Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former Aide: Ron Paul is 'Most Certainly Anti-Israel'
Arutz Sheva ^ | 27/12/11 | Chana Yaar

Posted on 12/26/2011 4:24:57 PM PST by Eleutheria5

A former senior aide to GOP presidential candidate Ron Paul has decided to "set the record straight" in a 'tell all' post on the Right Wing News blog -- and in the process, has confirmed that Paul wishes "the Israeli state did not exist at all."

Eric Dondero served as former senior aide to Paul when he was a U.S. Congressman from 1997 to 2003, and worked closely with the candidate as an aide since 1988.

"I've noticed in some media that my words have been twisted and used for an agenda from both sides," Dondero wrote, explaining from the outset why he had decided to set forth his views in such a blunt manner, on the site that he chose. "I wish to set the record straight with media that I trust and know will get the story right: conservative/libertarian-conservative bloggers."

Ron Paul is not a racist, Dondero wrote. "I never heard a racist word expressed towards Blacks or Jews come out of his mouth. Not once," he wrote. "Is Ron Paul an Anti-Semite? Absolutely No. As a Jew, (half on my mother’s side), I can categorically say... No slurs. No derogatory remarks."

However, the candidate's feelings about Israel versus the Palestinian Authority are another matter entirely, Dondero wrote.

"He is however, most certainly Anti-Israel, and Anti-Israeli in general. He wishes the Israeli state did not exist at all. He expressed this to me numerous times in our private conversations. His view is that Israel is more trouble than it is worth, specifically to the America taxpayer. He sides with the Palestinians, and supports their calls for the abolishment of the Jewish state, and the return of Israel, all of it, to the Arabs."

.....

(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Israel; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aide; antiisrael; apaulogia; apaulogists; former; freepers4mitt; paultardation; paultards; ronpaul; ronpaulbashing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-64 next last
I'm so relieved that Ron Paul is not anti-Semitic./sarc
1 posted on 12/26/2011 4:25:01 PM PST by Eleutheria5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

No wonder he’s getting support from Democrats.


2 posted on 12/26/2011 4:28:10 PM PST by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

WOW so Ron Paul hates Jews..now THAT is breaking news/sarc


3 posted on 12/26/2011 4:34:56 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

...Maybe a grudge? Or some Blackmail in the futume.


4 posted on 12/26/2011 4:40:05 PM PST by gargoyle (...a well informed public and a well regulated militia...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda
"Is Ron Paul an Anti-Semite? Absolutely No. As a Jew, (half on my mother’s side), I can categorically say... No slurs. No derogatory remarks."

That is an anti-semite? Somehow I didn't get antisemite from the article, even if the article said he didn't like Israel.

That would be like saying someone who doesn't like Canada hates white people.

5 posted on 12/26/2011 4:43:47 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

I just pray that Ron Paul does NOT get the GOP nomination. There is a reason why Democrats support this guy, they know what will happen if he gets the nomination..and its downright scary, it will be between a whack job anti semite and a Communist


6 posted on 12/26/2011 4:51:28 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5
I don't believe a word of it. As a professing Christian, Ron Paul would make a mockery of his own faith by rejecting a very basic Judeo-Christian belief regarding the holy land.

Until I heard it straight from Paul's mouth, it's political smear as far as I'm concerned.

I don't agree with everything Paul supports, but he is the closest candidate to a true constitutionalists.

Paul, regardless of all the nutball comments, is an accomplished individual. Served in the armed services, attended college and became a doctor, then has served ten terms in the congress.

He has been the most consistent representative on record with regards to fiscal policy.

Say what you will about Ron Paul, he is principled, consistent and conservative.

7 posted on 12/26/2011 4:53:31 PM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5
As a Jew, (half on my mother’s side)

A dead giveaway of a JINO (Jew in name only). You can't be "half-Jewish" on your mother's side because "Jewishness" is passed down through the mother.

8 posted on 12/26/2011 4:53:49 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

He didn’t say “half-Jewish”, he said Jew. If Paul gets the nomeination, we’re all screwed of course, but I’m starting to think it’s way too late anyway. Save yourselves.


9 posted on 12/26/2011 4:58:08 PM PST by Flightdeck (If you hear me yell "Eject, Eject, Eject!" the last two will be echos...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

And in my state (Virginia), the only two people going to be on the ballot will be Romney and Paul (not sure if write-ins are allowed for primaries or not). Might just not vote. Argh. Oy. Crud.


10 posted on 12/26/2011 5:04:01 PM PST by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis (Chag Chanukkah Sameach!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

I pray that he does. Not wanting the U.S. to be an Israeli vassal is not the same as being anti-Semitic.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IYoYaDNjnY&feature=email


11 posted on 12/26/2011 5:15:58 PM PST by rashley (Rashley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5
Well, who can believe this source. Now he's Eric Dondero. He's been Eric Rittberg, which is his real name. He uses other pseudonyms. He engages in waaaaaaaaaaay out rants on all kind of New World Order, pro-militia, paleo-Libertarian topics through every medium. You can't believe him. In fact, only the worse kind of total raving lunatic would ever think of hiring this kind of nutbag. Only a drooling, half-conscious, mentally challenged , pscychotic, rambling old weird uncle of a gasbag would deal with this guy for more than a week or tw . . .

Wait? This guy was an aide to Ron Paul for over a decade?

I guess Ron Paul makes his own case that you can't believe this guy . . . or Ron Paul.

Oh. Merry Christmas and beware of those Trilateralist boogiemen in your closet.

Psst!

I know a Jew! And he told me it was the Massad or them there disgruntled Jew fellas what done blowed up the World Trade Center. Signed - Your Friend Ron.


12 posted on 12/26/2011 5:18:00 PM PST by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

I saw that on Special Report. Just makes you shake your head to think that this....I hesitatate to use the word ‘loon’ so let me use one that’s much worse - fanatic....is going to win a national presidential caucus.

Don’t do this to the country, Iowa. Ya want to not go with the flow, then vote Rick Santorum. You put Paul at the top, no one should ever pay attention to Iowa again. This is worse than boosting Robertson, who was a good man but had no place on the presidential stage.


13 posted on 12/26/2011 5:19:15 PM PST by citizen (Don't blow it, Iowa! R Paul may be saving his lump-of-coal present til the spring: A 3rd party run!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: citizen

hesitatate = hesitate


14 posted on 12/26/2011 5:20:26 PM PST by citizen (Don't blow it, Iowa! R Paul may be saving his lump-of-coal present til the spring: A 3rd party run!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

I don’t think you should trust “accomplished individuals” who make “nutball comments” with nuclear devices. I don’t think people who want to erase entire countries for fiscal reasons are actually conservative, and even if they are, I live in the country he would rather not have around. I view his fiscal conservatism the way I view that crazed gunman who was obsessed with proper grammar. I like proper grammar, too. I also like fiscal conservatism. But I wouldn’t vote for a crazy person if I were you.


15 posted on 12/26/2011 5:24:59 PM PST by Eleutheria5 (Diplomacy is war by other means.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777
Say what you will about Ron Paul, he is principled, consistent and conservative.

I'm not sure this is true, but I do know that the last thing the Republican party, and some here on FR, want is a candidate who is a principled, consistent conservative.

16 posted on 12/26/2011 5:27:21 PM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

Being anti jew and anti Israel is very different. Thats like saying he’s anti-Taiwan and wish it didn’t exist, but not racist. Still... its not a good policy position to take. The bottom line, they exist and what are you going to do with it? If your policy is to help wipe those countries out, thats appalling


17 posted on 12/26/2011 5:27:44 PM PST by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rashley

I’ll even concede Ron Paul isn’t anti-Semitic. Not wanting there to be an Israel, however, is not the same thing as not wanting America to be an Israeli vassal. I don’t want America to be an Israeli vassal, either, and I’m also not anti-Semitic. But I’m also opposed Iran developing nuclear weapons, and I’m also not nuts.


18 posted on 12/26/2011 5:32:06 PM PST by Eleutheria5 (Diplomacy is war by other means.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

This is all just so troubling. After spending 3 days with family and friends I have now stated publicly that I’m so disappointed in how this election is turning out. Not going to stop me from voting, but just so damned sad for all of us. And don’t have a clue who to vote for in primary. :( (Never will be RP that’s for sure)


19 posted on 12/26/2011 5:34:48 PM PST by marygam ((Hurry November 2012, we might not make it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

I can understand Ron Paul policy of non-interference but

Is this statement true
Ron Paul will criticize Israel
but
Ron Paul will not criticize Arab nations

Wouldn’t that be interfering. You’re taking a side


20 posted on 12/26/2011 5:51:01 PM PST by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks Eleutheria5.
Ron Paul is not a racist, Dondero wrote.
IOW, Dondero's never read Ron Paul's racist screed.
"He is however, most certainly Anti-Israel, and Anti-Israeli in general. He wishes the Israeli state did not exist at all. He expressed this to me numerous times in our private conversations. His view is that Israel is more trouble than it is worth, specifically to the America taxpayer. He sides with the Palestinians, and supports their calls for the abolishment of the Jewish state, and the return of Israel, all of it, to the Arabs."
Wow, there's a surprise.


21 posted on 12/26/2011 6:09:11 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Merry Christmas, Happy New Year! May 2013 be even Happier!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

Who wrote this article?


22 posted on 12/26/2011 6:18:24 PM PST by doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

not anti-Jewish ...

so exactly what is supposed to happen to 6 million JEWS
living in Israel (which he wishes wouldn’t exist)?

guess we could ask Iran’s President Imanutjob if we can’t
get a straight answer from our nutjob


23 posted on 12/26/2011 6:21:00 PM PST by Optimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

Paul opposes continued subsidies of Israel? That should win him the majority American Jewish vote.


24 posted on 12/26/2011 6:32:53 PM PST by mas cerveza por favor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Optimist

He works for them, so he’s really their nutjob too.


25 posted on 12/26/2011 6:45:28 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Merry Christmas, Happy New Year! May 2013 be even Happier!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

The effort to drive Ron Paul from the gop continues. It will probably be successful. Problem is, it’ll cost the gop the general election when he simply runs as a third party candidate. Not that it’ll much matter; like there is all that big of a difference between mittens and barky anyway.


26 posted on 12/26/2011 6:47:57 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (The gop is as much a plantation for conservatives as the 'rat party is for blacks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

“I just pray that Ron Paul does NOT get the GOP nomination.”

Be careful what you pray for; you might get it. Especially if he is run out of the party and launches a 3rd party challenge in the general. Which I think is likely.

Too bad Sarah didn’t run. It would have avoided this ongoing circular firing squad.


27 posted on 12/26/2011 6:51:23 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (The gop is as much a plantation for conservatives as the 'rat party is for blacks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

“Say what you will about Ron Paul, he is principled, consistent and conservative.”

Now, now. Don’t go using logic. The idea of these threads is to see who can howl the loudest that Ron Paul is CRAZY!! ANTISEMITIC!! RACIST!! UNRELIABLE!! NAIVE!!

That he would likely cut the scope and breadth of government by more than any other candidate running for the gop nomination never enters into the equation.


28 posted on 12/26/2011 6:57:58 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (The gop is as much a plantation for conservatives as the 'rat party is for blacks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

I say, “A plague on both their houses.”

Does that mean I fail the litmus test?


29 posted on 12/26/2011 6:58:32 PM PST by dagogo redux (A whiff of primitive spirits in the air, harbingers of an impending descent into the feral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis

No write-ins. Sorry. The fix is in.


30 posted on 12/26/2011 7:01:30 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (The gop is as much a plantation for conservatives as the 'rat party is for blacks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

It was those Establishment Republicans that did not want Sarah to run..and she knew that, she knew what she had to deal with if she had run. They would have done everything possible to make sure she did not get the nomination. How ironic how they were so terrified of her running but have NO issue with Ron Paul running..this guy is downright scary. If he gets the nomination Obama won’t have to do anything, he will have the election in the bag. Even if Paul launches a 3rd party challenge it will be the same like every time he runs, he will get a few percentage points of votes but it really wont make a difference, but if he gets the GOP Nomination all hell is gonna break loose


31 posted on 12/26/2011 7:05:16 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat
Guess I can't vote then. I can't in good conscience cast a ballot for either of these losers.
32 posted on 12/26/2011 7:05:22 PM PST by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis (Chag Chanukkah Sameach!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Scoutmaster

The Mossad possibly bombing the new york trade center building? Really? Sheesh....


33 posted on 12/26/2011 7:07:13 PM PST by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis (Chag Chanukkah Sameach!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

“It was those Establishment Republicans that did not want Sarah to run..and she knew that, she knew what she had to deal with if she had run. They would have done everything possible to make sure she did not get the nomination.”

Yup. I think she decided that she didn’t need it. Can’t say I blame her. I wouldn’t wish it on anyone.

“How ironic how they were so terrified of her running but have NO issue with Ron Paul running..this guy is downright scary.”

They didn’t think he would do as well as he is. As for him being “scary”, I find him relatively innocuous. I disagree with him on a few issues but remember: the President is not a dictator. He has to get Congress to go along on most things, which will tend to moderate things.

“If he gets the nomination Obama won’t have to do anything, he will have the election in the bag.”

Ron Paul won’t get the nomination. That has been ordained for mitt. But obama need not worry; when selecting between a socialist and someone who just acts like one, people will pick the real mccoy every time.

“Even if Paul launches a 3rd party challenge it will be the same like every time he runs, he will get a few percentage points of votes but it really wont make a difference...”

I respectfully disagree. There are so many people out there who are angry at both parties that Ron Paul will get a significant chunk of votes as a third party candidate regardless. I don’t think he can win it, but he can peel off maybe 15-20%.

“...but if he gets the GOP Nomination all hell is gonna break loose.”

It sure will. And it’ll be long overdue.


34 posted on 12/26/2011 7:39:44 PM PST by RKBA Democrat (The gop is as much a plantation for conservatives as the 'rat party is for blacks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5
link
“Ron Paul is most assuredly an isolationist. He denies this charge vociferously. But I can tell you straight out, I had countless arguments/discussions with him over his personal views. For example, he strenuously does not believe the United States had any business getting involved in fighting Hitler in WWII. He expressed to me countless times, that “saving the Jews,” was absolutely none of our business. When pressed, he often times brings up conspiracy theories like FDR knew about the attacks of Pearl Harbor weeks before hand, or that WWII was just “blowback,” for Woodrow Wilson’s foreign policy errors, and such.”
35 posted on 12/26/2011 7:43:05 PM PST by Optimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

Palin and Paul, despite their differences on issues, were the only genuine anti-establishment candidates. Palin’s leaving left Paul the sole option for voters sick of the establishment.


36 posted on 12/26/2011 7:44:53 PM PST by mas cerveza por favor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mas cerveza por favor
I guess Michele Bachmann would also fall under the anti-establishmnet category.
37 posted on 12/26/2011 8:40:23 PM PST by pterional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

They don’t get it ...not a clue as they are led down the garden path. They would rather mittens than Paul, a sad state we find ourselves in.


38 posted on 12/26/2011 8:53:36 PM PST by free_life (If you ask Jesus to forgive you and to save you, He will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: pterional

Perhaps. I liked her speaking out about the phony Kinsey Report but she seems to stick to the status quo on economic issues.


39 posted on 12/26/2011 9:43:52 PM PST by mas cerveza por favor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda
...but if [Ron Paul] gets the GOP Nomination all hell is gonna break loose.

Please, Sarah Barracuda, don't be overly concerned. He could "win" the Iowa caucuses with 20% or so of the vote, but he won't go much further toward the nomination. He might take a smattering of delegates to the National Convention, but nowhere near enough to impact the party's policy. The GOP is still by far the stronger party on national defense and national security - and, logically enough, on support for Israel against the forces of radical Islam.

I would kindly suggest that if you dig Sarah Palin, you should support her political "twin" and friend, Michele Bachmann.

40 posted on 12/26/2011 9:52:37 PM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda
At this point, the question becomes one of how long we are going to be saddled with Romney/obamacare, how far down the road of economic devastation we want this country to go. Without a sound economy, defense becomes impracticable. .

We really need to pay attention to the Congressional races, because regardless of the resident at 1600 PA Ave, the Congress can make things happen--or stop them.

That will take a Congress with the sense of purpose and collective visceral fortitude to get the job done. Even a pacifist in the WH cannot ignore a Declaration of War passed by the Congress--and as many have seemed to forget, that is Congress' Constitutional Authority, not the Executive's.

I think, in light of that, we'd be better positioned to correct our domestic situation (especially downsizing the Federal Government and reducing our expenditures and getting useless regulation out of the way of economic recovery), and the Congress `could demand what we need for the military--something it should have been doing.

What other candidate has embraced that position, other than to state intent to make big government more 'efficient' by streamlining an entity which still usurps the Constitutional powers and authority of the States and the People?

Romney is not likely to effect any change in the current mess, save for a little less criminal activity in the Executive Branch, provided he even managed to beat Obama.

Looking at the calculus of the situation:

We have disaffected, young, possible (and former) Obama voters who are disaffected, who believe they may get what they want from a non-establishment candidate.

The anti-Israel folks would be a wash, Obama isn't exactly kind to Israel, either, and may be far more mothvated in his emnity by Islamic influences.

Despite the stereotypes, there are those more strict constitutionalists who favor downsizing the Federal Government, eliminating executive branch agencies which have been the source of myriad 'regulations' which carry the force of law, effectively legislating by bureaucracy.

While returning the abortion issue to the states would not stop the slaughter entirely, in many jurisdictions it would provide an opportunity to legislate against the practice, and effectively reduce the number of 'procedures.

As for the drug war, we've been fighting that almost as long as the 'War on Poverty', and aside from consuming tremendous resources and getting people killed, the chief effect has been gutting the Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment Rights of Americans--we still have a drug problem, and the profit motive (and profits) have corrupted all levels of enforcement as well as likely having been the chief reason the border remains open.

Considering the small fraction of drug profits it would take to make those in charge wealthy, or to run operations which would politically compromise them, it would be simply a cost of doing business. Eliminate that motive, and eliminate the appeal of doing something rebellious for the young, and while there will still be those with problems I don't think there would be an appreciable increase in actual drug use (although there might be a few more who would admit it if it wasn't a crime). Pulling that huge underground economy into the spotlight would increase tax revenues as well, and provide for the means to prosecute those who did not pay taxes.

I find it ironic that we tax the bejeebers out of a pack of cigarettes, but the entire cocaine/meth/?/pot trade goes unencumbered, leaving billions of dollars in trade untouched. (Demanding a declaration of illegally acquired income violates the Fifth Amendment, as it requires self-incrimination.)

So the deciding factor in a Paul vs. Obama race would be the number of Conservatives and Republicans who really could pull the lever for Anyone But Obama, despite the full-court Alinsky tactics used against Paul.

It is far from over, there are a lot of primaries and caucuses left, and the convention may well end up being brokered, drafting a 'dark horse candidate.

We do live in interesting times, and I am still hoping for the draft option to be used at the Convention.

For those who are desperately emotionally involved in the campaigns, step back from the keyboard, take a deep breath, and recognize the first thing we have to do is beat Obama. From there it is a question of whether we can field a candidate who will not further the harm Obama has done, who can fix the domestic situation (especially economic), and who will actually downsize the Federal Government.

Economically, the road we are on is a road to impotence. Without an economically strong America, there can be no force to project, just a paper tiger.

41 posted on 12/26/2011 10:25:05 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
Except that Israel is the homeland of the Jewish people... and the only Jewish nation in all the world.

Whereas Canada is just one of many nations whose population is majority white.

Did you not know this or find it relevant to this article?

42 posted on 12/26/2011 10:51:53 PM PST by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rashley
Believing America *IS* Israel's vassal is anti-semitic, for it casts Israel... and hence the Jewish people, as puppeteers controlling the world, a la The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

It is, also, a patent lie.

43 posted on 12/26/2011 10:58:08 PM PST by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gogogodzilla
Apparently you missed my point. There are Jewish people worldwide, too.

Someone disagreeing with a political subdivision on the planet's surface does not translate to individually hating each and every person in the dominant demographic of that subdivision, worldwide.

It is possible to disagree with a national boundary without hating the people, just as "54.40 or fight!" wasn't anti-'white'.

A true anti-semite might not dislike Israel as a political entity, but would harbor universal emnity toward Jewish people wherever they are.

44 posted on 12/26/2011 11:54:46 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: free_life

“They don’t get it ...not a clue as they are led down the garden path. They would rather mittens than Paul, a sad state we find ourselves in.”

Keep in mind that FR represents a slice of the population. A lot of these folks are trying to reconcile themselves to the idea that the gop will nominate mitt, who does not represent their views very well. I think the bulk will do what they’ve always done; vote for the gop nominee regardless. But they’re trying to rationalize that. And it’s tough; mittens record is not conservative in any real sense of the word. As my site handle and tagline would indicate, supporting the gop has never been high on my priority list. I support conservatives.

Ron Paul does a lot better with the general population than he does with FReepers. And thus he will do better in the primaries and potentially the general election than these anti-Paul threads would seem to indicate.

Interesting thing I’ve noted, though, is that while most of these threads started with few people disagreeing with the “Ron Paul is _____ !(add the derogatory comment of your choice)” theme, I’m finding more FReepers stepping up to the plate and challenging that. That’s good news. It also makes these threads a lot more interesting. Debate isn’t any fun if no one is actually disagreeing.


45 posted on 12/27/2011 3:48:58 AM PST by RKBA Democrat (The gop is as much a plantation for conservatives as the 'rat party is for blacks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

I haven't commented much on Paul this time around since his "conservatism" has been pretty much debunked on FR. In the unlikely event he makes a couple strong showings he'll present the bigotry issue to Obama on a silver platter, the fact that a few conservatives, on FR, outed him last election cycle won't matter. And the press will love it. However I'll add a comment I made a couple weeks ago, there's no question that Paul is anti-Israel.

Of course opposing aid isn't antisemitism, and I doubt is antisemitic though he's clearly anti Israel, sympathetic to arab revisionism.

Leaving aside his fetis with neocons and the Likud party, and the "Jewish Lobby", the only powerful lobby in DC, there's his view of the region as expressed in his book.

He does acknowledge a few hundred thousand were expelled a few millenia ago, and that a few families stayed. And unlike the Arab world that the Jews who moved to Palestine (don't think he knows that was the name for the Jewish Homeland, stupidity when you're commenting on an important topic. However he describes Zionism as a movement of Orthodox Jews (Herzl would be surprised as would have most of the "Orthodox" of the day) who wanted to separate secular European Jews from the culture they had assimilated into so well. Secular European Jews fully integrated and accepted into late 19th century Europe, like Alfred Dreyfus. Is Paul stupid, or a revisionist.

Then his history conveniently skips forward to post WWI, where the UN decided to partition Palestine. Apparently out of thin air, no Mandate, no partitioning at San Remo, no pogrums. The UN just up and decided to do it.

Probably most telling is his experience meeting a young palestinian attending school in the US. Her story about how her family was thrown off land in her family for centuries. To build Israeli settlements. This happened in the early 1950s, clear proof that Ron considers Tel Aviv a settlement. Like San Antonio I guess. But what the heck, it was just a group of people taking land from others on the specious arguement that G-d told them to do it. Classic pro-Arab fairy tale from the Congressman.

BTW, his #1 book to read on the topic, Jimmy Carter's Apartheid work. It's on the Code Pink suggested reading list too.


46 posted on 12/27/2011 4:32:58 AM PST by SJackson (The Pilgrims¬óDoing the jobs Native Americans wouldn't do !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis
The Mossad possibly bombing the new york trade center building?

Well, it must be true, because Ron Paul hinted it.

Just like for $99/year for the newsletter than Ron Paul never read despite his name and photograph and the first person stories about his wife and children and congressional colleagues and the financial tips about gold that he gets credit for . . . you should know that (pssst!) AIDs could have been made by the gubmint, because it's the job of a U.S. Congressman to share important information like that (but not for free; information like that shouldn't be freely available to all of the public; only to those with $99 and a desire to read about the new world order, those nasty blacks, those damn Jews, and how to pick people for your militia group):


47 posted on 12/27/2011 5:49:53 AM PST by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Ron Paul is an anti-Semitic Nut. What makes him so dangerous is that he sounds rational on domestic policy but his foreign policy statements expose him for what he is - a Nut.


48 posted on 12/27/2011 9:12:57 AM PST by ZULU (LIBERATE HAGIA SOPHIA!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Scoutmaster

Paul sure has some weird views, doesn’t he?


49 posted on 12/27/2011 9:15:59 AM PST by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis (Chag Chanukkah Sameach!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: gogogodzilla

You make my point.


50 posted on 12/27/2011 9:23:25 AM PST by rashley (Rashley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson