Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich woos with prospect of $2 gallon gas
Money.com ^ | February 20, 2012 6:05 PM ET | BRIAN BAKST

Posted on 02/20/2012 5:52:44 PM PST by Red Steel

TULSA, Okla. (AP) - Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich is dangling the prospect of gas as low as $2 a gallon if he's elected.

The former House speaker has spoken in the past of gas dropping to $2.50 a gallon under a Gingrich administration. Monday's prediction, coming as Gingrich campaigned in Oklahoma, contrasts sharply with rival Rick Santorum, who told an Ohio audience that big-city Americans should brace themselves for $5-a-gallon gas.

Both candidates are citing new sensitivity over rising pump prices to push for relaxed regulation on domestic oil production.

According to AAA's daily fuel gauge, the national average Monday for a gallon of regular gas was $3.56.

Gingrich and Santorum have been highlighting oil exploration in North Dakota and slamming the Obama administration for delaying a Canada-to-Texas oil pipeline.

Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich dangled the prospect of gas as low as $2 a gallon if he's elected, playing off voter angst about rising prices at the pump.

The former House speaker has spoken in the past of gas dropping to $2.50 a gallon under a Gingrich administration. Monday's prediction came as Gingrich campaigned in Oklahoma, where the oil and natural gas sector is vital to a bustling state economy.

"With Gingrich policies, what we know is we will dramatically expand our independence in the world market, dramatically expand our capacity to produce energy without regard to our foreign potential enemies and in the process prices will clearly be a lot lower," Gingrich said. "Now, I picked $2.50 as a stabilizing price for capital investment reasons. It could easily go down to $2."

According to AAA's daily fuel gauge, a gallon of regular gas was approaching $4 in some places and even topped it in California.

(Excerpt) Read more at money.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: gingrich; newt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-129 next last

1 posted on 02/20/2012 5:52:48 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Newt should just go ahead and say $1.99 or $1.98

Why not while he’s at it?


2 posted on 02/20/2012 5:55:31 PM PST by CainConservative (Santorum/Huck 2012 w/ Newt, Cain, Palin, Bach, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Petraeus in the Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

That’s just stupid and desperate. Please. We all know that’s BS.

Santorum 2012


3 posted on 02/20/2012 5:59:56 PM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CainConservative
I remember $.19/9 per gallon at a Piester-Derby station in Southern Iowa in the early 60s. Over the line in Missouri, it was $.17/9.
4 posted on 02/20/2012 6:01:26 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Beware the Sweater Vest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


5 posted on 02/20/2012 6:01:29 PM PST by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CainConservative
I agree because Newt could pull it off.

There is no reason other than Government why we are paying such high prices on energy.

At every turn over the past three years one rule of thumb can be applied. If it is good for America, this administration (and by extension the Democrat party) is against it. If it can hurt America, this administration is for it.

6 posted on 02/20/2012 6:01:43 PM PST by Michael Barnes (Obamaa+ Downgrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

He said $2.50 on Hannity today. Now he’s down to $2.00??

Someone should ask him to make a good six pack of beer $3, and a fine steak $5 as long as he’s determining the price of free market goods.


7 posted on 02/20/2012 6:03:10 PM PST by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

And you back that up how newcomer?


8 posted on 02/20/2012 6:03:20 PM PST by Michael Barnes (Obamaa+ Downgrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Red Steel
-> ;contrasts sharply with rival Rick Santorum, who told an Ohio audience that big-city Americans should brace themselves for $5-a-gallon gas.

Proving once again, Santorum has no confidence or of any domestic plan in turning the economy around. He tells us, get use to the price increases. Very un -inspiring. Between the candidates, Newt is right on target. Drill here, open up the fuel reserves in which God gave us.

10 posted on 02/20/2012 6:04:03 PM PST by Christie at the beach (I like Newt and would love to see political dead bodies on the floor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes

Remove the local state and fed taxes on each gallon!


11 posted on 02/20/2012 6:04:09 PM PST by ronnie raygun (V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Conquer Saudi Arabia?


12 posted on 02/20/2012 6:04:22 PM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (REPEAL WASHINGTON! -- Islam Delenda Est! -- I Want Constantinople Back. -- Rumble thee forth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes

How do YOU back up that Newt could wave a magic wand and make gasoline $2 a gallon?


13 posted on 02/20/2012 6:04:38 PM PST by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Info Ping.

Watch out for the pest poop.


14 posted on 02/20/2012 6:05:09 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45

Remove Government excess and you could very well have that.


15 posted on 02/20/2012 6:05:20 PM PST by Michael Barnes (Obamaa+ Downgrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

I’ve got no problem with a reasonable tax on a gallon of gas... as long as it goes DIRECTLY to road maintenance and repair (and nowhere else). You can reduce it... you can’t get rid of it. Roads don’t fix themselves.


16 posted on 02/20/2012 6:07:13 PM PST by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

It’s people like you that are scary. You really believe what you just said which is that we’ll never see $2 gas again.

People like you are the reason we’re in this mess. You probably voted for the hope and change guy last time because you believed what he said.

How depressing.
JB


17 posted on 02/20/2012 6:08:11 PM PST by thatjoeguy (MAYDAY! MAYDAY! We are so going in ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CainConservative

Bachmann claimed $1.80.

Do we hear $1.75?

Why not $1.50?

Or even $1.00?

[Pandering is pandering.]


18 posted on 02/20/2012 6:08:20 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

He shouldn’t be making price predictions, as that lends the impression that he’d mess with the marketplace to achieve his goals.

Give us a promise to get out of the marketplace and tell us how’d you do that, but no price promises.


19 posted on 02/20/2012 6:08:30 PM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Any president who can make gas cost $2 a gallon, can make gas cost $1 a gallon.

In other words: price setting is an empty political slogan. Newt can put in place good policies and give us a better energy outlook, but promising gas at price X is silly.

20 posted on 02/20/2012 6:08:29 PM PST by ClearCase_guy ("And the public gets what the public wants" -- The Jam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45

$3 six pack? $5 Ribeye?

I’m with you all the way!


21 posted on 02/20/2012 6:08:43 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

[We all know that’s BS.]

BS is thinking gas has to be $5 a gallon.


22 posted on 02/20/2012 6:09:36 PM PST by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes

A barrel of oil on the open international market is over $100. There is no WAY you’re going to get $2 gas at that price. The removal of what “government excess” exactly is going to get the price of a barrel of oil down to $50?


23 posted on 02/20/2012 6:09:36 PM PST by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes

It’s the most basic economic question.

Increase the supply. Supply meets and exceed demand that creates competition, and the consumers benefit from the competition by lower prices.


24 posted on 02/20/2012 6:09:51 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45
How do YOU back up that Newt could wave a magic wand and make gasoline $2 a gallon?\

You can't back that up. Newt is still my preferred candidate, but that he's lowered himself to Michelle Bachmann at her lowest says a lot about his expectations.

25 posted on 02/20/2012 6:11:22 PM PST by BfloGuy (The final outcome of the credit expansion is general impoverishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: thatjoeguy

In 1970 you could buy a great car brand new for $5000. We’ll never see that price again. Does pointing that out make me “scary”?


26 posted on 02/20/2012 6:12:01 PM PST by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
I remember $.19/9 per gallon

I remember $0.15 per gallon in the early 70s in northeastern Oklahoma. Gas wars were frequent and common. That ended about 1973 when prices started a stead rising.
27 posted on 02/20/2012 6:12:01 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CainConservative

Didn’t Bachmann suggest something like this back in September? And if I remember, she was lampooned for it.


28 posted on 02/20/2012 6:12:35 PM PST by parksstp (I pick Rick! (If he's good enough for Mark Levin and Rush Limbaugh, he's good enough for me))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Desperation


29 posted on 02/20/2012 6:12:50 PM PST by stuck_in_new_orleans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Sold


30 posted on 02/20/2012 6:12:56 PM PST by Flavius (What hopes for victory, Gaius Crastinus? What grounds for encouragement ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth; Jim Robinson

“Eminently desirable for average commuting suburban Americans. Of course, this offer is as much advertisment of whoredom as an increase of minimum wage increase to the SEIU thugs. Why not offer free cheese, Newt, you whore?”

Don’t think your word is acceptable. I suggest you lose that word when referring to Newt.


31 posted on 02/20/2012 6:13:14 PM PST by Marcella ((Newt will smash Hussein in debates. Newt needs money.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth

[Why not offer free cheese, Newt, you whore? ]

Santorum you gay castratti, don’t you realize gas was at $2.50 relatively recently? If you put curbs on the Fed (Gingrich’s idea, not Santorum’s) and opened the fields for drilling, this would most certainly happen.


32 posted on 02/20/2012 6:13:45 PM PST by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: stuck_in_new_orleans
Desperation

Nope.

33 posted on 02/20/2012 6:13:57 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Christie at the beach
It must be liberals on this thread-making every excuse in
the book not to have a solid turn out-it’s doom and can”t do attitude. Bitch about nothing getting done, then when someone promises a big change (which it can work as Newt explained), the hands fly out with magic wands and stubbornness. No wonder we are in such trouble. ( if Newt gets in, there will be lower gas prices again since he will set forth better polices)
34 posted on 02/20/2012 6:15:00 PM PST by Christie at the beach (I like Newt and would love to see political dead bodies on the floor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel; onyx

I see it, Red. Probably here we go again. Hope not.


35 posted on 02/20/2012 6:16:20 PM PST by Marcella ((Newt will smash Hussein in debates. Newt needs money.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Christie at the beach

uhhh....nooo..... you know what it sounds like? “Hope and Change”. With nothing to back it up. Sound familiar?


36 posted on 02/20/2012 6:16:50 PM PST by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

I owned a ‘66 Chevy with the 396 rat motor. I think i got 8 miles to the gallon but it didn’t matter.


37 posted on 02/20/2012 6:16:58 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Beware the Sweater Vest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DaxtonBrown
Santorum you gay castratti ...

What was it, the sweater vests that gave it away?

38 posted on 02/20/2012 6:17:15 PM PST by al44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
[Pandering is pandering.]

Sort of the way Santorum panders for manufacturers.

39 posted on 02/20/2012 6:17:15 PM PST by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45

First off by reducing Government, i.e. taxes on individuals and corporations. Secondly by tossing into the trash bin our current (STUPID) energy policy (”blends” of gasolines) and finally, getting rid of entire Federal Agencies (EPA for starters) and making these asinine lawsuits the greenies bring “loser pays” expenses by doing what Newt said, start arresting some judges that are legislating from the bench (siding with their ideology; my words).


40 posted on 02/20/2012 6:17:23 PM PST by Michael Barnes (Obamaa+ Downgrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Marcella

Suggest away.

Newton has acted in Newton’s interests ever since 1992 when he realized he could manipulate public opinion to his advantage. 1996 proved him wrong and his friends, the Tofflers, and the intervening years have confirmed the same.

I will not, and cannot, repent of my convictions.


41 posted on 02/20/2012 6:18:04 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth (I'm for Churchill in 1940!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45
Someone should ask him to make a good six pack of beer $3, and a fine steak $5 as long as he’s determining the price of free market goods.

I know you think you were being smart with your snark, but you were showing your ignorance instead. What Newt was saying is that the free market would and could get gas down to two bucks or thereabouts if government would get the hell out of the way. Maybe your sweater vest is so tight the blood flow to your brain is compressed.

42 posted on 02/20/2012 6:19:01 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Gasoline in the range of $2.50 per gallon would be possible much more quickly than you may think. During the Arab oil embargo of the Carter years the price per barrel was pretty high. Deregulation under Reagan started a domestic energy production boom. Arab countries started flooding the market with oil, the price of which dropped like a stone. Because of the lower price (and profits) domestic drilling slowed...but we had much cheaper energy costs, which helped fuel the great economic expansion that resulted. We start drilling...the same thing will happen again. The Arabs are nothing if not predictable.


43 posted on 02/20/2012 6:19:20 PM PST by jdsteel (Give me freedom, not more government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CainConservative

Just electing a Republican Senate and a Republican President will probably in of itself cause a dramatic decrease in a gallon of gas perhaps as much as a dollar. I few oil drilling and pipe projects and a strengthening of the $USD could easily cause another dollar drop. $2.00 / gal is very reasonable.


44 posted on 02/20/2012 6:19:42 PM PST by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45
Newt's polices vs Obama’s radicalism.

Get a better answer.

45 posted on 02/20/2012 6:20:12 PM PST by Christie at the beach (I like Newt and would love to see political dead bodies on the floor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: bigdaddy45

[In 1970 you could buy a great car brand new for $5000. We’ll never see that price again. Does pointing that out make me “scary”?]

It certainly does because it means you are ignorant both of monetary policy and free market economics unfetterd by govenment over-regulation. Scary indeed.


46 posted on 02/20/2012 6:20:15 PM PST by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DaxtonBrown

When Washington can control the economy, please alert me. Until then, their rhetoric is little more than flatulence.


47 posted on 02/20/2012 6:20:34 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth (I'm for Churchill in 1940!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Michael Barnes

Vote Newt = $2 gas....Vote commie obama = $7 gas...


48 posted on 02/20/2012 6:20:40 PM PST by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Marcella

Life with the peasants is frustrating tonight, ain’t it? Perhaps the irony of Working Class Filth’s forum name is lost on him. Wouldn’t be the only irony lost IMO.


49 posted on 02/20/2012 6:22:01 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: al44

[What was it, the sweater vests that gave it away?]

I just think I got a freebie. When someone called Gingrich a whore I went all in for Santorum as a gay castrati. Though that sweater vest does give pause.


50 posted on 02/20/2012 6:23:47 PM PST by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson