Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mnehring

Qwest ran a similar trial for $1.00 bill pay online, I called and switched back to paper bill rather than e-bills and sent them checks for several months, it was changd back fairly quickly, I think they just trying to pad the profit. Way cheaper to have online bill pay rather than processing checks.


13 posted on 12/30/2011 1:35:54 PM PST by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: ThisLittleLightofMine
Qwest ran a similar trial for $1.00 bill pay online, I called and switched back to paper bill rather than e-bills and sent them checks for several months, it was changd back fairly quickly, I think they just trying to pad the profit. Way cheaper to have online bill pay rather than processing checks.

I wonder if you could fool your bank's online bill-pay to mistake them for a non-electronic payee. Perhaps, instead of selecting the carrier from the bank's list of known payees, you could just enter their name and the address to which snail-mail payments are to be sent (as if they were the local plumber instead of a big corporation). That way, you just fill in the amount and click Make Payment, but they get a paper check in the mail that costs just as much to process as if you had written a check and licked a stamp.

31 posted on 12/30/2011 4:09:12 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson