Posted on 01/02/2012 9:42:46 AM PST by SvenMagnussen
Las Vegas 1 January 2011 (sic). President Obama has(sic) had a dream run to the White House and hopes to remain there for another term. His chances of re election are diminished by his failure to convince Americans that he is entitled to the office he holds.
There are many Americans who are concerned that Barack Obama is not who and what he says he is. Veterans like Robert Laity are frustrated that media outlets have not pressured President Obama into releasing a real authenticated copy of his birth certificate. There appears little doubt that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii but many people believe that he is not entitled to hold his office as he is ineligible due to the status of his parents. The President's birth certificate would clear up that issue.
Robert Laity is a vocal American who is complaining to have Barack Obama charged with electoral fraud. The issue seems to be that the election authorities do not require a candidate to prove that he or she is entitled to seek an office. It is up to someone to prove that a candidate is not entitled to stand.
(Excerpt) Read more at international.to ...
“It doesn’t matter where his father was born. It only matters if his father was a citizen when he was born.”
Correct
IF you believe 3 forged PDF files, and not notice the LACK OF A PAPER BC!
Seriously his baby daddy was a Kenyan/British citizen. Making 0bastard0 a DUAL CITIZEN at best.
Dual Citizens are NOT ELIGIBLE!
Obama’s HI COLB is prima facie evidence he was born in Hawaii on Aug 4, 1961.
The key to understanding Obama’s eligibility problem is that his Original Long Form BC has a “date accepted” Aug 8, 1961 and his COLB has a “date filed” Aug 8, 1961. The difference is due to an edit, update or change in the record since the original record was created.
The HI DoH records administrator can lawfully change, edit or update a birth record if a Court Order is issued. A court Order was issued when the Soetoro adoption was annulled.
The HI DoH has several birth records for Obama on file.
1) Original Long Form BC with a “date accepted” Aug 8, 1961, sealed and archived by the Soetoro adoption
2) The Barry Soetoro COLB with a “date filed” Aug 8, 1961, sealed and archived by the annulment of the Soetoro adoption.
3) The Obama COLB with a “date filed” Aug 8, 1961 created after the Soetoro adoption was annulled and the BHO’s Sr. rights were restored as the birth father.
Obama’s ineligibility is due to the fact he used the naturalization process to restore his U.S. Citizenship after he turned 18. When his SSN was filed for it was filed by his legal guardian located in Connecticut. As a Permanent Resident Alien, Obama was entitled to obtain a SSN.
So where and when did Obama natuaralize?
`Willard Has Two (3? 4? 5?) Mommies’
and I heard he was conceived on the roof of a moving station wagon... in a dog carrier, no less!
I believe this can be resolved without a constitutional crisis by waiting till after he is out of office. Then his laws and appointments can be overturned.
Right now, considering succession, it’s just too complicated an issue to deal with.
But if it were up to me, I’d throw the criminal out and let the chips fall where they may.
So, IMHO, the first round in this absurd "place of birth" match is a draw. The real question is, and always has been IMHO, "His father was not a citizen of the US, so is this Mombasa MF a "Natural Born American Citizen?"
Now for 200 years or so, everyone, including yours truly, sort of had an idea that an "NBC" had to have two (2) parents who were American citizens. Unfortunately, no one felt the need to write that down in simple declarative English.
Now, when we turn to our courts to handle the question, as they should, they run and hide. The team of Socialists, Marxists, and outright Communists who are the ridiculous Puppet-POTUS's stringpullers have pulled off the greatest anti-Constitutionalist coups (and a rather impressive PR trick) in our history. They have done this by shifting the focus OFF the Constitution and onto the sunny shores of Hawaii. OK the SOB was born in Hawaii. So what?
They have us fighting the essentially sideshow birther battle which neither side can win, while the main event of Constitution Eligibility slips by unnoticed. The Furhrer would be proud. Houdini could not have done it better.
The SCOTUS is very well aware of the issue and has chosen not to enter the fray. But now the problem is snowballing. Rubio is not eligible. Jindal is not eligible. My grandson is not eligible. Both parents must be American citizens at the time of the candidate's birth. WTF is so hard about the concept? Yes or No. Up or Down. Ya black-robed, overpaid bumkissers! Just do your gddam jobs.
Perhaps one election official will make the case at the state level, forcing Obama off one state's primary ballots and into the courts. I will not hold my breath. Ain't nobody guaranteed this Republic was going to last forever. With the coming majority of those living here and those they will choose to represent them, it simply won't.
Obama went to Indonesia in 1981 (he was twenty years old) before he traveled to Pakistan. Now we know Obama’s mother was living in Hawaii in 1981 after viewing the Soetoro divorce record.
So, Obama went to Indonesia before he traveled to Pakistan to renew his Indonesian Passport. Consequently, we can reasonable conclude Obama naturalized as a U.S. Citizen in 1982 or 1983.
Wrong. Not one shred of proof has been discovered that Obama was born in Hawaii
Every document offered by the Obama camp of his origin has been quickly proven to be amateurish forgeries. And every effort by Obama's supporters to locate his Birth Certificate have met failure.
I have no doubt that Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen. He is likely not even a citizen. He has never proven citizenship.
Therefore, if Obama is a citizen but not natural born, then he is guilty of High Treason by illegally assuming the Presidency. If he is not even a citizen, he is a spy and enemy of the United States.
Until Obama proves his citizenship, he is one or the other...nothing else.
It's that simple.
Not true if the document has been altered or is a forgery. Disagree?
The key to understanding Obama’s eligibility problem is that his Original Long Form BC has a “date accepted” Aug 8, 1961…
What is your evidence for commenting about anything depicted on the “Original Long Form BC”? Have you seen the document?
Obama’s ineligibility is due to the fact he used the naturalization process to restore his U.S. Citizenship after he turned 18.
What evidence supports any claim there was a naturalization process?
What is the basis for contending that one born in the U.S. who lost citizenship while a minor by action of a parent, but who was later naturalized, is ineligible as to the NBC requirement of being born in the U.S.?
Not sure I’d be SO sure about Hawaii. A probability, NOT a certainty. No KNOWN hospital, NO absolute BC proof in existence. Who the hell knows? The guy has six different names. Multiple SS#’s. No known college records of ANY kind. Only a FEW poorly written non-legal pieces from Harvard that clearly demonstrate he could NOT have and did NOT write either book. Corpsman? 57 states? The guy is a moron. How about his homosexual friends? Trip to Pakistan and Indonesia (lady-boys?) with his ‘good’ pal? And that’s just the tip of the iceberg!
Mitt’s father, George, was born in Mexico. As far as Mexico is concerned, a child born under its jurisdiction is a Mexican. So George has to naturalize to be a US citizen when his parents bought him back to US. It is not known if George was ever ‘naturalized’ to be a US citizen prior to Mitt’s birth. So, if Mitt was born to a Mexican father, Mitt is NOT a natural born citizen and constitutionally ineligible to be the pres.
McCain was born in the Canal Zone ,which was U.S. territory, to parents that were citizens of the U.S. He is most definitely a Natural Born U.S. citizen. No other country or sovereign could make claims upon his loyalty , and that is the reason for the Natural Born Citizen clause.
Absolutely right. But I don’t think that means we have to throw out the birther issue. There are TWO reasons for saying that Obama is an illegitimate POTUS. And they are stonewalling on both of them.
Not to mention that he has hidden virtually all of his life records, including his academic grades from kindergarten through law school, and the press refuses to question it.
I don’t think that we need to drop any of these issues. They are all significant.
Not according to his birth certificate, he wasn't.
He was born in Colón. Colón is now and always has been in Panama. Like West Berlin, surrounded by East Germany, it was surrounded by the Canal Zone, but never part of it.
‘The President’s birth certificate would clear up that issue.’
No need the birth cert to clear up that issue!
Soetoro/obama has already admitted that he was born to a Brit citizen father, so he fails to meet article 2 natural born citizen (nbc) requirement - supreme court cases, founding fathers’ documents, ‘Law of Nations’ ...all define natural born citizen as one born on US soil to 2 US citizen paretnS. obumo’s own ‘resolution 511’ in April 2008 also ‘resolved’ that McCain is natural born US citizen because he was born to 2 US citizen parents.
But then obumo declared himself a nbc to the state of Az (in 2008) although he was NOT born to 2 US citizen parents!
And his father George was clearly ineligible, yet was a candidate until he dropped out—not because someone pointed out he was constitutionally ineligible but because of his “brainwashing” comment and the uproar that followed.
His son is also ineligible, and so is Barry Soetero. There is no reason to wait until either is (re) elected. Toss them out now, 0’s done enough damage, and Willard would be worse because what he does would carry the imprimatur of the GOP.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.