Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/21/2011 8:44:43 AM PST by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: servo1969

“Breaking News”???


2 posted on 12/21/2011 8:51:05 AM PST by marshmallow (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Splitting the vote. I’ve always thought of the Libertarian party as taking one step away from conservatism and walking down the road toward liberalism.

Paul is another Ross Perot.


3 posted on 12/21/2011 8:52:06 AM PST by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Ron Paul is not even a Libertarian, he is an anarchist. People wonder where he is getting his support? Try Occupy movement, the different factions of the anarchist movement.

His outspoken support of Bradley Manning calling HIM a HERO is outragous.

By the way on the vid I posted on another thread he voiced support for the homosexuals.


4 posted on 12/21/2011 8:53:30 AM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Our founders held extreme libertarian ideals. They didn’t hold those in check for the revolution because Samuel Adams was too extreme or a lightening rod.

But we do not have any inspiring candidates which leaves us voting AGAINST rather than enthusiastically FOR a candidate. All candidates want to tinker at the margins and out tax credit the other guy.

Is Romney the “best” we can do? Heaven help us


5 posted on 12/21/2011 8:55:27 AM PST by ccwman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Ron Paul will not win in Iowa because of the goodness of folks. Ron Paul supporters will not be able to recruit supporters because they are worse than aggressive cultists that visit your front door. If you think Ron Paul is Coco Puffs his supporters are even worse and will be rejected by the folks in Iowa.


6 posted on 12/21/2011 8:55:46 AM PST by vicar7 ("Polls are for strippers and cross-country skiers" Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969
You want MADNESS?????? here's Madness..
In the 2008 Presidential elections Ron Paul endorsed four canidates they were;

Chuck Baldwin,
Bob Barr,
Cynthia McKinney,
and Ralph Nader

7 posted on 12/21/2011 8:56:20 AM PST by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Yep lunacy to get rid of the fed reserve, EPA and every dept of dictatorship you can name. I disagree with him on foreign policy, but we have problems within. Who else will abolish the income tax? If he stops talking, the IRS, the fed and all the rest can keep us under their thumb. So we are in a poor position, keep status quo and implode or try a different strategy. Unfortunately, without Herman, we are probaly stuck with taxation without representation. I hope I am wrong.


8 posted on 12/21/2011 8:58:32 AM PST by momincombatboots (Back to West by G-d Virginia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

This opinion piece is really not at all helpful. The author is basically saying that Paul is idealistic and has some of the same ideas that our founding fathers had and therefore he and his followers are Bolsheviks and mad.

I think that more people are taking a look at the “crazy uncle” of conservative politics and actually reading his position statements because they are totally dissatisfied with the jumble of “practical” candidates floating out there now.

It would be interesting if this author had drawn any factual evidence supporting his position. But it sounds like he is hanging his hat on two things - the fed is good and necessary (as evidenced by how well things are going now?) and legalizing some illicit drugs is bad because we would have to pay to take care of all the new abusers (not thinking through what we already spend related to alcohol abuse or supporting the ATF, FBI, TSA, DEA, Gun Runner, etc )


9 posted on 12/21/2011 8:59:00 AM PST by monkeypants (It's a Republic, if you can keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969
People who don't know who Murray Rothbard is or what the Austrian School is have no business voting for Paul.

If someone hides, even through omission, their true ideals and influences we should be extremely wary of them. Ron Paul scares the crap out of me...

And last time we tried (we being the human race) to implement an untested economic system how’d that work out?

10 posted on 12/21/2011 8:59:32 AM PST by oldleft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969
When I first got on internet in 1993 it seemed to be mostly full of IT geek types and mostly Libertarians. I generally liked a lot of their ideas until you got to the border. Then they said there should be no borders and free flow of people and goods. Basically they ignore the idea of countries in the name if individualism. For a while we had the Libertarian Republicans which was a influential group well supported by Newt back in 1995. In Texas we actually go up to 10% of the vote and some local elections. In the end the Libertarians became a debating society. Libertarians do not know how to moderate their public thoughts to be electable and accepted by the general public. I happen to believe in the legalization and taxation of drugs but Libertarians tend to loose that argument in the way they sell it. On the local talk radio shows there are no more argumentative people who often end up yelling than Ron Paul supporters. Its a shame they many great ideas. However they are naive in the workings of the world and politics.
16 posted on 12/21/2011 9:12:54 AM PST by pwatson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Conservative voters have been asked to choose pragmatism over idealism for 20 years. The establishment has visited that well too many times.

Not me, not ever again. Give me a candidate who has unshakable loyalty to the consitution or forget about my support.

People please realize that if we continue to accept this, they will continue to present this to us as the only “viable” option. Drawing the line in the sand right now.

Given the choice between anti freedom socialists and anti freedom socialists is to be given the choice between fast demise or slow demise.

Lead, follow, or get out of the way.


19 posted on 12/21/2011 9:36:39 AM PST by Kinzua (Are you ready to admit that electing Obama was a mistake?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969
extremist views held by Paul and his merry band of libertarian Bolsheviks

I see. If you reject Globalism and you want the US government to abide by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights you are an extremist and a Bolshevik. That's rich.

It ironic because Ron Paul is the only candidate and one of the very few national politicians opposes the same Banksters that brought the Bolsheviks into power.

Wall St. and the Bolshevik Revolution

20 posted on 12/21/2011 9:40:33 AM PST by Roninf5-1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

Why don’t we hear of the Madness of Myth Romney?..
The madness of Barack Obama or even of idiots Axlerod.. or Biden?..

But no the madness of Paul the only one willing to follow the Constitution completely..
But Newt may be getting on that Constitution train (somewhat) soon to be called “crazy”...


23 posted on 12/21/2011 10:00:23 AM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969

I take my comment back, forgot Ron Paul is not running as an independent.


25 posted on 12/21/2011 10:31:50 AM PST by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969
I find the demonization of Paul bordering on the comical...I know, so are his policies, I've heard that one before too. The issue here is very simple; if you want more government spending (which we clearly can't afford), more Fed mischief, more worthless money, more war, or more government interference in your life, vote for any of the other candidates. It is your vote, cast it or waste it as you please.
26 posted on 12/21/2011 10:58:37 AM PST by USAF_ret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: servo1969
I find the demonization of Paul bordering on the comical...I know, so are his policies, I've heard that one before too. The issue here is very simple; if you want more government spending (which we clearly can't afford), more Fed mischief, more worthless money, more war, or more government interference in your life, vote for any of the other candidates. It is your vote, cast it or waste it as you please.
27 posted on 12/21/2011 10:58:45 AM PST by USAF_ret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson