Posted on 12/29/2011 7:02:41 AM PST by Kaslin
I decided in ‘08 that Paul was more dangerous than Clinton. Paul refuses to acknowledge that jet planes and missiles make the world a different place than the one that George Washington knew.
Yeah, even they had some ‘help’ from foreign allies, such as the French,(biggest ally) Spanish, Dutch, Polish, a few Germans (Von Steuben), etc.. Although some of them were a few individuals. Some were entire governments like the French.
I’m wondering if Washington might have advised that about the “foreign entanglements” because at that time, America was still such a little nation? He didn’t want it to become “helped” by another country, that could easily taken over it in it’s infant stage! Who knows if he would’ve advised that in this day and age?
“I don’t the Paultards ever think much past smoking dope, never paying any taxes, and perhaps sex with farm animals.”
I’ve heard that if Paul dropped legalizing dope from his platform, he’d lose 50% of his supporters. Not a joke.
If Paul himself ever stopped smoking dope he would realize where he was and go home.
You are ridiculous.
There is a HUGE risk, in Iran having nukes, a larger risk than what we have faced with any other country.
Iran WILL use the nukes.
Iran WILL sell nukes to terrorists.
Ron Paul is not fit to be Commander in Chief.
You are ridiculous.
There is a HUGE risk, in Iran having nukes, a larger risk than what we have faced with any other country.
Iran WILL use the nukes.
Iran WILL sell nukes to terrorists.
Ron Paul is not fit to be Commander in Chief.
The words “provide for the common defense” do not imply that the U.S should be the policeman for the world. Defense is different than offense.
There always has been and always will be a dominant world military power. What country would you like for that to be?
Whether it is a winning sports team, athlete, company, employee, or miltary power, “defending” their standing or title comes from a combination of defense and offense. A fighter just standing with his gloves covering his face get the living crap beat out of him.
I just cannot decide who I should listen to on the national defense, an isolationist crackpot politician like Paul or centuries of history and our military leadership.
Then you agree the United States was responsible for 9/11, and you are for legalizing drugs, and you agree with Iran wanting a Nuclear program and agenda to destroy our nation,.. and you agree Obama isn't so bad after all...and the lists goes on and on of Paul being anti- American and using the Constitution as a smoke screen to further dumbdown his supporters and hurt this nation.
If you don't agree then you need to pull your support for him...if you do..then find another country that adheres to Pauls isolated and anti-American agenda.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.