[Kinzua]

Its easy to see which side of this “debate” discusses principles and issues and which side gets even more hysterical without offering anything objective or constructive.

The anti-Paul people had better come up with something more substantial than aaaahhhh he’s nuts! and anyone looking for a real Constutional candidate is a Paulbot.

Ending excessive foreign entanglements is not “cutting and running” or “appeasing”. In fact, the result would be a stronger America, more secure and prosperous and more able to be a real example in the World.

[xzins]

1. Newsletters

2. Foreign policy statements

3. Israel

4. Lack of fiscal plan

[ejonesie22]

Oh please principles and issues my ass, the SOB wants to let the musszies kill me and my kid...

Paul had been shown time and time to be a nut job here and you paulitard keep doing the “We are so smart you guys don't understand how brilliant Paul is, he is the only one who yada yada yada...

At some point the you stop debating the dense and just point and laugh...

[trisham]

The anti-Paul people had better come up with something more substantial than aaaahhhh he’s nuts! and anyone looking for a real Constutional candidate is a Paulbot.

*********************************

Are you saying he's not nuts? Being nuts seems a pretty substantial problem to me.

[Jewbacca]

“Ending excessive foreign entanglements”

Paul is a selective ender of foreign entanglements -— only avoids them when it might help his agenda of killing Jews.

Yes, that is what I said.

He’s clearly a virulent anti-semite. You can dismiss one or two things, but collectively the picture is very clear.

[PSYCHO-FREEP]

Here is a quote from Paul’s own campaign site;

[”Can you think of one Ron Paul supporter who isn’t a pot smoker?

Because I certainly can’t.”]

[Ingtar]

I’m desperately seeking a Constitutional candidate. Ron Paul is NOT the one I am looking for.

[algernonpj]

Its easy to see which side of this “debate” discusses principles and issues and which side gets even more hysterical without offering anything objective or constructive.

The anti-Paul people had better come up with something more substantial than aaaahhhh he’s nuts! and anyone looking for a real Constutional candidate is a Paulbot.

Ending excessive foreign entanglements is not “cutting and running” or “appeasing”. In fact, the result would be a stronger America, more secure and prosperous and more able to be a real example in the World.

You forgot Paultard, Ronulan, and lives in mother's basement smoking weed.

Considering the shape this country is in, you'd think people would want an open discussion of many possible solutions. The status quo has well nigh eviscerated our once prosperous middle class, resulted in Islamic republics in Iran and Afghanistan, and bankrupted the country.

For example regarding Israel:

While my research thus far leads me to believe that Ron Paul is naive regarding the most basic motivation of Jihadis, consider the following:

GW kept reminding us that 'Islam is a religion of 'peace'. Never mentioned that Islam is a total political system and peace is achieved when there is a world wide caliphate under Sharia.

Ultimately Paul's foreign policy would be better for both Israel and Christianity.

While Israel would get no foreign aid, neither would its enemies:
2011 Interview

Newsmax: What should our relationship be with Israel?
Ron Paul: We should be their friend and their trading partner. They are a democracy and we share many values with them. But we should not be their master. We should not dictate where their borders will be nor should we have veto power over their foreign policy.
... Stop and consider America’s policy: We give $3 billion a year to Israel in loans; and we give $12 billion or more in assistance to Israel’s self-declared enemies. Some of these are countries that say they will drive Israel into the sea.
... We should share intelligence for mutually agreed-upon goals. We should honor our pledge to refuse any arms sales that would undermine Israel’s qualitative military edge in the region.

As a result of 'nation building', promoting 'democracy' in the middle east, and PC immigration policy:

Iraq's Christians Near Extinction

Per Pamela Geller "US policy regarding the refugee resettlement program would shock most Americans if they only knew. The UN picks who becomes US refugees. Christians are being refused refugee status and face persecution and many times certain death for their religious beliefs under the sharia, while whole Muslim communities are entering the US by the tens of thousands per month despite the fact that they face no religious persecution"

Paul would stop funding the UN and pull us out of all treaties that impinge upon our sovereignty. His proposed budget would shut down entire federal bureaucracies while preserving military pensions. Could shutting down the tax payer funded trough be what has the political elite so p*ssed and the source of the smear campaign?

[RealImmigrant]

Ending excessive foreign entanglements is not “cutting and running” or “appeasing”. In fact, the result would be a stronger America, more secure and prosperous and more able to be a real example in the World
————————————————————————\

Good points, but trying to explain that to some of the Statist RINOs whose only response is “Ron Paul is a Nut”

Most of the Statist RINOs have no problem with the current foreign policy endorsed by Obama, The Clintons, Al Gore, Barabara Boxer, et al