Skip to comments.Matt Drudge Now Has 9 Negative Stories On Newt, Zero On Romney
Posted on 01/26/2012 4:35:06 AM PST by icwhatudo
Anne Coulter pal Matt Drudge has declared all out war on the Gingrich campaign. As of 7am Eastern time he has 9 negative mentions about Newt (none on Romney):
NEWT FLASHBACK 1983: REAGAN RESPONSIBLE FOR NATIONAL 'DECAY'...
NEWT 1986: 'The Reagan administration has failed, is failing... President Reagan is clearly failing'...
NEWT 1988: 'If Bush runs as continuation of Reaganism he will lose'... VIDEO...
INSIDER: GINGRICH REPEATEDLY INSULTED REAGAN
R. EMMETT TYRRELL: William Jefferson Gingrich...
COULTER: RE-ELECT OBAMA: VOTE NEWT!...
CNN: Gingrich admits his ABC claim was false during debate...
Gingrich tells UNIVISION: No perjury during my divorce depositions...
Marianne Gingrich lawyer: 'He was never deposed'...
Newt’s got some history of attacking conservatives, including Ronald Reagan. Unless we decide that conservatism is whatever Newt happens to think or say at some moment, say, when he’s paling around with Nancy Pelosi, we’ll have to realize he’s a leaky vessel to be the sole source of conservative orthodoxy. Newt’s fidelity to conservatism is similar to Romney’s. It’s just that some people are choosing to overlook it when it comes to Newt. I see no reason for us to close our eyes and pretend he’s been always faithful.
FOX and Friends highlighted all this today.
Matt is a fag and Ann has turned into a party hack Faghag...
RINOs gotta get the conservative....
Rinos GOTTA GET the conservative.....
Rinos gotta get the CONSERVATIVE.............
GET HIM! STOMP HIM! KILL HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!
On the Drudge Report, I sent this tip in his tip box: Matt is in the tank for Mitt.
I wonder what Newt did to Drudge. It looks personal.
Or maybe it’s because Newt is a poor candidate and his flaws are becoming more apparent?
There is no such thing as unbiased news coverage.
While I’d pick Newt any day of the week and twice on Sunday over mitt, Newt is a bottom tier choice.
Matt is working overtime with his girlfriend Ann.
It is getting kind of obvious: he’s Ann Coulter’s little poodle. She’s against Newt so he’s against Newt. No matter what he does, she still won’t sleep with him, I’m guessing ...Creepy!
Context is everything. It seems odd today, but Reagan was often criticized by conservatives for not being conservative enough. Reagan had many moderates/liberals in his administration.
I agree with you. A better position to take regarding Newt would be to not try to pretend and make excuses for some of his non conservative positions, but to say that you know the flaws in Newt but feel there is a better chance for Newt to come around than there would be with Romney.
Like maybe 50/50? If you are lucky.
Newt at least HAS an established politically conservative record of sorts while Mitt has NO record of conservative public service—in fact quite the opposite as he was left of Ted Kennedy.
Both don’t always tell the truth but with Romney there is no proof he was EVER a conservative politician while with Newt there is.
Please. Gingrich is the frontrunner and the frontrunner always gets the most negative attention.
Instead of complaining that these stories are out there — which should be of no surprise to anyone (in fact, there will be many more coming) — why not spend energy defending Newt for repeatedly saying what Harry Reid said about President Bush — that President Reagan, his administration and his foreign policy was a complete failure.
No way Mitt will do more conservative “things” compared to Newt. So even if half the criticisms are true he’s still more conservative than Mitt. A Massachusetts political figure just doesn’t beat a Newt.
Drudge be a poofta.
If he's going to be President, this will only work if conservatives DON'T gloss over Newt's foibles and failures and, rather, serve him strong notice that he OWES US this time and we WILL hold him accountable.
If you don't like what you read or see there; for pete's sake...STOP GOING TO THE SITE!
Mr. Drudge, fox msm, oreilly's site, hannity's site, beck's site, et al, don't exist to fit either your requirements or your perception.
Matt Drudge Now Has 9 Negative Stories On Newt, Zero On Romney
This is called desperation and I suspect it has something to do with internal polling at the National level.
This isn’t rocket surgery. The group of people once called the “GOP base” can’t decide which it loathes more...the MSM and talking heads, Obama and the Libs, or the party that opposes it’s own platform.
As such, the ‘establishment” encompassing the above icons of scorn, realized in 10 that they were all in deep crap since their traditional methods of controlling us failed utterly. Now as we go into the 12 election, they spent the last year trying the same crap to rope us back onto the Ponderosa without success. So they just fall bck on blaming us for our lack of intelligence and ‘vision’.
At this point, If Newt was found with a dead girl, a live boy and the family Schnauzer, I’d still crawl naked over cut glass to vote for him if for no other reason than to watch their Utopia burn.
Newt, of all people, needs to be smacked upside-the-head on a regular basis.
Drudge was real helpful in taking down Perry, too.
I doubt Drudge is a Romney fan, but he’s not a Gingrich believer, and who can blame him. He’s facing the same quandry we all are: the entire Republican field stinks (Ron Paul appears more principled than most, but also has serious weaknesses).
G*d save America.
That’s not the point.
The point is are we going to nominate/elect a man without serving him notice that we’re on to him and we have expectations that he better meet?
Giving Gingrich a pass is neither necessary nor helpful, even if one is all-in for him.
There's a lot of truth to that statement, but it's also obvious if you've been paying any attention to the Drudge Report that Matt Drudge is intensely anti-Newt. He has been flooding his page with anti-Newt stories non-stop. There have been several other candidates who been out in the front at various times and none of them have received this kind of over-the-top hostile propagandizing from Drudge.
So being conservative means being against the “establishment”?
I’ve said it before, I don’t know how people can be out of their heads concerning Mitt Romney and then turn around and act like Newt is the next Reagan.
I think a good point is that they’re both professional politicians, Romney less so. I really fear they both are more committed to personal success than to conservative success. Time will tell. I am confident that one of these men will be the next president of the US. I’m also hoping that we conservatives won’t self-destruct because we don’t have the perfect candidate and end up getting four more years of Obama. Either Newt or Romney will do a better job of leading our country if elected. For that matter, so would porky pig.
Matt Is a Romney bot !
It’s sad how the former outsider becomes a tool of the DC Media
Thank the other DC elite Ann traitor Coulter
who is sadly just another NE lib elite republican !
Drudge tortured Cain too...I see a pattern.
There's so much stuff out that's not even close to being contained on Drudge. THIS, not Newt's messy marriages, THIS burgeoning archive of political garbage is what people were warning about when referring to Newt's baggage.
Such as here's a story that I saw a few minutes ago only because it was in a sidebar to an article I was reading:
This is the sort of thing (plus Monica Lewinsky) we are going to be dealing with in 2012 if Newt is our nominee.
Doesn't mean we have an alternative. But we do need to be real about who this man is and what we'd have to do to get him elected.
You mean like the tea party candidates in Washington that haven’t delivered? So where are all the great conservative presidential candidates who will deliver? We are having to choose between the lesser of “two evils” and that’s the real point. Gingrich is the lesser evil of the two.
No. It’s not desperation. It’s called “traffic.”
Drudge is running a business and he puts out what brings traffic to his site and generates buzz.
That is all.
I’m boycotting Drudge
Newt must be doing something right.
Check this out — an amazing read:
You can see the outline Newt plans to follow.
I abhor this victim mentality.
No one "controlled" or "controls" anyone.
Early Reagan and early Newt has some comparisons as far as marriage and affairs.
If the democrats and “moderates” can get moist over the prospects of a Clinton presidency redux as a great ear in US history, then can certainly look at Newt as capable of becoming the kind of determined charismatic leader this nation (and the world) needs!
The eurocrats are not going to like Newt any more than they liked Bush, but they will fare much better with him in charge of the US than anyone else on the horizon.
In the next 4 years we will have a nuclear armed Iran in axis with a belligerent Russia and China, an expansionist militaristic China with a gasping economy, the fall of the existing economic and social order in europe, America at a crossroads and having to live with whatever turn we lurch towards. And the continuing social rot being perpetrated on our children by “progressives” burrowed into every institution. The schools, the govt, the courts, the media.
Who do you trust most to show up on your TV screen at 3AM to announce US response ot news that Iran launched missiles at Israel because it refused UN occupation to enforce “social justice” for Gaza?
Mitt? Barack? or Newt.
In the next 4 years I could give 2 craps whether Newt is on wife 3 or 4. At least he marries his lovers and they are of the opposite sex.
“Black-and-white” mentality takes one nowhere. This attitude that “If it’s my candidate, anything bad is a lie” is useless. I think Gingrich is the best of the bunch but this ostrich-like sticking the head in the sand is useless. We should, and Newt should, be open, honest and forthright about the way things really are, the good, the bad, and the ugly.
Newt needs to be stopped since he is another bill clinton.
The only thing I can figure out is that maybe he is working hard to get all the dirt on Newt out now to diffuse the Obama attacks in the main election. Maybe there is some method to the madness, much like what Matt did with ABC story - make it a non-story by making it a story before it gets any legs.
FOX has been pathetic, just talking heads for Romney fair and balanced yea right.
All they do in the morning is read Drudge and then report what he has on, lazy lazy lazy.
Will be interesting to see if Limbaugh mentions this today during his GOP estab/media attack analysis today. It’s beyond obvious that Drudge is glaringly biased. Drudge should post a poll about it in his left column.
Yeah, and the MSM would never make up stories like that about Mitt Romney in the general election. Let’s nominate him instead.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.