Skip to comments.Vanity: Will Palin's FB piece on GOP-E and Newt be reported on?
Posted on 01/28/2012 6:36:01 AM PST by vmivol00
Has anyone other than Freerepublic published Sarah Palin's latest piece on Facebook regarding the GOP-E, Mittens, and Newt?
I really think it could help Newt....so I'm guessing that means no one outside of FR will report on it. I have to think Palin's pseudo-endorsement in SC helped push Newt over the top. In guessing the Romneybots, and the GOP-E are pissing their pants at the thought of this story getting out.
All this being said, I'm really glad she wrote it, but her timing was poor. Typically the DC folks dump documents and stories on Friday nights to minimize the number of folks who see it. Somehow this story needs to be front and center on Monday morning.
If Romney ends up as the nominee, there is no way I can vote for him. If we are going to have a gun grabbing socialist in the Whitehouse, I would rather it be a Democrat. I am conservative first and GOP second. I refuse to vote for the architect of socialized medicine in America. By pushing Romney, the GOP is showing how out of touch they are with the people. I am predicting the end of GOP as conservatives know it. This election has proven that we are no longer welcome in the GOP. I can only hope that Palin and some of the Tea Party House members will hand together to start something new.
Rome wasn’t sacked in a day.
“The Supreme Court is the true prize here ...”
Yes and I do not trust him for the picks. I live in the northeast and the fact that Scott Brown voters like him will never resonate.
Why was Romney there anyway? What was a millionaire mormon doing outside of his natural domain? Not good.
From another post, my assessment of just how different Romney and Obama are. I will resist both of these malefactors in any way I can, for the duration.
I think a nadir has been reached with Romney where truly, we have a distinction without a difference. Always we must select between flawed people. That is a given. Here though, both are so close to absolute moral voids that I cannot see a practical distinction.
Here is another analogy. A choice must be made between two men:
One is Ernst Julius Röhm, head of the Sturmabteilung, or Brownshirts. He is a Nazi. He is a personally brutish, squalid and morally depraved street thug. He is a drug abuser and a sexual predator and pervert. He is a chaotic train wreck.
The other is Heinrich Luitpold Himmler, leader of the Schutzstaffel, or SS. Like Röhm, Himmler is a Nazi. Unlike Röhm, Himmler is self controlled. In his personal life Himmler is a teetotaler, a non-smoker, and he is a family man, faithful to his wife and loving towards his daughter. In his professional life Himmler is orderly, diligent, detail oriented and punctilious. He is an effective and honest administrator.
Which is the better man? Which would you vote for, as between the two? In the event, Hitler opted for Himmler on the Night of the Long Knives. Indeed, for his purposes Himmler was the better man.
But say the choice was yours. Which of these men would you advance, if the power was held in your hands? How could you advance either one without aiding and abetting evil?
Romney and Obama have proven, demonstrable track records.
1) Both are responsible for entrenching and enabling abortion at will, and doubtless have effected more of them through their policies, Romney by making it cheaper with money taken in taxes from the general population, and Obama by holding the line as long as he could for post birth infanticide.
2) Both are contemptuous of the Second Amendment rights of Americans, which is to say the natural right of all persons to self defense.
3) Both are willing to compel government health care, which by definition can rightly be called health control. This is not the State in ones bedroom, this is the State in ones very medicine cabinet and ultimately veins - or not. It is, after all, not the individuals decision anymore.
4) Both are economic predators, as seen by their embrace not only of the TARP legislation, but the whole ideology behind TARP. There is a distinction in that Romney is corporatist, and Obama is a syndicalist, but that is as significant as whether one is eaten by hyenas or eaten by jackals.
5) Both have repeatedly demonstrated their commitment to advancing homosexual copulatory arrangements and dignifying those liaisons with the name marriage.
6) Both are brazen deceivers, who have never admitted error, fault, or guilt as far as I know.
I regard neither Romney nor Obama as lesser evils. Both of these statist sociopaths are such great evils that I cannot and will not assist either one to greater power and influence. They are comparable, analogous great evils who I reject and oppose with every fiber of my being. I will not participate in this game. That is my stand.
Yep, fight on. There is so much legal and political infrastructure support of the 2-party system in the US that it'd be faster to take over the GOP than to get a third party into second place to gain the system advantage.
Palin needs to take a little advice from Todd.
POST OF THE DAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!......
Romney looks real good about now to you, or were you always kind of a romney type?
Democrats judge choices in Massachussetts? Shocking!
The FR's favorite consevative, Palin, appointed a former director of Planned Parenthood to the state bench. This woman was so liberal that three years later obama put her on the federal bench.
What does that say about whom Palin would pick if given the chance?
The argument here supporting her choice is that a democrat assembly sent her nothing but liberal choices.
Name the conservative options that Romney had and rejected in favor of registered dems.
As if it isn't destroyed already.
Are you saying these were the best he could come up with in the entire state of Massachusetts? He will select people as souless and malleable as he is, no matter what office he occupies.
Cannibals in GOP Establishment Employ Tactics of the Left
We have witnessed something very disturbing this week. The Republican establishment which fought Ronald Reagan in the 1970s and which continues to fight the grassroots Tea Party movement today has adopted the tactics of the left in using the media and the politics of personal destruction to attack an opponent.
Continue reading »
Name anything Romney has ever done for the conservative cause.
Look he could have probably won the Den primary...that’s the prize he should have sought.
You can blather on until the end of time, but that won’t change Romney’s liberal socialist record, and it won’t make conservatives support him.
Peddle your end of the world scare tactics and rhetoric elsewhere. If Romney is the nominee and conservatives don’t support him it won’t be the end of world. In all likelihood conservatives will be better off. This week has convinced me the GOP needs another whipping from the Dems. Maybe then conservatives can start to take their party back.
Regardless of what others say, yours is a thoughtful and reasoned post.
I don’t want Romney either. But I’m not so foolish as to believe that he would be “just like Obama” in the White House.
Having Romney in the Oval Office would be the equivalent of having a mushy-middle-left democrat. Think LBJ without the legislative “oomph” behind him. So long as we retain a unified majority in at least one house of Congress, he won’t be able to do much damage.
But Obama is an out-and-out communist. Always was, always will be. And having succeeded in circumventing the Constitution in minor ways in his first term, he will “reach for more” in a second one.
Regardless of the damage Romney may do, it pales in comparison to the damage we _know_ Obama _will_ do.
That’s my opinion. I realize others’ may differ....
This is just a “what if..” we stop supporting the GOP nominee because they know we have no place else to go, and Obama has landslide victory as half of the republicans don’t vote. Obama knowing he has 4 years but without the house and maybe not the senate can get his destruction done by EO and agency regs only goes even further radical then he he has now which causes people, all people, to rise up against him, take to the streets, Internet and airwaves to demand he leave office? Kinda like letting a big company go bankrupt rather then bailing it out.
Again, name the conservative options that he rejected. do you even know the process? It doesn’t sound like it.
Where do you get that from? My multiple posts saying that I will not vote for him in anything but the general election? Or did you pull it out of your ass?
You raised the point. You tell me.
Any fool could see that after four more years of obama there will be nothing left....maybe that's what you really want...is that it?
Are you really selling the destruction of the republic but hiding behind "principles"?
We don't know who you are or what your real agenda may be but that's what it looks like to me.
It is duly noted that you ducked the question of which conservative choices Romney rejected in favor of liberal judges.
Our Republic is still breathing and still fighting...give obama four more years and that will not be the case.
There is nothing at stake in a Romney Obama race. Romney = Obama. In fact Romney would be worse than Obama in two ways a) he would absolutely destroy the Republican brand because he would preside over the great collapse b) he gets a free pass on implementing big government from people like you. Period.
No matter who is elected — if you brought back a zombie Reagan from the dead — we’re screwed.
“It is duly noted that you ducked the question of which conservative choices Romney rejected in favor of liberal judges.”
It is also duly noted (insert harrumph and strut here) that this is thus far the best defense you can muster on behalf of your client, err... candidate.
Let the record further reflect (insert phlegmy throat clearing here) that you ARE defending one Willard Mitt Romney’s record as governor of the state of Massachusetts.
I was wondering when you would start to lie...now I know.
Nice talking to you.
He has so far chosen two lesbian activist marxists. Two more similar justices and it will not matter one bit who owns the House, the Senate or from 2016 onward, the WH.
We will see Chief Justice Sotomayor who will run the court and the country for forty years.
Romney did not govern from a conservative standpoint. How would I know what conservatives he passed over when he was Gov? Are you really trying to suggest that there are no conservatives at all in Mass? That is the weakest argument I’ve heard yet for Romney. Your question illustrates your boy’s weskness. I’m sure you can find some better talking points than that on his website.
Show me one thing in his record (not just BS and lies that he spews) that bares any resemblance to conservatism. As a matter of fact show me where his record is substantially different from Obama. The only one I can think of is that Zero defines the “rich” at $250k and Mittens defines it at $200k.
If conservatives continually give in to this lesser of two evils BS, we will never regain the party.
I dont support socialist gun grabbers regardless of if the GOP tells me to. If you want bend over and take it...go ahead. That’s not my style. (but I hear Romney’s ok with that too).
By the way, how’s the weak conciliatory go along to get along approach working for conservatives? Yeah..,real well.
“He has so far chosen two lesbian activist marxists.”
Are you talking about Romney or Obama? I lost the context on who “He” is?
As I’m not a socialist, I don’t know all the nuances if socialized medicine. Can you explain why Romney’s socialistic views are so much better than Obama’s? I must be missing some of the very relevant finer points that only someone who truly appreciates the system can point out.
yeah...we bought time in the last election....Remember?...How long u wanna wait??
sometimes its better to man up to the situation and take your chances early... rather then live your life in constant retreat and be out-numbered by your own time consuming indecision's....Think it over..
That's my opinion...I welcome yours.........
conservatives are now viewed by the Republican party the same way afro-americans are viewed by the democratic party....
Cheap workers on THEIR plantation!!!!
“I was wondering when you would start to lie...now I know.”
I haven’t lied, nor have you told the truth. You’ve yet to refute a point against the candidate you defend either.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.