a very poor time to call others a “Fool”.
Posted on 01/26/2012 5:55:04 AM PST by RaceBannon
Article II SUPERPAC streaming live video and audio at this link
It's dead in the sense that birthers have lost every intellectual argument and there's no possible way it will change the outcome of the election. If birthers are still going to go out there and make fools of themselves, as Orly Taitz did this morning in particularly humiliating fashion, then they deserve ridicule. This distraction should have ended years ago.
watch states drop him like domino’s
Anyone else wondering what happened in chambers before the hearing???
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The Steady Drip
http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2012/01/latest-update-from-obama-ballot.html
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Latest Update from Obama ballot challenge
I just got off the phone with Dean Haskins who was in the courtroom this morning assisting with the Art 2Pac live stream. Judge Malihi talked to the attorneys in chambers before the hearing this morning and told them that he was going to enter a DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Obama and recommend that Obama’s name not be on the Georgia ballot! Alll the attorneys expressed a desire to put an abbreviated streamlined case on the record and the judge agreed. How does the mainstream media spin this? The Georgia SOS has already indicated that he will follow the judge’s recommendation. Obama will not get any popular vote or electors from the great state of Georgia! Congratulations to all freedom-loving Americans!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Ok people, put your thinking caps on..... what is a default judgment?
YES! Tanks for the ping.
No, I think he’s making a valid point. That’s the danger of the NBC argument. In order to make that argument they have to accept that Obama Sr is Obama’s legal father, but to accept that they have to consent to using fraudulent documents as if they were authentic. That sets a precedent. Obama can now say that those 2 fakes were accepted by a judge as authentic.
This argument is a paradox. Nothing has changed. The judge either will rule in favor of the plaintiffs claiming lineage or against them based purely on statute.
It is far more difficult proving the entire state of Hawaii is corrupt in an administrative court than it is to challenge the defendent on Constitutional face value. This is especially true in a civil litigation. Fraud and corruption are usually left to the DA's office to pursue.
We WANT this court to make a Constitutional claim. That way it can be fast tracked right to the U.S. Supreme Court for an ultimate decision. No other case to date has followed this path.
Always choose the path of least resistance. Our framing fathers did not require paperwork. They only required a test. At this point, the test is very simple to execute.
I generally read and not post because you little ankle biter obots are more annoying then the Bluegill when I’m skinny dipping in my pond...but I just can’t help pointing out that you seemed to pick a very poor time to call others a “Fool”.
That means the plaintiffs win and successfully will get the Judge to request that Brian Kemp, Georgia Sec of State, to strike Obama’s name from the ballot in the presidential primary. The judge will in his recommendation write how defendent Obama was a no show as well as his council which disresptected the judges order to appear on said date of January 26th, 2012. Kemp in his letter to Jablonski stated that he will abide by Judge Malihi’s ruling. Expect big headlines when this happens.
It would need to be a bit more sophisticated than that, although JohnRob could probably come up with something good enough. It would need to prevent the following, predictable, troll counter strategy: an Obot or PaulBot could join, run around Down Thumbing all the good posters, but post no replies so they couldn’t be personal Down Thumbed.
MEDIA CAN NOT HIDE IT NOW
Default judgment is a binding judgment in favor of either party based on some failure to take action by the other party. Most often, it is a judgment in favor of a plaintiff when the defendant has not responded to a summons or has failed to appear before a court of law.
(((ping)))
Sweet.
See my post and the original person who posted it. Meant to add your name too.
Just told daddy: He said, through tears, the judge handled it perfectly and again stated that the lawyers did not appear in order to secure their law license and reputation.
God bless Orley.
Null and void is an excellent freeper, one of the very best.
Timing....isn’t it just, well, everything?
Elaborate!!
Soebarkah’s Blackberry is likely set to speed dial Bill Ayers.
You omitted the sarcasm tag! Right?
Nice dream, but it isn’t going to happen. If you are convinced it will, you can probably get great odds in Vegas.
I half expected to see you here. Were you elsewhere?
Great first step.
I hope it is true.
Now, if only people on this site would deal with the reality of Minor V Happersett and Wong Kim Ark . People on this site should be picking apart Wong Kim Ark and helping build a defense when Obama’s Legal Team starts ripping apart the foundation some of you have built on not understanding the case.
It just amazes me when I see people posting about Vattel and claiming that Wong Kim Ark backs them up.
Once again, Wong Kim Ark is about SCOTUS declaring that the 14th Amendment was just a means of making common law doctrine official.
Everyone who posts about that case should be required to read the lower court case.
This must be a real yuk-fest for you. Do you post at Fogbow too?
This must be a real yuk-fest for you. (Do you post at Fogbow too? If not you should check it out. I think you would fit in nicely.)
The first time you addressed me you started by calling me an ass:
To: null and voidYou asserted that:hey you ASS
I am NOT willfully ignorant OR deliberately lying, what the hell do I have to gain by that? And why the hell would you make such an accusation against someone you don’t know?
I am expressing my opinion (as an actual scientist) based in the data I have seen.
The steps are NOT “well documented”, and no ‘intermediary species’ has ever been found- do you hear that - EVER.
We see complete eyeballs, but never the millions of evolutionary years and incremental steps to MAKE a complete eyeball through evolution. (or the dead bodies of those creatures, which should be millions of times more prevalent)
My ‘God’ does not need protecting from anyone. Nothing I have read either way (evolution or not) disproves the existance of God.
I am expressing my opinion (as an actual scientist) based in the data I have seen.
At that time I asked what flavor of "actual scientist" you are.
You never did answer.
I asked you again. You didn't answer.
To spare you embarrassment, today I asked by private FReepmail, only to get a snide comment back in private, and a backstabbing accusation in public.
And you still won't admit what kind of "actual" scientist you are.
Just sayin'...
JimRob need to put a button next to a posters name so we can out them as trolls.
Sort of like the Thumbs Up and Thumbs Down on facebook
Then when an OBOT is trolling you can spot them easier and keep your blood pressure in check.
is a fine idea...
You are one of the best!
I think you are right, but didn’t the absentee ballots go out last Saturday? Will the SOS just now ignore those? What happens to all those pre-printed ballots? What is the mechanism for that?
OMG ROLFLMAO big time, thank you!
There's a majority of independent Americans that know Obama isn't on the level.
Some know it because of his foreign parentage — some because of the bogus birth documents he's presented to support his bogus history — some because of the phony “Official Certification of Nomination” documents signed and submitted by Nancy Pelosi and the Chairman of the Democrat Party — some because of the multiple and fraudulent Social Security Numbers — some because of all his sealed records — I could go on and on.
Then there are people like you — committed Obots or the brain dead.
Cheers . . .
Ya beat me to it! Good on ya!!!
My question is that one something this big why hasn’t Orly gotten together with someone like Mark Levin who knows this stuff inside out?I don’t get it.
I remember that cartoon character, what was that dogs name?
What? You’re saying they couldn’t use an unconstitutional 2012 law to deport BHO Sr. in 1963, just so junior can be president in 2008?
Mark Levin is one of the large group of radio hosts who refuse to touch it. For reason/s known only to himself. I say “cowards”.
It seems to me that there is spin room in this.
I was explaining to my husband how much this means and he was reminding me that it’s just one step. But I had to make sure that he understood that we actually had a judge - the only judge thus far - who withstood without being threatened into ignoring the law. That is such reason to celebrate!
My question is that one something this big why hasn’t Orly gotten together with someone like Mark Levin who knows this stuff inside out?I don’t get it.
_________________________________________
Maybe someone can ask Mark ...
I hope he mentions this court case...
That is incorrect! At the beginning of the hearing, Van Irions presented numerous INS documents showing that Obama Sr WAS NEVER a US citizen!
I hate to get into this, but I believe what Sven is pointing out is that the vast majority of the legal system has been operating under the Jus Soli principle for so long that they are not even familiar with the Jus Sanguinus principle.
Sven is saying the judge is going to rule he's eligible because the judge doesn't know the correct history or meaning of the term "natural born citizen" and is simply going to follow the ruts left by the 14th amendment and Wong Kim Ark.
This is something which I have been very worried about as well. It takes quite a lot of time and research to gain a correct understanding of the Father requirement for a natural born citizen, but it is EASY to simply trail along behind the existing crowd.
I won't be surprised if the Judge rules he is eligible. He will be wrong, but that never stopped a judge before.
I could be very wrong, but it seems to me Levin is doing his listeners a disservice. As the leading constitutionalist on the air, he could explain this comprehensively yet concisely. From what I have heard of him on the matter, it sounds to me like he doesn't even want to touch it.
Again, I have not heard every hour, or every show. so I could be wrong.
I will admit to finding some humor in Orly’s antics today. And, no, I’ve never posted there.
I could be wrong but I believe this decision is final. The court is a function of the executive branch as is the SoS. As in NH, there is legal recourse for an executive decision.
“Judge Malihi talked to the attorneys in chambers before the hearing this morning and told them that he was going to enter a DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Obama and recommend that Obama’s name not be on the Georgia ballot! Alll the attorneys expressed a desire to put an abbreviated streamlined case on the record and the judge agreed.”
Win the battle, lose the war.
Plaintiffs entered Obama’s COLB and long form BC on Judicial record as undisputed fact. Obama may be kicked off the Georgia ballot, but he will be able to defend himself against future challenges by asking the Court to take Judicial notice of his COLB and Long Form BC entered as undisputed fact in the Georgia case.
As I expwctes; and why he pretty much told Taitz to shut up and just submit her documents.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.