Posted on 01/28/2012 3:09:53 PM PST by Panzerlied
Attorneys who argued in a Georgia court this week that Barack Obama isn’t eligible to be president say Administrative Law Judge Michael Malihi considered granting a default judgment before they even argued the case.
That presumably could have recommended that Obama failed to prove his eligibility and therefore should not be on the 2012 ballot, since he and his lawyer snubbed the hearing, for which Obama was subpoenaed.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
The best comment I read about this hearing, is that the non-appearance by Obama’s local attorney Michael Jablonski could lead to disciplinary actions by the Georgia Bar Association which would threaten the loss of his license to practice law.
Anyone choosing to launch an ethics probe of Mr. Jablonski’s willful neglect of his professional duties, can consult http://www.gabar.org/ethics
I hope this case leads to bigger things. I would love to see Obama’s name not placed on numerous state ballots.
Martial law,here we come.Obama will not go quietly you can bet on that.
fyi.
What if 0bama gives orders to his people of a “not go quietly” nature and they simply turn to him and say “the jig is up, you’re done” and turn their backs on him?
It’s my assertion that there are a lot of people in his inner circle that know he’s ineligible and will only stick by him as long as there seems to be a chance of him getting away with his fraud. They’ll abandon his ship when it begins sinking.
It would be nice for some of these powers-that-be do something other than “consider” action; do something proactive, take a chance, jump into the water, make the decision for a default judgement, your career might skyrocket.
Since this is happening in a redstate, it may go nowhere, but if they can get this going in someplace like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, or Michigan, Obama will go to political DEFCON ONE.
You obviously don’t know hard-core leftists very well.
Please be careful sir, your country is counting on you.
5.56mm
"“If Obama were to appeal in Georgia, only this election is in play, and only as to Georgia’s ballots, but if he loses in Georgia, appealing to the SCOTUS brings in his entire eligibility, and the legitimacy of his current administration,” Donofrio warned.The Narcissist-in-Chief really believes he can continue the charade.“My personal belief is that if the U.S. Supreme Court held that he was ineligible, he might simply ignore the ruling, and test the will of the nation, just as he is testing the will of the state of Georgia,” he said.
“If the judge’s recommendation – and I’ve been told that it’s going to be to disqualify Mr. Obama as a candidate – is followed by the secretary of state, Mr. Obama has got a real problem,” said Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation."
Bless you Leo!
I know a few leftists, but not many. From what I’ve gleaned, they seem to be utopian wusses that talk a lot and claim to be the smartest guys in any room but don’t have the balls to put their own safety and well-being on the line if the odds turn against them. Fair-weather friends works for a good moniker for many leftists. I may be completely wrong, but wanted to throw the question out there for general consideration.
"You obviously don’t know hard-core leftists very well."Oh I know them well, spineless wimps when push comes to shove.
"Stuff like this can cause civil wars…@Panzerlied
Separation of powers, Federal vs. State jurisdiction, sovereign immunity, acceding to presumption of jurisdiction through presence... there are so many issue involved in subpoenaing the president of the U.S., and virtually none of them are being discussed.
But the bottom line is that Georgia is going to either block Obama from the ballot, or not. If they do, Obama will sue in FEDERAL court, and if he loses there it will go directly, do not pass go, do not collect $200, to the Supremes. if, that is, it doesn’t go directly to the top in the first place.
Yes, that's what happens when a defendant fails to appear and argue against the plaintiff. The plaintiff's case is laid out in the pleadings filed with the court; no supporting argument is generally required.
But how can the federal court claim jurisdiction when states are each allowed their own election rules?
The states made the federal, not the other way around.
It seems that someone smarter than I am would have a solid answer as to why Zero couldn’t sue in a federal court.
If 0bama is afraid to go directly to the courts, I look for action by Holder and the Dept of inJustice. Several states have to submit changes to their voting rules to the DOJ, under the Voting Rights Act. He might use this to force the usurper to be included on the ballot. This is contrary to the 10th Amendment, but that was one of the first parts off the Constitution to be cast aside.
Obama swore an oath to uphold the Constitution.
If he files with SCOTUS to reverse its interpretation of the “natural born citizen” clause and loses, then refuses to obey a ruling, technically that is grounds for impeachment.
0bama could simply produce all the documents that prove he is eligible for the position of President. Thus, he does not need SCOTUS to overturn the Constitution.
Oh wait....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.