Using a tax-free, non-profit for their activities is going to implicate a lot of people who thought they were contributing to a legit "charity."
The "charity's" checks should be especially scrutinized----the IRS says that's the biggest n/p scam---one "charity" writing checks to another "charity." That's how they finance their activities----and skim tax-free monies off for themselves.
Sandusky's disgusting shower sex is going to look tame---after they start digging into Spanier's anything-goes, sexual free-for-all.
READ MORE HERE http://dailycaller.com/2011/08/15/conference-aims-to-normalize-pedophilia/
BE AWARE There is a HUGE push to normalize pedophilia---BY PP AND ASSOCIATED GROUPS----they have been organizing for years. When one pedophile surfaces, you can be sure there are many others lurking around.
Keep in mind, these evil souless predators are amazingly persuasive and take pride in their ability to dupe people without displaying their true nature. People are easily taken in by these calculatedly charming, persuasive predators. Pedophiles entice their victims by gaining their trust.......the same way they get people to cover for them. The judge in the notorious Penn State case actually let Sandusky go free---another sign WRT how easily predators dupe people into being their willing enablers.
REALTIME CAUTIONARY TALE It was recently revealed - an alarmed mother found Sandusky took her son out of class without her permission on three occasions. When she approached the school, she was told she was being unduly alarmed, b/c, school officials reminded her, Jerry has a heart of gold. The mom insisted they call the police. But the braindead dupes talked her out of reporting it b/c that would hurt poor Jerry, they said.
Can I trouble you to elaborate on that? I've seen a very suspicious pattern resembling that at a charity I used to finance.
The reporter who I think broke this story has said he believes there was a sex ring where young boys were pimped out to donors. Nothing would surprise me in this culture! Follow the money.
It's a valid question ... I'm sure 'the press' will look into it... Just kidding - non-profits are a protected victim 'do gooder' liberal touchy feel thing. The press won't look unless they're forced by a picture or something. (Remember John Edwards? Teddy Kennedy and a dead woman? Clinton and Paula and Juanita?
And what about that woman who hired a hit man to kill anyone wearing fur? That's NOT being covered. It would be if a hit man was hired to kill an abortion doctor.
Wonder how the New York Times excuses that one away? No conservatives to trash? No interest...