Ron Paul Is Crazy. Admit It.

sfweekly.com ^ | 12/26/2011 | Peter Jamison

[John D]

Ron Paul’s support is growing across the board, not just among Republicans. If he should go third party, he would take voters from both Dim and Repubs,

He would not take any Republican votes. No Republican would vote for someone who blames 9/11 on America. Republicans do not think a person who rails against earmarks takes more than any candidate running. Republicans do not want our military destroyed. Republicans do not want open boarders. Most Republicans do not want gays in the military.
I do not see any threat to the Republicans if the surrender monkey runs third party.

[SaxxonWoods]

“As far as I can tell, Paul is the only candidate in at least a generation in either party, actually attempting to accurately interpret the Constitution of the United States of America.”

You just made your case for appointing Paul to the Supreme Court. I have to say that would be interesting.

You are not the arbiter of who can “accurately interpret” the Constitution. The Consittution does not require interpretation by a President. It only requires being upheld as written.

Dr. Paul is right where he needs to be, where he can vote against wasteful spending. His foreign policy is suicidal, and he likes to hint that Bush brought down the Towers.

He is impossible to take seriously.

[FrankR]

Perot handed us clinton...on a silver platter.

[ejonesie22]

Sorry but Paul is nuts, the others simply stupid from time to time and none want to surrender to our enemies...

[verity]

"Ron Paul is the only guy who cannot beat BO."

Perhaps he needs to change his brand of soap. ;-)

[Tex-Con-Man]

naw...it's his foreign policy that stinks...

[pallis]

Okay, okay! I admit it.

[meadsjn]

Newt will not win because Independents do not like him.

Where do you get that idea?

The 20% of GOP primary voters who support Romney are mostly registered Republicans, claiming to be "moderates", but just as commie left as their fellow Democrats.

Independents who voted for TEA Party Republicans in 2010 are more conservative than the Romney commies, and these conservative Independents outnumber the entire bloc of registered Republicans.

[little jeremiah]

RPaul was one of the five treacherous Rs voted to repeal DADT. He thinks homos in the military is a good thing.

Fie on him.

[Conservative Vermont Vet]

Men are from Mars, Women from Venus and Paul from.....

[Cringing Negativism Network]

If Bush and his merry band of RINO’s hadn’t selfishly gotten in the way of Perot, Clinton would have lost.

But no...

:D

Equally valid criticism...

Perot was right.

[FrankR]

Perot was a kook, just like Paul, who said all the things the radical right wing wanted to hear, and bled off enough votes to hand it to clinton.

It was the worse mistake I ever made, and I voted for him too. Learned my lesson...don't be taken in by wild-eyed kooks.

It seems you're a "right" (read: correct) fighter, who has to be "right" no matter what...so, I'll end this debate by opting out and letting you be "right".

Nevertheless...Ron Paul is still a tinfoil hat wearing kook...

[RBK]

Ron Paul is neither a conservative or a republican.
He is a Libertarian KOOK

[RBK]

Ron Paul is neither a conservative nor a republican.
He is a Libertarian KOOK

[RBK]

Ron Paul is neither a conservative nor a republican.
He is a Libertarian KOOK

[RBK]

Ron Paul is neither a conservative nor a republican.
He is a Libertarian KOOK

[Cringing Negativism Network]

I’ve been counting.

Your posts were the 32,726th, and 32,727th time the word “kook” has been tossed at Ron Paul on FR today.

[ejonesie22]

About 967273 times too few if ya ask me.

Until it gets through the thickest skull it bears repeating.

[RBK]

You dont count too well either

[Cringing Negativism Network]

Lol yeah I saw that.

I don’t count too well, true enough. I’m blaming this one on my mouse though.