Posted on 01/20/2012 4:15:12 PM PST by usar91B
New Obama 2012 Campaign Flyer: "I was born in Hawaii to a Single Mother..."
This flyer is currently being shared / "re-shared" on Facebook. I am curious as to where it originated and thought it might interest my fellow freepers. I have only posted once or twice.. long ago, so 'bare' with me. ;) The text reads:
"I was born in Hawaii to a single mother.
I was raised in Kansas by my two loving grandparents.
I went to Harvard Law School and became a community organizer in Chicago.
My story is one told a million times over in this country; from sea to shining sea. It is a dream shared by all who come to this country seeking opportunity and prosperity.
I am NOT RADICAL.
I am NOT SOCIALIST.
I am NOT A MUSLIM TERRORIST.
I am NOT THE ANTI-CHRIST.
I am Barack Hussein Obama and I am the American Dream."
2012 BARACKOBAMA.COM
I find this flyer to be bogus given the raised in Kansas stuff.
“Born to a single mother” would sort of invalidate the COLB that Obama has presented?
“I am the American Dream.”
Has he let Dusty Rhodes know about that?
“I am the American Dream.”
Has he let Dusty Rhodes know about that?
Wow, he DID slip up there! I missed that at first.
I hope Barry will tell us just WHEN he came to this country seeking opportunity and prosperity. Inquiring FReepers would like to know!
I am NOT RADICAL. I just hung around radicals because it was convenient
I am NOT SOCIALIST. Obamacare isn’t socialist, why would you people say it is?
I am NOT A MUSLIM TERRORIST. Ok, so we agree on one.
I am NOT THE ANTI-CHRIST. So get your nose out of the heavens Mr Narcissist!
I have long thought that when a wealth of evidence points to the guilt of a person but the DNA doesn't match, it would be wise to take a look at the people constituting the lab that declared the mismatch. Of course, it would be considered politically incorrect to question the integrity and motives of the people trusted with a technical effort like DNA analysis. However, such analyses should be done "in the blind" so that the person doing the analysis has no knowledge of the person or crime for which he/she is providing information.
With these suspicions in mind, it would be wise to take a long, hard look at any evidence which might shed light on the parentage of Barack Hussein Obama. Any evidence brought forth in that regard will likely be of the "manufactured" genre. And, sadly, we have a very large number of people in this "republic gone awry" who will rush to embrace any data that will cast the "Miscreant-in-Chief" in the best light possible.
I am Batak Hussein Obama...The Dumb ass US President who will forever be known for blocking the Canadian Pipeline.
It will be my shameful epitaph.
If more than a couple of states begin to work seriously at knocking Obama off the ballot I can surely see something like that. Then the leftists will start moaning loudly about the backwardness of a society that would force him to take such a subterfuge.
I remember when I first found the Daily KOS birth certificate posted. It was a big deal at the time. Some of my original images somehow disappeared from my site but I had made this page;
http://domania.us/Oaccess/OBAMA/BirthCertificate.html
http://domania.us/Oaccess/ObamaBirthCertificate.gif
I love how he states...
“come to this country”...
Did he just admit it?
LOL
I’m glad you’ve kept such a good archive.
If he ever releases a valid long form certificate of live birth, it might be the corrected one submitted to Hawaii. I want to see the one filed at birth ( if he was born where he claims.
If his father was BHO the First, he’s not a natural born citizen anyway. SCOTUS is dodging the key issue.
I think the GOP looked the other way in exchange for making sure McCain’s NBC status was “clarified” by Congress. Wait until a GOP nominee names a bright young minority VP nominee whose parents were immigrants. Todo el mundo will suddenly become concerned about NBC status.
Lol, I try to keep track unless things disappear.
Interesting graphic being shared on Facebook, I’ve never heard of Obama admitting his mother was a ‘single mother’ before. Many threads have posted information about the Obama’s divorce. Michelle once mentioned it.
Strange things always happen with Obama.
Obama has been ordered to appear in court in Atlanta Thursday, for a hearing on a complaint that says Obama isn’t a natural-born citizen and can’t be president.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2836240/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2836082/posts
Well - we know that isn’t going to happen. It seems that no laws can make him do anything. I hope we eventually learn the truth about all of this.
Edit; Michelle once mentioned his “single mother”.
“I was born a poor, black child....”
There seems to be any record of a marriage or of a divorce.
He wasn’t assembled from the products of two mothers.
Do you mean there is no record of a marriage???
I am one of those that believe there was no marriage.
However, someone here went through a process to obtain info from Hawaii. In that process that was some documentation about Ann that indicated she got a license or maybe it was an index that indicated there was some activity.
There a lot of things surrounding this whole story that I barely remember.
But this info could have only been the preliminary and not the actual marriage.
There was a divorce.
That does not mean there was a marriage.
One poster who works in family court said that anything can be said in a divorce decree.
My theory is different than many because I have no doubt whatsover that Obama’s family worked with the spooks.
There had to be a divorce because the story was that there was a marriage and Lolo would have gotten tripped up without a divorce decree.
I dunno if he's the first basturd sweetie. We never did get to see ole Bills' mothers' husband ........................................ FRegards
Thanks for the ping!
Takes two to tango, yuh know?
The terminology is used to evoke an image.
The idea to identification of the parentage and origin is the original birth records. At the time a child is born, the doctor takes a print from each foot and incorporates it onto the original hospital birth record. Exactly how this record is preserved may vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. In at least one state in the US, the doctor gets two sets of prints and one reposes in the state Health Department.
So on its face, identification of an adult to his birth records would be as simple as getting a print. And to the lawyer that print is an evidentary issue--witnesses of every stage with the print attested on the face of the print document under oath.
Now we have seen a vast array of fraudulent documents as we attempt to accumulate real evidence about the origin of zero. Significant criminal conduct is obviously involved. So the prospect of further fraud cannot be excluded.
On the other hand, if original documents exist, as I believe they do, modification of original prints incorporated in micro fiche records in at least one controlled location, in a birth file setting out a birth record consistent with the events as we now believe they occurred, may present a more difficult challenge for Opposing Forces than the Hawaii Health Department.
An argument based only on DNA is likely to rest on a factual inquiry into the evidence. It is possible that a conclusive chain of evidence might confirm the story--it is equally possible that it will not in which case the story would be rejected.
The legend that Zero's parentage might be the object of sufficient negative substance to merit an extensive effort to conceal it has been around long enough that we have not been able to trace its origin or the time when it was first heard. It appears to date before the original legislative campaign.
I have tended to ignore that story over the years for the reason that I didn't view it as credible--against a very positive election result in a national campaign, I just didn't believe there would be a sufficient incentive to maintain the cover up.
However as I have learned more about the actual underlying events, my views have to some degree shifted.
For one thing, his father was under an Islamic Death Edict which might well have included his father's male heirs. That Death Edict was ultimately the subject of action in which his father was assassinated. And the original cover up appears to originate in his father's objective to protect the son from the consequences of the threat and is consistent with that effort.
But another significant element of the objective has appeared.
His mother is of a different race than his father. Her personal and ethnic origin has been in continuing conflict with those of his father for several generations.
She was a very young single woman--19 at the time of his conception; 19 or 20 at the date of his birth. A member of a large family who were prominent in public Christian and political communities. She had a developing professional career of her own in which she has continued to prosper throughout the years with a fine reputation.
Although there is no way to prove it as yet, I infer from the limited factual background we know about that she did not tell her family of the birth. There is a gap in her professional career between the time it would have been apparent that she was pregnant and about three weeks after the probable birth date.
The birth appears to have occurred at some significant distance from any geographical location where she or her family or professional associates were active.
At this point, in my view, the political consequences of disclosure offer both difficulty and opportunity. It appears to me that if Gingrich is in fact the nominee, he is focusing on the underlying departure of Zero's policies from the foundational principles on which America was founded. Gingrich is now talking about vague distinctions that may result from knowledge of Zero's heritage which implies to me that his campaign may have penetrated the legend.
Zero's primary political exposure is that he is a complete fraud. Nothing you think you know about him is true. He is Anti-American; he is a historical Anti-American, Anti-Free Enterprise, Anti-American culture, Anti-Constitutional governance, Liberal Ends Justifies the Means politician.
That is a delicate political case to make. His position with respect to cover up of his origins is sympathetic--his parents were just attempting to protect him from adverse conditions that might have threatened him.
If Zero were a conservative; pro Constitution; pro-free enterprise candidate; we would welcome him with open arms. No one here would care who is father and mother were nor what their historical political activity involved.
So if the political objective is to be achieved, likely this is going to involve a challenging effort.
Dates?
You know, G, I actually missed the whole “Bill’s a bastard” issue. Where was I? Dang.
0bama Exposer's comment:
"From what I am hearing now is that 0bama is trying to set it up for some kind of mis-trial type appeal where he can claim he got incompetent representation by Jablonski for the ballot hearing? - He could then attempt to get another judge of their liking to hold the hearing in front of?"
We have seen images of the Stanley Ann Dunham - Barack Obama (Sr.) Hawaii court divorce case file here before, so there was a legal - unconcontested - divorce granted to SAD. (Judging by the numbering of the documents, there was at least one document missing from the file, which some speculated to have been BHO II's BC.)
When I first saw that, I was under the impression that one has to assert that there was a past legal marriage as a requirement to filing a divorce case. But a few folks here said that was not necessarily true. Still seems odd to me that there could be a divorce without a previous marriage.
As to the purported campaign flyer shown in the first post of this thread, it's obvious that some facts there are inconsistent with Obama's "Dreams from My Father." Obviously both cannot be true with respect to, e.g., Obama's mother's marital status at his birth and the state where Obama was raised. When it comes to Zero's past, there are few verifiable facts. There are still important mysteries to be definitely solved.
Facebook isn't exactly the Internet site for the most reliable information, from what I've heard.
And "Dreams from My Father" isn't necessarily truthful either.
So take both sources accordingly and realize that it may take more time to solve these mysteries convincingly. Let's hope that the time for resolution of these questions will come sooner rather than later.
“Zero's primary political exposure is that he is a complete fraud. Nothing you think you know about him is true. He is Anti-American; he is a historical Anti-American, Anti-Free Enterprise, Anti-American culture, Anti-Constitutional governance, Liberal Ends Justifies the Means politician.”
Perry threw his support to Newt and Perry was backed by Arpaio who may, in fact, have “penetrated the legend.”
Remember that Newt embraced the premise of the book “The Roots of Obama’s Rage” in which Obama is seen as anti-imperial, anti-colonial, anti-American.
The divorce was necessary for a paper trail on his citizenship. He was removed from her passport and on his own. Coming back from Indonesia or wherever he had been. There are document missing in the proceedings. (like the original marriage license)
In my opinion, there was never a marriage between BHO, Sr. and SAD.
There is no proof they ever lived as husband and wife, anywhere.
If SAD gave birth to what is known as BHO, Jr. without a father listed on the COLB, but born outside the U.S. he would not be a citizen because she was not old enough at the time to transfer citizenship to her child under the Immigration and Naturalisation Act of 1952.
In neither case would he be a "natural born U.S. citizen". (don't confuse with native born, natural born "American" citizen, or other legal weasel words)
When I first saw that, I was under the impression that one has to assert that there was a past legal marriage as a requirement to filing a divorce case. But a few folks here said that was not necessarily true. Still seems odd to me that there could be a divorce without a previous marriage.
As to the purported campaign flyer shown in the first post of this thread, it's obvious that some facts there are inconsistent with Obama's "Dreams from My Father." Obviously both cannot be true with respect to, e.g., Obama's mother's marital status at his birth and the state where Obama was raised. When it comes to Zero's past, there are few verifiable facts. There are still important mysteries to be definitely solved.
First place, as to marriage.
In the modern world, people are held to be married on the basis of a wide range of conduct and statements. There are cases which hold people married because they checked into a motel for the evening and indicated on the registration sheet that they were married.
In some jurisdictions, oral statements are sufficient.
And marriage in turn affects a number of different kinds of rights and privileges, even if there are no children. And if there are children, even if the man she is living with who she and he have stated is the married husband is not in fact a civil law husband, is also not the father, custody is at best uncertain absent a court determination.
For that reason, when counsel sees the nice lady in this situation, his advice would be to file a divorce and get a court order determining that they are no longer married--if children exist in the living arrangement; get the court to find and order that they are the children of the wife, if true, and order that she has custody.
Stanley and Senior probably did enough to get into a position that conservative counsel would have, under the circumstances described, advise her to file a divorce proceeding.
I don't think that is what happened here.
They were not married. They were never married. And they never acted as man and wife in any setting.
On the record, as we now recognize what happened, we know that the subject of the divorce proceeding was a child. This proceeding was initiated to obtain a custody order for the purpose of establishing legal control over a minor child who was at the time around three and a half or five years old.
We cannot be sure whether the objective was Barack Hussein Obama II or Zero who was about a year and a half younger.
We can clearly see that at some point, Zero assumed the name Barack H. Obama II but for some purposes, he was BHO II and for other purposes he was Barry Suetoro or someone else. As late as the 1980's he was using other names.
We have also identified the true BHO 2. As late as August of 1982, he appeared using the name BHO 2 at the funeral of Barack H. Obama Senior. Zero was not there.
But, there is also evidence that has zero using the BHO II name much earlier for some purposes. So we can't be sure what the objective of the custody order in the divorce proceeding was.
Thanks very much for the Ping! Lots and Lots of good reading, lately. :)
Ping; Update.
Check out #174; # 182, and # 185.
Chinese New Year - January 23, 2012 begins The Year of The Dragon.
We have also identified the true BHO 2. As late as August of 1982, he appeared using the name BHO 2 at the funeral of Barack H. Obama Senior. Zero was not there.
Is that photoshopped?
Oops, #186 was quoting. That’s what I get for reading the thread upwards.
I read this comment yesterday following article regarding his birth certificate...
“What I think might be possible is that Frank Marshall Davis, a US citizen, is actually his father. In Davis’ biography, he mentioned a “threesome” with “Anne”, which could easily be Barry’s mother, about the time of Barry’s conception. So, that would make him eligible and maybe he’s actually told Congress the truth and that’s why they ignore the matter.”
“If so, Barry is probably hiding it because Marshall was a Marxist or socialist and also a sexual pervert. That explains why Barry is also a Marxist and bisexual (Larry Sinclair, the gay guys in his old church who died mysteriously and Reggie Love being his boyfriends).”
A grainy photo of the person from Ghana named Obama who went to college in the USSR?
When are "We" who have made this identification going to reveal it? Hopefully not after the 2012 election...
Thank you for your diligence!
It’s so good to “see” you!
“in Davis’ biography”
My reading on this was it was in a book of porn that he wrote under a sudo name (which was identified by the publisher as his work). I have never read it was in his biography.
Stanley was born on November 29, 1942
BHO, Jr. was reported as being born on August 4th, 1961
Conception ~Dec 1960.
Calculating SAD age at time of birth gives 18 year 8.2 months.
9 month gestation period for humans. Do the math.
So she was 17 at the time of his conception and 18 at the time of his birth.
Anyone who still thinks Stanley was his mother is really not in possession of all the available information about his birth.
He wasn't born on August 4, 1961; there is no real evidence that Stanley ever even met him prior to December of 1970 (although to be fair there is a suggestion that may support a December 1969 date).
Same guy Malik says he grew up with in the village in Kenya when zero is confirmed to have been living in Indonesia.
bttt
To believe your totally undocumented speculations claiming an alternate mom for Barry, you must assert that the following DOCUMENTS were FORGED...documents in the case of the INS absolutely screw up Barry's early family narrative and show BHO Sr. to be a loathsome character:
1. U of HI transcripts confirmed by U of WA transfer credit confirm that SADO was in Russian class with BHO Sr. in the fall of 1960.
2. INS files showing that INS totally believed U of Hi explicit reports of the marriage on Feb 2, 1961 and SADO’s intent to leave HI and study in WA in the fall of 1961..and also report of Baby Barry.
3. The HI newspaper announcements of Barry's birth to BHO Sr and Stanley Ann (wherever that may have occurred). There is no "real" evidence that any of these pieces of evidence were forged. Then there is the photograph of Barry's Gramps, Stanley Dunham on the dock with BHO Sr at Srs departure from HI.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
