Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Old but relevant: Bain part-owner Clear Channel
Clear Channel Corporate ^ | April 18, 2007 | Clear Channel

Posted on 01/10/2012 6:38:08 PM PST by NoPrisoners

San Antonio, Texas, April 18, 2007 – Clear Channel Communications, Inc. (NYSE: CCU) today announced that it has entered into an amendment to its previously announced merger agreement with a private equity group co-led by Bain Capital Partners, LLC and Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P., providing for an increase to $39.00 per share in the price shareholders will receive in cash for each share of Clear Channel common stock they hold. This is an increase from the previous price of $37.60 per share in cash.

(Excerpt) Read more at clearchannel.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aha; bain; clearchannel; corruption; limbaugh; newt; romney; rushlimbaugh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: dfwgator

see there? Even quicker than I thought.

Don’t worry... Republicans are just stupid enough to eat their own and your boy will easily be re-elected.


21 posted on 01/10/2012 7:55:20 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I'd give us one chance in three. More tea anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
Conservative FReepers will have nothing to do with either one of them.,/p>

Better reread this thread. Lots of Romney-bots in here!

22 posted on 01/10/2012 7:56:14 PM PST by NoPrisoners ("When in the course of human events...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
.


"Dream On about your OWS Sign Fantasy" ...


Like your photo of Obama-Lenin ... looks like we've both been here (almost) since the beginning ...


.
23 posted on 01/10/2012 7:57:28 PM PST by Patton@Bastogne (Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin in 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
It's right on top in red on the home page:

ObamaCare = RomneyCare = CommieCare. NO Romney! NO WAY!!

24 posted on 01/10/2012 7:57:59 PM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
Bye bye Newt.

I hope you're ready to pull the lever for Romney then, because that's who the Establishment wants.

25 posted on 01/10/2012 7:58:47 PM PST by NoPrisoners ("When in the course of human events...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne
"Dream On about your OWS Sign Fantasy" ...

It's not a dream, it's exactly what you're behaving like. Your own words condemn you.

Remember: It doesn't matter what you call yourself. What matters are the words you use in expressing your ideas.

Your post reads exactly like any number of OWS signs I see on a daily basis as they protest outside the very building I work in every day.

In the words of Bill Engvall, "Here's your sign."

26 posted on 01/10/2012 8:01:49 PM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

yeah, whatever. Its not even fun to discuss anymore. Knock yourself out.


27 posted on 01/10/2012 8:03:09 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I'd give us one chance in three. More tea anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne
OK, let`s have it--no more of these same cliches over and over.

Post the evidence that Romney fired people who di(n`t have to be fired. Articles, testimony--FACTS not just hyperbole.

We are seeing why Newt `Pelosi`s Couchmate` Gingrich should get out and let one of the actual conservatives take hold and defeat Romney NOW--because Newt will do anything to win, even repeat these Occupy talking points and help create a `meme` for those who will be attacking not Romney but CAPITALISM. `Even Newt Gingrich says...` they`ll be telling us.

This isn`t about Romney but about Newt brainwashing `conservatives` to Obama`s way of `morality in business.`

Let`s have it--the facts, not just assertions. Let`s see the proof of all these jobs that didn`t have to be cut, oh oracle of how businesses should be run. {How many businesses has Newt run, other than consulting for Fannie/Freddie?]

Capitalism--yes! `Two Americas` Gingrich New Age crap--NO!

28 posted on 01/10/2012 8:03:20 PM PST by Darkwolf377 ( It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies.--C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NoPrisoners
I hope you're ready to pull the lever for Romney then

Never said I was. Can you find in any post of mine over the last 10+ years that I've said anything about ever voting for Romney?

You can look through my rich, sometimes sordid history of posting on here and never find such words.

But let me add this anyway: Not just NO, but HELL NO. If anything, I seem to be a voter without a candidate at this point. Probably won't matter, by the time the primaries get to my state it's typically all over anyway.

29 posted on 01/10/2012 8:04:42 PM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

Have fun voting for your pro-gay, pro-abortion, corporate-raiding, socialist.


30 posted on 01/10/2012 8:05:56 PM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

I agree with you. But as the other candidates start looking more and more like clowns, Mitt starts to look better in comparison. In any event, I will swim through burning molasses to vote for Obama’s opponent.


31 posted on 01/10/2012 8:09:30 PM PST by sand lake bar (You have not converted a man because you have silenced him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bobk333
Damn straight.

If Gingrich is incapable of taking out Romney by using his record--which has more than enough to do the job--and has to smear the very business ideas that will revive the economy [yes, sorry, restructuring, FIRING some employees, investing and GROWING businesses doesn`t always mean everyone is happy in the end--welcome to #he adult world!] he is only proving he is unfit to be president.

I guess he wasn`t worried about all this `questionable` wealth when he was spending money at Sacks or wherever it was. [His finances are off-limits, but he thinks government should prevent people from making `too much`?]

32 posted on 01/10/2012 8:10:19 PM PST by Darkwolf377 ( It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies.--C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

“Romney made huge fortune while workers lost jobs, stockholders and creditors lost money. Here’s just one example:

In 1992, Mitt Romney was running Bain Capital, a private equity firm. Bain Capital bought American Pad & Paper Co. (Ampad) for $5 million.

Over the next several years Romney’s firm bled the company dry. Hundreds of workers lost their jobs. Stockholders were left with worthless shares. Creditors and vendors were paid less than 50 cents on the dollar. While they were exploiting the company, Romney’s firm charged Ampad millions of dollars in “management fees.” In all, Romney and his investors reaped more than $100 million dollars from the deal.”
[http://www.massresistance.org/romney/ampad_062607/index.html]


33 posted on 01/10/2012 8:26:41 PM PST by NoPrisoners ("When in the course of human events...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: balls

Yeah, this whole joint has gone insane. This is boiler-plate socialist, leftist crap. Gingrich and Perry are, seemingly, ready to completely poison the well. This week may go down as the week an Obama second term was insured. The greedy, heartless capitalistic Republican meme has been bonafide now by fellow republicans.


34 posted on 01/10/2012 8:26:41 PM PST by SoDak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377; Ramius; usconservative; woofie; Dave W

I think it’s time to not dignify with a response the ignorance on display on this thread. Who would have thought that to be against four more years of 0 would be anti-Conservative?


35 posted on 01/10/2012 8:29:09 PM PST by balls (0 lies like a Muslim (Google "taqiyya"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: NoPrisoners
Better reread this thread. Lots of Romney-bots in here!

I said "Conservative FReepers". There are FReepers that will bend over for the GOP if Willard gets the nomination. They are not conservative.
36 posted on 01/10/2012 8:32:25 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NoPrisoners

You stated that Rush Limbaugh is in the pocket of Romney because Bain capital owned some of Clear Channel

Once again That is absurd BS

grow up
take up basket weaving ....do anything but come up with BS crackpot theories .....you are not good at it


37 posted on 01/10/2012 8:43:13 PM PST by woofie (It takes three villages and a forest of woodland creatures to raise a child in Obamaville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: bobk333
Dangerous leftists? How about realists?

Do you really believe that, in a time of long term, high unemployment, where a high percentage of people have recent experience with being fired or laid off or simply lost their job when the company they worked for went out of business, are going to vote for someone who "likes to fire people" as Romney will now be known for?

Do you really believe that in a country where the majority of businesses are small to medium sized, single owner/entrepreneur run/owned, corporate raiders are thought of as average capitalists, just like the rest of us?

Trust me on this, Romney's business model, the one he'll be known for in this coming election, is a form of capitalism and legal, but it is not held in high regard when times are good and especially not when we're struggling with obamanomics.

38 posted on 01/10/2012 9:31:33 PM PST by GBA (Natural Born American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: woofie
You stated that Rush Limbaugh is in the pocket of Romney because Bain capital owned some of Clear Channel

Please give me the post number where I said that Rush is in Romney's pocket.

grow up take up basket weaving ....do anything but come up with BS crackpot theories .....you are not good at it

And you think Obama will give Romney a pass on this? You think it will have all been forgotten and swept under the carpet? It'll be ok with the Libs that Romney put people out of their jobs and hauled in lots of money in the process?

Ha! You try growing up. My criticisms are NOTHING compared to the roasting Romney will receive if/when he gets the nomination.

Like Obama do you? Well you'll get 4 more years to like him because of Mitt.

39 posted on 01/10/2012 9:46:20 PM PST by NoPrisoners ("When in the course of human events...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: GBA
Do you really believe that, in a time of long term, high unemployment, where a high percentage of people have recent experience with being fired or laid off or simply lost their job when the company they worked for went out of business, are going to vote for someone who "likes to fire people" as Romney will now be known for?

EXACTLY!!!

40 posted on 01/10/2012 9:47:51 PM PST by NoPrisoners ("When in the course of human events...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson