Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

VP hopeful Marco Rubio's Mormon past revealed as it emerges he was baptized LDS at 8-years-old
DailyMail ^ | 23rd February 2012 | MEGHAN KENEALLY

Posted on 02/23/2012 12:40:00 PM PST by wrrock

New revelations that Republican rising star Senator Marco Rubio was a Mormon as a child may create a major obstacle for his political future.

Viewed by many as a likely- and popular- vice presidential candidate in the upcoming elections, the admission that Mr Rubio was an active and enthusiastic Mormon from ages 8 to 13 may hinder his chances because of the negative connotation many conservatives have with the religion.

And, if Mitt Romney- who is arguably the country’s best known Mormon- wins the nomination, Mr Rubio’s chances of being put on the ticket are slashed even further.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; mitt; mittromney; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-55 next last

1 posted on 02/23/2012 12:40:18 PM PST by wrrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wrrock

It’s interesting to me that being a Mormon is evidently considered to be a “negative” thing in politics....which it is not.

I cannot wait until a Muslim runs for office...so that I can watch the MSM claim that it is a “positive” thing.

Of course, considering Muhammed Obama...


2 posted on 02/23/2012 12:43:08 PM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

It’s not negative, just new. Sometimes new things take a while to adjust.


3 posted on 02/23/2012 12:44:47 PM PST by wrrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

Even if true, big deal. Seriously what 8 year old gets to chose what religion they can be?


4 posted on 02/23/2012 12:44:53 PM PST by napscoordinator (A moral principled Christian with character is the frontrunner! Congrats Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

only about the 10th thread on this. do you also count it negative if someone wasn’t born into a Christian family?


5 posted on 02/23/2012 12:45:24 PM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

Rubio has been baptized into two different religions and one will claim him as a church member for life. I think he can be removed from the books of the LDS, but I don’t think the Catholics will stop counting him.


6 posted on 02/23/2012 12:45:24 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

Why, all of a sudden, is a candidate or potential candidate’s religion an issue with the MSM? They didn’t give a rat’s hind leg about it in 2008............


7 posted on 02/23/2012 12:45:33 PM PST by Red Badger (If you are unemployed long enough, you are no longer unemployed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

Is this a spoof piece? Seriously, who cares whether he is, was or ever has been a Mormon . . . and for goodness sake, raising the fact that he was a Mormon for a few years as a kid? Somehow I think the Pulitzer committee will take a pass on this story.


8 posted on 02/23/2012 12:45:57 PM PST by AtlasStalled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Once you’re in, you’re in............


9 posted on 02/23/2012 12:46:37 PM PST by Red Badger (If you are unemployed long enough, you are no longer unemployed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

Hahaha! He was a rabid Mormon from 8 to 13!! Are these people insane?


10 posted on 02/23/2012 12:48:41 PM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote
It’s interesting to me that being a Mormon is evidently considered to be a “negative” thing in politics....which it is not.

I don't know what political sources you are reading, but everything I read about Mormonism and political polling says that it is a negative.

The figures I see are that 20% to 30% (depending on party) of voters nationally won't vote for a Mormon President, that is pretty negative.

11 posted on 02/23/2012 12:51:32 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled
Apparently the Rubio camp is attempting to suppress the news that:

RUBIO'S DOG IS A SECRET MORMON!!!!!!!!!!!! HOLY CRAP!!!

12 posted on 02/23/2012 12:52:21 PM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Deb

Well, he may have been there as an 8 year old, but he probably didn’t “listen”.


13 posted on 02/23/2012 12:53:20 PM PST by Anima Mundi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wrrock
Rubio's main problem as a national candidate has nothing to do with religion.

He is not, according to me, a Natural Born Citizen. Neither of his parents was an American citizen at the time of his birth.

Is this a way to get the also ineligible Mombasa MF used as some sort of precedent? One wonders.

14 posted on 02/23/2012 12:54:23 PM PST by Kenny Bunk ((So, you're telling me Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Roberts can't figure out this eligibility stuff?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“Why, all of a sudden, is a candidate or potential candidate’s religion an issue with the MSM? They didn’t give a rat’s hind leg about it in 2008............”

You are making an excellent point. But then we all know MSM are hypocrites.


15 posted on 02/23/2012 12:55:04 PM PST by entropy12 (Islam is intolerant of every other religion. Most tolerant religion? The oldest one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Deb

Well, he may have been there as an 8 year old, but he probably didn’t “listen”. And, what was Obama when he was an eight year old? And what drugs was he doing in college? Oh, yeah, none of that has any relevance because it was long ago. The media are becoming too ridiculous and do not see they are making themselves more irrelevant by the hour at this point.


16 posted on 02/23/2012 12:56:13 PM PST by Anima Mundi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

For cyring out loud-I could care less


17 posted on 02/23/2012 12:58:30 PM PST by funfan (and his crew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

“It’s interesting to me that being a Mormon is evidently considered to be a “negative” thing in politics....which it is not.”

Indeed! During my 37 working years, I worked with a few mormons, and they were the best workers, always well mannered, and non-prejudicial to others. Actually I will go so far as to say they were better class of people than any other religious group I came across.


18 posted on 02/23/2012 1:00:28 PM PST by entropy12 (Islam is intolerant of every other religion. Most tolerant religion? The oldest one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Anima Mundi

Great point about Obama. He was a Muslim attending a madrasa from 8 to 13. Something like that.


19 posted on 02/23/2012 1:04:59 PM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

How was that sells pitch in anyway related to the fact that Mormonism is seen as a negative in politics?


20 posted on 02/23/2012 1:05:15 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Deb; Anima Mundi

Obama was born into Islam, and converted to Christianity at age 27.


21 posted on 02/23/2012 1:08:28 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Anima Mundi

And what you’re doing isn’t hypocritical? You can’t say what religion Obama was raised in is important but what religion Rubio was raised in isn’t. Both are important. These are a person’s formative years and it may have relevance as to what their world view is. Since it’s often impossible to trust what a politician says, it’s important to know all the verifiable facts about them that we can.


22 posted on 02/23/2012 1:08:39 PM PST by JediJones (Watch "Gingrich to Michigan: Change or Die" on YouTube. Best Speech Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

27, yikes.


23 posted on 02/23/2012 1:10:02 PM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk
"He is not, according to me, a Natural Born Citizen. Neither of his parents was an American citizen at the time of his birth."

Amazing isn't it Kenny. This appears a tactic like running McCain, to provide cover for Obama. We have learned that precedent doesn't mean much, seeing that judges can make up nonsense while ignoring Minor v Happersett, precedent confirming the common law. Both parties are complicit, and Ron Paul is a distraction. He has deliberately avoided addressing Constitutional eligibility, and will let Israel destroy the Middle East by itself if it must, to survive.

The law is so clear, and the avoidance so clear, that it is also clear that government of, by and for the people is a myth. What appears a political process is a distraction for the proletariat.

24 posted on 02/23/2012 1:12:56 PM PST by Spaulding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

I think you misunderstood. When I said “it didn’t matter because it was so long ago” I was referring to the fact that the press said that about Obama in 2008. I am not being hypocritical at all. I am saying it either matters in both instances or it matters in neither, I didn’t state an opinion on that. My point is that it either matters/doesn’t in BOTH cases. It can’t matter for one and not matter for the other.


25 posted on 02/23/2012 1:17:46 PM PST by Anima Mundi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote
It hasn't been a negative for Harry Reid. If it becomes one for Romney, all Romney has to do is call on Reid to stand with him against the attackers. That would put Reid in a very awkward place.

-PJ

26 posted on 02/23/2012 1:23:29 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you can vote for President, then your children can run for President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

Finally, an explanation for his tremendously misguided love of all things Romney.


27 posted on 02/23/2012 1:30:51 PM PST by Waryone (Mitt Romney, the father of gay marriage and socialized medicine in the US, is a lying socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

You must have never worked with or come across any Lutherans.


28 posted on 02/23/2012 1:30:57 PM PST by CainConservative (Santorum/Huck 2012 w/ Newt, Cain, Palin, Bach, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Petraeus in the Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: wrrock
the admission that Mr Rubio was an active and enthusiastic Mormon from ages 8 to 13...

No wonder he quit. Cuban coffee is just too intoxicating to avoid. Anybody else out there ever drink Cuban coffee? And for that reason you will find few Cuban Mormons.

29 posted on 02/23/2012 1:32:51 PM PST by PJ-Comix ("Now I am become Death, destroyer of oysters" ---from the Buffetvad Gita)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk
He is not, according to me, a Natural Born Citizen. Neither of his parents was an American citizen at the time of his birth.

According to YOU. If any such case were brought before the Supremes, it would be LAUGHED out of court within minutes. There are only TWO types of citizens: Natural Born and Naturalized. No make believe third type.

30 posted on 02/23/2012 1:36:17 PM PST by PJ-Comix ("Now I am become Death, destroyer of oysters" ---from the Buffetvad Gita)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

This is a big to do over nothing. Who is behind this crap: Liberals or the GOP establishment?


31 posted on 02/23/2012 1:37:44 PM PST by Rudder (The Main Stream Media is Our Enemy---get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

What, you mean you haven’t seen all those attacks on Christian religion by the Mormons??? Calling it false, etc?

Me either.

And then there is this:

WALTER RUSSELL MEAD: Mormon Theocracy Meme Debunked.

Bigotry is bad; how hard is that to remember?

Apparently, very hard for a lot of American liberals who have allowed their dislike and suspicion of Republican politics to lower their defenses against cheap and ugly religious bigotry. Nasty, ill-founded slanders against alleged Mormon plans for theocracy are spewing forth from news organizations and writers who, when the better angels of their nature are more fully in control, recognize the vicious and evil nature of religious bigotry in other contexts.


Well Walter, that’s not just coming from liberals, I hate to have to tell you.

Disclosure: I don’t and won’t support Romney. My reasons for non-support are not related to his Mormonism, that’s all. There are plenty of political reasons to not support Mitt Romney.


32 posted on 02/23/2012 1:38:51 PM PST by SaxxonWoods (....The days are long, but the years are short.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Waryone

Rubio actually enthusiastically endorsed Huck (as far from Mormonism as you can get) OVER Romney in 2008.

And endorsed no one since Huck decided not to run this cycle.


33 posted on 02/23/2012 1:41:54 PM PST by CainConservative (Santorum/Huck 2012 w/ Newt, Cain, Palin, Bach, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Petraeus in the Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

The DOpiest thing about this article is that who the hell at the age of 8 has any real knowledge of specific religious doctrine? I mean I remember at that age asking my father why they were always talking about “parties” on the radio and tube and he had to explain to me about political parties not being the same as birthday parties.


34 posted on 02/23/2012 1:42:20 PM PST by PJ-Comix ("Now I am become Death, destroyer of oysters" ---from the Buffetvad Gita)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Nothing more frightening than an 8 year old Mormon at your door.

Please.

35 posted on 02/23/2012 2:19:51 PM PST by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wrrock
This is so damn stupid. Why is everyone obsessed with Santorum's and Rubio's religion???? Santorum and Rubio are baptized practicing Catholics and believe in Catholic teachings. It is not a real mystery. They are against abortion. They are against gay marriage. They are for traditional family values. There is no real digging to do to get an accurate picture of where they stand.

On the other hand, we have someone who had an atheist mother, a muslim father, a muslim step-father, non-practicing Christian grandparents, spent 20 years in a Black Liberation Theology church and describes himself simply as "Christian". There are a million questions to be asked here and no one seems to be interested in the answers.

36 posted on 02/23/2012 3:05:41 PM PST by nitzy (A just law does not punish virtue nor reward vice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nitzy
Santorum and Rubio are baptized practicing Catholics and believe in Catholic teachings.

Incorrect. Santorum is a practicing Catholic. Rubio is not unless he reverted in the last 18 months.

Rubio belongs to the Christ Fellowship nondenominational Church in West Kendall, Fla., where he has attended for the last six years.

37 posted on 02/23/2012 3:29:18 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
"According to YOU. If any such case were brought before the Supremes, it would be LAUGHED out of court within minutes. There are only TWO types of citizens: Natural Born and Naturalized. No make believe third type."

Whether or not Mr/Ms Comix is an Obot, though the allusion to ridicule -"LAUGHED" - is a strong hint of "Obot", don't be confused. We will keep trying to clarify while telling the truth doesn't put us in reeducation camps. There are just two classes of citizen, as Comix says, and Mr. Rubio is a naturalized citizen. It was a statute, a naturalization law, that made Rubio a citizen. The law originated in Congress, and was ratified as an amendment, but an amendment that never mentioned natural born citizenship, citizenship based upon natural law, whether cited by Vattel, Grotius, Pufendorf, Bynkershoek, Locke, Wolff, Leibniz, Cicero, or Aristotle. Chief Justice Marshall thought Vattel's definition was the most concise, and cited in The Venus, 12 U.S. 253. Here is one of the most clear declarations of the common-law definition, but with no citations, because Chief Justice Waite fixed the definition as precedent, to be "held" by subsequent courts. Remember, there are essentially no definitions is the Constitution. The Constitution was written to be understandable by literate citizens, and depended upon the common language and law at the time of its framers.

Here is Chief Justice Morrison Waite explaining who are natural born citizens, and pointing out that there were many doubts about who were the naturalized citizens, just enabled by the 14th Amendment ratified less than ten years before Minor v. Happersett. Just try to follow who is a citizen to see that naturalization has always been a moving target. But natural born citizenship has never been altered, and Congress has no authority to interpret Supreme Court or Constitutional definitions:

“The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that.At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”

38 posted on 02/23/2012 3:47:48 PM PST by Spaulding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: wrrock

Being a Mormon is only a negative when it applies to a conservative. When it is applied to a RINO, it is a badge of honor.


39 posted on 02/23/2012 4:44:18 PM PST by BobL (I don't care about his past - Santorum will BRING THE FIGHT to Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL
Being a Mormon is only a negative when it applies to a conservative. When it is applied to a RINO, it is a badge of honor.

?????????

Romney certainly gets a lot of grief for being a Mormon, so if he's the RINO you're talking about, you're wrong.

Harry Reid doesn't get any trouble from the media for being Mormon. Neither did the Udalls. But I doubt anyone's pinning a medal on them for that.

40 posted on 02/23/2012 4:47:18 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: CainConservative

I live in Florida. Yes, Rubio did not endorse anyone, but when he ran for the senate he had Mitt Romney’s picture prominently displayed even larger than his own on the front of his website. He has spoken glowingly of Romney often here. I don’t recall him speaking about any of the other candidates running in the same way so, forgive me if I mention his Romney love.

Perhaps it’s just because stealth RINOs like to stick together.


41 posted on 02/23/2012 5:28:24 PM PST by Waryone (Mitt Romney, the father of gay marriage and socialized medicine in the US, is a lying socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: x

“Romney certainly gets a lot of grief for being a Mormon, so if he’s the RINO you’re talking about, you’re wrong.”

Please point me to some MSM articles that go after Romney based on his ‘religion’.


42 posted on 02/23/2012 5:40:40 PM PST by BobL (I don't care about his past - Santorum will BRING THE FIGHT to Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Yeah, looks like it is pile-on Rubio night on FR.


43 posted on 02/23/2012 5:46:04 PM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo (FR: Now, More Than Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
PJ, I respect the heck out of your opinion.

in re: LAUGHED out of court within minutes

Plain fact of the matter is that the SCOTUS has absolutely dodged this issue, along with every other black-robed bumkisser before whom the strange and wonderful cases have arrived.

What is a "Natural Born Citizen?" The SCOTUS owes us a definition about now, instead of allowing the Mombasa MF and his advocates to settle it without benefit of adjudication. If a court actually hears the case on the issue and then laughs it out, OK-PJ.... then, I'm buying.

Until that happy, or sad, day. The issue hangs like a cloud over this administration and the country. This remains a valid constitutional question.

44 posted on 02/24/2012 7:22:34 AM PST by Kenny Bunk ((So, you're telling me Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Roberts can't figure out this eligibility stuff?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

Rubio’s parents were NOT American Citizens when he was born. He is NOT a Natural Born Citizen as defined by the ONLY SCOTUS Ruling to ever define the term.
It REQUIRES two parents who are American Citizens and being born on American soil in order to qualify as a Natural Born Citizen eligible for POTUS and VP BOTH.

STOP trial ballooning an unconstitutional candidate!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It makes us no better than Obamalamadingdong!


45 posted on 02/24/2012 8:56:17 AM PST by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Spaulding

Well said as always Spaulding!


46 posted on 02/24/2012 8:58:14 AM PST by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

That’s right, and Rubio is a Naturalized citizen, by means of the 14th Amendment. A Natural Born Citizen is one which needs NO statute to provide citizenship status because both that persons parents were citizens at the time of his birth in the United States or it’s territory.

Rubio’s parents were not American citizens at the time of his birth, so his citizenship claims comes from the 14th Amendment, not from the condition of his birth.


47 posted on 02/24/2012 9:02:02 AM PST by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Spaulding
Two problems ... OK 3:

(1)Team Obama, with the help of WND, Taitz, et al, has managed to turn this very real Constitutional matter into the "Birth Certificate" charade, adroitly shifting focus from the real to the surreal. If Obama is not paying these people, he ought to be.

(2) The Constitutional case is absolutely unique, giving courts, all the way up to and including the SCOTUS, ample opportunity to shuck and jive their administrative way around it. With no firm precedent upon which to actually opine, that could mean taking some sort of definitive stand on the actual matter. Heaven forfend!

(3)Obviously, no court in the land wants to be on record as opining on the eligibility of a sitting President to actually be sitting! (,i>especially after they swore the SOB in!) They pray that this cup may pass from them.

It is particularly galling to those many millions of us who want an answer on the issue to be dismissed ... as if this was res judicata. ... and that we are a bunch of silly moos for asking what is, I repeat ..again ... a legitimate question.

48 posted on 02/24/2012 9:32:03 AM PST by Kenny Bunk ((So, you're telling me Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Roberts can't figure out this eligibility stuff?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Danae
Of course, I agree with you.

However Danae, it is just not our job to extrapolate from Minor vs. H, or the 14th Amendment. It is a job for the SCOTUS. It is ultimately their job to interpret the Constitution as the final court of appeal in the land.

The obstacle here is, as Justice Thomas, Alito, and Scalia have so heavily hinted, is that the SCOTUS wants no part of the issue, and has grasped any straw to avoid hearing a case on the issue.

Sadly, neither does it seem that any state AG wants a piece of the action. This is a massive case of national insanity. It won't go away until some part of the judiciary, legislature, or state officials act. So far, no good.

49 posted on 02/24/2012 9:50:19 AM PST by Kenny Bunk ((So, you're telling me Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Roberts can't figure out this eligibility stuff?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

I agree Kenny. I understand their reasoning. Challenging it...DEALING with it brings us literally to the brink of dissolution of the Union. No joke. I don’t blame them for being cowards, I blame them for CHOOSING to act like cowards.

On their souls be it.


50 posted on 02/24/2012 10:13:54 AM PST by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson