Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2012 Iowa Caucus Live Thread
Iowa GOP ^ | 1.3.12 | Free Vulcan

Posted on 01/03/2012 8:08:24 AM PST by Free Vulcan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,021-1,0401,041-1,0601,061-1,080 ... 2,121-2,136 next last
To: Deo volente

If Santorum is the nominee, the GOP loses and we get another 4 years of Obama.


1,041 posted on 01/03/2012 8:10:05 PM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1032 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

I do not believe that Perot elected Clinton; I believe a fellow named GHWB elected Clinton, just as GWB elected Obama.


1,042 posted on 01/03/2012 8:10:15 PM PST by Theodore R. (I'll still vote for Santorum if he is on the April 3 ballot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1018 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius; Kansas58

Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162 (1875)
This case concerned Mrs. Happersett, an original suffragette, who in virtue of the 14th Amendment attempted to register to vote in the State of Missouri, and was refused because she was not a man. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in that year, wrote the majority opinion, in which he stated:

The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents.

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)
In this case, Wong Kim Ark, the son of 2 resident Chinese aliens, claimed U.S. Citizenship and was vindicated by the court on the basis of the 14th Amendment. In this case the Justice Gray gave the opinion of the court. On p. 168-9 of the record, He cites approvingly the decision in Minor vs. Happersett:

At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children, born in a country of parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.


1,043 posted on 01/03/2012 8:10:15 PM PST by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 887 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Dave,

Check out this map AGAIN. It’s a Huckaboom again! Rick with WINS in 55 and counting counties across the state.. dominating the map of Iowa’s counties.

Wow!!!

http://iowacaucus.com/results/


1,044 posted on 01/03/2012 8:10:41 PM PST by CainConservative ( Newt/Santorum 2012 with Cain,Huck, Bolton, Perry, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 967 | View Replies]

To: taildragger
"Yes that too....I am liking Rich better..

Have a friend with special needs daughter. Santorum has a special needs daughter too ( As does Sarah with her son ).

These folks get life, like we don't, and they are humble... it might be quite the juxtaposition to the arrogance we have seen from Oboingo. It would be good for America IMHO... "

When Rick Santorum was serving as our senator, he employed a good friend of our family. She had a major health problem involving complicated surgery and other treatments. When the insurance company initially denied part of her treatment, the senator became involved personally. He made sure that she had her medical needs covered and that her job would be waiting for her when she was ready to return. I've always remembered him for his basic kindness and decency.

1,045 posted on 01/03/2012 8:10:41 PM PST by Think free or die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 940 | View Replies]

To: CainConservative

Thanks, CainConservative. Very nice.


1,046 posted on 01/03/2012 8:10:57 PM PST by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1020 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

You’re asking for a lesson in “Birther 101”.

There was a guy on one thread promulgating the theory that in order to be “natural born” you had to be a direct descendent of one of the people alive when the Constitution was ratified.

So I, according to him, being the grandson of Greek immigrants would be “native born” but not “natural born”.


1,047 posted on 01/03/2012 8:10:57 PM PST by Yankee (ANNOY THE RNC AND THE MEDIA: NOMINATE NEWT GINGRICH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 944 | View Replies]

To: VinL

I read it and he will need it and then some.

Give till it hurts!


1,048 posted on 01/03/2012 8:11:12 PM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 952 | View Replies]

To: onyx

They are going to Gingrich HQ very soon. Flip back and forth.


1,049 posted on 01/03/2012 8:11:20 PM PST by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1015 | View Replies]

To: onyx

With his nose pressed up against a window of the debate venue???


1,050 posted on 01/03/2012 8:11:36 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1026 | View Replies]

FOXNews projects Paul at 3rd.


1,051 posted on 01/03/2012 8:11:58 PM PST by matt1234 (Bring back the HUAC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1039 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

the backstabber, Bishop Romney, is NOT ELIGIBLE.

he is nothing but a Soros-backed, DNC-posing saboteur.

Romney is a guaranteed Loss for the GOP.


1,052 posted on 01/03/2012 8:12:03 PM PST by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1024 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin

Don’t worry about Santorum and the life issues. He’ll spend plenty of time and effort on the economy if he wins the nomination.


1,053 posted on 01/03/2012 8:12:03 PM PST by Deo volente (God willing, America will survive this Obamination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1025 | View Replies]

To: Pappy Smear; MSF BU; Free Vulcan; All

810 posted on Tuesday, January 03, 2012 9:34:06 PM by Pappy Smear: “(MSFBU asked) Does anybody know if the later report caucus sites tend to be more or less conservative...?”
One thing I noticed on the map, Jefferson and Story Counties (Fairfield and Ames) have not reported yet. They will likely have strong Paul votes. (Jefferson was the only county Paul won in 08, and Story is home of Iowa State University, where I expect Paul would win. However, 3 NW counties which are huge social conservative counties have not reported. I would think they would be heavy Santorum and Perry support.”

Pappy Smear is right. The later counties to report are generally those in northwest Iowa, which while they may have lower populations have a stronger voice in the caucuses.

With the interesting exception of Plymouth County (just north of the metropolis of Sioux City, Iowa’s largest western city), most have gone for Santorum so far.


1,054 posted on 01/03/2012 8:12:11 PM PST by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 810 | View Replies]

To: JohnBovenmyer

Paulbots in Iowa are over 40 dopers.


1,055 posted on 01/03/2012 8:12:18 PM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1035 | View Replies]

To: StarFan

Yikes, thanks. I just heard that. The question is when will Faux let him speak?


1,056 posted on 01/03/2012 8:13:10 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC:DONATE MONTHLY! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1030 | View Replies]

To: altura

I’d bet there are more Santorum than Perry supporters on FR. So are you saying FR has gone mad also?


1,057 posted on 01/03/2012 8:13:16 PM PST by teg_76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1037 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

I think the other big loser tonight was Ron Paul. I really think he had to go out and win to really have any story to tell. He has a cult following but that will go by the wayside. I think Sanatorum will stay in the picture. Romney’s to lose, unfortunately, and I think tonight’s results are a win. Newt can take SC but I don’t think he goes all the way. The question is, can anyone stop Romney, I know there are a lot a votes against, but unless one person comes out as a true one on one challenger, I think Romney moves through and wins.


1,058 posted on 01/03/2012 8:13:21 PM PST by shoedog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1041 | View Replies]

To: CSI007

” With Newts crushing lose tonight his coffers will dry up fast.” <<<

Conservatives are holding out for the South Carolina contest, thank you very much, where WE get to speak for a change. So, please hold your breath. (Recalling McCain lost to fourth place on this night and won the dang nomination.) Get a grip when you saw legs off.


1,059 posted on 01/03/2012 8:13:36 PM PST by RitaOK (The higher you poll in Iowa, the more embarrassing it is for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 910 | View Replies]

CNN projecting that Ron Paul will finish in 3rd.


1,060 posted on 01/03/2012 8:13:40 PM PST by Mozilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1051 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,021-1,0401,041-1,0601,061-1,080 ... 2,121-2,136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson