Satire?
IBTZ
what part of “abomination” does Ted need explained??
Who is this nut?
Teddy is using his intellect and reasoning for the wrong purpose - to undermine judeo-christian values.
This is not a civil rights issue. It’s about sane Americans resisting the gay mafia’s attempts to redefine the word marriage.
Dressing up anal sex in flowery civil-rights language is leftwing propaganda of the highest order.
This is, I trust, Barbara’s husband? And he argues before the Supreme Court. He seems to be not merely amoral but monumentally brain-dead.
FUTO!!
License to commit buggery is conservative? Conserve what?
When I see myself as labelled “almost knee-jerk” in the first sentence, I read no further.
My opposition to the homosexualization of marriage, and my opposition or support of anything else, is not “knee-jerk.” I have substantive reasons for my opinions. I think about things. I study.
This author is condescending and I therefore don’t care to read the article. If this author would like to win hearts or minds, he might start by not insulting the majority of Americans in his opening statement.
The dailybeast now equals Newsweek??? Pinko?
Step away from the bong, Teddy.
I’m not reading four pages of this. I wonder if he ever addresses the fact that for many homosexual men, marriage is no bar to promiscuity, no elixir of stability.
Marriage was intended to contain fertility. Now it is a privileging of sexual love above all other love.
And in turn, Ted's giving us the fake, knee-jerk emotional BS-propoganda that is used to justify "gay-marriage."
Many of the things he says about couples is true. Bedrock, Stable Bonds building blocks of our neighborhoods.
Two individuals WHO CAN BREED creating loving households and raising children.
Marriages are extemely important. That is why marrioage is between a man and a woman . Not two freaks who want to play with each other.
Ted Olson sounds potted and NoPinkos is ZOTTED!
The term marriage which has acquired the fixed meaning of man and woman pledging to each other has suddenly been given a new referent, which is then assumed to have been the meaning all along. Sodomy is neither marriage nor love it is a decadence phenomenon.
Let’s see....why not gay marriage?
1)It’s sick.
2)Violates the design God intended.
3)It has a greater tendency to spread horrid diseases.
4)Violates a direct command of God.
5)Turns the stomach of any human male that has a shred of masculinity in them.
Okay...numbers 1 and 5 are subjective, but still...
Can someone please explain how 2 gay men can consummate their
wedding vows?