Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WikiLeaks Publishes Intelligence Firmís E-Mails [Stratfor]
http://www.nytimes.com ^ | February 27, 2012 | SOMINI SENGUPTA

Posted on 02/27/2012 7:07:46 AM PST by fight_truth_decay

Edited on 02/27/2012 7:22:48 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

WikiLeaks said Monday that it had begun to expose e-mail correspondence from the global geopolitical analysis firm known as Stratfor, detailing the companyís work for clients.

WikiLeaks did not disclose how it had obtained the e-mails, but Stratfor acknowledged in December that its data servers had been breached by a group of hackers known as Anonymous. The loose-knit group publicly supports WikiLeaks.


(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anonymous; assange; sourcetitlenoturl; stratfor; wiki

1 posted on 02/27/2012 7:07:59 AM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

Dow Chemicals appointed Stratfor to spy on Bhopal activists: WikiLeaks
AFP | Feb 27, 2012, 07.36PM IST

Times of India

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Dow-Chemicals-appointed-Stratfor-to-spy-on-Bhopal-activists-WikiLeaks/articleshow/12058565.cms


2 posted on 02/27/2012 7:09:13 AM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

Honest question: how is one to believe these are authentic and un-tampered with?


3 posted on 02/27/2012 7:12:26 AM PST by USMCWife6869
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

“Stratfor said that some of the e-mails being published ‘may be forged or altered to include inaccuracies’”

Sounds like panic to me. I’ve never read anything in the past about Anonymous or Wikileaks fabricating documents. Not a big fan of the two groups but fabricating doesn’t seem to fit their MO; rather, to the contrary, it seems to me that they pride themselves on getting to real stuff.


4 posted on 02/27/2012 7:15:17 AM PST by AtlasStalled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

Source for this article is NY Times, not Stratfor.


5 posted on 02/27/2012 7:17:23 AM PST by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

I really think a SEAL Team needs to take Assange out.


6 posted on 02/27/2012 7:20:04 AM PST by InsidiousMongo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

George Friedman evidently resigned yesterday as CEO.


7 posted on 02/27/2012 7:24:45 AM PST by GOPyouth ("We're buying shrimp, guys. Come on." - Dear Leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InsidiousMongo

“I really think a SEAL Team needs to take Assange out.”

I think you’re giving Anonymous and Wikileaks too much importance. When Wikileaks released all those diplomatic cables there was little, if anything, published which wasn’t already known or assumed by most people who cover international affairs, and there’s been no evidence of any harm coming to anyone from the release of the material notwithstanding the hysterical warnings from government officials. The government is unduly sensitive about its intelligence, and Anonymous and Wikileaks overestimate their own importance. At the end of the day it all seems like manufactured drama on both sides.


8 posted on 02/27/2012 7:32:05 AM PST by AtlasStalled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled
I think you’re giving Anonymous and Wikileaks too much importance.

Whoever was responsible for this attack on STRATFOR did some serious damage, both physically and to its reputation.

Based on the damage done to the servers, I suspect this was not just some attempt to embarrass the company, but to shut it down.

9 posted on 02/27/2012 7:43:10 AM PST by GOPyouth ("We're buying shrimp, guys. Come on." - Dear Leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GOPyouth

“Whoever was responsible for this attack on STRATFOR did some serious damage, both physically and to its reputation. “

And I believe whoever is responsible for this should be prosecuted.

My point simply is that the two groups likely aren’t endangering national security; rather, they are more like vandals and trespassers, and hardly deserve the world stage the media, governments and intelligence community are affording them.


10 posted on 02/27/2012 8:03:02 AM PST by AtlasStalled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GOPyouth
The Breach was under his watch--am guessing he felt it was the appropriate thing to do especially while dealing with further ongoing investigations. His clients are HUGE. I have been following Stratfor for years.

As they say in Twitterland: Someone is following you, and you are following them back.

11 posted on 02/27/2012 8:10:23 AM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled

I agree, and I should have put that on my response to you. I meant to stress the issue of this being a private company and not a government agency. However, STRATFOR has its fair share of former government officials who have been known to spook around the world in a former life. Hopefully at some point the people responsible for this will be found.


12 posted on 02/27/2012 8:12:49 AM PST by GOPyouth ("We're buying shrimp, guys. Come on." - Dear Leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled
They dont try and abuse the dictatorships or kingdoms that are our/Western enemies they are supported by those that will profit from the leaks. If I were them I would worry about the double tap coming their way or to their friends and family.
13 posted on 02/27/2012 8:15:44 AM PST by bdfromlv (Leavenworth hard time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
His clients are HUGE. I have been following Stratfor for years.

Oh yeah, it's pretty amazing down there. I did an internship there in college when the Kosovo war was going on. I was blown away at Friedman's mind, and at the amount/quality of information that was rolling into that office regarding what was going on in Serbia/Kosovo. I think that's the event that put them on the map.

14 posted on 02/27/2012 8:17:05 AM PST by GOPyouth ("We're buying shrimp, guys. Come on." - Dear Leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

ooops sorry got the link right..am just usually posting Startfor pieces. Thanks for heads up.


15 posted on 02/27/2012 8:20:48 AM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GOPyouth

Were you there when they first implemented the paywall?

I have a really low opinion of StratFor, mostly due to the huge amount of agitprop directed towards deceiving the “general public” in the Anglophonic world. Untold thousands of hours of freepers lives have been spent reading annd dicussing stratfor media that turned out to be the obfuscation PR releases for stratfor’s clients.


16 posted on 02/27/2012 9:34:10 AM PST by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander
Were you there when they first implemented the paywall?

I can't remember what all was free at the time I was there. That was, what, 1999ish, I believe? I do know that the Kosovo stuff I was doing sit-reps on was free at the time, much like some of their current content. I know that they had paying clients at that point, but it may have been for much more detailed analysis.

I had my job to do, so I didn't have much time to know about the other aspects of the company. I do know that they had contacts out the wazoo who they were constantly in contact with. The "news" aspect of it was what I was involved with and not the analysis and forecasting.

17 posted on 02/27/2012 10:26:07 AM PST by GOPyouth ("We're buying shrimp, guys. Come on." - Dear Leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
I can't figure out why everyone involved in the WickiLeaks organization are not dead by now.

...something else is going on here....either:

. ..none of the "leaks" are harmful to anyone...

or:..the leaked against organization want the info out there...

...you can't tell me that the US government cannot do anything about the "leaks"

..hell, they can find and shut down watch and jeans counterfeiters, music down-loaders, etc....and will absolutely trash facilities and houses, kill pets and scare the hell out of innocent people in a drug raid, or a raid on an lobster fishing outfit, or do not have any problem shutting down half a state because of a minnow fish...

18 posted on 02/27/2012 10:41:35 AM PST by B.O. Plenty (Elections have consequences....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled

Really? So you’re saying that the full names of confidential sources in foreign countries were already known or suspected by everyone before wikileaks “accidentally” published them?


19 posted on 02/27/2012 1:14:20 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GOPyouth
Whoever was responsible for this attack on STRATFOR did some serious damage, both physically and to its reputation.

And the founder and now-former CEO of Stratfor did some damage as well to Stratfor when he said they didn't take security as seriously as they should. I'm still trying to figure out why he said that - not only did he shake confidence for current and potential clients, but he probably opened Stratfor up to civil lawsuits.
20 posted on 02/27/2012 1:32:59 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GOPyouth

Where did you read that? I took your word for it, as received no email to support a resignation; but then got this tonight:

RE: As you can see, emails sent to many people about my resignation were clearly forged.

Transcript:

I’m George Friedman, founder and CEO of Stratfor.

As most of you know, in December thieves hacked into Stratfor data systems and stole a large number of company emails, as well as private information of Stratfor subscribers and friends. Today Wikileaks is publishing the emails that were stolen in December. This is a deplorable, unfortunate — and illegal — breach of privacy.

Some of the emails may be forged or altered to include inaccuracies. Some may be authentic. We will not validate either, nor will we explain the thinking that went into them. Having had our property stolen, we will not be victimized twice by submitting to questions about them.

The disclosure of these emails does not mean that there has been another hack of Stratfor’s computer and data systems. Those systems, which we have rebuilt with enhanced security measures, remain secure and protected.

The release of these emails is, however, a direct attack on Stratfor. This is another attempt to silence and intimidate the company, and one we reject. As you can see, emails sent to many people about my resignation were clearly forged.

We do not know what else has been manufactured. Stratfor will not be silenced, and we will continue to publish the geopolitical analysis our friends and subscribers have come to rely on.

As we have said before, Stratfor has worked to build good sources in many countries around the world, as any publisher of geopolitical analysis would do.

We are proud of the relationships we have built, which help our analysts better understand the issues in many of these countries through the eyes of people who live there.

We have developed these relationships with individuals and partnerships with local media in a straightforward manner, and we are committed to meeting the highest standards of professional and ethical conduct.

Stratfor is not a government organization, not is it affiliated with any government. The emails are private property. Like all private emails, they were written casually, with no expectation that anyone other than the sender and recipient would ever see them. And clearly, as with my supposed resignation letter, some of the emails may be fabricated or altered.

Stratfor understands that this hack and the fallout from it have created serious difficulties for our subscribers, friends and employees. We again apologize for this incident, and we deeply appreciate the loyalty that has been shown to Stratfor since last year’s hack.

We want to assure everyone that Stratfor is recovering from the hack. We will continue to do what we do best: produce and publish independent analysis of international affairs. And we will be back in full operation in the coming weeks. We look forward to continuing to serve you.
http://Stratfor.com/hacking-news


21 posted on 02/27/2012 6:34:32 PM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

Post #21


22 posted on 02/27/2012 6:35:33 PM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: AtlasStalled

Post 21


23 posted on 02/27/2012 6:37:23 PM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

Why didn’t they have these “enhanced security measures” from the beginning? They all of places should have had such measures from the start.


24 posted on 02/28/2012 11:23:23 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
Sorry for the delay in responding. I don't recall where I saw the piece about Friedman resigning. When I was searching this story, I came across it. It was from an email. That email could have clearly been faked, as Friedman has mentioned in his message you posted.

Ok, I did a quick search and came across several sites that posted the resignation piece. Forgive me for not hyperlinking it, but I'm tied up at work.

http://techfleece.com/2012/02/27/stratfor-ceo-george-friedman-announces-his-resignation-due-to-wikileaks-emails/

There is one site.

I'm glad that it's not the case, and I should have prefaced my comment more rather than citing it as truth. For that I apologize.

25 posted on 03/01/2012 7:14:09 AM PST by GOPyouth ("We're buying shrimp, guys. Come on." - Dear Leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: GOPyouth
RE: As you can see, emails sent to many people about my resignation were clearly forged

I would have not known; if I had not received the email directly after our posts, from Friedman @Stratfor firm.

As we see now you were probably privy to the email or posting from some group on his alleged resignation.

Thanks for your input..do not feel it is not greatly appreciated, GOPyouth!

26 posted on 03/01/2012 2:38:04 PM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson