Skip to comments.The New York Times Company Lost $39.7 Million In 2011 (Dinosaur Media DeathWatch™)
Posted on 02/02/2012 8:34:01 AM PST by abb
The New York Times Company reported its Q4 earnings today, and they lost $39.7 million in 2011, or 27 cents a share, after making $107.7 million in 2010.
Q4 profit is down 12.2% y/y thanks to the continuing decline of print advertising and a 67.4% decline in the About Group's operating profit, which also saw a 25.7% decrease in quarterly ad revenues y/y.
The NYT also missed analysts' estimates quarterly net income of 39 cents a share was lower than expectations of 42 cents a share. The fourth quarter income also reflects a $4.5 million payout to departed CEO Janet Robinson, and $7.9 million in severance costs, up from $4.7 in Q4 2010.
(Excerpt) Read more at finance.yahoo.com ...
Not good enough...the libs will keep it afloat no matter how much it loses.
"Did I do that?"
To big to fail?
Now you know why they want to control the Internet.
Most people can spot their B.S. a mile away.
What a great day! Die Commie NYT, Die!
-—What a great day! Die Commie NYT, Die!-—
This proves that if you just look hard enough, you can find some good news in the Obama economy!
I’m sure the Gay Mafia running the Times is very distressed, right?
“Not good enough...the libs will keep it afloat no matter how much it loses.”
It’s not only that. Frontpage had an article on the single company propping up the NYT: Kaplan Learning who uses govt funds to siphon money and keep it operating. I mean, you had NYT editors washing cars to actually help their salaries..
Quarterly Profit Falls 12.2% at Times Co.
Time For Video to Step Out From TV’s Shadow
Viacom Earnings Hurt By Nickelodeon Issues
Lower Ad revenues, plus a Rock Band charge, cut net
Genachowski Praises Comcast’s Stepped-Up Drive on Low-Cost Broadband
In Networks Race for Ratings, Chicanery Is on the Schedule
Viacoms Profit Drops 65% as Advertising Falls
Is Netflix Kids’ Streaming Part of Nickelodeon’s Ratings Drop?
P&G signals plans to cut ad costs by shifting to digital media
L.A. Times Revenue Officer Departs (Exclusive)
Hearst Corporation announces new leadership appointments at the Houston Chronicle
The newsonomics of the next New York Times CEO
The newspaper is encouraging reporters to jump into the comment threads of their own stories, not hide from them.
Even these numbers are probably cooked. The only outsider who gets to look at the real numbers would be Carlos Slim, their sugar daddy from south of the border. And being as how he is a businessman, it it hard to see what interest he would have in the NY Slimes, other than the liquidation value of its plant and real estate. Re that point, when the Slimes goes under and Carlos is selling off their assets, does he get a stepped up basis? The NY Slimes’ death spasms and convulsions are pegging the schadenfreude meters of Real Americans all across the fruited plains.
They’re so good even their DIGITAL product is shrinking.
I don’t follow the business of media and entertainment at all - and you can call me a cynic or conspiracy-theorist — but I think that it just doesn’t matter how much money NY Times makes or loses. It will be around forever.
Its too important a part of the establishment.
Or at least the people who write and publish it, in some form. Which is why it is important that we conservatives learn the business and build our own networks and news reporting agencies.
>>>I dont follow the business of media and entertainment at all - and you can call me a cynic or conspiracy-theorist but I think that it just doesnt matter how much money NY Times makes or loses. It will be around forever.<<<
I’m old enough to recall my mother saying the same thing about the Herald-Tribune. You’ll probably have to Google it to find out when it closed down.
What would be great is if a Conservative bought the rag, fired all the Leftist journos save one as the token Leftist, and those taking their places would be Conservative ones.
In case you missed it, there are other problems for the First Family at Happy Hollow. Among other things:
Less than three years after the New York Times Co. was forced to slash its dividend to save cash, members of the papers founding family pressured management to restore the rich payout.
Members of the Ochs Sulzberger clan are reportedly unhappy that the once-mighty and now struggling company has not been able to dole out the dividend, which was a major source of income for the family whose trust controls the company through a dual-class share structure.
Some family members had put pressure on Chairman Arthur Pinch Sulzberger, Jr. and recently ousted CEO Janet Robinson to reinstate the dividend, according to a new report.
Seems like granny passed away last February and that triggered a boatload of estate taxes. Thus, the need for even more filthy lucre.
Not to worry, however. At least the money-losing side of the business, their Internet site, is growing. Maybe they can eventually make things up in volume eventually, providing they don't go broke first.
Bravely climbing to the top of the highest mast to wave the liberal flag from a sinking ship. Bon Voyage!
The Dinosaur media has the worst possible business model of all time. Basically it is the Jim Jones cult model of group control. The Chicago Trib spends its time looking for racists who can only be white, the same as its declining readership.
What would be great if a Mexican brought it and turned it into a Spanish language luchadores fanzine.
Still yet another reason to kick Zero out of office. Get him out before he thinks of a way to spend tax dollars to prop up the media.
I don’t understand how these large companies “lose” money yet keep on going. If I have $100 at the beginning of the year and I’m $10 in the hole at the end of they year, how do I keep my doors open? These big builders and car makers have been posting losses for years.
Thank you Nelson.
In the case of The NY Times, they’ve been liquidating assets to keep the doors open. Selling TV stations, other newspapers, etc.
In 1997, the book value was $1.73 billion. Today, it is $593 million.
“Book value” is the value at which an asset is carried on a balance sheet. It is the total value of the company’s assets that shareholders would theoretically receive if a company were liquidated.
Media General to face debt crunch within weeks
Rick Edmonds by Rick Edmonds Published Jan. 26, 2012 5:01 pm Updated Jan. 26, 2012 5:40 pm
On Thursday, Media General publisher of the Richmond Times-Dispatch and the Tampa Tribune reported a net loss for the fourth quarter of 2011 and for the full year.
That was not the really bad news, however.
Management announced that it is uncomfortable with its ability to remain in compliance with the terms of its loans, which are tightening each quarter of 2012.
In a conference call with analysts, CFO James Woodward said the company is working with advisers to get out of trouble. It hopes to have a proposal within two weeks to renegotiate the terms of the loans and/or extend their maturity date (currently March 2013).
CEO and President Marshall Morton added that the company would consider possible asset sales of a newspaper property or a local TV station as part of a longer term resolution of the debt issue.
They've been spinning off newspapers and TV stations for years. They sacked 165 employees a couple of months ago. They're flagship properties are losing money even though they are in the middle of an election. Now they are working under a deadline to renegotiate their debt within the next two weeks.
Doesn't sound like they're very much longer for this world.