Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt Gingrich's Freddie Mac Contract Released
Center for Health Transformation ^

Posted on 01/23/2012 4:25:59 PM PST by Utmost Certainty

Document Shows No Lobbying By Former Speaker

ATLANTA - The Gingrich Group, LLC today announced it is releasing a contract written by Freddie Mac for consulting services it contracted with the organization.

“Subject to a conversation between our counsel and Freddie Mac, we have received permission to release the attached contract,” said Nancy Desmond, Chairman and CEO of the Gingrich Group. “As noted under the scope of work section on Page 14, the contract was solely for consulting purposes and not lobbying.

“Freddie Mac and The Gingrich Group have agreed that this release is limited to the contract alone and does not constitute a general release of the confidentiality provisions between us,” Desmond added. Newt Gingrich relinquished his ownership in the company in May 2010 when he announced his bid for President of the United States.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012primaries; freddiemac; freddiemaccontract; gingrich; gingrichcontract; gingrichgroup; housing; lobbying; newt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-93 last
To: napscoordinator

I have no idea why you are upset. This thread was not posted by me and I’ve been saying all along that Gingrich worked as a consultant, never as a lobbyist.

That the contract was released is interesting, but it doesn’t tell us what he advised Freddie Mac, thus the nondisclosure clause isn’t violated.

So, what’s your real beef?

(Aside from using this as an opportunity to be insulting.)


51 posted on 01/23/2012 5:09:33 PM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

OK, I’m correcting myself! LOL
The Center for Healthcare Transformation is a group associated with the Gingrich Group - which is the company that Newt was contracted through. The company itself (which no longer employs Newt) had to work with Freddie Mac to OK the release of what is their business records and not Newt’s personal property. It was also covered by a confidentiality agreement. It had to be released through the company’s channel’s as it didn’t belong to Newt or his campaign.


52 posted on 01/23/2012 5:10:03 PM PST by LibertyRocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks

See post #41 above. The Center for Healthcare Transformation is the new name of The Gingrich Group, which it took when it limited its activities to consulting for the healthcare industry. Odd though it seems, it is thus the same company that consulted for Freddie Mac, rebranded because it would no longer consult for Freddie Mac (or other non-healthcare-related clients).


53 posted on 01/23/2012 5:14:53 PM PST by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

He can’t even figure out how to get someone to wash his underware, how’s he gonna figure out how to be president??


54 posted on 01/23/2012 5:17:24 PM PST by Joined2Justify (Speechless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: BagCamAddict

“Experts” in NY get ~$600/hr.


55 posted on 01/23/2012 5:17:39 PM PST by seton89 (Starve the Beast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kevao
I wonder why Mitt — or Newt, for that matter — but particularly Mitt, who after all was until very recently the presumptive frontrunner/nominee, hasn’t challenged Obama to release his high-school records, college transcripts, thesis, etc.?

Patience, grasshopper. Newt will lay that little land mine when it will do the most damage...

56 posted on 01/23/2012 5:18:16 PM PST by COBOL2Java (Virginia GOP: Romney's favorite butt boys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty

The only reason Newt was hired was to convince the GOP in Congress to back off from more oversight.

I doubt even Newt figured it out at the time, not like it (oversight of Fannie-Freddie) was a huge media story at the time.


57 posted on 01/23/2012 5:22:02 PM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BagCamAddict

Anything under $300.00 per hour is cheap for high service. Been there paid there and gained little.


58 posted on 01/23/2012 5:23:56 PM PST by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

(Aside from using this as an opportunity to be insulting.)

Hold it. You told me to take a nap when you know perfectly well that my name “napscoordinator” has NOTHING to do with that. Secondly, you basically told me that I did not support Newt (which is 100 percent not true) because I mentioned about the Freddie contract getting released. You told me that I was this horrid Romney supporter which again is not true. I have know you a long time and always respected you but when you call me a Romney supporter of all things that is DEFINITELY below the belt. You can call me an ahole and that is better than a Romney supporter. Anyway, looking forward to the debate as I am sure you are too. The girlfriend thing was in jest and you knew it. Are we that serious right now that we can’t joke with each other? Especially among two people who have posted back and forth for years?


59 posted on 01/23/2012 5:25:14 PM PST by napscoordinator (Newt MUST win the nomination to get rid of Romney and Obama....Dear God let November 2012 go our way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Sweet Onyx, I predicted earlier today he would do this ! ROTFL!

It is almost sad, Mitt is the Bull and the two Matadors at this point are Mr Newt and Sarah.

Speaking of bull, boy did she do a number on the Jersey Dirigible..

Navy Aviators had a name for them when they were in use ( based out of NJ if my memory is correct) but this is a family program...

60 posted on 01/23/2012 5:27:18 PM PST by taildragger (( Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

He (Newt) had since turned his attention to a number of policy issues, and healthcare seemed to be No. 1. He founded the Center for Health Transformation in 2003, which recently has come under fire for bringing in millions in membership fees from entities such as AHIP and the American Hospital Association.
  


61 posted on 01/23/2012 5:29:04 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

I heard on Rush that Milt was using Charlie Christ’s team of advisors in FL! That’s just funny.


62 posted on 01/23/2012 5:32:02 PM PST by Jane Long (Soli Deo Gloria!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Yeah. I read that on FR. But I believe he’s also using Steve Schmidt. I *think* that’s the name. If I remember right, McCain was using Dems and Romney people. And Schmidt was one of them.


63 posted on 01/23/2012 5:37:36 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: BagCamAddict
It works out to a billing rate of $156/hr for 40 hrs/week of work. Or let’s say $300/hr for 20 hrs/week of work.

Wow, my billing rate is more than that. And, I'm not any high powered consultant/lawyer. I'm just a specialized IT consultant.

Of course, I don't get all of it. But, that's how much my company clients pay.

64 posted on 01/23/2012 5:38:17 PM PST by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer
"Apparently Mitt does not know the difference between a lobbyist and a consultant going by what he has been saying the last couple of days."

Oh he knows and so do the media. Problem is how many of the people know. The media know all they need to do is keep repeating the lie, and the sheeple will believe them.

65 posted on 01/23/2012 5:39:43 PM PST by Spunky (Sarah Palin on Polls "Poles are for Strippers and Cross Country Skiers")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Ah, Schmidt...isn’t he the one who’s always smearing Sarah? That slime ball? Good luck with that, Milt.


66 posted on 01/23/2012 5:42:20 PM PST by Jane Long (Soli Deo Gloria!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long
That's the one! :-)

I think Romney's been playing dirty tricks for quite some time.

67 posted on 01/23/2012 5:45:34 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
"I think Romney's been playing dirty tricks for quite some time."

Like destroying ALL his governorship records. Legal, but what did he have to hide?

68 posted on 01/23/2012 5:50:45 PM PST by Spunky (Sarah Palin on Polls "Poles are for Strippers and Cross Country Skiers")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: All; Utmost Certainty

When I click on your link I get black pages. Does anyone else?


69 posted on 01/23/2012 5:56:00 PM PST by Spunky (Sarah Palin on Polls "Poles are for Strippers and Cross Country Skiers")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Spunky

That too. But having his “team” work for other candidates and undermine them. Leaks and whispered lies. That kinda thing.


70 posted on 01/23/2012 5:57:06 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

Exactly. And Newt didn’t get all of it either. His company gets it, and it covers overhead, administrative staff, liability insurance, etc.

So all this talk about Newt getting “millions” or even “1.5 million” from Fannie Mae is BS. The money came in over a period of years, and as the contract indicates, it was paid at a maximum of $25,000 per month, at a completely reasonable billing rate for Newt’s services.

But you watch, someone will bring up how Newt made/charged all this money “while Americans were hurting and losing their houses.”


71 posted on 01/23/2012 6:00:27 PM PST by BagCamAddict (THANK YOU GOVERNOR PERRY for doing the right thing. GO NEWT !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

can not wait.


72 posted on 01/23/2012 6:03:47 PM PST by go-ken-go (Ca)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

can not wait.


73 posted on 01/23/2012 6:04:09 PM PST by go-ken-go (Ca)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Jukeman

“Yet Obama won’t release records on his life and Romney is hiding all sorts of secrets.”

Newt Gingrinch must hammer home both of these points. He released his tax returns, which show that he made money but also paid almost 1/3 of it in taxes. Romney has had to be dragged kicking and screaming into releasing his returns and, according to him, he probably paid less than 1/2 of Gingrinch’s rate.

As for the Bamster, Newt should also release his college transcripts immediately and ask why Obama won’t do the same! If he brings it up in a debate it may finally hit the mainstream press, no matter how hard Carney tries to change the subject!


74 posted on 01/23/2012 6:04:22 PM PST by VikingMom (I may not know what the future holds but I know who holds the future!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

Mitt’s got Charlie Crist’s ex-campaign staffers working for him in Florida. I’m not kidding.

Newt has Marco Rubio’s campaign manager working for him in Florida. I’m not kidding about that either.

Newt wins.


75 posted on 01/23/2012 6:09:23 PM PST by lonevoice (Klepto Baracka Marxo, impeach we much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

Gingrich is a smart cookie. Slick Willard thought he could simply buy the WH.


76 posted on 01/23/2012 6:11:40 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty

Go Newt - fight fire with the facts! FUMR!!!!!!!!!


77 posted on 01/23/2012 6:13:03 PM PST by RobertClark ("Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: musicman; All

Fred Thompson was just on Hannity announcing his endorsement for Newt


78 posted on 01/23/2012 6:54:08 PM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty; All

Just heard Andrea Mitchell on NBC say that Romney’s tax filings will show that he has investments of over $500,000 in both and Fanny and Freddie Mac...and he has the audacity to attack Gingrich.


79 posted on 01/23/2012 8:26:05 PM PST by Hotlanta Mike (TeaNami)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty

I hope Newt does not release too much. Better to keep his stuff as a carrot for Obama so he can ask Obama to release all the things he’s hiding (if Newt becomes the nominee).


80 posted on 01/23/2012 8:28:14 PM PST by tsowellfan (https://twitter.com/cafenetamerica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I just got back on FR. GREAT NEWS about Fred!!

Thanks for the ping!!!


81 posted on 01/23/2012 8:40:58 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: babygene

He should charge a lot more!!

How else will Calista be able to continue spending hundreds of thousands of dollars at Tiffany and Co??


82 posted on 01/23/2012 8:41:42 PM PST by JRochelle (Note to the MSM: Unemployment has been higher under every month of Obama than any month under Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty
in May 2010 when he announced his bid for President

Shouldn't that be 2011? Hate for them to start off with saying it's in error because of that!

83 posted on 01/23/2012 10:10:44 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VikingMom

As for the Bamster, Newt should also release his college transcripts immediately and ask why Obama won’t do the same!

* * *

Yes, Newt should do exactly that - release EVERYTHING - but not now. He should do it about an hour before his first debate with Obama. (My guess is that, under pressure, Obama will agree to two debates.) Then Newt can ask, “So, Mr. President, you and your staff have seen my information. Where is all YOUR information?” . . . and watch Bambi stutter along without his teleprompter to help him. Good times!!! ;o)


84 posted on 01/23/2012 10:46:18 PM PST by Hetty_Fauxvert ("She turned me into a Newt . . . backer!" . . . . . Go Newt 2012!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty
Newt's name does not appear in any of these [lobbying databases], nor do any of his organizations.

What I don't understand is why anyone would think Freddie Mac would hire Newt to lobby for them . . . in 1996, the dems were poised to take Congress, Freddie Mac had the dems in their back pocket (probably some GOPers too), the dems hated Newt, the GOP-E hated Newt. Plus Newt does have rather an abrasive manner (personally I like his personality -- LOL).

As far as I can see, Freddie Mac was sitting pretty (and way prettier than Newt); it would be more credible that Newt would hire Freddie Mac to lobby for him.

Maybe I just don't understand the lobbying/influence-peddling business . . . wouldn't be the first thing I didn't understand . . . :(

85 posted on 01/24/2012 2:19:24 AM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Utmost Certainty

Actually I believe that is only part of it, they can’t “find” the rest.


86 posted on 01/24/2012 4:08:54 AM PST by midwyf (Wyoming Native. Environmentalism is a religion too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raebie

“Lol...we pay expert programmers that rate.”

PeopleSoft and SAP come to mind. $175/hour and up.


87 posted on 01/24/2012 4:14:23 AM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BagCamAddict
So all this talk about Newt getting “millions” or even “1.5 million” from Fannie Mae is BS. The money came in over a period of years, and as the contract indicates, it was paid at a maximum of $25,000 per month, at a completely reasonable billing rate for Newt’s services.

That's not exactly an accurate description of the contract's terms. He wasn't paid by the hour, he was paid a flat rate of $25,000 per month, without regard to how many hours he worked. The hourly rate people have been discussing in this thread is based on that monthly rate, and assumes that Newt worked 20-40 hours a week on this contract. There is no indication, in the contract or anywhere else, of how many hours/week Newt worked under this contract.

88 posted on 01/24/2012 4:50:17 AM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative
There is no indication, in the contract or anywhere else, of how many hours/week Newt worked under this contract.

Wouldn't it also have covered, say, research assistants, with the costs of overhead and secretarial calculated in?

89 posted on 01/24/2012 5:11:03 AM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative
True. Sort of. The flat rate is for each full month, so apparently it would be prorated for less than a full month (which is why I used the phrasing of "a maximum of $25,000 per month).

And we can certainly over-analyze it if we want to.

I broke it down to an hourly rate for easy mental comparison, because we can assume that the Gingrich Group did SOME work for that $25,000, as opposed to it being a "retainer" where the Gingrich Group does no work but is on standby in case the client needs to use them. The $25,000 was to be paid "in exchange for" the Gingrich Group providing "consulting and related services as requested."

So you're right, it was not an hourly rate, it was a lump sum for a full month, assuming SOME work was done during that full month.

90 posted on 01/24/2012 6:38:01 AM PST by BagCamAddict (THANK YOU GOVERNOR PERRY for doing the right thing. GO NEWT !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: VikingMom

Exactly!


91 posted on 01/24/2012 6:44:10 AM PST by Jukeman (God help us for we are deep in trouble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: All; Utmost Certainty
Excellent; I'm glad FM was accommodating to allow the contract release.

This emphasizes what I was saying to those who said Newt should release everything that Romney demanded -- Newt doesn't control what can be released, he's under confidentiality agreements.

92 posted on 01/24/2012 7:28:00 AM PST by newzjunkey (a FL win returns Romney to the "inevitability" path... do the right thing, Rick!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BagCamAddict

The only way for Gingrich to put this “issue” to rest TOTALLY
is to offer some accounting for the ACTUAL work, what group of people worked on it, how much research it involved, and what the final report was, and how his conclusions about the Fannie/Freddie operation were arrived at, in reference to the conclusions the research and evaluation finally arrived at.
Otherwise it will look like Newt was just in it to bilk the taxpayer, in concert with Fannie and Freddie. We know all the final conclusions of the Gingrich Group were NEGATIVE, and the interesting thing is of course that the criticism for Newt’s involvement AT ALL with Fannie/Freddie could ONLY come from his GOP opponents, not the Left.The Left couldn’t get much mileage out of badmouthing anyone’s evaluation of this beloved institution of theirs just because the final objective evaluation of it was negative.


93 posted on 01/24/2012 8:07:55 AM PST by supremedoctrine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-93 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson