Skip to comments.Newt Gingrich addresses the NRA in a way that No Other presidential candidate has before
Posted on 02/26/2012 12:39:50 AM PST by Marguerite
Newt Gingrich addresses the NRA in a way that No Other presidential candidate has before in 24 yrs.
Every single website is saturating their news post attempting to downplay Newt Gingrich's presidential campaign. This all-out effort is proof positive that this man is at the right time in the right place. We need somebody like Newt Gingrich that can go into Washington and go to work on day one. All the other presidential candidates are a mere learn on the job apprentices compared to Newt Gingrich.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
I pray we actually get to hear that debate. EAGLES UP MR. NEWT!
He’s leaps and bounds above the competition.
Newt has the potential of being the modern day Churchill. He has the sagely intellect and apparently the desire for greatness. We would be fools to turn away from this mutual opportunity.
I think all of you should forward the link to your hunting buddies and to all people who believe in their unalienable rights.
It a tremendous speech in defense of American exceptionalism.
I’m going to post it on my FB page.
“I watched the speech. It was indeed incredible.”
I watched it twice. Newt never misses a beat.The audience was under the spell, just like I was. Such a man comes along once in a century. I wish ALL Republicans, conservatives, moderates, independents would understand that America and the World needs such a leader NOW.
We live in dangerous times, and here is the MAN for this season. There is no other available. After Reagan, Newt is the best.
You could add this essential link:
Newt Gingrich Attacks Obama’s Secular Socialist Machine
I escaped from behind the Iron Curtin in mid 80s and do know when socialism/communism moved in, the first thing they did was to take guns away from the citizens. Shortly after that, a total dictatorship ran rampant, and millions of innocent lives were destroyed and eliminated without trace.
Is there a transcript for those of us still on dial-up?
Can you imagine winning this election only to install a George W. Bush in the White House? Even if we succeed in shedding the soft tyranny of Barack Obama, events are already in control and a reckoning of some sort or other cannot be evaded but only shaped. Gingrich has the power by virtue of his intellect, experience, and vision to bring the country through.
Consider one example. Our $16 trillion national debt is about to wreck the economy, destroy our defense system, and probably do away with capitalism in favor of a controlled, paternalistic economy. It will install crony capitalism/socialism, and utterly vitiate representative democracy. Gingrich has pointed out that if we permitted extraction of oil and gas on federal property it would likely generate $16 trillion or more in license fees and taxes in the next decade. He says he can find $500 billion a year in savings by resorting to modern management methods and his figure does not sound unrealistic. Combining these two numbers would produce about $21 trillion in 10 years and come close to restoring us to fiscal sanity without increasing taxes etc.
These are matters of vision which Gingrich possesses in abundance and which no other candidate apart from Barack Obama himself has demonstrated. Unfortunately, Obama's vision is breathtaking but tyrannical and ruinous.
Gingrich alone among the candidates articulates a coherent foreign policy which accepts the complexity of the threat of aggressive Islam, the limitations as well as the uses of military power, and the need for clear thinking to avoid self-deception, which has been the distinguishing characteristic of the Obama administration.
Yes, Santorum and Romney declare they will be muscular but they also have to bring the country along. Churchill did that with his speeches and Gingrich can do the same. When he says, "I want to say a word about foreign policy, I think we should have one" he drives a shaft into the heart of the Obama administration foreign-policy failures and then he brings the audience to its feet by declaring he wants an American constitutional foreign policy.
In other words, he can bring the country along.
Just as it avails little to win the election only to install a non-entity, even more does it avail nothing to lose the election. As John F. Kennedy said, "first you gotta win." So we have to have a candidate who can beat the billion-dollar baby.
Consider the utter failure of the McCain candidacy. His failure was not that he lost debates, his failure was the had no vision. His failure was that he was selling nothing but himself. Sounds like Mitt Romney, doesn't it?. Small wonder that McCain could never bring himself to attack Obama for having no specifics in his grandiose "vision" because that driving impulse was as foreign to him as it was to George HW Bush.
Gingrich has vision and from that he will structure a campaign to put himself and us on the attack and dominate the stage. That is the way to defeat Obama. The Bush-McCain path of passive resistance will probably fail. It is not simply a question of stringing together soundbites against Obama's policies and results, it is vital to explain why the failure is so abject. It is vital to offer a positive solution. It is vital to do so in words that clarify, convince, inspire.
What will Romney offer? Certainly not "vision." His path to the nomination has demonstrated that he has but three things to offer: 1) electability-now a greatly damaged presumption; 2) a Nixonian tendency to sacrifice his party by destroying his opponents through cut-out surrogates slandering with negative ads; 3) a dismaying tendency to conspire with the Ron Paul libertarian camp to contrive a fifth column operating against the other candidates-a very Nixonian and unattractive modus operandi.
The question is, can Newt gain the nomination? His chances are slim. A lot depends on the viability of Rick Santorum who, I predict, has started a slide and whose supporters for the most part are likely to go to Gingrich. I believe Santorum will lose both Michigan and Arizona and will as a consequence be further weakened. The pity is that the folks will not get another look at Santorum in debate to decide whether or not he is in fact "presidential."
If Santorum does slide, the real question is whether his lack of viability will be apparent in time for Gingrich to rise once again to the top? Any opinion on this is mere speculation. Clearly, Gingrich is making one terrific speech after another to one constituent group after another such as the Hispanics, the NRA, the Jews, the energy consumers etc. He is predicating his main issue on energy and I think he is right to do so. We normally fill our cars once a week and that means that Gingrich's message is being reinforced potential voters every week. Half of those people who take their cars are women and that gender represents Gingrich's greatest electoral weakness.
But is he getting his message out? We junkies watch it on the net but what about Joe The Plumber?
If I had to predict, I will say that Romney wins the nomination but if Gingrich can stay viable yet a while longer fate may yet have another trick to play on us.
A compilation of various Newt Gingrich clips from several 2011 GOP primary debates:
Excellent post, Nathan. Very well said.
Great post as always!
If you liked that speech...you should listen to Mr. Newt’s “Victory or Death” speech. It runs approximately 9 minutes, but is so powerful you will come close to tears. Here is the linc:
I could not find the transcript. I would check back to his website:
Thanks. Just watched it.
If there is a consistent man in American politics, that man is Newt.
you are right, Newt is the man for the times.
Newt speaks eloquently of Washington crossing the Delaware.
For anyone who hasn’t seen it, THE CROSSING with Jeff Daniels is superb.
equality of opportunity...not equality of outcome...
the crux of the difference between free people and serfs
the crux of the difference between conservatives/libertarians and the democrats/socialists
That is a good one. One to go down in the history books. :)
“equality of opportunity...not equality of outcome...”
Where do you think Obama took his “spreading the wealth” mantra from ?
Directly from ... Karl Marx’ concept of a communist society:
“From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs”.
I. Nothing in society will belong to anyone, either as a personal possession or as capital goods, except the things for which the person has immediate use, for either his needs, his pleasures, or his daily work.
II. Every citizen will be a public man, sustained by, supported by, and occupied at the public expense.
III. Every citizen will make his particular contribution to the activities of the community according to his capacity, his talent and his age; it is on this basis that his duties will be determined, in conformity with the distributive laws.
In other words, those who have no abilities whatsoever, they will still receive “according to their needs”, which will be taken from the pockets of hard-working people.
Obama’s idea of America is absolutely contrary to the conservative concept and to the right of each human being to pursue happiness and enjoy the fruits of his hard labor.
“Victory or Death” is a MUST, MUST watch video.
Thank you for posting!!
Thank you for posting this.........a great speech that I was blessed to have been able to hear because of your post.
I truly hope so. Gingich IS the statesman. I contiue to post his speeches on my Facebook page and forward in email. There are some of my female friends who dismiss him but many others who do not. Last election, they elected a candidate with no experience and a lot of blather and corruption. This time we need a seasoned candidate, one who has worked both sectors, has an impeccable command of history and can put forth real ideas and real solutions. And one who will never EVER put America’s interests second. My money’s on Newt.
Another must see video!
Thank you for posting!!
Send the link to your family and friends :)
I watched that speech. Newt was awesome!
Here’s a thought; Gingrich/Palin
I know that Sarah said she wouldn’t want second billing because she couldn’t call the shots but Newt is sounding quite Palinesque. She would bring an excitement to his campaign that Newt is lacking. As VP, she could be put in charge of reforming government, eliminating waste, etc. Plus, she would be ready in 2016 to run for president if Newt decides to serve only one term.
Newt would be an excellent mentor for Sarah. She would be a great draw and fundraiser for him.
As many people as possible should watch it.
Email the video link to everyone you know:
I’ll vote for the Newtster....even though he’s ticked me off many a’time. (Appearing with that wench Pelosi should qualify one for infinite torture.
However, thanks to the Obamaloon, my wife and I just completed our concealed carry classes. We’ve long had the weaponry, but thanks to the liberals, we’ve finally realized that we have need to have them available.
Hopefully, he, or Santorum (or ANYBODY EXECPT RINOmney) will become our president.
I really don’t think Sarah Palin wishes to be immersed in another national campaign, but Newt has already said, if elected he will offer to Gov.Palin a “major role” in his administration.
Newt was one of the few, who vigorously defended Sarah in 2008:
Sarah as Sec of State. That would be awesome. On state visits to Russia she can show KGBoy Putin how to properly handle a firearm. “Now see, Vlad, this is how you take down a bear.” BOOM!
September 3, 2008
Interview of Newt Gingrich on the O’Reilly factor regarding Sarah Palin:
“Sarah as Sec of State. That would be awesome”
Bump for later viewing.
Ontario: dad arrested after 4 year old draws picture of gun
by Walter Olson on February 25, 2012
The trouble began at school in Kitchener, Ontario, when a 4-year-old girl drew a picture of her father, Jessie Sansone, with a gun in his hand. When asked about the gun in the picture, according to police, the girl said her siblings played with it and that it scared her. The school principal, police and child welfare officials said they had to investigate to determine whether there was a gun in Sansones house that children had access to. And apparently that investigation had to involve detaining and strip-searching Sansone when he showed up at school to pick up his daughter, searching his home, and spiriting away his other children to Family and Childrens Services to be interviewed. Sansone was told he was being charged with possession of a firearm from the articles context, an offense in itself in that Second-Amendment-less locality. When police searched the Sansone home, they found a clear plastic toy gun that shoots soft plastic biodegradable BBs and retails for around $20 at Walmart and he was released without charges.
Don’t let your kids go to public schools or they will be taught, actually tutored by the government, to become proper, controllable idiots.
That was incredible!! Well stated and explained in a logical manner. No wonder our public schools don’t teach American history.
We badly need an awakening to the founding pricipals and culture of the United States. The elitists need to be knocked back in their assumptions that they “rule” over us in any way they chose in violation of our Nation’s interest and constitution.
The courts have to be reminded that the constitution can not be decided away by their elitist will. New immigrants have to be introduced to these idea so they understand that although they came to the US to make money; that opportunity is available because of America’s individual freedom. Socialism is for peasants and slaves.
Finally, the watermelons have to be exposed and put out to pasture for their opposition and hatred of human life. Population control is a genocide ideology and they have no right to plot and work against human life. It is not their globe. People do not belong to them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.