Posted on 02/01/2012 11:50:48 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Just read the entire statement. The main point of the entire statement was that he sympathizes with the 95% of people who are struggling and suffering under Obama.
Your problem is with Romney, not with the statement. If you want to criticize his policies that is ok with me.
“I do think as a presidential candidate he should not say he is not concerned about certain financial groups of people, rich or poor.”
Good point. The “not concerned” wording makes it easier to take out of context.
“Of course the economy is getting better”
“I’m not concerned about the very poor”
“You can focus on the poor. I’m not concerned about the poor”
“I like firing people”
Did I miss any? Tell me again how this is the only Republican that can beat OBama.
I know these are taken out of context, but I imagine that won’t stop the Bambster’s people. It didn’t stop Romney’s when they attacked Newt. Karma sucks.
As will OBama’s people. Karma sucks.
The Republican Presidential nominee must be able to make the case why government is inefficient at helping the poor. The system needs to reformed, not ignored, which apparently is what Romney wants to do.
No, he didn't. He missed the opportunity to make the case our welfare system creates a dependency factor, welcomes fraud and needs to reformed. Government has always done a lousy job trying to assist the poor.
Conservatives should care about the poor, care enough to free them from the bondage of the welfare state.
What are you talking about? He just told the poor he’s not even going to think about them. He just sunk his whole campaign. Thank GOd Santorum and NOOT are still out there.
What’s to take out of context? So what if there’s a safety net. He just told people he isn’t even going to think about them.
“I'm not concerned about the very poor. We have a safety net there. If it needs repair, I'll fix it. I'm not concerned about the very rich. They're doing just fine. I'm concerned about the very heart of America, the 90-95 percent of Americans who right now are struggling.”
I agree with that. We should be concerned about the 95% who are struggling and suffering under Obama.
I agree. He could have used the opportunity to point out the many problems in the current welfare system.
The problem is this.
“We have a safety net (hammock) there. If it needs repair (in the opinion of the left/media) , I’ll fix it (spend billions and billions more).”
****
Yes, the statement was fine if the entire sudience were moderate Republicans. Unfortunately for Mitt, most people are NOT moderate Republicans. Even worse for Mitt, this ham-handed statement will absolutely be taken out of context in print, on audio and in video.
"Im not concerned about the very poor...Im not concerned about the very rich, theyre doing just fine." - Mitt Romney on January 31,2012
Anything else Mitt said either before, after or in-between those two sentences will be ignored by the media. Any explanation that tries to put that statement in context will be ignored by the media. The average independent or moderate voter will not be provided the proper context by the media.
The news soundbite that will be played over and over and over again on most TV and cable networks will be:
"Im not concerned about the very poor...Im not concerned about the very rich, theyre doing just fine." - Mitt Romney on January 31,2012
The soundbite that will be played over and over and over again in President Obama's class warfare re-election campaign commercials will be:
"Im not concerned about the very poor...Im not concerned about the very rich, theyre doing just fine." - Mitt Romney on January 31,2012
Worst of all, this gaffe will only reinforce the Democrat's warped caricature of Republicans to indedependents and Democrats. For conservatives, this gaffe only reinforces their very real and accurate opinion that Mitt Romeny is the living, breathing embodiment of Establishment Republicanism (or RINO, for short).
This gaffe effectively ends any chance Mitt Romney might have had to become President.
Stick a fork in him, Romney's done.
****
Yes, the statement was fine if the entire sudience were moderate Republicans. Unfortunately for Mitt, most people are NOT moderate Republicans. Even worse for Mitt, this ham-handed statement will absolutely be taken out of context in print, on audio and in video.
"Im not concerned about the very poor...Im not concerned about the very rich, theyre doing just fine." - Mitt Romney on January 31,2012
Anything else Mitt said either before, after or in-between those two sentences will be ignored by the media. Any explanation that tries to put that statement in context will be ignored by the media. The average independent or moderate voter will not be provided the proper context by the media.
The news soundbite that will be played over and over and over again on most TV and cable networks will be:
"Im not concerned about the very poor...Im not concerned about the very rich, theyre doing just fine." - Mitt Romney on January 31,2012
The soundbite that will be played over and over and over again in President Obama's class warfare re-election campaign commercials will be:
"Im not concerned about the very poor...Im not concerned about the very rich, theyre doing just fine." - Mitt Romney on January 31,2012
Worst of all, this gaffe will only reinforce the Democrat's warped caricature of Republicans to indedependents and Democrats. For conservatives, this gaffe only reinforces their very real and accurate opinion that Mitt Romeny is the living, breathing embodiment of Establishment Republicanism (or RINO, for short).
This gaffe effectively ends any chance Mitt Romney might have had to become President.
Stick a fork in him, Romney's done.
oh yeah? How about the unemployed who have been out of work for a time long enough to lose everything they had? How about them? Unemployment don’t either I don’t guess, unless it feeds your cronies($two million and up income$)
We have a safety net (hammock) there. If it needs repair (in the opinion of the left/media) , Ill fix it (spend billions and billions more).
I agree that there is a danger of wasting even more money on government giveaway programs. But saying Romney wants to spend billions on the very poor is almost the opposite of saying he doesn’t care about the very poor. I think he was saying he is concerned about the 95% that are struggling. Romney needs to become more articulate.
The bottom line is that this statement about the poor means that Romney SUPPORTS AND WILL UPHOLD THE WELFARE STATE!
Who out there wants to give the poor a hand up instead of a hand out?
They are the ones who truly care about the poor.
Actually spending billions more on failed government programs that do nothing but enslave poor people is the opposite of caring.
What a stupid comment to make. Lets’ hope Newt makes t he most of Mitt’s gaffe.
My point was simply that his entire statement was ok. I agree that we should be concerned with the 95% who are struggling.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.