Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney calls on Gingrich to release House Ethics report
The Hill ^ | 01/20/12 12:28 PM ET | Cameron Joseph

Posted on 01/20/2012 12:46:34 PM PST by BradtotheBone

GILBERT, S.C. — Mitt Romney and a top surrogate called for Newt Gingrich, Romney's chief rival for the Republican presidential nomination, to release the House Ethics Committee report that led to a reprimand of Gingrich and a $300,000 fine.

After Romney was pressed on his tax returns, Gov. Nikki Haley (R-S.C.) stepped in and interrupted Romney.

"The people of South Carolina are not talking about tax returns. They're not. They're talking about jobs, spending and the economy," she said before taking a shot at Gingrich, who is neck and neck with Romney in recent polls of South Carolina.

"In all honesty, I've heard more people wondering why you guys aren't asking about Ethics reports and ethics problems with the Gingrich campaign."

Romney then agreed with Haley that Gingrich should release the Ethics investigation immediately.

"Of course he should," Romney told reporters. "One of the issues that was raised last night by Rick Santorum was the fact that he was pushed out of the House by his fellow members. I think over 80 percent of Republican congressmen voted to reprimand the Speaker of the House, the first time in history. And Nancy Pelosi has the full record of that Ethics investigation. You know it's going to get out before the general election. Sure, he ought to get it out now."

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: badloserromney; badsportromney; benedictromney; bowb4romney; collapsingromney; cowardromney; gingrich; loserromney; newt; pettyromney; piousbishopromney; poorsportromney; rinoromney; romney; romneyinhiding; romneythespoiler; romneyunderskirts; saboteurromney; tokyoromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-108 next last
To: BradtotheBone
Dear Nikki Haley, Please STFU. Looking forward to your re-election campaign.

Signed, A South Carolinian voter.
51 posted on 01/20/2012 1:26:37 PM PST by stylecouncilor (Some minds are like soup in a poor restaurant...better left unstirred.-PG Wodehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Thank you, it saved me a post except to say that Romney really needs better staff. This group doesn’t play defense very well when their dirty tricks blow up in their faces.


52 posted on 01/20/2012 1:28:56 PM PST by Steamburg (The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Fantastic video! Hilarious!


53 posted on 01/20/2012 1:28:56 PM PST by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Here is some more ...

Bozell Statement: Newt Was Found Innocent Nearly 13 Years Ago – Networks Have Yet To Report It

By Brent Bozell | December 07, 2011 | 14:40
50
Change font size: A | A
Brent Bozell’s picture

Following the recent threats from Nancy Pelosi and the heavy brush with which the media are painting Newt Gingrich as unethical, the Media Research Center is now calling on the networks to seize the moment and report the truth from nearly 13 years ago.

It has been 4,689 days since the IRS formally cleared Newt Gingrich of any violation of tax law. It’s been 4,689 days since ABC, CBS, and NBC have had the opportunity to report it. What the heck. Why not today? Now is the time for these networks to report the truth for once. The networks owe it to the American people to report the fact that in 1999 the IRS completely vindicated Gingrich.

Between December 15, 1996 and January 31, 1997 the network morning and evening newscasts filed a staggering 244 stories. Total number of network stories on the news that Newt was completely innocent? Zero. That’s beyond pathetic.

Oh and what about CNN? We found that the cable network filed one — count ‘em, one — story. They’re probably exhausted by all that effort, so we’ll let them off the hook.

See Bozell’s column “ Newt Is Vindicated, But Nobody Knows It” in February of 1999, detailing how the IRS cleared Gingrich of any violation of the tax laws but was spiked from being covered by ABC, CBS and NBC News.

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-bozell/2011/12/07/bozell-statement-newt-was-found-innocent-nearly-13-years-ago-networks-#ixzz1ikUZ4olc


54 posted on 01/20/2012 1:29:46 PM PST by ConfidentConservative (If my people shall humble themselves and pray,I will hear from Heaven and heal their land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tsowellfan

He seems just the petty type. It’s certainly not about America with this spiteful little girl. He reminds me of Nelly Oleson.


55 posted on 01/20/2012 1:30:53 PM PST by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: WalterSkinner
South Carolina will probably reelect her again as they keep reelecting that doofus Lindsay. South Carolina is a strange state with regards to their electing people. Again, she was put on a pedestal here at Free Republic. It happens way too much that we put people way higher than they deserve. Anyway, who knows she might have decided that one term as Governor is all she wants. I can't imagine that she really feels that Romney is what is best for America. She should be supporting Santorum or Newt. But again this is calculated and I believe she got into office and sees that she didn't like it like she thought she would and probably will bow out in 2014. Just my hunch.
56 posted on 01/20/2012 1:31:13 PM PST by napscoordinator (Newt MUST win the nomination to get rid of Romney and Obama....Dear God let November 2012 go our way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Leep

LOL, It’s true that every cloud has a silver lining!


57 posted on 01/20/2012 1:32:56 PM PST by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

THEN to make SURE everyone understands Newt Gingrich was NOT FINED!!!

Words from their own mouths....

House Rep’s statement on Newt Gingrich’s Non Fine...

Numerous statements from elected officials and other individuals associated with the Committee’s investigation make it clear that the sanction levied against Speaker Gingrich was nothing more than a cost assessment. In presenting the Report to the Members of the House, former Congresswoman Nancy Johnson (R-CT) characterized the Speaker’s payment in the following manner:

“Likewise in past cases where the committee imposed monetary sanctions on a Member, the committee found that the Member had been personally enriched by the misconduct. The committee made no such finding against Representative Gingrich, yet recommends that a cost reimbursement of $300,000 be paid to the House by him.”

Likewise, Democrat Congressman Adam Schiff (D-CA), a member of the Investigation Subcommittee, described the Report findings in the Congressional Record as follows:

“Based upon the allegation, the violations we found, the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct on a 7-to-1 vote, full committee now, entire committee, recommended the following penalty. It recommended a reprimand and a cost assessment of $300,000. . . . We set $300,000 as the estimated costs of that portion of the investigation that dealt with clearing up the misstatements that we received, which may be begun to be prepared in Mr. Gingrich’s law firm, but for which he is responsible as Member of the House.”

Indeed, even Democrat Congressman (now Senator) Ben Cardin (D-MD) agreed on the proper classification of the Speaker’s $300,000 payment. In his remarks to the House urging adoption of the Ethics Committee Report and Resolution, then-Congressman Cardin described the proposed sanction against Speaker Gingrich in the following manner:

“It provides a reprimand plus a required $300,000 contribution by Mr. Gingrich to the cost of these proceedings.”

Moreover, in the transcript of the sanctions proceedings before the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, Special Counsel to the House Ethics Committee James Cole could not have made it more clear when he responded to questions from Congressman Thomas Sawyer (D-OH) as follows:

“In addition, this is not a fine that we are recommending. The rule book says that a fine is an appropriate sanction when a member has received personal gain. And as Mr. Smith had asked and as I told him, no, we did not find that.”

In sum, there was never any fine levied against Speaker Gingrich as a result of the findings of the House Ethics Committee Report referenced in the subject advertisements. Any statement to the contrary in any broadcast communication produced on behalf of Governor Romney, any other presidential candidate, or any SuperPAC is all at once false, misleading, and defamatory.

http://gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com/2012/01/06/gispeaker-gingrich-says-it-is-false-and-defamatory-he-unleashes-his-lawyer-about-romney-superpac-and-official-romney-ads-for-president/?


58 posted on 01/20/2012 1:33:35 PM PST by ConfidentConservative (If my people shall humble themselves and pray,I will hear from Heaven and heal their land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Romney destroyed hard drives from his Governorship,
and then refused to release IRS papers just this week.

Romney covered up the BIG DIG fiasco and installed
the NEW YORK TIMES agenda against the Mass.
Constitution.

How above us all the carpetbagger RINO Romney truly is.


59 posted on 01/20/2012 1:35:36 PM PST by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
Again, she was put on a pedestal here at Free Republic. It happens way too much that we put people way higher than they deserve.

Amen to that. No matter who we support, we need to remember why we support them and quit making it about the person, or we're going to be bambozled every time. We rightly made fun of the left for slobbering over Hussein the way they do. It's the policies and drection of the nation, not the person.
60 posted on 01/20/2012 1:39:00 PM PST by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

..another thought naps, is that they promised her the VP—boy did she hook up her wagon to the wrong horse LOL


61 posted on 01/20/2012 1:39:59 PM PST by WalterSkinner ( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Newt should tell Romney that he will release them in April.


62 posted on 01/20/2012 1:40:03 PM PST by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Add ‘The Hill’ to the list of rags perpetuating the myth that Gingrich was fined $300,000. He agreed to pay for a portion of the investigation (which later found him innocent). That is not a fine, and I have never seen the phrase “acquitted” or “found innocent” in any article mentioning the ethics investigation.


63 posted on 01/20/2012 1:41:04 PM PST by Flightdeck (If you hear me yell "Eject, Eject, Eject!" the last two will be echos...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WalterSkinner

Didn’t Nikki just receive a large contribution from Mitt? Was it just a down payment?


64 posted on 01/20/2012 1:42:03 PM PST by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

While Romney Goes Negative Attacking Fellow Republicans, Newt Gingrich Talks About Solutions For America... http://ow.ly/8AZVs


65 posted on 01/20/2012 1:42:03 PM PST by tsowellfan (Video: The Real Romney (running to the left of Ted Kennedy) http://ow.ly/8rknZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
Oh no... you have to use the let me google that for you link (just for effect) Let me google that for you
66 posted on 01/20/2012 1:44:22 PM PST by lahargis (Every day is independence day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name
There's a problem with that idea. I don't believe South Carolina has initiative, referendum and recall in place.

It's a Souvrn' state ~ so new fangled contrivances like they have in Wisconsin just don't cut it.

BTW, back when you guys were pushing the sex scandal I did some evaluation of the photographic evidence available on the net regarding where you could or could not park in the vicinity of that restaurant (central to the story) and discovered you couldn't really do what you were saying took place.

Just absolutely amazing.

From my point of view, though, I suspect that both attacks then, and the misrepresentation going on now, started with either the Paulbots or the Mittbots. Both groups didn't want Haley to win ~ Mitt gave her a recommendation which he thought wouldn't help, but he could come back later and tell the TEA Party crowd that "I hep't you'all".

Eventually she has to be informed about Newt's innocense on the ethics charges ~ it's a tad complex but as an earlier poster just demonstrated, it's already on the net.

67 posted on 01/20/2012 1:45:42 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Kinda what I though. LOLOLOLOL...

What a dolt.


68 posted on 01/20/2012 1:47:08 PM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody

He should start cleaning out his campaign crowd. Obvious his fact checkers blew it. That’s a sign he has some Democrats in the mix ~ the last thing any of those guys ever notice is that a Republican was exonerated.


69 posted on 01/20/2012 1:49:22 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Leep

Paul and Ventura

YOU ARE JOKING RIGHT?


70 posted on 01/20/2012 1:49:44 PM PST by manc (Marriage is between one man and one woman.Trolls get a life, I HATE OUR BIASED LIBERAL MEDIA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: lahargis
Beautiful. Well played. If Eric Fehrnstrom (pronounced: gay) lurks here, he might try to use that in the future.
71 posted on 01/20/2012 1:50:15 PM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

So Haley has to save his butt, because he is not fast enough on his feet to do it himself.


72 posted on 01/20/2012 1:52:02 PM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
Here's a thread link that addresses that Link
73 posted on 01/20/2012 1:53:12 PM PST by WalterSkinner ( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: manc

Paul and Ventura

YOU ARE JOKING RIGHT?


Ventura/Pualn 2016? :)


74 posted on 01/20/2012 1:56:30 PM PST by Leep (Paul/Ventura 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: stylecouncilor

I just sent Haley an email expressing my disgust with her behavior. I also informed her that she would get no financial support from me, nor my vote.


75 posted on 01/20/2012 1:56:30 PM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
The BIG DIG was a Democrat gift to former Speaker of the House Tip O'Neill.

The Democrats complain that the cost overruns occurred because Republican owned construction companies got all the work and did a bad job.

However, I recall that BEFORE the Democrats voted funding for the BIG DIG that Republicans were predicting ruinous cost overruns.

Turned out there were ruinous cost overruns.

It was a stupid idea.

76 posted on 01/20/2012 1:57:19 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter
IIRC, Gingrich was the only candidate who could respond with three South Carolina bullet points when the subject of the South Carolina economy came up last night.

You do recall correctly...Newt is doing his homework. His time in the House has taught him some skills he is using today, like learn the local issues when in someone else's backyard.

77 posted on 01/20/2012 1:59:43 PM PST by ez (When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ConfidentConservative

Quick...someone tweet this to Nikki! She seems out of the loop.


78 posted on 01/20/2012 1:59:49 PM PST by Jane Long (Soli Deo Gloria!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

< tag line>: (Paul/Ventura 2016)
Are you for real?!

Ventura/Paul 2016? :)

I am for real but I have a odd sense of humor. I hope that answered your question.


79 posted on 01/20/2012 2:02:11 PM PST by Leep (Paul/Ventura 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
Gingrich is paying $300,000 for the costs of an ethics committee investigation after admitting last year he made inaccurate statements during a lengthy probe into Democratic allegations that he misused tax-exempt donations. Gingrich denied the charges but submitted to a reprimand by the House.

This article specifically states that the fine is "for the costs of an ethics committee investigation." It also appears that Gingrich agreed to the reprimand voluntarily and without an admission or finding of guilt.

80 posted on 01/20/2012 2:04:24 PM PST by ez (When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage

You are SO Right, whew... Glad you are on our side! :)


81 posted on 01/20/2012 2:06:14 PM PST by ConfidentConservative (If my people shall humble themselves and pray,I will hear from Heaven and heal their land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: All
What did I do to STEAL Nikki Haley's heart??... ... I gave that honey a "deal"... know what i mean?.... Wink, wink...

:)

82 posted on 01/20/2012 2:07:53 PM PST by ElPatriota (The SILENCE of the Catholic Church in protecting our culture from perversion is ** DEAFENING **)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

It’s been out there AND reported on. HT to a fellow freeper (can’t remember name)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/govt/leadership/ethics.htm


83 posted on 01/20/2012 2:10:34 PM PST by austinaero (Obama or America - can't have both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

The GOP needs to stop the circular firing squad.


84 posted on 01/20/2012 2:10:43 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
South Carolina will probably reelect her again

I hope not. The people I hear call into talk radio here in the upstate want her head on a stake.
85 posted on 01/20/2012 2:13:44 PM PST by stylecouncilor (Some minds are like soup in a poor restaurant...better left unstirred.-PG Wodehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel

Romney made a big mistake going after Iowa after he said he wouldn’t. If he had ceded IA, we could have been listed as the comeback guy in NH, but still not the front runner with Newt strong in SC. As it was he “won” Iowa, then NH, so he became a target for everyone. If he had skipped IA, HE WOULD BE THE STALKING candidate in SC going after Newt, instead of being the STALKED, and may have sling-shotted out into first. He will regret jumping the gun and going after Newt too soon.


86 posted on 01/20/2012 2:14:29 PM PST by ez (When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I am thinking that Haley is burning herself at the stake.


87 posted on 01/20/2012 2:19:32 PM PST by Gator113 (~Just livin' life, my way~..... GO NEWT GO.....!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

He’s such a skeeve. Wherever he is, let him stay there. I’m sure he’s up to no good.


88 posted on 01/20/2012 2:21:34 PM PST by liberalh8ter (I don't like what the world has become....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: WalterSkinner

I believe that Haley, and maybe Christie in NJ, are cringing a bit now that Mittens doesn’t look like a runaway for the nomination.

I understand it’s all up in the air now so not to wishful think, but I bet Haley’s going to really be hurting if Mittens looses this thing.

So quick to jump on the bandwagon, so quick to betray. May the fleas of a thousand camels infest their armpits.


89 posted on 01/20/2012 2:30:26 PM PST by Fishtalk (http://patfish.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Leep

“Romney is outing all the RINOs. Go Romney!”

That was very stupid to post.


90 posted on 01/20/2012 2:31:28 PM PST by Gator113 (~Just livin' life, my way~..... GO NEWT GO.....!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ez

Romney made a big mistake running on the R ticket when his natural constituency would be D.


91 posted on 01/20/2012 2:32:08 PM PST by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

So sick of these guys attacking each other instead of Obummer.


92 posted on 01/20/2012 2:39:15 PM PST by Bigg Red (Pray for our republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

“Romney is outing all the RINOs. Go Romney!”

That was very stupid to post.

Hey, everyone should be allowed to have at least one very stupid post.


93 posted on 01/20/2012 2:39:38 PM PST by Leep (Paul/Ventura 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Standing behind the girl and let her do your fighting? Someone on radio said it best...he’s brittle...one good shot and he breaks.

He gets uptight and a bit shrill when faced with having to think on his feet. His rehearsed stuff comes off okay..and he does have some good ideas...but he would get creamed in the general. We don’t need wishy-washy.


94 posted on 01/20/2012 2:43:54 PM PST by SueRae (I can see November from my HOUSE!!!!!!!! 11.06.2012, the Tower of Sauron falls,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

There are at least 37,000 reasons she endorsed Mitt.


95 posted on 01/20/2012 2:47:18 PM PST by proudpapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ez

Meanwhile Romney didn’t know jack about South Carolina’s specific issues and possible solutions.


96 posted on 01/20/2012 2:56:34 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Our Governor has lost her mind.”

No, she is just coin-operated. In this case, it involved about $70k worth of coin.


97 posted on 01/20/2012 3:08:02 PM PST by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Diogenes; All

exactly - I’ve been waitng for someone to ask RomBot - why did you spend $100,000 to hide all your records as governor?

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/12/06/us-usa-campaign-romney-computers-idUSTRE7B500X20111206

And where is the media on this?

Look at the expense and flurry they went to to rush off to Alaska to comb through all Sarah’s emails - drooling with thoughts of ‘destroy Sarah’ - and she’s not running for anything, let alone president.

Keep the lamp lit, Diogenes


98 posted on 01/20/2012 3:43:30 PM PST by maine-iac7 (A prudent man foreseeth the evil,... but the simple pass on, and are punished. Prov 23:3 KJV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

A new movie coming out tonight: “Panic in Romney Park”


99 posted on 01/20/2012 3:55:56 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
There's a problem with that idea

I said it flippantly - I don't know the rules in SC. But they can be changed! Her not only endorsing mitt but feeling the need to cover his butt w/his taxes and coming against Newt shows one hungry political hack/whore. There's nothing TP about her, she'll ride the back of whoever will give her a ride. She's about 'nikki' not America. But if she'll save her voters a buck or two - she'll have their support. Selling out America comes in subtle ways.

BTW, back when you guys were pushing the sex scandal I did some evaluation

What are you talking about?

Both groups didn't want Haley to win

I have no idea who wanted what - I went to wiki to find out about her earlier since she became such a loud mouth FOR an enemy to conservatism.
100 posted on 01/20/2012 4:09:40 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson