OBAMA ELIGIBILITY HEARING TO BE STREAMED LIVE STARTING AT 0900 EST

Article II SUPERPAC ^ | 01/26/2012 | Article II SUPERPAC

[RaceBannon]

Article II SUPERPAC streaming live video and audio at this link

[Danae]

The only thing I know is that more will be revealed.

[hoosiermama]

In that case there will be appeals, right up to the SCOTUS...Standing will no longer be the issue.

[Tennessee Nana]

The only way to FORCE the media to cover it is if it hits big on talk radio FIRST
________________________________________

Yes well

Rush never mentioned in in all his 2 hours

if he did then I must have dozed off

but he was too busy bashing Newt

at 4PM Sean has yet to say something

he too is singing Romneys praises

I had to laugh when he played a Newt ad exposing Romney instead of a Romney one that lied about Newt..

I thought Sean was going to cry...

LOL

[Churchillspirit]

Excellent post.

[null and void]

Nope.

umm... am I mistaken or did you call me willfully ignorant AND a deliberate liar?...because I dont AGREE with you?

You are mistaken, I didn't post it "...because I dont AGREE with you"

I posted it because I believe that you are smart enough, and well informed enough to know full well your opinion did not square with facts well known to those skilled in the art, or even those merely reasonably well informed.

Which brings us back to the question of your scientific specialty. The question you are apparently ashamed or afraid to answer.

It kinda reminds me of someone who would spend thousands of courtroom hours and millions of dollars to avoid showing their $12 birth certificate.

[justlurking]

I even had material which has never seen public reading which show Barry was not even born in the USA but his mtoher broguht him back tot he U.S. within the first month of his life, but that is no more useful now than it would have been in fall of 2008.

If the BC fabrication somehow gets legs (and I doubt it will), would you be willing to publish it?

[bgill]

Again, we REALLY DO NOT WANT this to go before the Supreme Court

Obama, Homeland Security Chertoff and the Senate agree with the TWO US PARENT definition. Thomas said the SCOTUS was "evading" the issue. To me, that says they know something smells.

[MHGinTN]

Nice try ... fail.

[Tennessee Nana]

My #800 the article in that other FR thread..

by craig anderson...

he was there and either taped the proceedings

or typed real fast...

[RummyChick]

You are guilty of the offense of Leo D. You are trying to interject what they should have said if they wanted to say.

Read the Court of Appeals case of Ankey. It actually addresses this.

I might remind you that THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA stated that the RULING of Wong Kim Ark was that Ark was a natural born citizen in their brief.

HOWEVER, all you really have to do is understand ONE CONCEPT.
It is pretty simple.
The Majority Opinion in Wong Kim Ark stated that the 14th amendment was declaratory. So did the Dissent. The Dissent didn’t agree with the ruling but set forth that this is what the majority ruled.

So, do you understand what it means to say that the 14th Amendment is declaratory?????

Look at how many paragraphs talk about natural born citizen as it related to Common Law.

If Common Law indicated that Ark is a natural born citizen and the 14th Amendment is Declaratory - what does that mean for Ark?

If YOU don’t understand what it means - read Justice Fuller’s dissent. He understand what it meant in terms of someone running for President. He disagreed with the notion and put it in his dissent.

You would be better served, as would this site, and your cause to actually understand what they meant and try to put forth a defense AGAINST Wong Kim Ark.

I will repeat what I have said repeatedly, those of you that support Vattel should understand that Wong REJECTED it.

[MHGinTN]

Appreciate the ‘cliffnotes’ version. If the video is ever put up on the Internet, I would love to watch it all.

[morphing libertarian]

Thanx

[Las Vegas Ron]

BS....you’ve been polutting these threads since the issue firsr arrose.

Try your lies with some one else.

[Las Vegas Ron]

BS....you've been polluting these threads since the issue first arose.

Try your lies with some one else.

[Suz in AZ]

Won’t happen until the judgement is rendered officially. Then it is a “factual event” that they can discuss, rather than being hearsay.

[Godebert]

Only a Constitutional Amendment will define Natural-born citizen.

You should be thrown out of here.

[philman_36]

Here is a simple question...Did the court declare Ark a natural born citizen?

[DiogenesLamp]

I really can’t fathom why Gray pulled the number he did in Wong

My theory is that he was rebuking the explicit racism of the Chinese Exclusion act and the Dred Scot v Sanford decisions. He wanted to make a political statement by forcing people whom he considered to be racists into accepting other races as equals whether they liked it or not. He wanted to ram it down their throats and watch them sputter and gag. It's really that simple.

You must remember, Republicans of that era became famous for "waving the bloody shirt." Excoriating the Previously Rebellious and Racist Democrats was a popular pastime in national politics after the civil war.

but it just goes to show you that the law will be decided how they want to that day and they will find a way to make it happen - even if it goes against another case that they previously decided a different way.

Exactly. The law means what the current judges SAY it means, with some respect to Precedent if it doesn't offend the current judges too badly. If it does, OUT WITH IT!

We are not a nation of laws, but of men. (and women.)

[esquirette]

Actually, they could have been presented for the singular proposition that they were offered by O as authentic. Thus, he admits that Sr. was African.

[MHGinTN]

Actually, just last December or late November (I don’t recall exact date), 2011, the facts surfaced through an unexpected channel, a Canadian source, so I don’t have to stick my neck out to get this into the public domain now.