Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WI: GAB Decides to Ignore All Independently-Provided Evidence of Recall Petition Fraud
MacIver News Service ^ | 2/7/12 | MacIver News Service

Posted on 02/07/2012 1:55:24 PM PST by Jean S

[Madison, Wisc...] Citizens not affiliated with either the recall organizations or the office holders targeted for recall this spring have found scores of problems with the petitions, but Wisconsin’s elections watchdogs have decided they will not consider any of their evidence.

GAB Director and General Counsel Kevin Kennedy said there is no process in place for accepting information from outside groups and individuals. Governor Scott Walker and the four Republican state senators against whom recall petitions were filed last month are the only parties that can contest the validity of signatures, according to Kennedy.

The GAB will not investigate or consider independently-submitted evidence of recall petition fraud. This includes circumstances wherein individuals might notify the board that their own name and forged signature were submitted.

According to the GAB, anyone concerned that their signature was fraudulently included on a recall petition, therefore, must notify not the GAB, but rather the target of the recall. In addition, they must do so by the challenge deadline if they want that signature reviewed and ultimately, possibly, struck.

“Staff believes the Board should only rely on information that is developed by the staff in its petition review, submitted by the officeholders in a challenge or the petitioners in response to determine the sufficiency of recall petitions,” wrote GAB Executive Director and General Counsel Kevin Kennedy in a memo to GAB members Tuesday.

The GAB discussion on the petition review criteria and process focused on their minimum statutory requirements. However nothing in state statutes prohibits the GAB from considering independently-gathered evidence of fraud.

“Given the unprecedented nature of these recall efforts it would be improper to change procedures in the midst of our review,” Kennedy wrote.

The four Republican state senators have until Thursday to challenge signatures. Governor Walker’s challenges are due Feb. 27 and Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch has until March 5 since she received copies of the petitions seeking her recall a week after Walker.

The GAB has until March 19 to verify all of the petitions.

MacIver News’ Bill Osmulski has more in this video report:


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: walkerrecall; wisconsinshowdown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
The GAB will not investigate or consider independently-submitted evidence of recall petition fraud. This includes circumstances wherein individuals might notify the board that their own name and forged signature were submitted.

The GAB is supposed to be bipartisan. 5 of the 6 members were appointed by Doyle.

Verify the Recall is challenging this legally.

1 posted on 02/07/2012 1:55:36 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Video at the link.

Walker recall ping!


2 posted on 02/07/2012 1:57:29 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

The fix is in......................


3 posted on 02/07/2012 2:01:19 PM PST by Red Badger (If you are unemployed long enough, you are no longer unemployed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

I bet it is because Verify The Recall is finding a lot of stuff that is wrong......and we all know when the left does something big they do it really big.......


4 posted on 02/07/2012 2:04:06 PM PST by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

Ok, so why aren’t Governor Scott Walker and the four Republican state senators filing challenges?


5 posted on 02/07/2012 2:05:14 PM PST by FormerLib (Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jean S
Staff believes...

i.e. unelected government employees, perhaps they have a conflict of interest. I mean their only employed to insure the veracity of the vote. Ignoring evidence is a part of that, no?

6 posted on 02/07/2012 2:16:24 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jean S
"Verify the Recall is challenging this legally."

Good. I spent a great deal of time verifying those recall signatures. Some of them are SO obvious.....like the same hand writing in several of the signatures info spots that were apparently "missing" information.

Filled in, just like that.

7 posted on 02/07/2012 2:23:10 PM PST by NoGrayZone (Jim "Firebrand" Robinson endorses Newt...with EPIC call to action!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

you’d be collecting

In my data entry I’ve come across:

a whole petition with no city or zip

numerous missing necessary information

obvious forged sigs

sigs that don’t match the name

Its not only the blatant fraud but the large amounts of sigs that do not have all of the info properly filled out that should be struck.

Originally I had said that there would likely be close to 750K legit sigs now I’m thinking its going to be closer to 650K...its that blatantly bad.


8 posted on 02/07/2012 2:25:23 PM PST by MNlurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

Those “in power” know they can get away with their ruling, so they do not care what anyone else thinks, and they know their will be no ramifications that will adversely affect them, so again, they do not care what anyone else thinks.

Until these lowlifes are held responsible for their actions, they will continue to perpetrate fraud with no remorse.


9 posted on 02/07/2012 2:27:02 PM PST by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoGrayZone

I’m still entering, but will switch over to walker as soon as its complete.


10 posted on 02/07/2012 2:28:21 PM PST by MNlurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

Hm. I see “GAB” everywhere in this article. But it’s defined nowhere. What does “GAB” mean?


11 posted on 02/07/2012 2:34:08 PM PST by Theo (May Rome decrease and Christ increase.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNlurker

I called his office when I first heard they weren’t accepting “outside” help, a few weeks ago.

Spoke with the Deputy Director, a very nice lady, who said Verify the Recall won’t be used, only WI residents could take part of any verification.

She said petitions were not officially released (as of that time). I asked what I could do to help and she said just to continue to support Walker.

I didn’t feel that was enough. I asked her if at ANY time, I could do more to help to let me know. She took my name, number and email address.


12 posted on 02/07/2012 2:42:22 PM PST by NoGrayZone (Jim "Firebrand" Robinson endorses Newt...with EPIC call to action!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Theo; afraidfortherepublic

GAB - Government Accountability Board. They’re supposedly a bipartisan group of retired judges who oversee elections in Wisconsin.

Ex-Gov. Doyle appointed 5 of the 6 on the current board. So much for “bipartisan” part. They’ve been putting roadblocks in our way all through this recall process.


13 posted on 02/07/2012 2:49:45 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jean S
Perhaps Walker should just let the GAB do it's lousy job - he won't get voted out anyway.

Then, after the election he can institute a complete review of ALL of the petitions, name names and start prosecution proceedings against the collectors and any that submitted multiple entries.

Shining the light on these cockroaches and exposing massive fraud (mainly of the (D) variety) would help the voter ID initiatives in all other states. Hey, the MSM says voter fraud doesn't exist - this would knock their argument right out of the water.

14 posted on 02/07/2012 3:06:34 PM PST by az_gila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib

One has been filed in one of the senate recall cases. Sen Scott Fitzgerald is contesting 3000 of the signatures. It is almost a mute point because no one has come forward to run against him.


15 posted on 02/07/2012 3:24:24 PM PST by UB355 (Slower traffic keep right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

The “lawless ones” have penetrated the whole system.
They can get away with ignoring this corruption, right in front of everyone’s faces. The “leaders” can get away with ignoring all evidence of corruption in all matters.


16 posted on 02/07/2012 3:34:42 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jean S
The four Republican state senators have until Thursday to challenge signatures. Governor Walker’s challenges are due Feb. 27 and Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch has until March 5 since she received copies of the petitions seeking her recall a week after Walker.

Sounds like the state senators, Gov. Walker and Lt. Gov. Kleefisch need to issue an immediate notice that the volunteer citizens are all officially designated as "unpaid temporary staff members", and then use their efforts in challenging signatures.

17 posted on 02/07/2012 3:46:50 PM PST by Col Freeper (FR is a smorgasbord of Conservative thoughts and ideas - dig in and enjoy it to its fullest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Col Freeper

We at the Waukesha Republican Party went through the Walker petitions over a week ago. We were surprised to recive 8 boxes of Kleefish petitions on Saturday. They’re going through them now.

The GAB is so (insert nasty words here) that they’re making it as difficult as possible for us to go through the petitions in time.

The WI GOP and the Scott Walker campaign (Friends of Scott Walker) have legal standing to go through the petitions.

That is... if the “bipartisan” GAB arbitrarily decides otherwise.

Some Tea Party groups such as verifytherecall.com are also challenging petitions. The GAB said they can’t.


18 posted on 02/07/2012 3:57:08 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

All of those phoney signers of the petition will vote in the Recall, probably multiple times.


19 posted on 02/07/2012 4:04:51 PM PST by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

Sue him personally and them as a group.


20 posted on 02/07/2012 4:38:27 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (We kneel to no prince but the Prince of Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson