Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GALLUP DAILY: GOP Ballot Tracking (Santorum 31, Romney 30, Gingrich 16; End of the Santorum Surge?)
Gallup ^ | 2/25/12 | Gallup

Posted on 02/25/2012 10:57:49 AM PST by BCrago66

Look at the chart at the bottom of the page:

Santorum's 10 point over Romney lead has been cut down to a 1 point lead...in just 4 days. Unfortunately for Gingrich supporters (such as myself), Newt has stabilized at 16, and it look like Romney, not Newt, has been the chief beneficiary of Santorum's recent polling dive.

(Excerpt) Read more at gallup.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: arlenvoted0bamacare; askdornanaboutnewt; biggovtrick; bigspenderrick; dcinsiderrick; mythreewives; newtplaysfield; niceguyloser; philanderernewt; poperick; populistliberalrick; preachersantorum; proillegalsrick; prounionsrick; rickbackedspector; saintearmarx; santorum; santorumisnotchange; santorumisnothope; serialadulterynewt; serialrepenternewt; sexoncapitolhill; squeakycleanloser
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-93 last
To: CainConservative
Santorum leads Romney 43% to 32% among men...

Romney leads Santorum 47% to 26% among women...

Herein lies the crux of the problem for both Newt and Santorum. Contrary to what some have said, Newt's problems with women voters have nothing to do with his marital history. The problem for both Newt and Rick with women is that women even in the Republican party are heavily going for Romney, even while men are going heavily against him. I have yet to see polling or interviews which even attempt to explain this gender gap. I can only speculate that it's because a lot of even Republican women don't like conservative views, they just plain don't understand the issues, or they are voting solely on looks (but that is less of a factor with Romney compared to Santorum).

51 posted on 02/25/2012 12:28:29 PM PST by JediJones (Watch "Gingrich to Michigan: Change or Die" on YouTube. Best Speech Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce
[I guess Republicans are going to have to get used to praying in the direction of Salt Lake City......]

Either that, or get used to praying in the direction of the Vatican. But Secular America will not let it get past the GOP Convention. Religious purity is about as popular as an IRS Audit these days.

52 posted on 02/25/2012 12:32:59 PM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

You kept saying Santorum supporters like to “positively spin”. Well I’m a supporter, but as you can tell, I’m not spinning. This whole process has made me bitter, angry, and turned me off to the Election. After I felt like the voters spit on me (military) in 2008, I thought there was no doubt that we would be able to correct that great injustice. Now, I just don’t even give a d@mn anymore. Why bother?”


I was a Perry guy. He and his supporters were lied about, name-called, and made fun of by a group of anti-Perry trolls up to the point where he dropped out. After that, it was all grace and “Thanks Governor Perry” from those hypocrites.

Guess who those guys mostly support now?

I’ll vote 3rd party or not at all. Why bother.


53 posted on 02/25/2012 12:35:04 PM PST by magritte (Nevermind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

What are you talking about? Like most Newt bashers, you are posting totally false statements. The chart clearly shows that both Newt and Romney have risen as Santorum has dropped. Based on what do you expect Santorum to reverse this trend? The public got their first good look at him after a meteoric rise and now he’s starting a meteoric fall. The argument that Newt was not electable was not compelling or convincing at all, not for the guy who led Republicans to win the House after 40 years of being out and who increased turnout both in 1994 and this year in South Carolina by huge margins. But the argument that Santorum is not electable IS compelling, based on his Senate loss and the fact that the media can paint him as a single-issue candidate in the general election. Newt is perceived as a broad-based conservative on all issues, not just on religious-themed issues.

I won’t argue that it looks like Romney is well on track to winning the primary at this point. He’s going to win Michigan and Arizona. Santorum’s disastrous debate performance sealed that deal. And those wins will have the RINO media arguing Mitt is inevitable again, as if they ever really stopped. Newt has proven he has the ability to rise in the polls based on skill, policy matters and natural appeal, not based on luck or winning by default after the other candidates smeared each other and ignored him. But women voters are determined to hand this thing to Romney and I don’t see Newt or Rick having anything close to a message that’s going to change that trend.

At this point, Mitt is the likely winner of the primary, followed by Newt, with Santorum a distant third. It is STILL likely however that Mitt wins without a plurality of delegates and it will have to be decided at the convention. Our only chance then will be for Newt + Rick to have more delegates than Mitt + Paul, which is still possible. But it will be a disaster if Newt + Rick splitting the votes gives Romney future winner-take-all states. That is where Newt + Rick will have a difficult choice of having one of them drop out.


54 posted on 02/25/2012 12:39:43 PM PST by JediJones (Watch "Gingrich to Michigan: Change or Die" on YouTube. Best Speech Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
Well I wish all the best to Newt getting into Heaven, but we are talking the Presidency and I want a squeaky clean President for a change. One that is conservative not a liberal like Carter who was kinda squeaky clean. We have never had a squeaky clean conservative Republican President. Let's give it a try for a change.
55 posted on 02/25/2012 12:43:15 PM PST by napscoordinator (A moral principled Christian with character is the frontrunner! Congrats Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC
You know what the South likes? : )


56 posted on 02/25/2012 12:43:22 PM PST by CainConservative (Santorum/Huck 2012 w/ Newt, Cain, Palin, Bach, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Petraeus in the Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

It’s complete nonsense for you to base your demographic analysis off of Florida. Why don’t you look at South Carolina instead?


57 posted on 02/25/2012 12:43:46 PM PST by JediJones (Watch "Gingrich to Michigan: Change or Die" on YouTube. Best Speech Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Jesus’ message was not to judge our fellow human beings, to let he who is without sin cast the first stone. If you owned millions of dollars in stock in Apple, would you insist they hire the most “squeaky clean” person as their CEO, or the guy who had the most creative ideas and the best business plan for making the company profitable? We don’t have the LUXURY of voting on personality with the economic and cultural crisis that our country is in now. We need someone who has the intelligence, the skill, the insight, the knowledge, the experience, the boldness, the toughness, and the conservative policy agenda to make things right. That is the only basis on which we should be picking a candidate.

Voting in a “nice guy” is probably the opposite of what we should be doing in an environment with as many vicious domestic enemies as there are vicious foreign enemies. We need a “tough guy” and the reality is that tough guys are generally not the purest and most moral people throughout their lives, because they can be a bit arrogant at times. But we need someone like that to be a leader who will be arrogant enough to not capitulate to our ruthless enemies domestic and abroad.


58 posted on 02/25/2012 12:53:53 PM PST by JediJones (Watch "Gingrich to Michigan: Change or Die" on YouTube. Best Speech Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: JediJones; Lazlo in PA; Brices Crossroads; writer33; cripplecreek; Yaelle; Mountain Mary; ...

This is the biggest load of cr@p I’ve ever read. Are you actually try to pin the blame of a potential Romney nomination on the shoulders of the Santorum supporters? Let me have what you’re smoking because I’ve been feeling depressed for days watching the race go down the tubes.

This is what you hardcore Newt supporters don’t get. You don’t understand the electorate and you don’t understand the real factors that win elections. In a 1 on 1 of Romney vrs Newt, Newt gets crushed. That’s a fact. He can’t win Seniors, Hispanics, or females. Where does he win outside the South?

The other problem with Newt is that he lacks two factors that were important to both Bachmann, Cain, Perry, and even Reagan supporters: TRUST and LIKEABILITY. Santorum’s got warts, but guess what? Generally conservatives TRUST Santorum more than they trust Gingrich. They also give him higher favorability ratings. It’s not enough to just speak conservatism. Go back to Reagan’s two landslides. Conservatism may have won Reagan those elections, but TRUST and LIKEABILITY gave him his landslides.

Newt’s NOT going to make a comeback. You clearly see this in the polls. Santorum is dropping, but Gingrich isn’t benefitting because many of Santorum’s supporters don’t see Gingrich as a viable alternative to Mitt Romney. It’s that simple.

Despite the completely unnatural heights to which NG has been raised up on FR, there are posts upon posts in the archives denouncing Gingrich as a RINO, Establishment Republcian (grouped in with Mitt and Rudy), and a “genuine phony”. NOTHING has changed except the fear and panic among people here to stop Romney even if it means compromising their principles and having a willing suspension of disbelief, which is precisely what many Newt supporters have done.

I’ve watched Newt for a long time and I know the game he plays. For every brilliant, articulate statement Newt makes for something, you can usually find a brilliant, articulate statement Newt makes against the same thing! This isn’t by accident, it’s by design. He’s a master at developing the “technically correct” answer which gives him cover to chose the statement in his past that most reflects what he thinks the voters want.

The Payroll Tax debate. TARP. Climate Change. Gay Marriage. Right-Wing Social Engineering. Big Tent Republicanism. Tea Party Conservatism. Mandates., etc, etc, etc. You can find a statement at one point or another of Newt arguing both FOR and AGAINST these issues. With a system like this, it’s hard to be proven wrong when you’ve taken every side. With Mitt Romney, we call this kind of thinking: flip-flopping, but with Newt, we call it a “superior oration”.

I’m sorry, I don’t buy it. I think Newt’s insincere and a complete opportunist who cannot be Trusted. Many Santorum supporters, who were previously on board with Bachmann, Cain, and Perry, feel the same way, which is why there will be no Newt comeback. Abscence of Trust is the biggest disfunction of a working team.


59 posted on 02/25/2012 12:55:11 PM PST by parksstp (I pick Rick! (If he's good enough for Mark Levin and Rush Limbaugh, he's good enough for me))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: All
it look like Romney, not Newt, has been the chief beneficiary of Santorum's recent polling dive.

You could ask yourself what some Santorum supporters see in both he and Romney that his stumbling benefits Mitt.

For me, it's easy: they're both establishment creatures.

60 posted on 02/25/2012 12:56:44 PM PST by newzjunkey (Santorum voted for Sotomayor, Obama's 1st Supreme Court nominee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

If you owned millions of dollars in stock in Apple, would you insist they hire the most “squeaky clean” person as their CEO, AND the guy who had the most creative ideas and the best business plan for making the company profitable?

That is Santorum! I am just glad that the rest of the voters feel the same as I do.


61 posted on 02/25/2012 1:00:41 PM PST by napscoordinator (A moral principled Christian with character is the frontrunner! Congrats Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

You’re kidding, right? Knock off those rose-colored glasses. All Santorum’s experienced is a shot across the bow.


62 posted on 02/25/2012 1:03:08 PM PST by newzjunkey (Santorum voted for Sotomayor, Obama's 1st Supreme Court nominee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

There are no more debates. Ron Paul’s viral ads are watched by Ron Paul cultists exclusively. All that’s left are Romney’s ad buys. If the sheer volume of television ads is going to determine the presidency, the race is already over and the country is already dead.


63 posted on 02/25/2012 1:12:41 PM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
That is where Newt + Rick will have a difficult choice of having one of them drop out.

Why drop out? They can collect enough delegates to matter at the convention or come to an agreement between the two to shift their delegates to the other for some shared thing. Milt is not lighting the world on fire here. He is not getting over 50% in these state match ups. Santorum is right behind him in all of them. In GA he is 3rd behind Newt and Rick. Depending how the distribution works out in some of these states, Milt and his buddy RuPaul won't be able to play their cute little game.

64 posted on 02/25/2012 1:17:35 PM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard

There should have never been that many debates and especially those that were monitored by the SRM


65 posted on 02/25/2012 1:30:01 PM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

“Santorum voted for Sotomayor”

Big deal..25 GOP Senators voted for her, including notorious libs (/sarc/) like Thad Cochran and Orrin Hatch. She was elevated from the district court bench where she had been appointed by George Bush 41. There were no red flags about her. She was no conservative but there was nothing really radical about her at that point. She was confirmed 67-29.

Santorum’s vote didn’t change a thing.


66 posted on 02/25/2012 1:33:12 PM PST by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66
I can't say I have jumped onto the Santorum bandwagon yet, but his appearance Thursday on the Glenn Beck TV show (GBTV) was time well spent.
67 posted on 02/25/2012 1:37:37 PM PST by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

At least they’re skipping the ridiculous MTV debate (debate #21 in 2008). That’s marginal improvement.


68 posted on 02/25/2012 1:39:08 PM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

Anyone that trusted the incompetence, poor judgment, and appalling lack of understanding on foreign and domestic policy issues of Bachmann, Perry and Cain needs to have their head examined. The profound inadequacies of all these candidates have to be unpacked for most voters at a much earlier stage next time and we won’t even be tempted with wishful thinking. Of course it’s all Paul’s fault anyway. No crystal ball here, but given the way things are going at present if he hadn’t been a spoiler in NH, Huntsman will likely be have been our hero. The most conservative, electable and cleanest candidate amalgamated.


69 posted on 02/25/2012 2:23:02 PM PST by erlayman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette
I hope he's changed his staff from fearful political cowardice (failed to attack and take charge at a critical time during the campaign) to courageous. People that say we go for it all or we lose it all, but we're not holding back.

People that have this kind of attitude when we ARE ahead:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4_47O2Pfy8&feature=related

Hope its not too late.

70 posted on 02/25/2012 3:02:29 PM PST by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66

Santorum is clearly tanking. All we have to do to fix this and stop Romney, is get behind Newt.

** President Newt Gingrich-”Our beloved republic deserves nothing less.”


71 posted on 02/25/2012 3:56:14 PM PST by Gator113 (** President Newt Gingrich-"Our beloved republic deserves nothing less." ~Just livin' life, my way~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjo

Was thinking about negative calls and ads.
So lemme get this straight: Romnuts people barrage the airwaves and peoples voice mails with anti Rick hate mail. And the stupid, idiotic recipient, “hello?” who hasn’t yet “made up his mind’ finally succumbs to the pressure by agreeing that what they are hearing must be true because Romney says so. Checkmate! High five at Mittens hdqtrs: One drone down, only ten thousand to go!

If Mittens pulls this off in Michigan, a hate filled vendetta based on lies,distortions and more lies, bribes and back room power plays, I may give up like parksstp...at least on the Presidential race.

We Conservatives shouldn’t have to sell our souls or beat our heads against the wall trying to convince a bunch of stupid brain dead excuses for voters(some of them our own family and friends) that they are making a huge mistake by voting for a sure fire Hussein reelection card candidate, Rombo Romney.

And let’s not forget the GOP-E which is every bit an epic fail as well..and if one more of those pompous country club Rove clones posing as a party big whig tries to tell me that it will be MY fault if Romney isn’t the chosen one...and therefore, MY fault if Obama wins.
I do more in one day for the causes of Conservatism than they do in a year.
I despise these people and will never again give the RNC or one GOP affiliated organization a plug nickel or a minute of my valuable time...if Mitt Romney is their choice.

Oh and about the Tea Party “leaders”...
“Hello? Anyone home?” Deafening silence. “What’s that? You won’t endorse a Conservative because you don’t want to offend your Romney loving friends? Okay, Got it. Bye. Nice knowin’ ya. Fun while it lasted.”

The force is too great...we’re drowning here.
Save ourselves and just know that we did our best.


72 posted on 02/25/2012 4:41:30 PM PST by Mountain Mary (Michigan patriots, ie Newt and Rick supporters, UNITE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

JediJones: Just where do you crunch the numbers to get a win for Newt to be the nominee? Just how do you see his path to the WH being a reality at this point? I like him too but Denial is Not a River in Egypt.

This is a battle to defeat Romney and victory will be obtained if and only if the Newt and Santorum camps come together for this common purpose.
You Santorum bashers should be ashamed. You are makin’ alot of noise but to what end?


73 posted on 02/25/2012 4:48:32 PM PST by Mountain Mary (Michigan patriots, ie Newt and Rick supporters, UNITE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

And there is a Santa Claus and an Easter bunny too, isn’t there Red Steel?


74 posted on 02/25/2012 4:51:55 PM PST by Mountain Mary (Michigan patriots, ie Newt and Rick supporters, UNITE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Mountain Mary

We asked the Santorum people to come to Newt and stay with Newt weeks ago and they didn’t. Now they’ve given Romney everything he wanted. He has Santorum, a candidate who endorsed him and called him a conservative, now trying to base his whole race against Romney on a flip-flop on that position. It’s the exact same thing Romney would be trying to do on Romneycare in the general election. And it’s likely to be just as ineffective. The establishment and RINO pundits were uncorking the champagne as soon as Rick shot to the top of the polls and Newt fell, because they know how weak Rick is as a candidate. Now we’re seeing the unvetted Rick sink under his first volley of attack ads and media exposure, just as me and all the Newt supporters said would happen weeks ago as Rick first started moving up in the polls. Rick is a non-starter and a guaranteed loser against Romney.

The path to victory for Newt is simple and is based on what you said, the Rick and Newt camps coming together. The Rick supporters need to come to their senses and back Newt, a far stronger and more threatening candidate to either Romney or Obama, not to mention someone who has what it takes to create true conservative reform in Washington while he is President. We cannot hang this country’s future on a lightweight like Santorum. A go-along-to-get-along guy cannot reform the government the way it needs to be. The path to victory involves the polls switching quickly back in Newt’s favor, which is obviously possible since the polls have switched quickly many times before. Not to mention Adelson just have Newt’s group possible $10 million and Newt is killing it in speeches and interviews, the only one continuing to give interesting new sound bites to the media. I don’t think Rick should drop out until about April, when more states become winner-take-all and we can’t afford to risk splitting the vote and letting Romney win with a plurality above Newt and Rick. He can accumulate delegates and use them to help Newt at the convention.


75 posted on 02/25/2012 5:03:14 PM PST by JediJones (Watch "Gingrich to Michigan: Change or Die" on YouTube. Best Speech Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Irenic
I'm with you Irenic. I support Newt 100% but if he goes down I don't think I can vote for either Romney or Santorum. I am still registered as a republican but I am not sending the RNC one dime..especially after the stunt they pulled on Newt in Fla.

Here's hoping the multi million dollar donation from Addelson helps Newt and that Newt does great in the south. Even so, I don't see Romney or Santorum able to pick up the 1,000 plus delegates they need as the Newt supporters are loyal as are the Paulbots.

76 posted on 02/25/2012 5:10:33 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mountain Mary

Ricky better be believing in the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus.


77 posted on 02/25/2012 6:45:06 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette
Newt supporters, don't act all " Sanctimonious " on us now.
It was a few weeks ago when there was that video of Rick being posted all over Free Republic painting him as being against the Tea Party and many Newt supporters took his words out of context.
That's a bit hypocritical and sanctimonious of the Newt supporters to cry foul now.
78 posted on 02/25/2012 7:25:49 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66
Hate to break up the Rick Santorum bashing party by the Newt supporters, but, contrary to what some are gleefully hoping here , Rick is closing in on Romney in Arizona.
So, no, the only 2 polls that matter in the next few days is Arizona and Michigan.
Now we know who are the one's who are against the NON-Romney candidate now.
79 posted on 02/25/2012 7:29:56 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2851393/posts


80 posted on 02/25/2012 7:30:20 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
Santourm is closing in on Romney in Arizona, so contrary to some of those who are gleefully hoping for Santorum's demise, no, Arizona and Michigan matter only now in the next few days.
It's amazing how some of these folks are so anti-Romney, but yet ? they are rooting and hoping for Santorum's demise.
81 posted on 02/25/2012 7:33:10 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CitizenM

that’s actually not true about Obama and McCain. If you look back at the polls, the debates really made little difference. Obama didn’t see any big boosts from any of them.

It’s also hard to tell because the market was collapsing by 30% over the same time frame as the debates. as well as McCain’s suspension and then support for TARP.

But I don’t really think the debates had all that much influence on the outcome. I don’t recall Obama doing all that well. Basically his entire debate strategy was “I’m not a Republican and McCain is” with a hearty helping of “I’m not Bush and McCain is”.

McCain also got in trouble in that the 1st debate was supposed to be on foreign policy which was his strength but they shifted it to domestic policy because of the economic meltdown and bailout votes. And even McCain would admit the economy wasn’t his strong suit.

basically, though, once the economy went south after Lehman collapsed the die was cast. the debates didn’t relaly matter all that much.


82 posted on 02/25/2012 7:35:22 PM PST by jeltz25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: parksstp

I’ll tell you how Newt wins. The same way Clinton and Reagan won. The economy is in bad enough shape by the election that people simply want something different. That’s the same way any Republican is going to win. Newt, Rick, Mitt, whoever.

Look back at the polls from April 1992. Bush41 had a 10 pt lead on Clinton. I’m sure many dems were saying “how will Clinton win?”. Look back at the polls from the spring of 1980. Carter had a double digit lead over Reagan. Many were probably saying “how can Reagan win?”

Both of them won because eventually Americans had enough of the incumbent.

If we get to the fall and gas is $5 a gallon, inflation is on the rise, job growth has slowed, stagnated, or even started to go negative, Newt will have a very good chance to win, close to as good as anyone else.

Seriously, where do you think Obama will be if gas is at $5? Where do you think he’ll be if unemployment heads back up to 9% or more? If the market drops 10%? 20%? More?

Newt could well win on gas prices alone.

As for Rick sweeping the midwest. the latest MI poll vs Obama shows Obama with a 26 pt lead over Rick, the latest WI poll has him up by 11, and the latest PA poll has him up by 8, so I don’t know if I’d say he has an excellent chance of sweeping all of them.

But look, if gas goes up to the high $4, past $5, Newt will have a great chance of winning, as will any Republican.


83 posted on 02/25/2012 8:08:23 PM PST by jeltz25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66

To those thinking third party, look at these 2000 TX general election returns to gauge the numerical futility of such an action:

President/Vice-President
George W. Bush /Dick Cheney REP 3,799,639 59.29%
Al Gore /Joe Lieberman DEM 2,433,746 37.98%
Harry Browne /Art Olivier LIB 23,160 0.36%
Ralph Nader /Winona LaDuke GRN 137,994 2.15%
Pat Buchanan /Ezola Foster IND 12,394 0.19%
Howard Phillips /J. Curtis Frazier W-I 567 0.00%
James “Jim” Wright /Leonard L. Foster W-I 74 0.00%
David McReynolds /Mary Cal Hollis W-I 63 0.00%


Race Total 6,407,637


84 posted on 02/25/2012 8:55:13 PM PST by Theodore R. (Forget the others: It's Santorum's turn, less baggage, articulate, passionate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
GO NEWT!

85 posted on 02/26/2012 5:14:40 AM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: jeltz25
I see your point, and I thought Obama was irritating, haughty, arrogant, and childish during the debates, but: Many of the people I have talked with who voted for Obama did so because they said they thought he did better in the debates. Now maybe the polls didn't reflect a bump for him after each debate, but in the end I believe there are many who liked his ridicule, sarcasm, and caustic comments...and his energy. And that did win many votes. Yes, we all agree that his African American base was always there and even Obama and his handlers knew it and took advantage of that.

This time I just hope and pray that whoever goes face to face with him is a sharp as a tack, quick with the come-backs, and able to expose how very ignorant, hateful, and uninformed/misinformed Obama really is.

86 posted on 02/26/2012 12:45:55 PM PST by CitizenM (Obama's legacy will be to be remembered as The architect of the decline of the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66

This poll also includes Romney’s debate bump which I’m sure has already evaporated. I doubt Romney’s ahead.


87 posted on 02/26/2012 1:39:00 PM PST by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PapaNew

Newt is giving great speeches everywhere he goes. The media, including, FOX rarely mentions his name or ever play any exerts from his fabulous speeches. The word has gone out not to promote Newt and not to mention his name unless you just can’t avoid it. Makes me sick. He is clearly the only one that can take down BO. The press doesn’t like him cause he can take them down too. Sad that fellow conservatives are not voting for him. Rick can’t take on the Chicago machine and survive. He’s a great man, but now is not his time—all in my opinion of course.


88 posted on 02/26/2012 2:26:22 PM PST by dandiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dandiegirl
I was for Palin, then Cain, then Newt. Newt seems like a crap shoot. Something happened to him at the most critical juncture in the campaign in the Florida debates. He was ahead. But curiously, he seemed quite uncomfortable being ahead. I strongly suspect he got terrible advice about "don't lose" instead of "do whatever it takes to win, pull out all the stops." The result was a weak Gingrich in maybe the two most important debates (Florida). Florida was the turning point for Gingrich. He didn't attack when attack was clearly called for. There was little passion. He basically blew it.

Now that he's behind, he seems comfortable again and is roaring like a lion. I don't know. Something about maybe Palin running in 2016 (?)

God help our beloved country.

89 posted on 02/26/2012 2:41:43 PM PST by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66

Its not the end of the surge. There is still plenty of delegates out there up for grabs.


90 posted on 02/26/2012 3:28:36 PM PST by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

It’s proportionate delegates, not winner take all in Michigan, so either way, Santorum will be adding handsomely to his delegate total. Neither of the other two guys, Gingrich and Paul, is going to get NOTHING that night. Foregone conclusion. A victory there will be icing on the cake. This thing goes on to states where Santorum is very competitive and in the lead. The race goes on. Just like the old days of the GOP where the thing was not decided until June or so. So be it.


91 posted on 02/26/2012 4:33:20 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo (I liked the FREE REPUBLIC of years on end which NEVER had a problem with Rick Santorum, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66

Governor Brewer just put Mittens over the top with her endorsement. I wonder if she first consulted John McPain.


92 posted on 02/26/2012 5:42:00 PM PST by Theodore R. (Forget the others: It's Santorum's turn, less baggage, articulate, passionate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeltz25
Newt will have a great chance of winning

A lot has changed since SC.

93 posted on 02/26/2012 5:44:51 PM PST by Theodore R. (Forget the others: It's Santorum's turn, less baggage, articulate, passionate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-93 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson