Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The day the tea party embraces Mitt Romney is the day the tea party accepts defeat
Vanity | Dec 17, 2012 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 12/17/2011 12:08:08 PM PST by Jim Robinson

First there was the Reagan Revolution, then Newt's Republican Revolution, and now the Tea Party Revolution.

In each successive revolution, the lovers of liberty threw off a bit more of the yoke of the oppressive ruling class to reestablish some vital part of our God given liberty and freedom.

Pro-life, small government, big defense Ronald Reagan set and accomplished the goal of bringing down the socialist Soviet Union as a threat to the world and reestablished free America as the dominate superpower. He rescued America from the hapless Jimmy Carter who had dragged the nation down into to the depths of despair. Reagan taught us that our best years were indeed yet to come. He reinvigorated our economy by reducing government regulations and taxes and created a free market environment ripe for capitalism to flourish. A lover of life and freedom, he fought off the socialists and merchants of doom and death at every turn and sparked the beginning of the decades long Reagan Economy. He was a champion of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness and he delivered us from evil.

Pro-life, small government, big defense Reaganite, Newt Gingrich, set and accomplished the major goal of wresting the congressional majority away from the socialist Democrats who had held it for forty years. His conservative Republican Revolution cut the taxes, cut the spending, cut the deficit, cut unemployment, blocked President Clinton's progressive agenda, blocked HillaryCare, reformed welfare, defended life, and balanced the budget four years running, ensuring that the Reagan Economy flourished and stretched throughout his term and beyond.

Mitt Romney set goals of protecting and sustaining abortion as safe and legal in America. He sought to be more radical than Ted Kennedy in respects to "gay rights." He swore to defend Massachusetts' strict gun-control laws that "kept us safe" and promised not to chip away at them. He set and accomplished the goal of bringing big government healthcare solutions to his state and mandating that all formerly free citizens must purchase a government approved product or suffer a tax penalty. He loves mandates against the people.

He stated that he was an independent during Reagan-Bush and he was not returning to Reagan-Bush. And he didn't. Instead, he delivered taxpayer funded abortion, gay marriage, gun-control, socialized healthcare, busted budgets, ruined economy, liberal activist judges and a destroyed Republican label.

Romney was and is demonstrably per record an anti-Reagan, pro-big government, pro-abortion, pro-gay agenda, pro-gun-control, anti-liberty, pro-socialist healthcare, mandate-loving, liberal judge appointing, budget busting progressive.

He is without a doubt the exact opposite of Reagan, Gingrich, the Reagan Revolution, the Republican Revolution and the Tea Party Revolution.

If the Tea Party now embraces Romney, it will have accepted defeat and surrendered to the ruling class.

There is a reason why the elite establishment GOPers are pushing the anti-Reagan Romney and rejecting the pro-life, Reaganite Newt Gingrich. And I guarantee you, it's not in the best interest of the Tea Party or the Liberty we seek.

Not on my watch!! No Romney, no way!!

Rebellion is brewing!!


TOPICS: Breaking News; Free Republic; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: elections; gingrich; newt; reaganrevolution; republicanrevolution; romney; teaparty; teapartyrebellion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150151-200201-250251-293 last
To: sargon
Romney = White, and a member of the GOP.

Obama = 1/2 White, 1/2 Black, and a member of the DIMS.

About the only differences in my mind.

251 posted on 12/18/2011 9:44:58 AM PST by Osage Orange (HE HATE ME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: garjog

Who was the guy who engineered a takeover of the House...by the GOP...that the DIMS had held for 40 FREAKING YEARS!!?!?!!?!?!?!


252 posted on 12/18/2011 9:50:21 AM PST by Osage Orange (HE HATE ME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Absolutely!! No Romney, no way, ever!!!


253 posted on 12/18/2011 10:14:40 AM PST by madmaximus (Anyone But Robamney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Jim -

Are you going to be on the Tea Party Patriots | Forum country-wide conference call this afternoon, 5pm EST?

They have Newt, Bachmann, and Romney scheduled for interviews/questions. Hope you have some input there, Mitt would be a slower extension of Soetoro/Obama!

Thanks for your guidance.

254 posted on 12/18/2011 10:42:36 AM PST by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Thank you Jim, agree 100 percent.


255 posted on 12/18/2011 11:13:38 AM PST by stratman1969 (Anyone but Obama or Romney in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blado

Besides McPain, AZ has also given us Sandra Day O’Connor, Janet Napolitano, Bruce Babbitt, Dennis DeConcini, and an assortment of others we could have done without. Not a helpful state


256 posted on 12/18/2011 11:18:43 AM PST by Theodore R. (I'll still vote for Santorum if he is on the April 3 ballot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: stratman1969

Adding also at this point, I’m not entirely in the Newt camp, but he’d definitely have my support and vote if he is the GOP nominee. If the establishment is successful in forcing the GOP version of John Kerry on us as our nominee, then the GOP and Romney can both go pound sand when it comes to my vote for President in November.


257 posted on 12/18/2011 11:22:34 AM PST by stratman1969 (Anyone but Obama or Romney in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: OwenKellogg

The weekend media reports seem to be saying that Gingrich has peaked and is now joining the former Bachmann and Cain “surges.” It’s still Mitt’s turn, they say, with Ron Paul still threatening mischief on the sidelines The surge missed all the others, including Santorum and Huntsman.


258 posted on 12/18/2011 12:06:02 PM PST by Theodore R. (I'll still vote for Santorum if he is on the April 3 ballot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VictoryGal

Not with the kind of Republican congressmen we have now who are in the tank for Boehner and McC


259 posted on 12/18/2011 12:07:01 PM PST by Theodore R. (I'll still vote for Santorum if he is on the April 3 ballot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

The SS Judges—the reason he had to vote for Dole, for McCain, and now Mittens. The Old SS argument— it works and it will force the Tea Party to support MItt Romney for President—just as the other side will us the vote—for—the Democrat or Abortions will be made illegal by rabid Republicans. I have been FOOLED too many times! The old arguments are not working. I would rather Obama and a Tea Party Congress than Mitt and a Democrat Congress/Senate. Congress CAN not confirm the nut case judges—its just that the GOP will roll over—Dems will not they will Bork any nomination they don’t like. The Tea Party must learn from them! We need to stop being so nice! This is why Rino Mitt will LOSE to Obama. The Fix is in.


260 posted on 12/18/2011 12:43:28 PM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

Lolololol Mitt Romneys first name is Willard lolol


261 posted on 12/18/2011 1:00:41 PM PST by angelcindy ("If you follow the crowd ,you get no further than the crowd!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD

“Now you are an anti-Mormon bigot which is why this doesn’t seem clear or rational to you. Bigotry does that to the rational mind, hence the irrationality of bigotry.”

Yea. I understand your point of view as someone wearing magic underwear as you typed that.
You guys like to make it all victimization. Your call.

Yet your mormon church teaches that ALL Christian churches are false... so put that in your
mormon pipe and give it a smoke. If the mormon church repented from teaching a false God,
false Savior, false Gospel, etc. I’d welcome them with open arms to the Christian Church.

In the interim, while we wait, I’ll follow my conscience and not vote for a RINO enemy who
also belongs to a false religion.


262 posted on 12/18/2011 1:55:36 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion (You know, 99.99999965% of the lawyers give all of them a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: TheOldLady

Mitt Commie is simply unacceptable.

ZOT! ZOT! ZOT! ZOT! ZOT!....


263 posted on 12/18/2011 5:07:21 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

Indeed.


264 posted on 12/18/2011 7:49:59 PM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

Thank you for making my point for me.


265 posted on 12/19/2011 6:07:42 AM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

Thank you for making my point for me. Have a merry Christmas.


266 posted on 12/19/2011 6:08:15 AM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

Agree. The only reason Mormons support him is because he’s “one of them”. It’s all identity politics, and they can play the victim/bigot card.


267 posted on 12/19/2011 6:49:35 AM PST by madmaximus (Anyone But Robamney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: JCG
You see someone encouraging others to vote for Romney just as a different opinion? When I want socialism,I won't be logging into FR - I know where to find it. Proud to be FReeper since Dec 3, 1997 How did you survive so long being so thin skinned? There is very little fight in you for conservatism and appear content in being robbed of what America stands for.
268 posted on 12/19/2011 7:44:57 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: WayneLusvardi
If conservative Republicans vote for Romney they will own him.

Get your oil checked, chump. No one could be that dumb and breathe on their own. I stomp on snakes in the grass and kick them out of my way-that's how I handle them - I don't want to own lying SOB'S!

269 posted on 12/19/2011 8:01:11 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

2010 showed that a strong conservative contingent in the house can push through DC bs.

It is not just the presidency, we need to utterly dominate in the house and senate so as to be able to have conservatives override a RINO president when needed.

we need to focus on more having a boston tea party in congress.


270 posted on 12/19/2011 8:04:55 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade

the MSM will change when their bosses realize they lunatic left reporters like crissy matherws or anderson “do these jeans make me look fat” cooper are no longer invited to the important parties.


271 posted on 12/19/2011 8:08:10 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: VictoryGal
I suggest we all do the same.

I suggest there is no picking what to support - we support it all from the top down. I'll not support listening to the libs and rino's in what 'they think' I shouldn't want in a president.

Go Newt - cream the b*^stards who are trying to take you out so they can keep control of our great country and stop you from canceling out all the damage they already did.
272 posted on 12/19/2011 8:10:50 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: VictoryGal

we also have to remember the tea party freshmen are being targeted in redistricting.


273 posted on 12/19/2011 8:14:14 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: stratman1969
If the establishment is successful in forcing the GOP version of John Kerry on us as our nominee

They only can be successful if we don't vote for Newt in the primary. So we would be only adding to their success by waiting until the general. And pounding sand is just venting - it has no real value - and they could give a flip if you threw sand in their face as long as they get Mitt. Now is the time to speak and not wait until the general.
274 posted on 12/19/2011 8:21:24 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: JCG

I think this article by Coulter is most naive. How can the Speaker carry a big stick, or to put it another way, there was never a speaker like Newt with regard of his accomplishments.

You carry a big stick as President, Ann. Do you get that? Do you understand that? Does it sink into that little brain of yours?

A year ago, I would never have thought Ann Couter and Laura INgraham would be supporting Romney.

Newt is the man. For the first time in a long time, we would have a leader who knows history and can articulate that with our allies and enemies. What we have now is a teleprompter and mouth piece. The guy know less about the History or this country than a 4th grader. He knows less about the culture of this country than a 3rd grader...


275 posted on 12/19/2011 9:11:13 AM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

I think you and I agree on almost everything. Can’t tell you how elated I am to have Jim R agreeing with us too.


276 posted on 12/19/2011 9:12:20 AM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
I remember a time not too long ago when Ann Coulter was welcomed at FR; there are still pictures of her with FR members somewhere back in the archives. But here she is, solidly in bed with Romney and the other northeastern RINO’s/liberals.

Yes, Ann's support of Christie and now Romney is a disappointment to me as well. Nevertheless she does get a lot of things right and I'm not willing to dump her just yet.

----

Send treats to the troops...
Great because you did it.
www.AnySoldier.com
(An entirely free service)

277 posted on 12/19/2011 11:50:21 AM PST by JCG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas
Were it up to me, anything linked to her would be zotted, and anyone peddling the harlot would be zotted as well.

You are fortunate that Mr. Robinson is more forebearant than myself. For supporting “Ann Coulter” is equivalent to supporting Mitt Romney.

Zowie! Where is Ronald Reagan now that we need him -- or at least a little of his spirit?

----

Send treats to the troops...
Great because you did it.
www.AnySoldier.com
(An entirely free service)

278 posted on 12/19/2011 11:56:09 AM PST by JCG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
You see someone encouraging others to vote for Romney just as a different opinion? When I want socialism,I won't be logging into FR - I know where to find it. Proud to be FReeper since Dec 3, 1997 How did you survive so long being so thin skinned? There is very little fight in you for conservatism and appear content in being robbed of what America stands for.

Frankly I don't support Romney, either. I also don't support the ZOT for people who do support Romney -- or any other candidate on our side of the fence.* If the only candidate is your candidate and you're going to ZOT people who differ in that opinion then you're the one who is thin-skinned.

So who is the conservative that you like?

* except Ron Paul who will get a lot of us killed

----

Send treats to the troops...
Great because you did it.
www.AnySoldier.com
(An entirely free service)

279 posted on 12/19/2011 12:38:39 PM PST by JCG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
It is only through obfuscation that Romney can stand on the same stage with Gingrich and claim that he is a conservative.

But Newt can sit on the same couch with Nancy Pelosi and claim that he's a conservative?

(Anyone hear Rush talking about Newt's 2013 book today?)

----

Send treats to the troops...
Great because you did it.
www.AnySoldier.com
(An entirely free service)

280 posted on 12/19/2011 12:43:21 PM PST by JCG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JCG
There is no conservative opinion on the science of climate change anymore than there is a conservative opinion on the science of string theory, big bang theory, peak oil, evolution, etc.

There is however a conservative opinion about how best to deal with climate change if in fact it exists and that is Gingrich's point, it should be dealt with by private enterprise and minimal government interference.

It is not conservatism but know-nothingism to bend science to fit political ideology-whether it is to deny global warming or to assert global warming.


281 posted on 12/19/2011 1:03:11 PM PST by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford
There is however a conservative opinion about how best to deal with climate change if in fact it exists and that is Gingrich's point, it should be dealt with by private enterprise and minimal government interference.

Right, so sit on a couch with that maven of "private enterprise and minimal government interference," Nancy Pelosi, and bloviate about it. Even Newt agrees it was a dumb thing to do.

BTW, there is a conservative opinion about Al Gore's global climate change (nee global warming) invention -- it's a hoax! Ask Rush if you don't believe me.

----

Send treats to the troops...
Great because you did it.
www.AnySoldier.com
(An entirely free service)

282 posted on 12/19/2011 3:10:02 PM PST by JCG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Yep. Plain as day.


283 posted on 12/19/2011 3:17:44 PM PST by GregoryFul (Obama - Jim Jones redux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
Newt is the man. For the first time in a long time, we would have a leader who knows history and can articulate that with our allies and enemies. What we have now is a teleprompter and mouth piece. The guy know less about the History or this country than a 4th grader. He knows less about the culture of this country than a 3rd grader...

I agree with everything you say with one caveat. Newt is not electable.

Trust me on this. By the time November 1, 2012 rolls around the national press will have vilified Gingrich so hard and so often that the American sheeple will believe that he is the Grinch who is about to steal their Christmas.

I would love to see a non-RINO elected. Believe me, I'm tired of holding my nose everytime I go to vote. But four more years of the present crypto-Marxist in charge is more scary than any Republican (except maybe Ross Paul, who would get lots of Americans killed,)

----

Send treats to the troops...
Great because you did it.
www.AnySoldier.com
(An entirely free service)

284 posted on 12/19/2011 3:23:45 PM PST by JCG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: JCG; All

“Zowie! Where is Ronald Reagan now that we need him — or at least a little of his spirit?”

I’m just sick to my stomach of Ann Coulter (AKA one of Romney’s wives), and I don’t like it when people quote her. Your not liking Newt isn’t a problem to me, just who you quote to discredit him. That harlot shouldn’t be spoken of on this forum.

I don’t think Reagan would care for her either.


285 posted on 12/19/2011 8:11:59 PM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: JCG

The mainstream media will vilify ANYONE who we nominate. Which candidate is going to be the best equipped to beat back the attacks and take his case directly to the American public? Which candidate has a record of accomplishment he can point to so he can say, no matter what they say about me, I’ve proven I can get what I say I’m going to do done?

There is another very important point to consider that could make nominating Romney very dangerous. Everyone is just assuming that the economy will remain the big issue a year from now. But what happens if it’s not? For one thing, the media is going to spin any minor uptick in the economy as a huge turning point and the start of the Obama recovery. If the Supreme Court overturns Obamacare, businesses will rejoice and almost overnight start expanding and hiring again. We are already swimming upstream as being the party people trust on the economy, because we rarely have been in the past. We also just got smacked down in Ohio on Kasich’s disastrous union referendum, indicating our “right-wing social engineering” may have gone beyond what the public was prepared for (please understand this electoral pragmatism is the only reason Newt had some issues with the Ryan plan). Any positive news on the economy and people could very easily move back to trusting Obama on that issue.

So where does that leave us with Romney? He’s being sold solely as a businessman who knows how to fix the economy. That is putting all of our eggs in one basket on one issue that we HOPE will be playing in our favor next year. Romney should be able to tell you that diversifying is what makes for the best investment.

For that reason, Newt is the clear choice. There isn’t one issue that Newt isn’t well-versed on and ready to debate. If there is a terrorist attack or other national security issue, Republicans should get all the automatic advantage on that. But Romney will present as a milquetoast national security lightweight without the 4 years of experience that Obama has. Newt on the other hand has the gravitas and the persona of toughness that people like to see from Republicans on national security matters. I can remember even some liberals saying Dick Cheney is the type of guy they want staring down America’s enemies. Newt also has an incredible knowledge of military history that could be used to his advantage in discussing any national security issue.

Even if every news story out there is going against us, Newt has the deftness to pull any kind of magic trick out of his pocket to try and win some advantage on a totally unexpected front. Look at how quickly Newt was able to stir up a national debate on the judiciary. Newt can turn the focus of the election around on a dime. He is prepared to discuss any topic in great depth. The election could come down to nothing but the difference in philosophy between our parties. Newt is ready to highlight any one of those differences. Even if Romney is a genuine, sudden convert to conservatism, there is no way he will be prepared to discuss what we believe and why we believe it on every issue with any kind of gravitas.

Romney is a bad investment when it comes to next year’s election, plain and simple. Newt is the candidate with the balanced portfolio that we can use to handle any contingency that might arise. Newt is actually the safe, conservative choice while Romney is the Hail Mary pass long shot. I’m putting my money on Newt.


286 posted on 12/19/2011 10:53:28 PM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Obama in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
Newt is actually the safe, conservative choice while Romney is the Hail Mary pass long shot. I’m putting my money on Newt.

You make a lot of good points in support of Newt. You also highlight his glaring fault. He's unpredictable. Being a bomb thrower can be a good thing but not if you blow yourself up.

I'm not a Romney supporter. I will vote for him in the general election if I have to but his candidacy does not excite me.

I doubt Newt will get the nomination because Republicans will remember him sitting on the couch with Nancy Pelosi, riding the bus with Al Sharpton and they will know all about the 2013 book which, according to reports, has more of the global warming wackiness he and Nancy were trying to sell us on.

I almost barf when I see the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qi6n_-wB154

As I've said before: Newt nominated = Obama reelected.

----

Send treats to the troops...
Great because you did it.
www.AnySoldier.com
(An entirely free service)

287 posted on 12/20/2011 5:28:34 AM PST by JCG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: JCG

Romney nominated=Obama re-elected.

Not that it would make any difference, voting for Romney is the same as voting for Obama.


288 posted on 12/20/2011 7:29:26 AM PST by madmaximus (Anyone But Robamney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: Monorprise

Ron Paul is a nut case.


289 posted on 12/20/2011 11:59:19 PM PST by ConservChristian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: ConservChristian

“Ron Paul is a nut case.”

Ok.... Whether that is true or not. Ron Paul’s prediction in this particular case does seem most sound to me.

Do you dispute that if republican & democrat congresses & presidents start purging the federal bench(non-supreme Court only as they can’t abolish the supreme curt). Their supposed “conflicting view” of the constitution would lead to a political war over the bench?

If not do you agree or disagree with me over the outcome of that war as being positive?

Regardless of your position could you provide some hint at the reasoning behind it?

I won’t dispute with you Ron Paul’s sanity, I do wish to dispute with you the ultimate outcome of Newts proposal once implemented.


290 posted on 12/21/2011 12:22:56 AM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: JCG

I think only someone mentally challenge will be voting for Obama. The man is tacking hard to the center, we can all see that, but he cant run on his record.


291 posted on 12/21/2011 12:35:16 AM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: VRW Conspirator
Not only the "gravy train" but the power to go along with their ill-gotten gain."

Money = Power = More Money = More Power, etc.

Ronald Reagan was right when he said, "a government big enough to give you everything you want, is also big enough to take everything you've got," God Bless him!

292 posted on 12/30/2011 6:06:15 PM PST by zerosix (native sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Etch a Sketch.


293 posted on 04/10/2012 6:00:57 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150151-200201-250251-293 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson