Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul in 2009: “I Wouldn’t Have Risked American Lives” To End The Holocaust
Big Government ^ | 12/27/11 | Jeffrey Scott Shapiro

Posted on 12/27/2011 9:32:29 AM PST by Nachum

On the evening of Sept. 16, 2009, I was invited to a function for Rand Paul’s U.S. Senate campaign at the headquarters of Americans for Tax Reform.

I had been invited by a friend of mine via Facebook who was a passionate supporter of Ron Paul. Within minutes of arriving, I saw Rep. Paul enter the room, followed by an entourage of several college students.

I immediately walked up to Paul and introduced myself, and Paul smiled at me and shook my hand. I told him that I had always wanted to ask him a question, and that it was a hypothetical question, but I would appreciate his answer nonetheless. Paul smiled, and welcomed the question. At this point there were about 15 people surrounding us, listening.

And so I asked Congressman Paul: if he were President of the United States during World War II, and as president he knew what we now know about the Holocaust, but the Third Reich presented no threat to the U.S., would he have sent American troops to Nazi Germany purely as a moral imperative to save the Jews?”

And the Congressman answered:

“No, I wouldn’t. I wouldn’t risk American lives to do that. If someone wants to do that on their own because they want to do that, well, that’s fine, but I wouldn’t do that.”

(Excerpt) Read more at biggovernment.com ...


TOPICS: Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911truther; apaulogia; apaulogists; doublezot; holocaust; israel; johnkerry; kenyanbornmuzzie; libertarians; lurch; onestatesolution; paul; paultards; randpaultruthfile; ron; ronpaul; ronpaultruthfile; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last

1 posted on 12/27/2011 9:32:34 AM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“Pearl Harbor is all America’s fault, right, Mommy?” - Ron Paul, age 6, 12/7/1941


2 posted on 12/27/2011 9:37:02 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

PaulTards descending to call Jeffrey Scott Shapiro a liar in 5 ... 4 ... 3 ... 2 ...


3 posted on 12/27/2011 9:37:08 AM PST by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American history, 0bama is the yellow stain in front.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

4 posted on 12/27/2011 9:37:53 AM PST by VU4G10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Paul’s a loon,as if we needed further proof.His crazed supporters will ignore this as they have many other insights into his character.


5 posted on 12/27/2011 9:38:05 AM PST by Farmer Dean (stop worrying about what they want to do to you,start thinking about what you want to do to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

And this is the same Ron Paul who defends Iran’s right to a nuclear weapon while continually making the point that he wants the United States to cut aid to Israel.


6 posted on 12/27/2011 9:41:32 AM PST by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Reading the header sort of disgusted me. I only say sort of because, coming from RP, it doesn’t surprise me. Then I got to thinking how many pols today are actively doing their part to bring about a more thorough holocaust and RP’s comments seem almost tame.


7 posted on 12/27/2011 9:41:32 AM PST by Hayride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Knowing what he knows now, 6M slaughtered - he’s the heartless one Perry was speaking of! Strange comment for being a doctor, also.


8 posted on 12/27/2011 9:41:53 AM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Please do not take this as a defense of Paul (I do not like anything about him), but to be fair, what would have Roosevelt’s answer been? Or Clinton’s? I think Nixon, Reagan, and the Bushi would have done the right thing, as would have Truman, JFK and Johnson. Just my $0.02.


9 posted on 12/27/2011 9:42:07 AM PST by Pharmboy (She turned me into a Newt! 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This is consistent with paleo conservatives like Pat Buchannan. Not surprising at all. Isolationists in the 1930’s tended to be anti Semitic.


10 posted on 12/27/2011 9:42:07 AM PST by JimSEA (The future ain't what it used to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Neither did FDR. FDR wouldn't even admit Jewish refugees, a population which vastly enriched the U.S. American efforts had a negligible effect on the outcome of the holocaust.
11 posted on 12/27/2011 9:43:36 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Ceterum autem censeo, Obama delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This creates a huge problem for me (and other Virginians). Stopping Paul is my #1 priority, but if I want to cast a primary ballot my only choice will be Mitt.


12 posted on 12/27/2011 9:44:08 AM PST by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
I realize the truth hurts BUT the US did NOT enter WWII to save the Jews, in fact the US for years denied entrance into the US for persecuted Jews. So Paul is merely speaking for the US Constitution and its separation of church and state. We are not to go to war over religion, period.

Maybe if more people read the Constitution in the eyes of the Torah as it was in those eyes that it was written & adopted in the 1st place, then YHVH could finally remove the blinders(2 Chron 7:14). It is so frustrating when a group that claims to be constitutional conservatives act as hypocrites, picking and choosing what parts of the US Constitution they like and which parts are dispensable for religious sake. Isn't that what we are fighting for? The restoration of that which was never meant to be dispensable?

13 posted on 12/27/2011 9:44:32 AM PST by patlin ("Knowledge is a powerful source that is 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

It is bad enough our government is overrun by communist criminals, and we have to deal nutcases like Paul as well.

The American electorate are to blame for the condition of our government. This is what happens when you get lazy, complacent and ignorant. Freedom is lost.


14 posted on 12/27/2011 9:45:19 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

“WE are the problem here!”


15 posted on 12/27/2011 9:46:41 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

? This, “Isolationists in the 1930’s tended to be anti Semitic.”

why single out one group. By definition wouldn’t isolationists be anti every group or nation but the USA?
Are you saying isolationists would not have to the aid of Ijews would have to the aid of muslims?

To be clear Paul’s position is abhorrent, but it is consistent to him.


16 posted on 12/27/2011 9:48:04 AM PST by RWGinger (Simpl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
FDR risked no Americans to stop it either!

And he could have done something!!

17 posted on 12/27/2011 9:48:37 AM PST by PALIN SMITH (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patlin
So Paul is merely speaking for the US Constitution and its separation of church and state.

LOLOLOL....what?

It is so frustrating when a group that claims to be constitutional conservatives act as hypocrites, picking and choosing what parts of the US Constitution they like and which parts are dispensable for religious sake.

LOL...FReep on!

18 posted on 12/27/2011 9:49:28 AM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Rush Limbaugh = the Beethoven of talk radio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Ron Paul in 2009: “I Wouldn’t Have Risked American Lives” To End The Holocaust.

Paul is so retarded.

19 posted on 12/27/2011 9:50:05 AM PST by CainConservative (Merry CHRISTmas and a Happy Newt/Marco 2012!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

FDR sent the SS St. Louis back to Germany and we knew about the camps as early as 1942 and said nothing because FDR didn’t want it to be “a Jewish war”.


20 posted on 12/27/2011 9:50:18 AM PST by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson