Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anonymous Hacks White Supremacist Site, Finds Direct Links to Ron Paul
LGF ^ | 2.2.2012 | C. Johnson

Posted on 02/02/2012 1:44:04 PM PST by wolfcreek

The “anti-fascist” wing of the “Anonymous” hacker group has broken into a website run by the white supremacist American Third Position (A3P), and released a document dump consisting of private forum messages, emails, organizational notes, and other personal information.

The documents show numerous connections between Republican candidate Ron Paul and these racist Neanderthals; they’re heavily involved in campaigning for Paul, and according to the messages, have held regular meetings with Ron Paul himself:

(Excerpt) Read more at littlegreenfootballs.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anonymous; apaulling; apaulogia; apaulogist; hackers; hacking; paulbearers; ronpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-96 last
To: SharpRightTurn
It is my understanding that he puts in earmarks for his district, then opposes the bill in the hope that the bill will be defeated.

He may vote against that particular bill, but he pays the dimwits who agree to vote for his earmarks back by voting for other bills they want.
51 posted on 02/03/2012 2:03:39 PM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn
What is important to me is that he has opposed the likes of No Child Gets an Education, Tarp, MediPill, etc. That is not “little” in my book. It’s certainly better than we saw out of Jorge Bush.

What good does it do to be opposed to something if he is unwilling to do anything to stop it?
I have done as much to stop waste in gov't as Cut and Run. In fact more, I have never wasted a penny on bogus shrimp studies.
52 posted on 02/03/2012 2:10:55 PM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: John D

“He voted no, big deal. What has he ever actually accomplished?”

He has one vote, just like the other 434. He can use it to vote for big government programs like Tarp, No Child Gets an Education, MediPill, etc. or he can vote against them.

How would you vote on these programs?


53 posted on 02/03/2012 2:32:09 PM PST by SharpRightTurn ( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: John D

“I could hear Cut and Run now if George Bush would have done anything to prevent the surrender monkey’s closest allies, the Islamic terrorists from immigrating. He would have been crying bloody murder that Bush was violating the terrorist civil right to kill innocent Americans.”

I don’t think you have to worry about Jorge “Islam is a religion of peace” Bush advocating that we stop the flow of Mohammedans to our country. Their numbers increased more during his regime than at any other time. Maybe Bush whispered that policy into the ear of the Saudi king while he was holding hands with him.


54 posted on 02/03/2012 2:35:10 PM PST by SharpRightTurn ( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: John D

“He may vote against that particular bill, but he pays the dimwits who agree to vote for his earmarks back by voting for other bills they want.”

The problem is, there are a lot more dimwits that refuse to end earmarks altogether than dimwits that put them in the omnibus bill and then vote against the omnibus bill. If you can turn those numbers around you’ll be “accomplishing” something.


55 posted on 02/03/2012 2:37:36 PM PST by SharpRightTurn ( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: John D

“What good does it do to be opposed to something if he is unwilling to do anything to stop it? I have done as much to stop waste in gov’t as Cut and Run. In fact more, I have never wasted a penny on bogus shrimp studies.”

A congressman can vote yes or no on a bill. What more are you suggesting they could do, kidnap the president or speaker of the House and hold him hostage to prevent passage of the legislation?


56 posted on 02/03/2012 2:40:35 PM PST by SharpRightTurn ( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn
What more are you suggesting they could do

He could work with other members, like other congressmen do to get what they want passed. Cut and Run is only good at complaining, but he does nothing to get something actually accomplished. Every other candidate running, even Romney has accomplishments. The surrender monkey none, other than his earmarks.
57 posted on 02/03/2012 4:21:06 PM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn
The problem is, there are a lot more dimwits that refuse to end earmarks altogether than dimwits that put them in the omnibus bill and then vote against the omnibus bill.

If the surrender monkey would not reward those who waste money on his earmarks by voting for their waste much more waste would be avoided. Cut and Run rewards those who vote for his waste, by voting for theirs.
58 posted on 02/03/2012 4:27:26 PM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

Missed this thread, learned about it thru BARF - Little Green Footballs: Free Republic Reacts to Ron Paul’s White Supremacist Links

Ron Paul's links to the white supremecist community is undeniable. The anonymous hacks, I'll post links at the end, I'm not big on hackers, they're criminals. As criminals, unreliable. While many of Paul's relationships are easy to document, from Willis Carto to Don Black to Spotlight, the newsletters, most people here familiar with the issue get it. However EMails from white supremecists yapping about meetings, might be true, more believeable than OJs rants. But there really isn't much here.

It's interesting, though not of late I've posted on lots of anti-FR sites, not suggesting that's what LGF is. Not much of an issue. Enjoyed a site of disgruntaled DU Jews, though I've lost track of it. I think Stormfront has an anti forum and I'm sure they'd welcome me. The only two sites that wouldn't let me post in the last 10 ro 15 years. DU, I had to make acceptable posts before posting articles, my interest gun control. And LGF. Never knew why, even sent an EMail or two telling them I post here. At least 5 years ago, if they read this I'm sure I'll be welcome.

59 posted on 02/03/2012 6:32:39 PM PST by SJackson (The Pilgrims¬óDoing the jobs Native Americans wouldn't do !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
Aware of this thread becaus of this one BARF - Little Green Footballs: Free Republic Reacts to Ron Paul’s White Supremacist Links

You've seen my comment on that thread. Paul's connections undeniable. Hackers should be in jail, I don't believe white supremecists, so the anonymous revelations are valuable only as confirmation of affection, not of actual incidents. A few links for anyone who wants to read them. The data is at http://pirasec.com/

http://www.indecisionforever.com/blog/2012/02/02/ron-paul-attracts-support-of-the-worlds-worst-people

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/291817/20120202/ron-paul-a3p-opblitzkrieg-nazi-anonymous-jamie.htm

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/291000/20120201/anonymous-ron-paul-neo-nazi-bnp-a3p.htm

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/290374/20120131/ron-paul-anonymous-neo-nazi-opblitzkrieg-antisec.htm

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/291817/20120202/ron-paul-a3p-opblitzkrieg-nazi-anonymous-jamie.htm

http://www.examiner.com/anonymous-in-national/hunting-nazis-anonymous-snares-ron-paul-operation-blitzkrieg

60 posted on 02/03/2012 6:38:48 PM PST by SJackson (The Pilgrims¬óDoing the jobs Native Americans wouldn't do !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

“Paul says he would cut $1 trillion from the federal behemoth. I think he would at least try.”

RuPaul has been in CONgress for thousands of years and has yet to accomplish a blessed thing. Why should we trust him now ?


61 posted on 02/03/2012 6:43:34 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92

Since when do two wrongs make a right ?


62 posted on 02/03/2012 6:44:52 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cymbaline

“By the way, I notice that LGF has a link to this very thread as his latest post. Hi Charles!

Oh, and by the way, most of us (Or a large number of us; I don’t speak for everybody of course) on FR don’t want to have anything to do with Paul, because we realize he’s insane. I’ve known this for a long time. He’s very popular on Alex Jones’ show, which is enough right there to make me suspicious. Then, he holds the U.S. responsible for 9/11. Sometimes he sounds like he could be running for president of Iran.

Since this is common knowledge on FR and not really news, we’re taking the opportunity to poke fun at you instead. Have a nice day!”

POST OF THE YEAR CANDIDATE!!

+1 !!

LOL!


63 posted on 02/03/2012 6:50:16 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

“RuPaul has been in CONgress for thousands of years and has yet to accomplish a blessed thing. Why should we trust him now ?”

He wants to slash the federal government. Of course he’s not going to be on the winning side with that. How many of the other 434 congressmen (either Dims or Republicans) want to do that? You can probably fit them in a phone booth.

Would you rather trust Geo. Bush or Willard Romeny and John Boehner to get the job done?

I am supporting Gingrich for Pres. (had supported Bachmann until she dropped out) because he is the most tolerable candidate left as far as I’m concerned. My preferences among the (not very encouraging) field:

1. Gingrich
2. Santorum
3. Paul
4. Romney.

Amoung the four, I think Paul would try to reign in government spending more than any of the others. I think Newt could be second. However, I favor Gingrich and Santorum over Paul based upon Paul’s foreign/defense positions and weakness on immigration. But Paul would be more likely to take a meat cleaver to the federal budget than would Willard or Santorum.


64 posted on 02/03/2012 6:53:12 PM PST by SharpRightTurn ( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

But supporting RuPaul is an act of Conservatism ? You know, the same guy who sat down with Bawney Fwank and a bunch $oros goons to slash the military by 50% ? Or perhaps you know him as the only Republican candidate who voted to repeal DADT ?

Spare us. RuPaul is to Conservative like kitten is to defensive tackle.


65 posted on 02/03/2012 6:57:28 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: svcw

“alterPaul says a lot of things. Show me once where he actually accomplished anything besides earmarks and bather.”

He also writes unreadable books and moonbat newsletters. Don’t sell RuPaul short!

LOL!


66 posted on 02/03/2012 7:01:22 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

“If so, perhaps you should reconsider being on a conservative website.”

You mean like the Daily Paul-tard or Screwy Lewy Rockwell’s sites ?

Real bastions of Conservatism there, huh ?


67 posted on 02/03/2012 7:04:20 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

I’ll give RuPaul credit:

No one, and I do mean NO ONE, can load pork on a bill quite like Jew hater Ron Paul. Not even Nazi Pelosi.


68 posted on 02/03/2012 7:09:08 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92
The Dems want Race Wars and the 60's all over again.

I think race antics will end with the old hippies dying off since the new
generation isn't so stuck on racist stupid. I say this because Dem leaders are
constantly trying to shove race down students necks. What a legacy.

69 posted on 02/03/2012 7:14:51 PM PST by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

You’re a Gingrich guy ? OUTSTANDING!!

Please disregard the snottiness of my last post.

If push came to shove, and it somehow came down to RuPaul and Mitt Commie, there’s no question that I’d vote for Paul. (Luckily, I wasn’t put in that situation and I voted for Newt.)

That being said, the moment I left the booth, I’d be planning to get rid of Paul in 2016.


70 posted on 02/03/2012 7:17:14 PM PST by Absolutely Nobama (NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER! I AM A CONSERVATIVE! CASE CLOSED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

Ron alterPaul is not a conservative.
Yes, he votes against bills he knows will pass AFTER he loads them up with earmarks.
alterPaul is a fraud.


71 posted on 02/03/2012 7:24:43 PM PST by svcw (For the new year: you better toughen up, if you are going to continue to be stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn; Absolutely Nobama

Blaming other people for not doing something just means you have nothing to say about alterPaul.
This thread is about alterPaul and his racist, anti-Semitic connections.
It would serve your points better if you stopped talking about other people and defend your choice in alterPaul.
What has alterPaul done that would demonstrate he could accomplish what he claims that he would accomplish if he were elected.
Since you are a supporter, are you bothered by his racist, anti-Semitic leanings and endorsers, and his other rabid anti-American supporters.


72 posted on 02/03/2012 7:32:22 PM PST by svcw (For the new year: you better toughen up, if you are going to continue to be stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
It's interesting, though not of late I've posted on lots of anti-FR sites

It's late and I'm a few drinks in, so correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't you one of the freepers who went to that British pro-Gulinani site after Jim banished y'all? I seem to remember busting your chops for this. My apgologies if wrong.

73 posted on 02/04/2012 12:16:42 AM PST by jmc813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn
What is important to me is that he has opposed the likes of No Child Gets an Education, Tarp, MediPill, etc. That is not “little” in my book.

You mean he SAYS he is opposed, but in reality he has done nothing to stop them.
Appeasement Paul has never accomplished a thing in the entire time he has been in Washington. In fact I do not know of any worth while accomplishments he has ever made. In the entire five years he was in the Air Force he could not even achieve one promotion.
Do you know if he got out voluntarily or was he forced out due to his incompetence?
74 posted on 02/04/2012 4:25:48 AM PST by rideharddiefast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: John D
I have done as much to stop waste in gov't as Cut and Run. In fact more, I have never wasted a penny on bogus shrimp studies.

There is not a person anywhere who has done less to stop waste than Appeasement Paul. He is the earmark king who SAYS he is against waste but refuses to do anything to stop it. He is a big talker, but a non doer.
75 posted on 02/04/2012 4:31:40 AM PST by rideharddiefast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn
The problem is, there are a lot more dimwits that refuse to end earmarks altogether

You mean like Appeasement Paul?
76 posted on 02/04/2012 4:34:13 AM PST by rideharddiefast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn


He wants to slash the federal government.


Again, HE SAYS, but he refuses to do anything. Can you name just one thing he has ever done, not what he hasn't done, just one thing he has done to slash the federal government?
I didn't think so.
77 posted on 02/04/2012 4:39:14 AM PST by rideharddiefast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: svcw

“Ron alterPaul is not a conservative. Yes, he votes against bills he knows will pass AFTER he loads them up with earmarks. alterPaul is a fraud.”

True, he’s a libertarian. As to being a fraud, I haven’t seen that but maybe you’ve researched that more than have I.


78 posted on 02/04/2012 7:09:29 AM PST by SharpRightTurn ( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: svcw

“Ron alterPaul is not a conservative. Yes, he votes against bills he knows will pass AFTER he loads them up with earmarks. alterPaul is a fraud.”

True, he’s a libertarian. As to being a fraud, I haven’t seen that but maybe you’ve researched that more than have I.


79 posted on 02/04/2012 7:20:47 AM PST by SharpRightTurn ( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: svcw

“Ron alterPaul is not a conservative. Yes, he votes against bills he knows will pass AFTER he loads them up with earmarks. alterPaul is a fraud.”

True, he’s a libertarian. As to being a fraud, I haven’t seen that but maybe you’ve researched that more than have I.


80 posted on 02/04/2012 7:20:47 AM PST by SharpRightTurn ( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn; svcw
True, he’s a libertarian. As to being a fraud, I haven’t seen that but maybe you’ve researched that more than have I.

What would YOU call a liberaltarian who runs as a Republican?
I would call him a fraud. I can't think of anything better.
81 posted on 02/04/2012 7:22:56 AM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: svcw

Pardon the triple post. The post button seemed to stall out.


82 posted on 02/04/2012 7:27:03 AM PST by SharpRightTurn ( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: rideharddiefast; SharpRightTurn
Again, HE SAYS, but he refuses to do anything. Can you name just one thing he has ever done, not what he hasn't done, just one thing he has done to slash the federal government? I didn't think so.

No paulbot can. I have been asking the same question for about 4 years now. As of yet no paulbot can tell me even one thing he has ever accomplished that will reduce the debt.
83 posted on 02/04/2012 7:48:30 AM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: rideharddiefast

“You mean he SAYS he is opposed, but in reality he has done nothing to stop them.”

And Jim DeMint, whom I admire, SAYS he is opposed to a lot of things. And he votes against them. And more often than not, he loses. So is DeMint doing nothing to stop them?


84 posted on 02/04/2012 8:48:07 AM PST by SharpRightTurn ( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: rideharddiefast

“The problem is, there are a lot more dimwits that refuse to end earmarks altogether You mean like Appeasement Paul?”

Do you have the rollcall votes that show where he opposed an end to all earmarks?


85 posted on 02/04/2012 8:50:21 AM PST by SharpRightTurn ( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

Big government types to not like earmarks since earmarks take away the power of big government bureaucrats to determine exactly how the tax payer money is spent instead of Congress. The down side of earmarks is that is facilitates a you scratch my back I’ll scratch yours attitude in Congress that leads to big spending. Bottom line is earmarks are not the problem, spending is the problem.


86 posted on 02/04/2012 9:01:10 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

“spending is the problem”

Yes it is.

Louie Gohmert sponsored a bill that passed the House yesterday (or the day before) that would make a significant reform in spending if it were to be enacted. (It won’t be with Harry Reid over the Senate and the CommiePunk in the Oval Office.) It would end baseline budgeting.

To stop our deficit spending at the current amount of revenue, we would have to trim about $1 trillion a year. That is what Paul is proposing. I agree with him.

I don’t hear many of the candidates talking about how much they would like to cut. They talk about tax reform, which is good, but I’m not hearing a lot about specific spending reductions.


87 posted on 02/04/2012 9:09:37 AM PST by SharpRightTurn ( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

Actually, sometimes someone in Congress NOT accomplishing anything is a plus. Maybe the rest of them should try it.


88 posted on 02/04/2012 9:19:11 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn; rideharddiefast
Do you have the rollcall votes that show where he opposed an end to all earmarks?

The surrender monkey was one of only four Republicans to vote against eliminating earmarks.
89 posted on 02/04/2012 9:27:56 AM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn
Newt is proposing keeping spending at 2007 levels, with exceptions for SS and Medicad, how creditable he is on that is debatable, he's rather late to the cut spending side of the argument. He is better on the tax side then he is the spending side.

All the other candidates are more or less in the grow our way out of the budget deficits camp. As is the Fed chair, Bernacy. Well maybe, but carrying the note on 20 trillion is gonna hurt. And should interest rate rise the pain of a 20 trillion note will become unbearable. Also the outlook for growth is not good. Europe is a mess and east Asia is slowing so I don't know where the growth is going to come from except maybe inflation. And as we all know inflation is another word for theif so I am not looking forward to inflation either. And besides deflation is still occurring in all but commonities so inflation is not assured either sans the fed dumping a few more trillion in a QE whatever.

90 posted on 02/04/2012 9:28:22 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

Example of fraud: votes against all foreign aid except to palestine.
Example of fraud: claims to want to cut the fed budget but adds millions in ear marks.
Example of fraud: knew about those racist, anti-Semitic
letters and contributed to some of them, yet had denied and knowledge until recently.
Example of fraud: rails against the GOP establishment, even though he has been in congress for decades doing nothing and has been partnering with Romney to destroy Gingrich and Santorum.


91 posted on 02/04/2012 9:30:05 AM PST by svcw (For the new year: you better toughen up, if you are going to continue to be stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
"Actually, sometimes someone in Congress NOT accomplishing anything is a plus"

I've made that argument too, just ask yourself would we be better off without all the legislation that Congress has passed in the last 30 years or not? My answer is hell yes, repel the last 30 years of the "do somthing" Congresses and we all would be MUCH better off. I wish we had a do nothing Congress when LBJ was in office.

92 posted on 02/04/2012 9:34:37 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

“Newt is proposing keeping spending at 2007 levels, with exceptions for SS and Medicad, how creditable he is on that is debatable, he’s rather late to the cut spending side of the argument. He is better on the tax side then he is the spending side.”

Good point. Newt has the capability of bold action and I am supporting him with crossed fingers hoping he would do so with the budget but talk about moon bases and the like worry me. The most important thing we can do is not to follow Greece to bankruptcy court.

“All the other candidates are more or less in the grow our way out of the budget deficits camp. As is the Fed chair, Bernacy. Well maybe, but carrying the note on 20 trillion is gonna hurt.”

Exactly. Santorum worries me because he has supported a lot of big government spending, though to his credit I think he opposed MediPill. I have no confidence at all that Willard will slash spending. I think Paul and Gingrich are the most likely to try to dramatically cut spending.

And you are right that our debt payments will eat our lunch once interest rates are no longer kept artifically low.


93 posted on 02/04/2012 12:08:21 PM PST by SharpRightTurn ( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: svcw

“Example of fraud: votes against all foreign aid except to palestine.”

You may consider that fraud. I call it ending foreign welfare. Why should American taxpayers pay billions to Mohammedan countries, African hellholes, etc. when we are borrowing 40 cents on every dollar? End all foreign aid now and by doing so cut our deficit.

“Example of fraud: claims to want to cut the fed budget but adds millions in ear marks.”

I believe we discussed this upthread, but to revisit the issue one last time: If there are not enough votes to end all earmarks, a congressman who is against earmarks may feel that if his constituents are going to have to pay for pet projects around the country anyway then his district may as well get their fair share, too. I don’t know that I would approach it any differently. If you refused earmarks for your own district on principle I would support that also.

“Example of fraud: knew about those racist, anti-Semitic
letters and contributed to some of them, yet had denied and knowledge until recently.”

This may well be. I don’t know. I know that Perry was slimed early in his campaign because alledgely his family used hunting grounds with an old rock that had a racist name. I suspect Willard will be slimed for the past history of Mormons and blacks. If Newt wins the nomination, some racist charge (real or imagined) will be thrown at him.

“Example of fraud: rails against the GOP establishment, even though he has been in congress for decades doing nothing and has been partnering with Romney to destroy Gingrich and Santorum.”

I rail against the establishment, too. I suggest you do so also. I disagree that by consistly voting “no” Paul has done nothing. Better a no vote on big government spending than a yes vote. Or do you think congressman should vote yes for big government programs?


94 posted on 02/04/2012 1:01:32 PM PST by SharpRightTurn ( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

So you think giving Palestine foreign aid is helping reduce our debt, and making us safer?


95 posted on 02/05/2012 12:16:33 PM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks wolfcreek. Maybe Anonymous are the true patriots. [snicker]


96 posted on 02/07/2012 6:33:01 PM PST by SunkenCiv (FReep this FReepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-96 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson