Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Club for Growth Blasts Gingrich for Bain Attacks
National Review Online ^ | January 9, 2012 | Patrick Brennan

Posted on 01/09/2012 10:01:52 PM PST by Saundra Duffy

In a press release this afternoon, Club for Growth criticized Newt Gingrich for his attacks on Mitt Romney’s career at Bain Capital, calling them unbecoming a “Reagan Conservative.” Club for Growth’s statement:

Yesterday, Gingrich said “Those of us who believe in free markets and those of us who believe that in fact the whole goal of investment is entrepreneurship and job creation…we find it pretty hard to justify rich people figuring out clever legal ways to loot a company, leaving behind 1,700 families without a job.” Gingrich’s attack was echoed that same day that by the Democratic National Committee, which also attacked Romney for his job creation record at Bain Capital.

“Newt Gingrich’s attacks on Mitt Romney’s record at Bain Capital are disgusting,” said Club for Growth President Chris Chocola. “There are a number of issues for Mitt Romney’s Republican opponents to attack him for, but attacking him for making investments in companies to create a profit for his investors is just wrong. Because of the efforts of Bain Capital, major companies like Staples, Domino’s Pizza, and the Sports Authority now employ thousands of people and have created billions in wealth in the private economy. Attacking Governor Romney for participating in free-market capitalism is just beyond the pale for any purported ‘Reagan Conservative.’ Newt Gingrich should stop his attacks on free markets and apologize to Governor Romney for them.”


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2ndammendment; americanlegion; bain; banglist; biglobbyist; bishopromneyfairy; commiesonthread; contractwiththeearth; ethics300k; freddienewt; gingrich; goa; googlenewtlautenberg; greenbooks; gunownersofamerica; jews4presfaownership; jpfo; mobysonthread; natrifleassoc; newtcrossedgunowners; newtgunfreezones; newthealthcarelobby; newtlautenberg; newtvotesantigun1996; nra; romney; usmc; vfw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-260 next last
To: Saundra Duffy
Romney CANNOT be trusted, as we all know,
except to lie and to hurt people and dogs for himself.

Romney makes Obama's ineligibility MOOT.
THAT is why the DNC wants him.

Romney makes Obama's ObamaCARE/RomneyCARE MOOT.
THAT is why the DNC wants him.

Romney makes Obama's IAG issues MOOT.
THAT is why the DNC wants him.

Romney makes Obama's Sharia issues MOOT.
THAT is why the DNC wants him.

Romney makes Obama's 911 Victory Mosque MOOT.
THAT is why the DNC wants him.

Romney makes Obama's RomneyMarriage/Gay Marriage issue MOOT.
THAT is why the DNC wants him.

Romney makes Obama's bad governmental history MOOT.
THAT is why the DNC wants him.

Romney makes Obama's AGW issue MOOT.
THAT is why the DNC wants him.

Romney makes Obama's liberal judge issue MOOT.
THAT is why the DNC wants him.


101 posted on 01/10/2012 4:30:48 AM PST by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Saundra Duffy:
"Gingrich is engaging in class warfare, side-by-side with the democrats."

No he is not.

Mr. Gingrich is protecting America from the pro-Sharia,
pro-911Victory Mosque, pro-TARP, pro-IAG, MITT ROMNEY.

We all know what a backstabbing, liar Romney is, so Mr. Gingrich
is acting like a true patriot.

102 posted on 01/10/2012 4:42:38 AM PST by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Sure, And your still supporting him. AFTER he comes out with comments and an ad which reveal him (NEWT) to be ANTI-CAPITALIST!

I'd say that this rather clearly reveals Newt supporters as Anti-Capitalist/Communist/Statists.

Looks like the DNC and OWS have infiltrated to pressure others to vote for Gingrich, using typical irrational Leftist tactics.

(e.g., http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/)

103 posted on 01/10/2012 5:00:59 AM PST by PENANCE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: PENANCE
This place is lost, man.

"free" "republic" my hairy white ass!

Last refuge of Leftist and Anarchist propagandists and sowers of dissent and disinformation.

104 posted on 01/10/2012 5:03:04 AM PST by PENANCE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
I agree, the Bain attacks are lame & wrongheaded.

OTOH, bad karma gets you lame & wrongheaded attacks.

105 posted on 01/10/2012 5:28:00 AM PST by Tribune7 (Vote Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
Free trade is a political heist that can be colored pro business or pro union. IMHO, it is a political platform instituted by politicians to control and enforce favoritism.

My business doesn't entail direct overseas marketing. I don't buy or sell goods. We sell services and we do it very well.

If I take Newt's Bain commercial and apply it to my business over the years Newt would have me look like a bad guy. I built my business from nothing. I employed good people, trained them well and paid them well. After 30 years in the business I had an opportunity to sell my business to a large NYSE business. I was approaching my early 60’s, the economy was again tettering and I wanted to retire and spend time traveling with my wife and family. I sold the business and in the process knew that people would be let go and my organization restructured into the acquiring entity. People were laid off and offices reduced in size or closed.

So, what does that make me? A Bain Capitalist? I created wealth for me and my family. I provided jobs for more than 30 years to my employees. I provided training for many that left and started similar successful businesses.
I paid millions of dollars in capital gains taxes.

What kind of “monster” am I in Newt Gingrich's eyes? When I saw this anti-capitalism add it made me furious. It still does when I think of that short 30 second shot.

Newt has relied on the United States Government for his clients. I didn't. From what I can tell, Newt's fortunes were made on the backs of taxpayers. Mine didn't. It took 30 years to make my American Dream come true. Newt accomplished his in almost half the time with luxury offices in DC and a full staff. I started working in small rental office in the suburbs.

I apologize for not answering your free trade question. However, I feel better getting this off my chest. I won't watch anymore debates. I am not going for the Anyone But Obama Ticket.

106 posted on 01/10/2012 6:19:02 AM PST by not2worry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; calcowgirl; Gilbo_3; ...
Club for Growth is right.

Once again Newt fires and hits another bystander : Capitalism. Newt's the 'shoot from the hip' kind of guy and you never know what he will hit.

His rhetoric feeds perfectly into the 'bail out the auto industry' argument that Obama is using for re-election.

107 posted on 01/10/2012 6:19:28 AM PST by sickoflibs (You MUST support the lesser of two RINOs or we all die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

Yes, it is a crappy attack to make, vis-a-vis Capitalism. But Romney MUST be f-ing destroyed, by any means necessary. Wreck his campaign, leave him in disgrace, make his wife and children sob in despair. I do not care. No more f**king McCains!


108 posted on 01/10/2012 6:48:15 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

1) Aligning corporate raiding to supply side growth economics is an insult to Reagan, Kemp, and Laffer.

2) If Mittens can’t defend his record on his own Obama will kill him in the general.

Defeat Mittens Kittens.


109 posted on 01/10/2012 6:50:17 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
RE :"1) Aligning corporate raiding to supply side growth economics is an insult to Reagan, Kemp, and Laffer. 2) If Mittens can’t defend his record on his own Obama will kill him in the general."

It's OK with me if Newt wants to play the Obama-surgate and test Romney against Obama-style leftist arguments currently being made on MSNBC, even bringing him down that way is OK with me.
However Newt making their arguments so passionately isn't going to convince me or many others that Newt is sincere when he says he believes he 'made a mistake teaming with Pelosi on Climate change' and his other recent liberal adventures.

110 posted on 01/10/2012 7:12:35 AM PST by sickoflibs (You MUST support the lesser of two RINOs or we all die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

>> I think of bald guys talking about going swimming and picking up young women. <<

And the trouble with that is _____ ???


111 posted on 01/10/2012 7:16:22 AM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jpsb
>> If elected I will institute a local community board that will determine if the poor man does in fact deserved to be fired. <<

A fantastic idea! Just what we need to solve our unemployment problems -- let's elect a community organizer for President!

Oh, wait . . . .

112 posted on 01/10/2012 7:22:23 AM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Art in Idaho

>> want to see Newt debate Obama? <<

I think the TOTUS’s handlers wouldn’t let him debate Newt. They’d find some disingenious way to explain their decision, and the MSM would back them to the hilt.


113 posted on 01/10/2012 7:26:07 AM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

“It’s OK with me if Newt wants to play the Obama-surgate”

Since Mittens is Obama Lite anyway, the surrogate things shouldn’t bother him.

To view how Romney savaged Gingrich in Iowa and expect anything less is to stick one’s head in the sand.

I think it is Romney who said it best, “it’s not bean bags”


114 posted on 01/10/2012 7:27:04 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
RE :”Since Mittens is Obama Lite anyway, the surrogate things shouldn’t bother him. To view how Romney savaged Gingrich in Iowa and expect anything less is to stick one’s head in the sand.

You mean those ads that pointed out how Newt teamed up with Pelosi to make that climate change video together?

There is one difference, most of those ads went after Newt for his liberal adventures. They were not exactly the same attack approach that Obama will take. Newt is playing the Obama-MSNBC surrogate here testing Romney with the arguments they (Obama) will use. He will have trouble getting that liberal mud off his hands, but he might help Santorum move up against Romney.

115 posted on 01/10/2012 7:38:57 AM PST by sickoflibs (You MUST support the lesser of two RINOs or we all die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47
>> Gingrich has committed political self suicide <<

Yep, but it's more like a suicide bombing, where the perp kills not only himself and his target, but also injures a lot of innocent bystanders -- like you and me.

116 posted on 01/10/2012 7:39:31 AM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

It does not surprise me in the least that you do not see the problem of attacking capitalism as an economic model. CINOs are really outing themselves on this issue.


117 posted on 01/10/2012 7:40:29 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Actually I was referring to the liberal interpretation of sme events listed by Romney...

Like “Gingrich was ousted by his own”.

Very True...Boehner,Delay....Scarborough....to name a few, who went on to spend us into oblivion and ruin the Republican brand.

But you don’t get to respond to 11 million of ads and if you do, you are off message...

No problem.

Now Mittens can defend himself, with support from people like you btw and all of the Establishment pukes and their hypocritical indignation at the ads.

FUMR


118 posted on 01/10/2012 7:45:43 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

The prime corollary to the Eleventh Commandment is: Thou shalt ESPECIALLY not attack another Republican FROM THE LEFT.


119 posted on 01/10/2012 7:49:55 AM PST by denydenydeny (The more a system is all about equality in theory the more it's an aristocracy in practice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

Nobody is interested in your Ron Paul lies and cult.


120 posted on 01/10/2012 7:50:26 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

Well at least Ron Paul is not out there attacking capitalism. He is out there defending capitalism.


121 posted on 01/10/2012 7:54:30 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
RE :"Actually I was referring to the liberal interpretation of sme events listed by Romney... Like “Gingrich was ousted by his own”."

He was. That is not 'liberal' that is a fact.

The fact that Newt didn't want Iowa Republicans to know that (until the general election) is not very inspiring. He keeps bragging about all his successes 20 years ago in congress but a real success won't resign under pressure.

You don't think Democrats would try to get the next Republican POTUS to resign? They would play nicer than the ones in the 1990s?

122 posted on 01/10/2012 7:55:03 AM PST by sickoflibs (You MUST support the lesser of two RINOs or we all die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Hawthorn
>> want to see Newt debate Obama? <<

I think the TOTUS’s handlers wouldn’t let him debate Newt. They’d find some disingenious way to explain their decision, and the MSM would back them to the hilt.

Bad idea handlers. If you do that, Newt will win in a landslide. My guess is the whole anti-Newt push is a coordinated effort of Romney/Obama.

123 posted on 01/10/2012 7:56:29 AM PST by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

Neither is Gingrich. Palin attacked Crony capitalism and Gingrich is attacking Corporate Raider capitalism via Mitt Romney.

You have no idea what you’re talking about, you’re a PaulBot robotron with little brain.


124 posted on 01/10/2012 7:56:51 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

“He was. That is not ‘liberal’ that is a fact.”

You mean like the fact that you are a Romney supporter.


125 posted on 01/10/2012 7:59:41 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
RE :”You mean like the fact that you are a Romney supporter.

I am a TRUTH supporter.
I don't just pick a ‘favorite’ candidate like you do and then deny (call them ‘lies’) facts so obvious that anyone can find them on the internet in a few minutes, as I am sure Iowa Republicans did before voting. That is called KOOLAID and a recipe for disaster,..

126 posted on 01/10/2012 8:08:01 AM PST by sickoflibs (You MUST support the lesser of two RINOs or we all die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

Duffy’s carring water for the mittster now eh?


127 posted on 01/10/2012 8:10:04 AM PST by Godzilla (3/7/77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

You are a supporter of Romney...you sit on the couch of Romney and defend Romney.

That is a FACT.


128 posted on 01/10/2012 8:12:46 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
..watching Newt's townhall meetings, I am convinced that he is trying to win

Going nuclear on Romney IS payback for Iowa, BUT I believe he is in it to win it...

129 posted on 01/10/2012 8:14:47 AM PST by WalterSkinner ( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

So cheers Duffy.

130 posted on 01/10/2012 8:16:31 AM PST by Godzilla (3/7/77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
RE :”You are a supporter of Romney...you sit on the couch of Romney and defend Romney. That is a FACT.

You are a KOOLAID drinker. You deny facts that are so obvious that anyone can find them out in a few minutes on the internet, as did Iowa voters did about Newt before the vote much to your distress.

You defend MSNBC maddow and Schulz's current socialist/progressive arguments just because 'your guy' is making them.

131 posted on 01/10/2012 8:19:36 AM PST by sickoflibs (You MUST support the lesser of two RINOs or we all die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: WalterSkinner

Gingrich will win South Carolina and then the real game is on...he will also win Florida.


132 posted on 01/10/2012 8:19:45 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

Gingrich is making a mistake here.


133 posted on 01/10/2012 8:21:09 AM PST by svcw (For the new year: you better toughen up, if you are going to continue to be stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

Saundra Duffy, a Mormon, schilling for Mormon Mitt Romney - Surprise, Surprise!!!

Oh Saundra, how far you’ve fallen from the conservative in the trenches that you were, to a toe-the-line-mormon-over-and-above-all cheerleader. It would be embarrassing if it wasn’t so sad.


134 posted on 01/10/2012 8:22:09 AM PST by colorcountry (Comforting lies are not your friends. Painful truths are not your enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
You think Mitt would be a good President.

Really that says all we need to know about your opinion...

135 posted on 01/10/2012 8:22:51 AM PST by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
You think Mitt would be a good President.

Really that says all we need to know about your opinion...

136 posted on 01/10/2012 8:23:02 AM PST by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
Asked whether Romney’s corporate takeover experience at Bain Capital would be a liability, Santorum said: “I’m not making it a liability. I believe in the private sector.
Rick Santorum declines to hit Mitt Romney on Bain

Unlike Maddow, Schultz and you-know-who.

137 posted on 01/10/2012 8:24:07 AM PST by sickoflibs (You MUST support the lesser of two RINOs or we all die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

I’m not distressed at all. I said a year ago that it would either be Palin or it would be Romney.

I pray I’m wrong...but Gingrich is the only conservative that can beat Romney and it is a long shot, but it is our best shot.

If Santorum comes out of SC and Florida a winner then I’ll support him, but I don’t see it happening. Gingrich is only a few points behind Romney in SC and he will win there.

Quit supporting Mitt Romney, this is a conservative website. Get off his couch.


138 posted on 01/10/2012 8:24:31 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

Class warfare comes to the Republican Party now. Newt has become Pitchfork Pat. Whatta shame.


139 posted on 01/10/2012 8:26:52 AM PST by magritte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


140 posted on 01/10/2012 8:27:03 AM PST by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MadelineZapeezda

The truth in this says what?


141 posted on 01/10/2012 8:29:10 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

Candidates or family members serving in the US mlitary

Rick Perry...Served

Ron Paul...Served

Rick Santorum...Father served

Newt Gingrich...Father served

John Huntsman...TWO sons serving now

Williard Mitt Romney... BLANK...Draft dodger..

No Romney for generations right back to the original arriving in the US has ever served in the US military

This is UNUSUAL for an established American family...

The Romneys never served in

the Spanish American War,
the First World War
The Second World War
Korea
Vietnam
Granada
Irag
Afghanistan

The Romneys cannot be called “patriotic”


142 posted on 01/10/2012 8:29:31 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

..though we are supporting Santorum right now, I can’t deny what I have been seeing the last few days—Newt is rolling...


143 posted on 01/10/2012 8:29:56 AM PST by WalterSkinner ( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
Don’t confuse Paulitards with facts, it confuses them and wastes your time...
144 posted on 01/10/2012 8:30:46 AM PST by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
RE :..this is a conservative website.

Really??
If you know that then why are you making the same progressive/socialist arguments that the leftists at MSNBC are making ? Is that what you wanted Palin to do if she had any interest in running?

145 posted on 01/10/2012 8:32:16 AM PST by sickoflibs (You MUST support the lesser of two RINOs or we all die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

So the basis of your argument is Gingrich is attacking Romney from the Left (which I would deny)

But you are attacking Gingrich from the Left with Mitt Romney as your conduit, since he is a RINO progressive.

It’s laughable. If you think about, you’d agree it’s laughable.


146 posted on 01/10/2012 8:39:15 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
RE :”So the basis of your argument is Gingrich is attacking Romney from the Left

More specifically Newt is showing too much comfort while using OWS progressive socialist anti-capitalist arguments for his own ends.

Asked whether Romney’s corporate takeover experience at Bain Capital would be a liability, Santorum said: “I’m not making it a liability. I believe in the private sector.
Rick Santorum declines to hit Mitt Romney on Bain

Unlike Noot apparently.

147 posted on 01/10/2012 8:50:04 AM PST by sickoflibs (You MUST support the lesser of two RINOs or we all die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
RE :" I said a year ago that it would either be Palin or it would be Romney"

There's your problem right there. She has too good a gig at FNC to muss herself up fighting with RINO's like Romney. At least noot is giving it a shot.

148 posted on 01/10/2012 8:54:09 AM PST by sickoflibs (You MUST support the lesser of two RINOs or we all die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

LOL, I knew you weren’t a Mitt supporter.

I was making a point, and it is a valid point. You are attacking Gingrich from the Left and accusing Gingrich of attacking Mitt from the Left.

Why not just espouse Santorum’s positive points.

After Florida, and preferably SC, one of them has to get out, or we get MF Romney.


149 posted on 01/10/2012 9:02:14 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
RE :"LOL, I knew you weren’t a Mitt supporter."

SHHH, that's our little secret LOL

150 posted on 01/10/2012 9:22:24 AM PST by sickoflibs (You MUST support the lesser of two RINOs or we all die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 251-260 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson