Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney, Santorum to Skip March 1 Debate
National Journal ^ | 2/16/12 | Sarah B. Boxer

Posted on 02/16/2012 12:45:46 PM PST by KansasGirl

The front of the GOP pack will be absent at the March 1 debate in Atlanta sponsored by CNN and the Georgia Republican Party, CBS News/National Journal has learned. The Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum campaigns said they have decided to skip the debate, throwing into question whether it will happen as planned. "With eight other states voting on March 6, we will be campaigning in other parts of the country and unable to schedule the CNN Georgia debate," Romney spokeswoman Andrea Saul said. "We have participated in 20 debates, including eight from CNN." The 20 debates include one scheduled for Feb. 22 in Mesa, Ariz.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationaljournal.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: afraidofnewt; cowardromney; cowardsantorum; dropoutnewt; gopdebates; newt4romney; santorum4romney; thesmelloffear; winning4tiffany
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 261-270 next last
To: KansasGirl
March 1, 2012 debate - Cancelled - Santorum, Romney and Paul all pulled out.

March 5, 2012 debate - Cancelled.

Super Tuesday in March 6 and we have debate cancellations on March 1 and March 5.

And we have Rick-fans here rationalizing Rick (and Mitt) dropping from those debates.

Unbelievable.

201 posted on 02/16/2012 6:33:52 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

I could like Santorum on a number of issues, and I give him a BIG thumbs up for the way he talks about freedom, but talk is easy, and specific proposals are hard. Just as bad, so far I’m not seeing anyone effectively responding to the bulk of the questions about him and many of his Senate votes. (See editor-surveyor’s long list on multiple threads, which is part of what got me really doubting; I am not going to repeat it here.)


202 posted on 02/16/2012 6:35:16 PM PST by Paul R. (We are in a break in an Ice Age. A brief break at that...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC; onyx
Just got off of a great tele-townhall with Newt!! Woo hoo!!

Newt spoke to supporters for almost an hour! He took questions from supporters all across the country. He mentioned Santo and McRomeny dissing OH and GA by not attending the debates and said he'd be putting together some sort of forum for those who had hoped to hear Newt debate both of them.

Went in to a lot of detail about all of his plans for BBA, domestic energy, reducing spending and government waste/fraud, etc.

Go Newt!!! Woo hoo!! Great tele-townhall!!


203 posted on 02/16/2012 6:36:56 PM PST by Jane Long (Soli Deo Gloria!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

It’d be interesting to see how many people in states that have not already had primaries have seen more than the equivalent of one or two debates. I don’t think it’s a high percentage at all, judging by people I talk to, who I certainly think would average as “more than typically interested in who becomes the Pub nominee”.


204 posted on 02/16/2012 6:41:52 PM PST by Paul R. (We are in a break in an Ice Age. A brief break at that...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long
Newt sounded like a fighter. Not a lover.
205 posted on 02/16/2012 6:43:20 PM PST by CainConservative (Santorum/Huck 2012 w/ Newt, Cain, Palin, Bach, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Petraeus in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Hey me too! Excellent questions and answers, His point about the duo pulling out of the debates was terrific in that the conservatives in the super Tuesday states should be very offended that they are being denied an opportunity to participate.


206 posted on 02/16/2012 6:43:32 PM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl

Sorry if it’s been said:
Santorum = Coward


207 posted on 02/16/2012 6:45:36 PM PST by bramps (Cama, Cama, Cama Chameleon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long
Thank you for sharing the info on the tele-town hall; I got the e-mail today and really wanted to participate; but, we had a very important prior commitment that conflicted.

I hope Sarah Palin Browbeats the ever lovin’ stuffing out of Santorum and Myth on their disgusting cheap trick. I had said I would reluctantly vote for Santorum if Newt didn't get the nomination ...scratch that; not gonna happen now!

GO NEWT!!!

208 posted on 02/16/2012 6:58:50 PM PST by Ozymandias Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite

Newt won’t let this pass. During the upcoming Feb. 22 CNN debate live on TV, Newt will expose to the world how the others chickened out on a most important pre Super Tuesday debate and why they did so.


209 posted on 02/16/2012 7:05:06 PM PST by Java4Jay (The evils of government are directly proportional to the tolerance of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite

Newt won’t let this pass. During the upcoming Feb. 22 CNN debate live on TV, Newt will expose to the world how the others chickened out on a most important pre Super Tuesday debate and why they did so.


210 posted on 02/16/2012 7:05:23 PM PST by Java4Jay (The evils of government are directly proportional to the tolerance of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl

I’ve skipped far more than they have.

This debate merry go round has been way overkill IMO.


211 posted on 02/16/2012 7:09:44 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Abortion? No. Gov't heath care? No. Gore on warming? No. McCain on immigration? No.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

Thank goodness I missed that, I see no reason, at all, to watch BOR.


212 posted on 02/16/2012 7:10:57 PM PST by The Cajun (Palin, Free Republic, Mark Levin, Newt......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long
said he'd be putting together some sort of forum for those who had hoped to hear Newt debate both of them.

I keep thinking Newt needs to SOMEHOW get his longer talks out to a lot more people. Maybe run a tele-internet town-hall where the best three follow up questions of topics covered in the first hour have a chance to win $5000, or something like that. (Is that legal?) If yes, advertise it widely, in advance.

Or get some local media in OH to sponsor a debate, or in lieu of that, another townhall forum to answer citizens' questions. (Can Santorum and Romney both afford to diss Ohio?)

Mail out CD's or DVD's containing policy issue discussions to prospective voters, encouraging them to copy and / or pass them on? (CD's are REALLY cheap in bulk, these days.)

Something... I just don't think even 10% of Republican voters have heard much more than soundbites from Gingrich, when it comes to real policy matters, because most of the media is in the Establishment tank. Saying "go to Newt.org" is just not enough.

213 posted on 02/16/2012 7:12:15 PM PST by Paul R. (We are in a break in an Ice Age. A brief break at that...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Ozymandias Ghost; Toespi
Yes, it was superb! Great idea on Newt's campaign's part. I jotted down the questions/topics from 10 or so callers. Great ideas and feedback on all. Newt mentioned he'd like to do this tele-townhall format every two weeks or so.

One caller mentioned they'd watched Newt's Facebook speech and loved it. He's also going to do more of those.

I'd personally like to see more follow up via emails (for those of us who are FB/twitter challenged) from Newt, his campaign and those who've endorsed him. I did receive the Gov. Perry email, but would like to see a lot more info-filled emails I could then forward on. That was going to be my idea/suggestion ;)

214 posted on 02/16/2012 7:13:46 PM PST by Jane Long (Soli Deo Gloria!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

BTW, is there a link to a replay somewhere? YouTube?


215 posted on 02/16/2012 7:18:38 PM PST by Paul R. (We are in a break in an Ice Age. A brief break at that...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl

Hmmm... let’s see now...
There’s fear of heights... fear of flying... fear of spiders... etc... etc.
These conditions all have a scientific name.
I wonder what the “Fear of Newt” is called?


216 posted on 02/16/2012 7:20:33 PM PST by navydad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

>> did you bother reading the article? <<

Hey, don’t spoil our fun and games! We’d don’t need to read no stinkin’ article. We’d much rather bash Santorum without knowing the facts!


217 posted on 02/16/2012 7:20:59 PM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Java4Jay

If he does this, Newt should present some solid numbers on how much of the electorate has seen over, say, 2 hours of the debates so far. I’m sure it’s not a high %. Plus, multiple new or resurfaced issues have cropped up in the last couple weeks.


218 posted on 02/16/2012 7:21:18 PM PST by Paul R. (We are in a break in an Ice Age. A brief break at that...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

That makes a lot of sense ...hope they do that!


219 posted on 02/16/2012 7:21:23 PM PST by Ozymandias Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Paul R.

Not to the tele-townhall, that I know of. But, who knows...with the great response it seems like they’d like to promote it. He mentioned that his speeches from CA and his FB video would be posted on Newt.org.


220 posted on 02/16/2012 7:29:59 PM PST by Jane Long (Soli Deo Gloria!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 261-270 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson