Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anonymous Hacks White Supremacist Site, Finds Direct Links to Ron Paul
LGF ^ | 2.2.2012 | C. Johnson

Posted on 02/02/2012 1:44:04 PM PST by wolfcreek

The “anti-fascist” wing of the “Anonymous” hacker group has broken into a website run by the white supremacist American Third Position (A3P), and released a document dump consisting of private forum messages, emails, organizational notes, and other personal information.

The documents show numerous connections between Republican candidate Ron Paul and these racist Neanderthals; they’re heavily involved in campaigning for Paul, and according to the messages, have held regular meetings with Ron Paul himself:

(Excerpt) Read more at littlegreenfootballs.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anonymous; apaulling; apaulogia; apaulogist; hackers; hacking; paulbearers; ronpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: rideharddiefast

Sorry forgot to ping you to #40.


41 posted on 02/03/2012 10:36:36 AM PST by svcw (For the new year: you better toughen up, if you are going to continue to be stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: jmc813; jpsb
I have never been on LGF, don't know what they post there (I assume if it was that bad, FR would ban links from there) and the story was sent to me by a FB friend.

If y'all don't want to read it...don't.

The censorship of posters and articles has gotten way over the top around here lately.

Why don't you guys just get a mirror, find a quite place and talk to your friggin selfs in private because that's where you're headed.

42 posted on 02/03/2012 11:17:18 AM PST by wolfcreek (Perry to Obama: Adios, MOFO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: svcw

“Cute but no cigar. What has Paul done is the question?
Voting no on bills he KNOWS will pass, is not doing anything. He does support foreign aid for palestine (always vote yes) but no one else, I guess that’s something.”

If you’re asking what kind of fundamental reforms is he responsible for, I’m not aware of any (though I haven’t researched it). I suppose in that regard Paul is as effective as Michelle Bachmann and Jim DeMint—it would take a lot more like-minded people to be able to outvote not only the Dims but the leftist, establishment Republicans. Unfortunately, we are still a long way from that. If you are a very conservative office holder, who would like the federal behemoth to spend only what is within its constitutional limits, and are surrounded by a majority who will spend any amount they please, voting “no” is about your only option.

Certainly voting “no” to huge spending by the federal monster is better than voting for new socialist programs like MediPill. Or do you disagree?


43 posted on 02/03/2012 11:55:27 AM PST by SharpRightTurn ( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn
George Bush was not afraid to defend us from the terrorist threat. Appeasement Paul's policy is appease, appease, and appease some more. Then when that no longer works he just wants to surrender.
44 posted on 02/03/2012 11:56:19 AM PST by rideharddiefast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: rideharddiefast

“George Bush was not afraid to defend us from the terrorist threat. Appeasement Paul’s policy is appease, appease, and appease some more. Then when that no longer works he just wants to surrender.”

Bush was stupid enough to push the line that “Islam is a religion of peace.” He did no service to us by pushing that lie. He spent hundreds of billions of dollars of our money in “nation-building” in the Middle Eastern hellholes that hate us—building roads, schools, water plants, etc. (at our expense) to “win their hearts and minds.” Our tax money was wasted. They still hate us and we are still unsafe. I don’t call that defending us from terrorist threats.

If Bush wanted to defend us from terrorist threats, he would have closed our borders on Sept. 12, 2001, booted out of our country Mohammedans who don’t belong here (most of them don’t belong here), and stopped further immigration to our country of Mohammedans. In addition to these domestic measures, he should have ordered the bombing of any sites deemed appropriate to take out terrorists. It would be fine with me if he wiped out large swaths of of their countries.

But instead he chose a policy of a decade long occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan that has helped bankrupt us and put our brave troops in unnecessary danger.

Paul’s policy regarding the Mohammedan threat is deranged. Bush’s was just plain stupid.


45 posted on 02/03/2012 12:17:54 PM PST by SharpRightTurn ( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn; svcw
If you’re asking what kind of fundamental reforms is he responsible for, I’m not aware of any

That is because he has not accomplished anything, except acquire as many earmarks as possible. He is not known as the earmark king for nothing. So as far as bringing home the pork he has done something. As far as doing anything about our debt he has done nothing. He never has and I doubt if he ever would.

If you are a very conservative office holder, who would like the federal behemoth to spend only what is within its constitutional limits, and are surrounded by a majority who will spend any amount they please, voting “no” is about your only option.


Appeasement Paul has been Chairman of the Domestic Monetary Policy Committee, the committee that oversees the Federal Reserve for almost two years. He has complained about the Fed, Reserve for about 20. In his time as chairman you do not think he had an opportunity to do something? He had the opportunity, but was unwilling to do anything.
Appeasement Paul talks big, does little.
46 posted on 02/03/2012 12:22:43 PM PST by rideharddiefast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: rideharddiefast

“That is because he has not accomplished anything, except acquire as many earmarks as possible. He is not known as the earmark king for nothing. So as far as bringing home the pork he has done something. As far as doing anything about our debt he has done nothing. He never has and I doubt if he ever would.”

Fair enough. I can understand the position that if he says he opposes earmarks, he should vote against every bill that contains an earmark for consistency. I can appreciate that stance. It is my understanding that he puts in earmarks for his district, then opposes the bill in the hope that the bill will be defeated. But if it is not defeated (because most Dims and elephants don’t oppose earmarks), and if his constituents are going to be paying for pet projects all over the country, it would be unfair if they don’t get their share. Of course if you can get enough people to vote like Paul, Paul’s district won’t get earmarks because the whole bill will go down. If you’re mad because he wants his constituency to share in earmarks if the bill passes, then so be it.

“Appeasement Paul has been Chairman of the Domestic Monetary Policy Committee, the committee that oversees the Federal Reserve for almost two years. He has complained about the Fed, Reserve for about 20. In his time as chairman you do not think he had an opportunity to do something? He had the opportunity, but was unwilling to do anything.”

If that is true, then Paul should be removed as chairman and replaced by someone who will do something about it. Let me know who you think Boehner might appoint to chair that committee to really do something and I will pass the recommendation along to my congress critter.

“Appeasement Paul talks big, does little.”

You are welcome to your own opinion as to how big he may talk. What is important to me is that he has opposed the likes of No Child Gets an Education, Tarp, MediPill, etc. That is not “little” in my book. It’s certainly better than we saw out of Jorge Bush.


47 posted on 02/03/2012 12:34:55 PM PST by SharpRightTurn ( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: rideharddiefast
Appeasement Paul has NEVER done anything in all the time he has been in Washington.

Now you know that is not true. He has collected more ear marks than any other person running. Probably more than all the candidates combined. He has also blamed America for every problem in the world.
Now other than that I agree. There is nothing in the quarter century he has been in Washington that he has accomplished.
48 posted on 02/03/2012 1:41:36 PM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn
He has voted No

He voted no, big deal. What has he ever actually accomplished? I already know the answer. Nothing, other than blame America for every problem in the world, and acquiring as many earmarks as possible. In the quarter century he has been in Washington he has been a complete failure.
49 posted on 02/03/2012 1:49:20 PM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn
If Bush wanted to defend us from terrorist threats, he would have closed our borders on Sept. 12, 2001, booted out of our country Mohammedans who don’t belong here (most of them don’t belong here), and stopped further immigration to our country of Mohammedans

I could hear Cut and Run now if George Bush would have done anything to prevent the surrender monkey's closest allies, the Islamic terrorists from immigrating. He would have been crying bloody murder that Bush was violating the terrorist civil right to kill innocent Americans.
50 posted on 02/03/2012 1:57:25 PM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn
It is my understanding that he puts in earmarks for his district, then opposes the bill in the hope that the bill will be defeated.

He may vote against that particular bill, but he pays the dimwits who agree to vote for his earmarks back by voting for other bills they want.
51 posted on 02/03/2012 2:03:39 PM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn
What is important to me is that he has opposed the likes of No Child Gets an Education, Tarp, MediPill, etc. That is not “little” in my book. It’s certainly better than we saw out of Jorge Bush.

What good does it do to be opposed to something if he is unwilling to do anything to stop it?
I have done as much to stop waste in gov't as Cut and Run. In fact more, I have never wasted a penny on bogus shrimp studies.
52 posted on 02/03/2012 2:10:55 PM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: John D

“He voted no, big deal. What has he ever actually accomplished?”

He has one vote, just like the other 434. He can use it to vote for big government programs like Tarp, No Child Gets an Education, MediPill, etc. or he can vote against them.

How would you vote on these programs?


53 posted on 02/03/2012 2:32:09 PM PST by SharpRightTurn ( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: John D

“I could hear Cut and Run now if George Bush would have done anything to prevent the surrender monkey’s closest allies, the Islamic terrorists from immigrating. He would have been crying bloody murder that Bush was violating the terrorist civil right to kill innocent Americans.”

I don’t think you have to worry about Jorge “Islam is a religion of peace” Bush advocating that we stop the flow of Mohammedans to our country. Their numbers increased more during his regime than at any other time. Maybe Bush whispered that policy into the ear of the Saudi king while he was holding hands with him.


54 posted on 02/03/2012 2:35:10 PM PST by SharpRightTurn ( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: John D

“He may vote against that particular bill, but he pays the dimwits who agree to vote for his earmarks back by voting for other bills they want.”

The problem is, there are a lot more dimwits that refuse to end earmarks altogether than dimwits that put them in the omnibus bill and then vote against the omnibus bill. If you can turn those numbers around you’ll be “accomplishing” something.


55 posted on 02/03/2012 2:37:36 PM PST by SharpRightTurn ( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: John D

“What good does it do to be opposed to something if he is unwilling to do anything to stop it? I have done as much to stop waste in gov’t as Cut and Run. In fact more, I have never wasted a penny on bogus shrimp studies.”

A congressman can vote yes or no on a bill. What more are you suggesting they could do, kidnap the president or speaker of the House and hold him hostage to prevent passage of the legislation?


56 posted on 02/03/2012 2:40:35 PM PST by SharpRightTurn ( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn
What more are you suggesting they could do

He could work with other members, like other congressmen do to get what they want passed. Cut and Run is only good at complaining, but he does nothing to get something actually accomplished. Every other candidate running, even Romney has accomplishments. The surrender monkey none, other than his earmarks.
57 posted on 02/03/2012 4:21:06 PM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn
The problem is, there are a lot more dimwits that refuse to end earmarks altogether than dimwits that put them in the omnibus bill and then vote against the omnibus bill.

If the surrender monkey would not reward those who waste money on his earmarks by voting for their waste much more waste would be avoided. Cut and Run rewards those who vote for his waste, by voting for theirs.
58 posted on 02/03/2012 4:27:26 PM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

Missed this thread, learned about it thru BARF - Little Green Footballs: Free Republic Reacts to Ron Paul’s White Supremacist Links

Ron Paul's links to the white supremecist community is undeniable. The anonymous hacks, I'll post links at the end, I'm not big on hackers, they're criminals. As criminals, unreliable. While many of Paul's relationships are easy to document, from Willis Carto to Don Black to Spotlight, the newsletters, most people here familiar with the issue get it. However EMails from white supremecists yapping about meetings, might be true, more believeable than OJs rants. But there really isn't much here.

It's interesting, though not of late I've posted on lots of anti-FR sites, not suggesting that's what LGF is. Not much of an issue. Enjoyed a site of disgruntaled DU Jews, though I've lost track of it. I think Stormfront has an anti forum and I'm sure they'd welcome me. The only two sites that wouldn't let me post in the last 10 ro 15 years. DU, I had to make acceptable posts before posting articles, my interest gun control. And LGF. Never knew why, even sent an EMail or two telling them I post here. At least 5 years ago, if they read this I'm sure I'll be welcome.

59 posted on 02/03/2012 6:32:39 PM PST by SJackson (The Pilgrims¬óDoing the jobs Native Americans wouldn't do !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
Aware of this thread becaus of this one BARF - Little Green Footballs: Free Republic Reacts to Ron Paul’s White Supremacist Links

You've seen my comment on that thread. Paul's connections undeniable. Hackers should be in jail, I don't believe white supremecists, so the anonymous revelations are valuable only as confirmation of affection, not of actual incidents. A few links for anyone who wants to read them. The data is at http://pirasec.com/

http://www.indecisionforever.com/blog/2012/02/02/ron-paul-attracts-support-of-the-worlds-worst-people

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/291817/20120202/ron-paul-a3p-opblitzkrieg-nazi-anonymous-jamie.htm

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/291000/20120201/anonymous-ron-paul-neo-nazi-bnp-a3p.htm

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/290374/20120131/ron-paul-anonymous-neo-nazi-opblitzkrieg-antisec.htm

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/291817/20120202/ron-paul-a3p-opblitzkrieg-nazi-anonymous-jamie.htm

http://www.examiner.com/anonymous-in-national/hunting-nazis-anonymous-snares-ron-paul-operation-blitzkrieg

60 posted on 02/03/2012 6:38:48 PM PST by SJackson (The Pilgrims¬óDoing the jobs Native Americans wouldn't do !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson