Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DRUDGE SIRENS: NETWORK TO AIR INTERVIEW THURSDAY ON NIGHTLINE
Drudge ^ | Wednesday January 17, 2012

Posted on 01/18/2012 3:41:06 PM PST by Bigtigermike

Exclusive... Developing...just headlines

(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abcnes; abcnews4romney; axlerod; axlerodmachine; bhoaxlerod; drudge; drudge4romney; gingrich; marianne; mariannegingrich; newt; newtgingrich; obama; questionthetiming; rinoromney; romneydirtytrick; roviandirtytrick; smellslikeaxlerod; smellslikemitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 541-543 next last
To: garykfd

How do we know this is a big deal? She once made some nasty remarks, and said she could destroy him in one interview.

Then again, ANY ex-wife could destroy ANY ex-husband’s political career with one interview.

For that matter, any CURRENT wife could destroy her husband’s political career with one interview!


361 posted on 01/18/2012 5:46:45 PM PST by cookcounty (Newt 2012: ---> Because he got it DONE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
Is Breitbart shilling for any particular candidate, or can we trust what he would come up with?

The last time I heard anything major out of Breitbart was last month when he came out in defense of Rick Perry's top pollster, Tony Fabrizio, who was outed as being gay by a supposed gay GOP group "GOProud". Breitbart blasted "GOProud" and I figured he was in favor of Perry since he was defending Perry's staff and ripping into the GOProud group for revealing Fabrizio's sexuality.
362 posted on 01/18/2012 5:47:29 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

After all the turmoil, litigation, press, etc. regarding Obama’s BC, if you honestly think that Santorum would run for President without being constitutionally qualified, then I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.

Yikes, I said I wasn’t going to dignify your pablum, but I did anyway. Doh!


363 posted on 01/18/2012 5:47:39 PM PST by disraeligears (How was the CREAM Madison Square Garden Concert?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: Toespi
Weeeeelllll. As to illegal -

Opposition Dossier on Romney Hits Internet

Romney Sat On Board Of Damon Clinical Laboratories, A Bain Capital Portfolio Company Fined Nearly$120 Million In 1996 Due To Medicare Fraud.

364 posted on 01/18/2012 5:47:47 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

"I see the A-holes at ABC ginning up a non story or something that most people already know about so that they can lay a cloud of doubt over Newt at a time when he could beat Mittens in SC. They will hold the “story” until Monday and then when it comes out, it will have already caused it’s damage."

Yep. And they're acting all sanctimonious here, as if they are making a serious choice according to "journalistic ethical standards".

365 posted on 01/18/2012 5:48:07 PM PST by Qbert ("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" - William F. Buckley, Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Yes but they were still married in 1995 when she said she’d do this if he ran.


366 posted on 01/18/2012 5:48:48 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

He’s been pretty equal to all the candidates- both good and bad.


367 posted on 01/18/2012 5:49:10 PM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Thanks for the heads up! :-)


368 posted on 01/18/2012 5:49:32 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

Comment #369 Removed by Moderator

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
According to the 1995 Vanity Fair article, she’s been plotting ways to derail his presidential aspirations since they were married.

Marianne sounds like a real catch.


For the Obama team who is always trolling for something to destroy his opponents. It seems that when there is someone exuding a desire to destroy, there are forces that are attracted to that person like sharks to blood in the water, forces that are eager to appropriate and amplify the destructive potential.
370 posted on 01/18/2012 5:51:44 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
My mother and father were already in the process of getting a divorce, which she requested.

Gee, I wonder if Newt's adulterous affair had anything to do with that request?

371 posted on 01/18/2012 5:52:00 PM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: Qbert
Yep. And they're acting all sanctimonious here, as if they are making a serious choice according to "journalistic ethical standards".

The same organization that hosted one of the most horrible debates out of all of them. "Journalistic ethical standards" is a joke when it comes to them. George Snuffleupagus was trying to ambush candidates with ridiculous questions and then admitted part of it was a ruse.
372 posted on 01/18/2012 5:52:22 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: Churchillspirit
"If the story is about a Republican why would it cause “civil war” at ABC ....they would all rush to air it, so maybe it is something distasteful about a ‘rat. "

Maybe it's a big nothing, and by "teasing" the voters, they can pump up Romney.

What's the point in holding it if it's real dirt? Even if Newt won SC and the story turned out to be horrible, Romney would just steamroll him the rest of the way

...on the other hand, if Newt drops too now, Gingrich's followers would go 98% to Santorum, and with Perry faltering.......

Hmmmm....

373 posted on 01/18/2012 5:52:31 PM PST by cookcounty (Newt 2012: ---> Because he got it DONE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
According to the 1995 Vanity Fair article, she’s been plotting ways to derail his presidential aspirations since they were married.

Marianne sounds like a real catch.


I wonder how Dobson would have liked that person to be first lady.
374 posted on 01/18/2012 5:53:00 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: merrylu

All of this is the danger of Newt winning the GOP nomination. By Labor Day Newt would have the tabloids, Obama will have the Rose Garden.

Gingrich spells electoral disaster.


375 posted on 01/18/2012 5:54:08 PM PST by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: disraeligears

After having the entire R establishment, media, courts, so-called “conservative” media, etc tell us that it’s nobody’s stinking business whether he is or isn’t qualified, why should he even care whether he was qualified? The official party and judicial line is that it’s nobody’s business. He just watched a guy get away with 2 bad forgeries while even the pubbies mocked those of us who had a problem with it.

I don’t trust any of these critters. Not any more. They’ve already told me that they don’t care about the rule of law and that they will mock me if I care.

From now on, I don’t trust anybody who refuses to verify what they claim. If that’s too much for Santorum to do then screw him. The R’s choosing a candidate without making sure he’s eligible is the ONLY way I would either sit out the election or vote third-party or write-in. Deal with it.


376 posted on 01/18/2012 5:54:23 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

She has severe “unresolved anger issues.”

Sounds like she was always in competition with Newt, so he eventually dumped her.


377 posted on 01/18/2012 5:54:29 PM PST by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC - DONATE MONTHLY! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty
Definitely back fire worthy:


378 posted on 01/18/2012 5:55:12 PM PST by show
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: disraeligears
Please consider Santorum before it is too late to matter.

No. Santorum is a priggish establishment statist. His wraps himself in "family values" to cover his love of government expansion like Medicare Part D, disdain or the 10th amendment, indefensible support of Democrat turncoat Arlen Spector over conservative Pat Toomey and his embrace of neocon interventionist foreign policy.

Rick Santorum is the worst of W without the charm, none of the executive experience and a law degree as well.

This ancient history "baggage" rap on Newt is the height of hypocrisy but I have come to expect it from from the so-called "forgiving" evangelical community. Maybe Newt's real "sin" is that he left the Southern Baptists for Catholicism when he sorted out his personal life.

Your moral high horse friends want a life of pristine personal morality in a president? How's Obama working out for them? I suggest they review their Bibles for the flawed men God chose and used to political (and sometimes spiritual) leaders.

379 posted on 01/18/2012 5:55:54 PM PST by newzjunkey (Imbecilic early voters doom us all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: All
Newt is soaring in the polls after his debate performance this past Monday.

This hit piece is timed to make sure he doesn't win South Carolina on Saturday.

380 posted on 01/18/2012 5:56:27 PM PST by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 541-543 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson