Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin says not too late to consider presidential run
Yahoo ^ | 12/20/11

Posted on 12/20/2011 5:48:59 AM PST by Libloather

Palin says not too late to consider presidential run
Reuters – 15 hrs ago

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Tea Party champion Sarah Palin, who has already ruled out a 2012 presidential run, on Monday attempted to dangle her name anew as a possible Republican candidate, although it's probably too late.

In an interview to air on Fox Business Network's "Follow the Money" program, the 2008 Republican nominee for vice president was asked whether she would still consider a run for the White House.

"It's not too late for folks to jump in," Palin said. "Who knows what will happen in the future."

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2012; elections; palin; president; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-108 next last
LOVE YA SARAH!


1 posted on 12/20/2011 5:49:03 AM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Yes and so... (Hint, hint)


2 posted on 12/20/2011 5:51:54 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network ("FREE TRADERS": Self-loathing Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Oh, what the hell.. why not? She’ll at least make it interesting.


3 posted on 12/20/2011 5:52:56 AM PST by ScottinVA (I miss America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network; Libloather

It’s never too late to make another bad decision.


4 posted on 12/20/2011 5:53:20 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Alas......poor Sarah. She dithers and dithers and then jumps the shark

Her day may be yet to come but it will be in 8 more years.


5 posted on 12/20/2011 5:54:38 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 ..... Crucifixion is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

Or correct a mistake... :D


6 posted on 12/20/2011 5:54:52 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network ("FREE TRADERS": Self-loathing Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bert

If Obama is re-elected in the current election cycle, I wouldn’t be at all surprised if she ran in 2016. Personally, I doubt Biden will run for President at that time, so the field will be wide open, just like 2008.


7 posted on 12/20/2011 5:57:03 AM PST by AnAmericanAbroad (It's all bread and circuses for the future prey of the Morlocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

If nutty little Ron Paul can run double-digits in Iowa.. who knows? The Republicans are splintering anyway.


8 posted on 12/20/2011 5:58:13 AM PST by ScottinVA (I miss America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I predict that the early part of 2012 will be known for when the passions run wild and supportive FOR Sarah Palin.

And those that openly despise and ridicule her will be “branded” so to speak. They will become the “uncool” trend of the year, the has beens, the whiners, the losers, the disciples of evil.

Mark my words.


9 posted on 12/20/2011 5:58:18 AM PST by Eye of Unk (Castigo Cay by Matt Bracken, check it out. And his other works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Looks like “Christian: Sarah forgot this verse:
But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.

Matthew 5:37(KJV)


10 posted on 12/20/2011 6:00:04 AM PST by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I am waiting for her to get in.


11 posted on 12/20/2011 6:00:12 AM PST by superdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

I hope so, but I just don’t see it.

I really hope you’re right and I’m wrong.


12 posted on 12/20/2011 6:02:22 AM PST by netmilsmom (Happiness is a choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

13 posted on 12/20/2011 6:02:50 AM PST by humblegunner (The kinder, gentler version...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk
I predict that the early part of 2012 will be known for when the passions run wild and supportive FOR Sarah Palin.

Are you seeing evidence this could occur in the general public? If so, please point to it, because I'm not seeing it.

14 posted on 12/20/2011 6:03:02 AM PST by ScottinVA (I miss America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

The public are all of a herd of white sheep in a field of snow.

But one is a black sheep and it knows why the lambs go silent in the night.


15 posted on 12/20/2011 6:09:13 AM PST by Eye of Unk (Castigo Cay by Matt Bracken, check it out. And his other works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

She was going 90 miles and hour towards running in the primary then hit the brakes. Why I don’t know what it is but there is something there. Sorry gang, she will not be running.


16 posted on 12/20/2011 6:10:50 AM PST by isthisnickcool (Sharia? No thanks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Palin should stop Teasing people, she isn’t going to jump in.


17 posted on 12/20/2011 6:12:58 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

OH NO....NOT THIS AGAIN! We love you Sarah but don’t play with our emotions anymore.


18 posted on 12/20/2011 6:16:29 AM PST by no dems (Why do you never see "Obama" bumper stickers on cars going to work in the morning?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

absolutely true

If Piper and Willow dont want her to run, then stay home and stop the tease, and please, no more reality shows


19 posted on 12/20/2011 6:19:49 AM PST by silverleaf (common sense is not so common- voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk

Nice.

But again.. what’s the evidence the public will warm up to Sarah Palin?


20 posted on 12/20/2011 6:21:50 AM PST by ScottinVA (I miss America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
I hope so, but I just don’t see it.
I really hope you’re right and I’m wrong.

Precisely my thoughts. I believe she chose not to run for specific reasons, probably family reasons, and I respect that. I hope those reasons will have changed by 2016 (and that she will announce well in advance so we're not wondering), but I'd be startled if they changed by next month.

21 posted on 12/20/2011 6:26:57 AM PST by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

It’s possible she didn’t think she could break though in the wake of the McGinniss release, Bristol was freaking out after her encounter in the bar, and her gut said no to how things looked then.

The interview with Amy Cramer of the Tea Party Express is very telling. She said she thinks Palin will get i n and only Cain, DeMint and Palin matter for endorsements—yet none of them has endorsed.


22 posted on 12/20/2011 6:27:11 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bert

“Alas......poor Sarah. She dithers and dithers and then jumps the shark”

It’s hard to really know people’s motivation, but consider the following:

If someone wasn’t driven to seek the job of president because it’s such a cool gig (see Romney) but rather would be willing to do it only if duty called because there was no other viable conservative candidate to take on Obama, we would see them behave very much like Sarah.

The dithering that we saw, I believe was hoping that good candidates would arise. Sarah said so on several occasions but cynical naysayers instead assigned calculating motives to everything she did and said. But virtue exists and some people live by it. That is why the left hates her.

Perry and Cain seemed to be riding high when she announced her decision to not run, they would have served the country well. Now that they’re out of the picture, she is rethinking that decision, not because she wants the job, but

FOR THE GOOD OF THE COUNTRY

Why is the concept of virtue so foreign even to many in the conservative electorate? That Sarah has it and lives it is apparent to me and I would hope, enough other people to matter.

To attribute what she does and says to cynicism and spin I feel is missing all the evidence of virtue in her.


23 posted on 12/20/2011 6:28:35 AM PST by UnChained (Draft Sarah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Hopefully, Nutty Little Ron Paul will be drooling on himself in a retirement home come 2016. I’m very tired of his act.


24 posted on 12/20/2011 6:30:11 AM PST by Buckeye Battle Cry (Mittt Romney - he lacks the courage of his absence of convictions .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanAbroad

If Obama is re-elected, there won’t BE a 2016.


25 posted on 12/20/2011 6:31:15 AM PST by crosshairs (Liberalism is to truth, what east is to west.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: crosshairs

“If Obama is re-elected, there won’t BE a 2016.”

****

True. Survivors in the Grand Caliphate will be using the Islamic calendar instead.


26 posted on 12/20/2011 6:36:18 AM PST by peyton randolph (B. Hussein Obama solved Bush's "problem" of a AAA credit rating)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

****on Monday attempted to dangle her name anew****

How does one ‘attempt to dangle’???????????

You either dangle or you don’t.


27 posted on 12/20/2011 6:36:53 AM PST by sodpoodle ( Newt - God has tested him for a reason..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I believe a well timed effort by the right candidate could work, if the primaries are cloudy. So, I agree with her that it’s not too late.

But the yo-yo-tease-final-decision by Palin has worn itself out with me. I don’t think she’d do much good and likely make things worse.


28 posted on 12/20/2011 6:42:41 AM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
Why I don’t know what it is but there is something there.

I have no knowledge, but I study people for a living.

I think being Mr. Sarah Palin was turning into a much tougher gig than it seemed in the beginning. I think the McGinnis trash caused a crisis (after things had been building up for a while) which did not have a short-term resolution.

Maybe, like a lot of things, it doesn't seem like such a big deal now.

I absolutely agree that the launch was on schedule for September, and it was stopped at the last minute.

29 posted on 12/20/2011 6:45:51 AM PST by Jim Noble ("The Germans: At your feet, or at your throat" - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: UnChained

If her intention was for the good of the country, she would have run or would endorse someone to help unify. Getting in the race will only help fracture it, likely a very nice gift to Romney.


30 posted on 12/20/2011 6:46:40 AM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Without getting to far into speculation, I sense you’re obliquely referencing what I’ve long thought.

However it could just be, that the other candidates have ironically, created an effective enough diversion to have let off the stress which (Mr. Palin?) just as most guys in that situation could have found themselves concerned with.

Todd’s Mr. Traditional. Clearly Mrs. Palin’s sudden juggernaut, somewhat divergent from that.

However he may have had some time to come to terms with all of it. I hope so, for our nation. And his family. And his traditions.

It’s not a zero sum. Everyone can win this one. Todd’s pretty much heroic, we all get that.

Let’s start considering how that can be accomplished.

For America. :D


31 posted on 12/20/2011 6:54:41 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network ("FREE TRADERS": Self-loathing Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

She works for FOX (the unwatchable “Mittens” channel), doesn’t she? They are getting so desperate.


32 posted on 12/20/2011 7:00:08 AM PST by Empire_of_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

When Palin declined to run a couple of months ago, she lost much of any Big Mo she would have received.

Jumping in now would make it an uphill battle. And until others drop out, they would not lose much support to a ‘late start, upstart’.

Additionally, Palin [or another staunch conservative] jumping in would only dilute the available votes, thus making it even more difficult for any conservative to mount a serious challenge for the nomination.

The current race already has three sort-of conservatives [Bachmann, Perry, Santorum] and the teeter-totter Gingrich. They are basically splitting the same pool of votes.

One [of the many] problems with the 2008 election cycle was too many conservatives being hangers-on and diluting to the voting pool, thus giving McCain and his Independents and cross-overs enough votes to get the nomination.

More conservatives candidates does NOT equal better chances in 2012.


33 posted on 12/20/2011 7:02:39 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

What has changed in Palin’s life that would make her now willing to go the distance on a presidential run? I would like to maintain my respect for Sarah and her leadership such as it was but I am now finding that these types of articles really, really, rub me the wrong way. Being of a practical nature, I rarely revisit past expectations but want to move on and get things done. I believe the adage that a person convinced against their will remains unconvinced still. I do not believe she would make a good candidate because her momentum has come and gone and she would lose in the general. The GOP establishment would see to that as they would rather turn this country over to the traitorous democrat party and their puppet president than support a conservative, tea party candidate. We need to focus on the reality of the present, not hopes on hold from the past or unrealistic expectations of any individual for the future.


34 posted on 12/20/2011 7:03:51 AM PST by mountainfolk (God Bless the United States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Palin mixing it up right now would dilute the effectiveness of the left/rino’s Alinsky tactics.

They can only smear one of ours, at a time.

The more they have to change the one they’re smearing, the less it works. At some point (long past for a lot of us) their constant complaints begin to resemble whining from a 5 year old. And just about as effective.

I say, shake this race up. Everyone will benefit.

Except maybe Romney. :D


35 posted on 12/20/2011 7:06:13 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network ("FREE TRADERS": Self-loathing Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Run or not, she would bring the fire back if she did. Right now I see another 4 years of Obama. The excitement that she brought there is gone. The remaining Republicans Candidates are so Blaaaah. Its going to be business as usual in DC after 11/6/12. Maybe Mc Cain will decide to jump in too? LOL.


36 posted on 12/20/2011 7:10:30 AM PST by Bringbackthedraft ( WHO YOU ELECT IS NOT AS IMPORTANT AS WHO THEY APPOINT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainfolk

-——What has changed in Palin’s life-——

Probably nothing. The piece is an attempt by a writer to be employed and write some words that will enhance a forward career.

Or, if something has changed in Sarah’s life, it came much too late. She is irrelevant in the current race. Nothing short of a bombed out debate stage will make her relevant in the ‘12 campaign


37 posted on 12/20/2011 7:13:15 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 ..... Crucifixion is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk
Mark my words.

Marked.

38 posted on 12/20/2011 7:15:57 AM PST by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

The Republican field is underwhelming, to say the least. Once more, conservatives are faced with a “hold your nose and vote” November option. I, for one am sick of it. I am also sick of what will follow after my posting this: “Okay, so what will you do—vote 3rd party or not at all and see their guy get in?” I am sick of it.

What Palin is saying, is what many conservatives are thinking—”Please let someone I can ENTHUSIASTICALLY support jump into this thing. Let someone I trust to be an “outside the beltway conservative AFTER the election get into this thing. In short, let someone who I believe can actually SAVE the country get in there. Mr. and Mrs. Conservative, you know you don’t really see that person yet, do you.

That this was construed as Palin “dangling HER name, I think is reading into things. I think she is really saying, “Sigh! No one there I see right now who gets the juices flowing.”

Remember how blah we all felt about McCain until Sarah got in there? Well, that’s the feeling we’re all waiting to feel right now...AND DON’T!


39 posted on 12/20/2011 7:18:49 AM PST by MarDav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bert

Or you have some other thought, as you post that.

Perhaps, another candidate you do not wish, to have the competition.

One of those.

Perhaps Palin actually is as smart, as many of us thought she is.

Sun Tzu baby.


40 posted on 12/20/2011 7:22:13 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network ("FREE TRADERS": Self-loathing Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

But its not too late for the likes of Chris Christie or Jeb Bush, eh?


41 posted on 12/20/2011 7:22:23 AM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Sarah Palin in talks for ‘Alaska’ Season 2

http://www.nypost.com/p/entertainment/tv/sarah_palin_in_talks_for_alaska_avDhXUM2jCL8ZOXR40tlHM

Sarah Palin is ready to get back to work — as a reality TV star.

Producer Mark Burnett says he is in discussions with TLC to bring “Sarah Palin’s Alaska” back for a second season next fall.

“The plan would be to shoot this in the summer of 2012,” he tells The Post.

New episodes of the outdoorsy reality series — which shows the former vice-presidential candidate fishing, hunting and dog sledding with her family — would not air until after the November presidential election.

“By the time we edit it, the election will be over,” Burnett says. “But I am sure the election would be mentioned [in the show].”


42 posted on 12/20/2011 7:26:09 AM PST by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler; Pan_Yan

Palin is right. Governor Mitch Daniels could decide to throw his hat in the ring. It isn’t too late.


43 posted on 12/20/2011 7:28:20 AM PST by Pan_Yans Wife ("Real solidarity means coming together for the common good."-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
“The plan would be to shoot this in the summer of 2012,” he tells The Post.

Mark Burnett is her business partner in this process. He's being quoted and is a reliable source. He would know her plans.

44 posted on 12/20/2011 7:31:05 AM PST by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountainfolk

Last week there were reports that her pitch for another realityTV series was declined.

Maybe she has some free time on her hands now.


45 posted on 12/20/2011 7:31:52 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

No should mean NO, not maybe. She made her decision in the minds of voters.


46 posted on 12/20/2011 7:32:22 AM PST by teletech (Say NO to RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bringbackthedraft

I’m with you. What we have running for office right now are politicians. We don’t need anymore politicians, we need a patriot who is disconnected from money, power, elitism and plugged into the very heart of America.

This is what has always been so appealing about Sarah.


47 posted on 12/20/2011 7:32:59 AM PST by MarDav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I’ve long said that Sarah will be a third party candidate. The Ross Perot of the 2012 election cycle.


48 posted on 12/20/2011 7:35:38 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

-——Perhaps Palin actually is as smart, as many of us thought she is.——

That is likely true but is trumped by her dithering. Perhaps dithering is actually teasing. Whichever, her tease has made her unnominateable much less electable in the current campaign.

As a Cain man, I currently have no candidate.

I like Newt and I like Rick. Either would make a strong President even though they do not toe the line of fervent conservatives


49 posted on 12/20/2011 7:39:54 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 ..... Crucifixion is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Bear looks like he caught sight of Moochelle.


50 posted on 12/20/2011 7:40:41 AM PST by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson