Skip to comments.Mark Levin Says Drudge Not Taking Sides in Election
Posted on 01/27/2012 3:40:03 PM PST by vbmoneyspender
Just said it on his show. Couldn't believe my ears.
Drudgie losing 2m+ hits must've prompted a call to Mark and Rush?
Running up the b?llsh!t flag on that One, Mark.
Well, I think Mark is wrong. But there’s a difference between mistaken and malignant, so I’m sure not throwing him under the bus. Mark’s one of the good ones, of that I’m sure.
I rarely disagree with anything Mark says, but this one is total BS!
Dance with the ones that brung ya, Matt
Mark, go tell your little buddy, that he owes his readers one simple, sincere apology.
He screwed up. Bad.
Yup. I know I’m done with MD.
Did he give his reasons for this analysis?
You can be news, or you can be editorial. Your choice, your audience.
Don’t claim shock when you swim against the tide.
Levin dances on the strings of the Powers That Be who control his program and it would appear they pulled the string that makes him say things they want to hear so he keeps his job.
Or, maybe he said exactly what he meant.
One man’s obvious bias is another man’s impartiality!
Just said that Drudge has done a lot of great things and that he isn’t taking sides. I don’t think there is anything that can be said to justify the position that Drudge is a neutral party.
Whut? That wasn’t what he said last night!
Levin just turned into a bottom-boy for Drudge !?
Now he`s defending that hysterical menopausal Coulter !?
Listen Mark, we know a pandering propagandist hack when we see one.
Dare insult our intelligence and just watch your listenership drop like Drudge`s website viewers has.
No doubt. On Oct 5, 2011 the day Sarah called into Mark's show to announce she is not running, sometime later during his show, Mark alluded to receiving an IM from Matt saying it's a sad day for America (in regards to Sarah not running).
Mark may be stating this for Matt's benefit, but it is apparent Matt is in the bag for Mitt.
We should be thanking Drudge. The sooner this stuff gets out the better. The last thing we want is a barrage of this stuff in October... Now there’s time to deal with it.
Me too. I’m done with Drudge. I completely disagree with Mark Levin on this! Drudge is in the tank for Romney. There is no doubt in my mind!
Bad choice of words?
I've found the reason Matt likes Mitt...
Video..Romney speaks French.
Send to all Floridians you know.
Looks like they're all establishment frauds.
What “stuff?” On the day of the debate he linked to a 20-year-old video clip that was posted on YouTube in December that basically cut Newt off in mid-sentence and put a false headline on it. That isn’t “news” of any sort. It could be done at any time about any candidate. There’s no excuse for linking to someone’s cheap attempt at propaganda. If he was a real reporter, he would have found the full, unedited video and linked to that instead. Besides, we’re not so much arguing that he’s posting anti-Newt stuff, it’s that he wasn’t posting any negatives on Romney at all. Did he ever link to the DNC ad that clipped Romney as saying “I like being able to fire people?”
We just got Mark’s answer-—I posted this thread on his Facebook page and he promptly deleted it.
Good for you.
There’s only one question left to ask about which side Matt Fudged is taking...top or bottom?
Drudge: I Do Not Love Sex With Men
Drudge has never been said to particularly relish his homosexuality or embrace it; in fact his gay romantic/sexual side has been described (when alleged) as conflicted and awkward.
David Brock, the former right-wing writer, wrote in his memoir Blinded by the Right about a scary date in which Drudge, after bringing Brock flowers and navigating the Santa Monica gay strip like a pro, stepped on a competing suitors foot really hard (in Drudges purported words) in a nightclub to scare him away from Brock.
Alec Baldwin stated that Drudge made an advance on him in an ABC Studios hallway, a proposition that had kind of a creepy quality to it.
Drudge denied he was gay to the Miami New Times in 2001, even as he launched into a disquisition on (as the New Times put it) the reigning DJ king of gay circuit parties and summarized his nightlife thusly: I go to straight bars, I go to gay bars.
Ann Coulter Named Honorary Chair Of GOProud
Ann helped put our organization on the map. Politics is full of the meek, the compromising and the apologists Ann, like GOProud, is the exact opposite of all of those things. We need more Ann Coulters.
The board includes some other names you may recognize as well: Margaret Hoover, Grover Norquist, Andrew Breitbart, Liz Mair, Chuck Muth, Lisa De Pasquale, Christian Josi, Roger Stone, Andrew Langer, Kathryn Serkes and Bob Carlstrom. Last year, Coulter was a big draw at GOProuds first-ever Homocon event in New York City.
I wonder if has considered that he could find himself being as one of them if he isn’t careful?
Now we are throwing Mark Levin under the bus because he has a friendship with Matt Drudge which leads him to say a few kind words about him? Are we going crazy? I swear: the left has driven us all crazy.
Anybody watch Fox News at 6:00 with Brett Baer? Seemed to be the anti-Newt news hour, from beginning to end.
Now is not the time for a few good words, we are at WAR with the BHO Liberals.
We are not crazy we are trying to save this country and we can not be nice about doing so.
I don’t mind him defending Drudge, but don’t defend Fox News and Ann Coulter.
It’s not an organized movement, but I have, and so have many others I know, gone through our contact books, and we are tag teaming Drudge, and sending links of his articles out by email or facebook, so people don’t have to give him a hit on his website... Matt loves quoting his number of hits each month...
There is an all out effort to damage Newt at a critical point. Drudge is the tip of the spear.
It has Romney’s MO all over it.
I mind him saying something that is flatly untrue and insults my intelligence to boot.
“Marks one of the good ones, of that Im sure.”
Never doubt the power of corruption, and always remember that man’s greatest weakness is his ability to forsake truth in favor of the schemes of his personal life.
Well Mark just got done verbally beating the snot out of those who are trying to defend Romneycare.
All I know is that right now Levin is absolutely trashing Romney care. He just said that Romney doesn’t want to talk about Obamacare but instead wants to focus on Gingrich not being a Reaganite, which he says, it’s absolutely ridiculous.
Whether or not Drudge is taking sides is a question to be determined by watching what Drudge does.
Not by listening to statements made by people who know him personally.
Yeah, if you even look at the stories about the wives, it’s pretty apparent who Drudge favors.
Why doesn’t Matt Dregs defend himself?
He is aware of the controversy. He should have the courage of his convictions and not use double-speak dressed up as news bulletins.
Birds of a feather - he is as gutless as Mitt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.