To: NELSON111
It's only global COOLING that's been a climate negative and stopped civilization...not GW. GW has always led to humanity THRIVING. Can you or has anyone EVER shown us how GW would have an overall NET negative impact? A warmer Earth would have Siberia and Canada becoming viable agricultural areas, with a huge impact on being able to feed the world. Warmer oceans mean more evaporation and more rainfall, with fewer droughts.
19 posted on
01/29/2012 7:16:20 AM PST by
PapaBear3625
(During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
To: PapaBear3625; NELSON111
Yes. Look at any text about the earth’s climate written before the left got its enthusiasm for CO2 as the cause of all things evil, and you find references to the Medieval climate optimum, the Roman climate optimum, the Minoan climate optimum and the Holocene climate optimum. Climate optimum, not warm period. Warm is good for mankind, cold is bad (though personally, I don’t mind it, having some Lappish ancestors whom I favor in terms of physiognomy and metabolism).
23 posted on
01/29/2012 7:45:45 AM PST by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
To: PapaBear3625
Canada becoming viable agricultural areas??????
Canada already is viable.
Canadian Ag
34 posted on
01/29/2012 11:22:02 AM PST by
xone
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson