Skip to comments.Anonymous Hacks White Supremacist Site, Finds Direct Links to Ron Paul
Posted on 02/02/2012 1:44:04 PM PST by wolfcreek
click here to read article
So what. Obama publicly talks to La Raza, the Congressional Black Caucus, and the NAACP.
They gonna hack obozo’s websites next?
I don’t require hackers to reveal to me that Ron Paul is associated with neo-nazis or neo-fascists. This has been pretty common knowledge around Texas for years and those are the kind of people in his district that keep electing him and supporting him. But what the hell? Maybe we will need that to turn this country around.
Let’s keep this an LGF-free site.
No conservative goes there anymore.
I may think Paul is a nut, but I’m not going to give anything “Anonymous” provides any credence.
I’ll have the duck with the mango salsa.
You have got to be kidding me. You're actually defending a Republican candidate's associations with such people?
LGF! My goodness I would rather be Hillary’s towel boy than see Freepers linking LGF!!
please....stormfront used to link here....JR protested of course
no one can stop that stuff
Little Green Footballs? lol
I’d vote for Paul before I’d vote for Willard.
Willard won’t downsize government. To paraphrase Newt, Willard will merely manage the further decay of our country.
Paul says he would cut $1 trillion from the federal behemoth. I think he would at least try. And that would only be considered racist by commie agitators.
I’ll put more credence in this when it’s reported somewhere other than LGF.
Why are you posting stuff from LGF? You might as well post from Daily Kos or DU.
Yeah, and anonymous says there are numerous connections between Eric Holder and the New Black Panthers.
They hack a site and find a link. Hackers are no better than who they hacked.
Here’s the original site where I saw it posted. (didn’t know anything about it)
Don’t kill the messenger.
Maybe this is more to your liking?
Paul will be fine to the media as long as he helps Romney and/or the left, as soon as that is over , then the media will drive him off.
No. I’m attacking the double standard.
What double standard? Someone here decrying Obama’s associations that you listed, as we all do, or someone here doing that and then defending Paul’s.
The two types are sometimes referred to as guilt by association and honor by association. Association fallacies are a special case of red herring, and can be based on an appeal to emotion."
Anyone with a 4th grade education can see that Ron Paul is a Neo-skinhead racist. But anyone with more than a 4th grade education can see that it is just more smear...
LGF? I hear “Socialist Worker’s Daily” has some interesting pieces, too.
Might be good to make that clearer next time, instead of simply saying, "So what."
I'm sure I'm not the only one who got the wrong impression about your post.
I’ll act shocked...
That probably would have been better as an original source. LGF has no credibility, and I wouldn’t want to give him any traffic.
I had no idea but, the ‘suspect’ credibility issue should fall on Anonymous.IMO
Do you frequent Little Green Footballs often? If so, perhaps you should reconsider being on a conservative website. They’re more looney left than DU as well as a deranged cult of personality to that weirdo who runs it.
Care2.com? That site has links to news about "Women" and "LGBT" right in their banner. You're burying yourself deeper, dude.
It’s a shame, and it’s actually weird what happened to Charles Johnson. He used to be conservative, and his site was very important during “Rathergate”, but I guess something snapped, I don’t know what. All of a sudden he starts ranting about creationism, and it’s been downhill ever since, to the point where he’s indistinguishable from Daily Kos.
By the way, I notice that LGF has a link to this very thread as his latest post. Hi Charles!
Oh, and by the way, most of us (Or a large number of us; I don’t speak for everybody of course) on FR don’t want to have anything to do with Paul, because we realize he’s insane. I’ve known this for a long time. He’s very popular on Alex Jones’ show, which is enough right there to make me suspicious. Then, he holds the U.S. responsible for 9/11. Sometimes he sounds like he could be running for president of Iran.
Since this is common knowledge on FR and not really news, we’re taking the opportunity to poke fun at you instead. Have a nice day!
Why are you providing blog hits for that radical leftist loon, Charles Johnson?
OK, so some members went to CPAC and met Paul there.
Personally, I don't care. If Al Sharpton can be considered mainstream and respectable -- if Obama's long associations with William Ayers and Rev Wright are considered OK -- then I will not concern myself over who Ron Paul has in his fan club.
alterPaul says a lot of things. Show me once where he actually accomplished anything besides earmarks and bather.
“Appeasement Paul has NEVER done anything in all the time he has been in Washington.”
He has voted No on No Child Gets an Education, the unPatriot Act, MediPill, various bloated budgets, hundreds of billions of dollars of taxpayers’ money squandered on “nation-building” Mohammedan projects in Iraq and Afghanistan, etc., etc. How does that square up with your buddy Juan Bush?
Cute but no cigar.
What has Paul done is the question?
Voting no on bills he KNOWS will pass, is not doing anything.
He does support foreign aid for palestine (always vote yes) but no one else, I guess that’s something.
Sorry forgot to ping you to #40.
If y'all don't want to read it...don't.
The censorship of posters and articles has gotten way over the top around here lately.
Why don't you guys just get a mirror, find a quite place and talk to your friggin selfs in private because that's where you're headed.
“Cute but no cigar. What has Paul done is the question?
Voting no on bills he KNOWS will pass, is not doing anything. He does support foreign aid for palestine (always vote yes) but no one else, I guess thats something.”
If you’re asking what kind of fundamental reforms is he responsible for, I’m not aware of any (though I haven’t researched it). I suppose in that regard Paul is as effective as Michelle Bachmann and Jim DeMint—it would take a lot more like-minded people to be able to outvote not only the Dims but the leftist, establishment Republicans. Unfortunately, we are still a long way from that. If you are a very conservative office holder, who would like the federal behemoth to spend only what is within its constitutional limits, and are surrounded by a majority who will spend any amount they please, voting “no” is about your only option.
Certainly voting “no” to huge spending by the federal monster is better than voting for new socialist programs like MediPill. Or do you disagree?
“George Bush was not afraid to defend us from the terrorist threat. Appeasement Paul’s policy is appease, appease, and appease some more. Then when that no longer works he just wants to surrender.”
Bush was stupid enough to push the line that “Islam is a religion of peace.” He did no service to us by pushing that lie. He spent hundreds of billions of dollars of our money in “nation-building” in the Middle Eastern hellholes that hate us—building roads, schools, water plants, etc. (at our expense) to “win their hearts and minds.” Our tax money was wasted. They still hate us and we are still unsafe. I don’t call that defending us from terrorist threats.
If Bush wanted to defend us from terrorist threats, he would have closed our borders on Sept. 12, 2001, booted out of our country Mohammedans who don’t belong here (most of them don’t belong here), and stopped further immigration to our country of Mohammedans. In addition to these domestic measures, he should have ordered the bombing of any sites deemed appropriate to take out terrorists. It would be fine with me if he wiped out large swaths of of their countries.
But instead he chose a policy of a decade long occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan that has helped bankrupt us and put our brave troops in unnecessary danger.
Paul’s policy regarding the Mohammedan threat is deranged. Bush’s was just plain stupid.
“That is because he has not accomplished anything, except acquire as many earmarks as possible. He is not known as the earmark king for nothing. So as far as bringing home the pork he has done something. As far as doing anything about our debt he has done nothing. He never has and I doubt if he ever would.”
Fair enough. I can understand the position that if he says he opposes earmarks, he should vote against every bill that contains an earmark for consistency. I can appreciate that stance. It is my understanding that he puts in earmarks for his district, then opposes the bill in the hope that the bill will be defeated. But if it is not defeated (because most Dims and elephants don’t oppose earmarks), and if his constituents are going to be paying for pet projects all over the country, it would be unfair if they don’t get their share. Of course if you can get enough people to vote like Paul, Paul’s district won’t get earmarks because the whole bill will go down. If you’re mad because he wants his constituency to share in earmarks if the bill passes, then so be it.
“Appeasement Paul has been Chairman of the Domestic Monetary Policy Committee, the committee that oversees the Federal Reserve for almost two years. He has complained about the Fed, Reserve for about 20. In his time as chairman you do not think he had an opportunity to do something? He had the opportunity, but was unwilling to do anything.”
If that is true, then Paul should be removed as chairman and replaced by someone who will do something about it. Let me know who you think Boehner might appoint to chair that committee to really do something and I will pass the recommendation along to my congress critter.
“Appeasement Paul talks big, does little.”
You are welcome to your own opinion as to how big he may talk. What is important to me is that he has opposed the likes of No Child Gets an Education, Tarp, MediPill, etc. That is not “little” in my book. It’s certainly better than we saw out of Jorge Bush.