Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US planned to fire missile at Australia, secret Cabinet papers from 1980s reveal
Sunday Telegraph (Sydney) ^ | 1st January 2012 | Samantha Maiden

Posted on 12/31/2011 6:35:44 PM PST by naturalman1975

A SECRET US plan to test MX missiles by firing them from California to the coast of Australia was signed off on by then prime minister Malcolm Fraser.

And it can be revealed that the federal Cabinet agreed to keep the intercontinental ballistic missile tests secret because it was "preferable for the matter not to become an election issue".

Details of the extraordinary plan, signed off by the most senior members of the Federal Government, are revealed in Cabinet papers released today by the National Archives.

Titled "United States Proposal Regarding Test Launch of MX Missiles", the file is marked "SECRET" and was presented to Cabinet by the defence minister James Killen.

The file notes that in June 1981 Cabinet had decided, after a verbal briefing from Mr Fraser, that there was "no objection in principle to the United States proposal".

Ronald Reagan, who was pursuing the strategic theory of Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) against the Russians, was seeking a firm date and Cabinet discussed the plan again.

Mr Fraser had outlined the US proposal "for two test launchings of the new MX missile to the Tasman Sea off Cape Pillar".

The proposed words for an announcement to Parliament are included in the Cabinet submission.

It states: "I wish to inform the House that the Government has agreed to the US request and that two test launches will occur in January/February 1984. I would emphasise that the tests do not involve warheads as such and the missiles will not contain any nuclear material.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 12/31/2011 6:35:48 PM PST by naturalman1975
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Someone who didn’t care for Crocodile Dundee?


2 posted on 12/31/2011 6:39:02 PM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Big deal. It’s not like there would have been any nuclear materials involved. Pure media sensationalism here.


3 posted on 12/31/2011 6:39:48 PM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

We have fire Minute Men Missiles at small islands. No big deal.


4 posted on 12/31/2011 6:42:02 PM PST by bmwcyle (I am ready to serve Jesus on Earth because the GOP failed again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Dummy warheads arriving from one MX missile

5 posted on 12/31/2011 6:46:30 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

Seems it would be good to publicize this kind of capability. Makes Irans photoshop missiles seem kinda cheesy.


6 posted on 12/31/2011 6:51:00 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Seem like a test for missile technology. Probably had a blank payload. Not sure what the issue is. It is not like it could have blown anything up.


7 posted on 12/31/2011 6:51:42 PM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

“I would emphasise that the tests do not involve warheads”

Why would this possibly be an issue??? Australia is a valued ally who was assisting in defense testing.


8 posted on 12/31/2011 7:00:45 PM PST by HereInTheHeartland (I love how the FR spellchecker doesn't recognize the word "Obama")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

” Ronald Reagan, who was pursuing the strategic theory of Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) against the Russians,”

That sounds kinda ominous or am I just reading that wrong?


9 posted on 12/31/2011 7:02:02 PM PST by Lurkina.n.Learnin (The democratic party is the greatest cargo cult in history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Seem like a test for missile technology. Probably had a blank payload. Not sure what the issue is. It is not like it could have blown anything up.

There is no issue. None whatsoever.

However, the Sydney Telegraph is trying to make it into one.

US TRIED TO FIRE MISSILES AT AUSTRALIA (awgggggghhhhhh!) CONSERVATIVE PM AGREED (double awggggggghhhhh!)

10 posted on 12/31/2011 7:10:35 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: okie01

I gotta missile for Julia Gillard...


11 posted on 12/31/2011 7:44:15 PM PST by null and void (Day 1075 of America's ObamaVacation from reality [Heroes aren't made, Frank, they're cornered...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Usually, missiles are fired from Vandenberg Air Force Base on the California coast to Kwajalein in the Marshall Islands - about 5000 miles. A test targeted at the Tasman Sea would be about 7-8000 miles. The Russians would have seen 8-10 dummy warheads projected 7500+ miles, meaning that we could hit anywhere we want in the Soviet Union and then some. Considering that the proposed MX warhead was a very advanced design in the 80’s the Soviets would have received an unmistakable message.


12 posted on 12/31/2011 8:10:53 PM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

MAD is more an academic theory.
Here it is assigned by the media as a pejorative, to further their “cowboy” characterization of Reagan.

I assure you, the true strategy was to WIN.


13 posted on 12/31/2011 8:16:06 PM PST by G Larry ("I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his Character.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Always Right; HereInTheHeartland
Seem like a test for missile technology. Probably had a blank payload. Not sure what the issue is

It was to do with internal Australian and Oceanic politics

The relevations aren't as sensational as the article makes them appear. Back at the time it was known that the Australian Labor Government (which came into power in 1982) had given approval for these tests. This just extends the policy and the way it was to be handled back to the previous Liberal (that's conservative to youse Yanks) government in 1981.

Under both Govs it was "these tests are normal, but let's keep the publicity low-key as some people might be bothered"

However in 1984 NZ elected a Labor Gpovernment that made the Australian Labor Governmen look Liberal. David Lange was extreme left anti-US alliance and wanted fo be the big frog in the South Pacific pond, leading an "independent foreign policy" anti-nuclear alliance of all those other little SoPac islands.

In Feb 1985 he refused a port visit by the USS Buchanan for the alleged reason the US Navy wouldn't tell if it had A-Bombs on board.

His stance was insanely (and I use the word advisedly) popular in New Zealand and the Australian Labor Left.

Shortly after Australian PM Bob Hawke withdrew his previous agreement for the tests. At the time I (and Blind Freddie) could see that it was obvious that Hawke did that to preserve the A(NZ)US treaty alliance - already looking shakey from Lange's decision to be a non-contributing "partner". More in Bulletin of Atomic Scientists June 1985

14 posted on 12/31/2011 8:17:01 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (Whatever happened to that Amy Summerland sailing chick?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

It was supposed to be ominous. Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD)was/is the basis of our nuclear deterrent. Many people don’t realize that there has been no defense against a nuclear ballistic attack. Rather, we made it clear to the Soviets that if they sent even one nuke in our direction, we would obliterate them. And, of course, they would obliterate us also. Hence, Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD).

So far, it’s worked.


15 posted on 12/31/2011 8:19:17 PM PST by Lucas McCain (The day may come when the courage of men will fail, but not this day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
” Ronald Reagan, who was pursuing the strategic theory of Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) against the Russians,”

That sounds kinda ominous or am I just reading that wrong?

Not ominous at all - more of a "so what" item. MAD was a fixture of the cold war, not a Reagan invention. But it seems the writer is going for sensationalism, trying to make something out of what is really a nothing news item.

So what if a test missile with dummy warheads is fired into the vicinity of Australia? There are only two reasons I could see that interesting Australians. One, it would be kinda cool if then knew when and about where it was supposed to come down - I'd love to try taking a time-lapse of the RVs. (like they have from Kwajalein) Two, if it meant we were jointly setting up radar and telemetry sites it might mean some jobs coming to the area putting in roads and setting up facilities, ongoing support/maintenance.

16 posted on 12/31/2011 8:22:03 PM PST by ThunderSleeps (Stop obama now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

MAD was hardly crafted by Reagan. It probably dates back to Eisenhower or maybe even Truman.


17 posted on 12/31/2011 8:26:56 PM PST by Western Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Yeh, well, it’s only because somewhere out there is an Aussie with a KB and a catcher’s mitt going, “I got it, mate!”


18 posted on 12/31/2011 8:29:41 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy

We should have “bombed” NZ with those dummy nukes just to tick them off!


19 posted on 12/31/2011 8:33:03 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

And that too would have broken the US-Australian alliance. We get to take the Michael out of our cousins across the Tasman: Anyone else tries it, it’s family.


20 posted on 12/31/2011 8:44:46 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (Whatever happened to that Amy Summerland sailing chick?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Western Phil; ThunderSleeps; Lucas McCain

I understood MAD. I was talking about the way the writer made it sound like Reagan was one crazy dude. As far as that goes I don’t mind our advisaries being not quite sure won’t the president will do.


21 posted on 12/31/2011 9:51:19 PM PST by Lurkina.n.Learnin (The democratic party is the greatest cargo cult in history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson