Third Way” on several occasions, running as a Libertarian - a party 50/50 composed of some of the furthest left ideolouges alive. He might just do it again this election cycle.

He is a spokesman for Reagan-haters, 9/11 Truthers, Israel-bashers, and pacifist anti-U.S. Military kooks.

You Paulistinians REALLY don’t want to get into second-degree endorsements. Paul has endorsed more than a few kooks for office, and let’s not even get into his racist newsletter. He advocates Libertarianism - do I even need to get into the litany of Liberal positions that Libertarianism believes in?

Ron Paul Endorses Chuck Baldwin for President:
http://www.ronpaul.com/2008-09-23/ron-paul-endorses-chuck-baldwin-for-president/

Chuck Baldwin ran on disbanding the entire U.S. Military. Ron Paul endorsed him in part because of this.


37 posted on 12/13/2011 2:43:44 PM PST by TitansAFC (Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry are not your enemies, my fellow Freepers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC

You seem incapable of discussing the subject at hand — Newt Gingrich — so I will leave you to your verbal diarrhea on Ron Paul. Have fun.


38 posted on 12/13/2011 2:51:53 PM PST by Bokababe (Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: marty60; All
BTW did you know Newt started out as a campaign official for Rockefeller. (Of Rockefeller Republican fame)

And your point is?

Reagan was a democrat into his 50's - and he was - GASP - DIVORCED.

OTOH, Carter, Clinton and Obama have never been divorced. That helped them to be great presidents - oh wait.

39 posted on 12/13/2011 3:53:45 PM PST by maine-iac7 (A prudent man foreseeth the evil,... but the simple pass on, and are punished. Prov 23:3 KJV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Ouch. That ad is devastating.


40 posted on 12/13/2011 3:55:44 PM PST by GlockThe Vote (The Obama Adminstration: 2nd wave of attacks on America after 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Ha great Ad


41 posted on 12/13/2011 4:02:45 PM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marty60
His positions are totally off the wall.

Really? FYI:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1944714/posts
42 posted on 12/13/2011 4:05:50 PM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: traviskicks; GlockThe Vote; Nachum
Then there's this one, not an official Ron Paul campaign ad. Worse, it's a series of videos on the Repub nomination from WND. There was something in the news about Santorum using this one although it wasn't made for him -- and Newt is the object of ridicule.

Newt Gingrich: The Kim Kardashian of the GOP.

43 posted on 12/13/2011 4:38:03 PM PST by Bokababe (Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Bokababe

The subject at hand is a purposefully deceptive video made by Ron Paul, and I am addressing it directly.


44 posted on 12/13/2011 5:33:33 PM PST by TitansAFC (Newt Gingrich and Rick Perry are not your enemies, my fellow Freepers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson