Posted on 12/24/2011 6:14:24 AM PST by Kaslin
Dittos to that.
But if Willard should scheme his way to the nomination -- and I don't think he will -- I will vote for him over 0.
This is one of those rare times where the devil we don't know is better than the one we do.
Agree.
Love the truther monkey! LOL!
I think Al Qaeda approved federal funding for Planned Parenthood. I think Al Qaeda encouraged the USSC to decide Roe v. Wade. I think Al Qaeda worked to help defeat Personhood legislation.
I have never had it explained to me why is “blame America first” to critique interventionist foreign policy (and its consequences), but it is not “blame America first” to critique interventionist domestic policy (and its consequences).
I will happily blame any wicked, criminal POS individual who is responsible for criminal acts - including encouraging or directing others to commit those criminal acts. I will happily blame any wicked person who personally acts or encourages or directs others in policies which undermine the traditional family and Christianity. I do not differentiate between persons who are citizens of these United States or any other country in that regard, and I do not believe that God does, either.
I'm starting to warm to Newt but Perry is still my guy by far.
Both Perry and Newt Gingrich are marred by previous, disabling dalliances with -- in Perry's case -- short lists of high-dollar contributors with specific agenda (including Open Borders(TM)), whom he caters for -- various liberal causes and ideas. Gingrich, in addition, was a weak Speaker, lost badly several key political battles with Bill Clinton and his Beastwoman, and has personal moral baggage which constitutes an electoral hurdle inasmuch as most of the women in the United States hate his guts, notwithstanding that they were provoked to that hatred by a number of Democrat-invented political lies and canards.
The only real conservatives still left in the race are Rick Santorum and Michele Bachmann. Cain's out for good and Sarah Palin is still on the sidelines (if only she would jump in -- liberals and neo-Stalinist Progs dread her and hate her virulently, which to me is the modern Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval).
If we get down to that, we've lost the election even if "we" win. It'll be back to Denny Hastert, Mark Foley, and bridges to nowhere if Romney gets in. He stands for nothing.
I listened to him on Charlie Rose the other night, and Charlie interrogated him on the issues. All I heard was a bunch of nothing.
Romney's m.o. is to make noises about "I don't like" this or that or "the way that other thing happened" -- but absolutely refuse to commit to a remedy or a principle. He is 100% opportunistic baloney, a tool for other agenda we will not be allowed to interrogate him about. By which I mean all the stuff that is off the table, like sovereignty, the liberty interest of the People, the structure of the Armed Forces.
To me, the biggest problem with Ron Paul is that he does not recognize the threat of radical Islam. Most of the conflicts around the world are because of radical Islam. We could remove all Americans from the Middle East and Africa and they would still hate us and ultimately want us to convert or die. That is not going to change. They want their religion and Sharia law to ultimately rule the world.
Can never believe we attacked ourselves and as for foreign policy, ron paul reminds me of Chamberlain. Still researching candidates, for defeating zer0 in this neck of the woods. (imho) paul and zer0 agree on foreign policy. Would bet zer0 is a 911 truther as well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.