Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Denver appeals court upholds military impostor law ( Stolen Valor Act )
ap ^ | January 27, 2012

Posted on 01/28/2012 4:17:11 PM PST by george76

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 last
To: MasterGunner01

I am in no way defending anyone who 1) steals benefits not earned, 2) lies to obtain veterans’ preference in hiring, 3) in any way financially defrauds an organization (or the government) with such claims. If the government wanted to outlaw wearing military uniforms by non-military personnel, I’d have much less of a problem with that than a law that restricts speech in any way. We’re already in a country where ethnic minorities are allowed to use a slew of words that are outright criminal offenses if uttered by whites (through “intimidation” and “bullying” legislation); I don’t see a point in pushing that further.

At this point the country has become unrecognizable; as the post-Christian left marches on destroying our institutions I have little affinity left for a “country” in which we’ve criminalized “whiteness” and Judeo-Christian values. The latest assault on religious liberty by this “president” standing in front of the American flag should open peoples’ eyes.


61 posted on 01/30/2012 5:50:18 PM PST by kearnyirish2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: kearnyirish2
If someone is misrepresenting themselves in a legal matter (including a job application where they are attesting that statements are true, or to qualify for a material gain/benefits), then they are either breaking an existing law or subject to firing already. If a law was designed specifically to sworn statements and such, I’d be more receptive to it. Otherwise, we’ve just added another group to the latter in terms of “All animals are equal; some are more equal than others”. Every new law is another link in the chains that shackle us (including those that fund both the government making the law and the military it alledgedly will protect).

Would it not be fraud for someone to claim to be a veteran and accept anything of value for it? If they only make the claim, then turn down the handouts, I can live with it. If they make the claim, then accept "gifts" that would otherwise not be offered, they commit theft.

It has nothing to do with Orwellian philosophy.

62 posted on 02/03/2012 2:22:11 AM PST by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: trebb

“Would it not be fraud for someone to claim to be a veteran and accept anything of value for it? If they only make the claim, then turn down the handouts, I can live with it. If they make the claim, then accept “gifts” that would otherwise not be offered, they commit theft.”

In this day & age there is no reason for anyone to receive gifts without those bestowing them doing their due diligence; it isn’t difficult to screen people like this. I’m sure it is a crime to have a fraudulent military ID or discharge papers. Theft of government benefits is also already illegal.


63 posted on 02/03/2012 4:29:07 AM PST by kearnyirish2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson