Skip to comments.Pelosi On A Gingrich Presidency: "That Will Never Happen" (San Fran Nan says she has dirt.)
Posted on 01/24/2012 5:04:46 PM PST by GR_Jr.
John King, CNN: "You make your case there passionately for President Obama. But also understand that this is a tough reelection climate for any president, Democrat or Republican in this economy. Because of your history with Speaker Gingrich, what goes through your mind when you think of the possibility, which is more real today than it was a week or a month ago, that he would be the Republican nominee and that you could come back here next January or next February with a President Gingrich?"
Rep. Nancy Pelosi: "Let me just say this. That will never happen."
Pelosi: "He's not going to be President of the United States. That's not going to happen. Let me just make my prediction and stand by it, it isn't going to happen."
King: "Why are you so sure?"
Pelosi: "There is something I know. The Republicans, if they choose to nominate him that's their prerogative. I don't even think that's going to happen."
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
It's called prison time Nancy. And I don't think you'll get the Martha Stewart suite either.
Egads! Or perhaps he forged his birth certificate!
I wish there was something we could do on this forum about Matt Drudge.
His attacks on Newt are a problem.
The woman is a major cocaine addict. My niece is a substance abuse conselor who is willing to bet her house that Nancy uses regularly. She says she displays all the classic symptoms; Involuntary mouth movements, bugs eyes and inability to stop moving her arms and hands, all of which she showed me Nancy doing on videos on Youtube. It was obvious as all hell the latest being that one video when the reporter asked her about the conflict of interest. Her mouth was flipping out a mile a minute, she had the bugs eyes and her arms and hand were all over the place.
My niece said a good idea would be to have a constitutional amendment requiring all Reps to submit to random drug tests. They make decisions that affect the lives of millions and they are not tested, but sanitations workers are? What are sanitations workers going to do while high, eat the garbage? But it’s OK having a wacko like Pelosi high as a kite as Speaker of the house? 2 heartbeats away from being POTUS? What is THAT?
It’s a bluff. I took game theory courses in college. It can only be a bluff.
Exactly, they were worried in 2008 that Obama, being an empty suit and (according to the left)America being racist (they were worried many people wouldn’t vote for a black man in the privacy of the voting both) he might not win. So they set up an incredible network of fraudulent votes. It was no secret that ACORN was signing up tens of thousand of bogus voters on registration roles that were going to be used. They didn’t use all those bogus voter registration, as it was very clear in the last week the pathetic McCain was going to be slaughtered.
But all those bogus registrations are available for 2012. And you are right about screwing with voting machines. Every effort to return to a paper ballot. even as a backup, has been squashed. Ballots can be counted and recounted under the supervision of representatives from both parties. Once the numbers are totaled in a machine, there is no way to validate they are correct - no ballots to pull out and compare.
I have a feeling the fraud will be at unseen levels. Much more than what we saw in 2,000. The democraps were starting to build their fraud base on a national scale, and have had 12 years to perfect it. I also have a bad feeling that it will be so well done, it will be hard to uncover except in a few obvious cases - which they will allow to be exposed and claim that there was only a small amount of fraud and it was exposed.
We may have lost this country and don’t even understand it yet
Nauseating. Thanks for the link, though.
Several others have touched on this, but here goes. Many said that 9-11 happened in part because of a ‘failure of imagination.’ Consider this: Nancy *didn’t* say she knew something about Newt. Well, what if she knows that martial law will be imposed before the election? Or that a coup will be complete by then?
I hope this line of reasoning is wrong, but....
Pelosi eats dirt.
"What happens next bears watching closely, as does the response of the president, ex-Speaker Pelosi, and others on the left. Encouraged by leftists in the Democratic Party and funded by left-leaning nonprofit organizations and celebrity contributors, Occupy Wall Street may in time morph into something resembling the radical factions of the late 1960s and 1970s."
"Behind the Violence, Says Jane Alpert, Was Sex"
--November 09, 1981--
"The leaders of the Weather Underground, she believes, followed a similar pattern of constantly shifting sexual alliances..."
"...the Weathermen, when not engaged in group sex, committed such revolutionary acts as parading with a Viet Cong flag through a local park on Independence Day and spray-painting the walls of a high school with the slogans, "Off the Pigs," "Viet Cong Will Win," and "F#$k U.S. Imperialism."..."
Don't need no Weatherman to see which way Comrade SanFranNan's fair wind blws.
GO NEWT! The Fabian she-wolf is trembling!
84 posted on Tuesday, January 24, 2012 8:02:55 PM by Bobalu: “There is no scandal they can drop onto Newt that he cannot best by dropping one of the worst of the Obama scandals back on them. My God, just think of the possibilities! They are not dealing with McLame here.”
That is one really good thing about Gingrich. Nobody doubts that he's an aggressive and nasty street fighter. We may need that type of approach. I strongly suspect that Gingrich is quite capable of throwing dirt back, and unlike McCain (who had tons of dirt on Rev. Jeremiah Wright) I believe Gingrich is willing to use it if necessary.
17 posted on Tuesday, January 24, 2012 7:15:50 PM by ltc8k6: “Newt needs to challenge her on this now.”
Agreed. I hope Gingrich calls her bluff.
Whatever it is needs to come out now while the primaries are still underway and it will build my respect for Gingrich considerably if he demands it come out now.
However, since Pelosi obviously wants President Obama to win re-election, my guess is that Pelosi wants to hold back on whatever she's got until such time as it can do the most damage, either to get Romney nominated or to get Obama re-elected. Democrats have a long history of trying to spring “October surprises” on Republicans.
That's unethical, but let's be fair: lots of Republicans would probably do the same if we had dirt on the Democrats and they were having their primary. I don't like that, but it's reality that politicians of both parties will hold things until they see the maximum advantage in a timed release.
Huh? photoshopped?. . .nope!
Thanks mate. /sarc
I WAS eating breakfast til I saw that.
Indeed. I'd always found it suspicious that once a paper ballot is cast it can't be traced back to a fraudulant registration, but I guess that's a "privacy" issue. Better than arbitrary numbers spit out by a mysterious, compromised machine that no one ever questions.
Possibly the most disturbing thing is, that NOBODY EVER DOUBTS THESE THINGS! The Tea Party should be up in arms!
Love your tagline BTW. Hate it actually, because it's painfully accurate.
There goes breakfast.
Crap, the tagline thing was for
Mortrey (Impeach President Soros)
Sorry (It’s late).
Another misleading headline. She didn’t say she had any “dirt” on Newt. She was voicing her stupid opinion.
Please eat poo & die...
Couple that with Nancy's MOST INSANE LOOK EVER, in the video -- which is short and is a MUST SEE -- and I think you are on to something.
>>> Heres the deal: Nancy is trying to scare people off Newt because she knows hell crush Obama and educate people on the evils of liberalism. <<<<
Thank you for saying that. Threats shall abound and become deafening as Newt becomes and increasing threat to them. There is enough coming in economic horros to bother with the fearsome bluster of the Marxists, now caught between a rock and a hard place, as things eek out.
Toss in Howard Dean, the DNC chairman in ‘08.
This woman is nothing more than a stupid gasbag. Thank you, San Francisco, land of rainbows and unicorns.
BS - this is just Operation Chaos 2.0. If Nancy actually had ANY info she’d leak it through her staff and it would be out there. Dems think it’s in the bag for them no matter who is nominated. I wouldn’t bet against it.
If she had anything material on Newt, she wouldn’t mention it before the convention.
Newt said this morning on Today show when asked about Pelosi’s comment. He said I have no idea what she is referring to and if she knows something to just say it now....
I just hope that it isn’t something substancial and they don’t wait until Newt is the Pres. Candidate in final round and then do another October surprise to bring it out...
Don’t forget the Hotels they own where they have non-union workers employed; but yet gets UNION donations for her campaign. What’s up with that?
Isn’t blackmail illegal or something? Somewhere in the back of my mind I’m thinking I heard that once.
As if there isn’t more, and worst, dirt out there about NP. If our side had any balls, they’d put it out there loudly and often. Might not work, though; corruption and bad ethics are badges of honor for the dems.
Newt was just asked this morning on the Today Show and Newt responded “I have a simple challenge (for Pelosi), spit it out, tell us what it is”
Wow! Gotta love Newt’s way of tackling problems head-on.
Glass houses biatch. Someone needs to drop her.
The only thing that could turn me away from Newt is if she has photos of the two of them in bed together. Then I would have SERIOUS doubts about his judgment and mental stability.
If this is true, a Gingrich nomination would guarantee Obama’s reelection and everyone on the left who knows about it will want Gingrich to be the nominee.
If Pelosi is lying, we have nothing to worry about.
And if Pelosi is telling the truth, what strategic reason would motivate her to bring it up now?
if shes suggesting shes going to use material that she developed while she was on the ethics committee, that is a fundamental violation of the rules of the House and I would hope that members would immediately file charges against her the second she does it.
Put out five square yards of flypaper and put a bottle of cheap scotch in the center.
LOL!!! That’s a good one!
Or she knows the electronic voting machines (supplied by a foreign entity) are going to tally a victory for Obama by manipulating the votes in each state.
Perhaps Obama will get 98% of the vote like Saddaam Hussein used to be accustomed to...
Tardive dyskinesia is a difficult-to-treat form of dyskinesia (disorder resulting in involuntary, repetitive body movements) that can be tardive (having a slow or belated onset). It frequently appears after long-term or high-dose use of antipsychotic drugs,[N 1] or in children and infants as a side effect from usage of drugs for gastrointestinal disorders prevention.[N 2]
Tardive dyskinesia most commonly occurs in patients with psychiatric conditions who are treated with antipsychotic medications for many years. One study reported that within the first four years of using antipsychotic medications, 18.5 percent of young adults develop symptoms. Furthermore, 31 percent of those over 55 years of age develop tardive dyskinesia symptoms in the same time frame. Other estimates suggest that it occurs in 15-30% of patients receiving treatment with antipsychotic neuroleptic medications for 3 months or longer. A study being conducted at the Yale University School of Medicine has estimated that 32% of patients develop persistent tics after 5 years on major tranquilizers, 57% by 15 years, and 68% by 25 years. Other estimates suggest that with each year of neuroleptic use, 5% of the patients will show signs of tardive dyskinesia, i.e., 5% after one year, 10% after two years, 15% after three years with no clear upper limit. Eventually, according to these estimates, if on the drugs long enough, the majority of patients will develop the disorder. The incidence of tardive dyskinesia varies with the type of neuroleptic (e.g., haloperidol (Haldol) more often than perphenazine (Trilafon)), daily dose and duration of treatment (the higher the daily dose and the longer the duration of treatment, the higher the risk).
Maybe Newt did some other things with Nancy on that famous couch.
I would think that what she is doing is pure and simple threatenig “blackmail”.
She’d better be very, very careful.
181 posted on Wednesday, January 25, 2012 7:32:32 AM by af_vet_rr: “Newt was just asked this morning on the Today Show and Newt responded I have a simple challenge (for Pelosi), spit it out, tell us what it is”
Is Pelosi ‘threatening’ the Speaker? Whatever it is will hurt her also....would be my guess.
I remember that.
Let's hope it happens.
It could be the Republican Establishment she’s threatening and not
particularly Newt. She is bound to have any access to ‘files’ on anyone she wants through her boy, 0.
And of course any little bad thing with Republicans is 1,000 times worst then anything a democRAT does because unlike the democRATS, the Republicans get rid of vermin. Just a thought.
Newt Challenges Pelosi: “Spit It Out!”
Just to be clear, Newt DID NOT pay a fine nor was it an admission of guilt. The 300K was what the expenses of the litigation were.
Yes, That CNN! Hard to believe
I agree with your take. Pelosi’s outburst indicates to me that she wants to stop Newt and help Romney get nominated. She’s a nasty piece of work, but she’s smart enough to see through the mainstream media nonsense that Romney is more electable.