Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney on Taxes: ‘I Want to Make Sure We Maintain the Progressivity of the Code’
CNSNews.com ^ | Terence P. Jeffrey

Posted on 02/27/2012 5:27:15 PM PST by JSDude1

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney said on Fox News Sunday that he wants to maintain “the progressivity” of the tax code so that as Americans make more money they are required to surrender increasing percentages of their earnings to the federal government in taxes.

Romney has a long record of opposing a flat tax--even investing more than $50,000 of his own money during the 1996 presidential campaign to run newspapers ads attacking then-presidential candidate Steve Forbes’s flat-tax proposal as a “tax cut for fat cats.”


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: business; income; romney; taxes

1 posted on 02/27/2012 5:27:22 PM PST by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Flat tax is fair tax. Your twenty percent is the same as my twenty percent...help wipe out class warfare. The only fair way.


2 posted on 02/27/2012 5:31:12 PM PST by jessduntno ("Newt Gingrich was part of the Reagan Revolution's Murderers' Row." - Jeffrey Lord, Reagan Admin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Leftwing activist governor, leftwing activist party mole, leftwing activist candidate.


3 posted on 02/27/2012 5:32:00 PM PST by Psalm 144
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Tell me, how can that “village mullah” dour scold social Neanderthal Santorum be much worse than this guy?


4 posted on 02/27/2012 5:32:06 PM PST by heye2monn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Makes sense. After all, he IS a “progressive”.


5 posted on 02/27/2012 5:35:15 PM PST by COBOL2Java (Mitt Romney is SEVERELY conservative - and I'm SEVERELY against giving him my vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

6 posted on 02/27/2012 5:36:15 PM PST by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

No, a head tax is the only truely fair tax, but the main problem is about $2.5 billion in unconstitutional spending.


7 posted on 02/27/2012 5:38:58 PM PST by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: heye2monn
Tell me, how can that “village mullah” dour scold social Neanderthal Santorum be much worse than this guy?

He's not worse, just different.

I think Santorum's loss to Obama would be of McGovern scale, costing maybe 100 House seats and a couple in the Senate. Romney will come closer, and some seats in Congress could be saved.

Either way, Obama gets a second term and the system changes.

8 posted on 02/27/2012 5:39:26 PM PST by Jim Noble ("The Germans: At your feet, or at your throat" - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

I thought that Massachusetts was one of the few states without a progressive tax scale. Was I wrong? My information was from the 1980’s.


9 posted on 02/27/2012 5:40:22 PM PST by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: achilles2000
the main problem is about $2.5 billion in unconstitutional spending

That is correct, but the people are not committed to ending it, and the GOP is split.

The significance of Romney is that he speaks for all those who think "the system" is basically sound but badly managed. This is of course an enormous error, but things have to get a lot worse before the people turn to a reformer - and by then, Obama will be re-elected.

10 posted on 02/27/2012 5:42:23 PM PST by Jim Noble ("The Germans: At your feet, or at your throat" - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

I have never understood the “logic” behind progressive taxes. $1,000 to a man making $10,000 is the same impact as $10,000 is to a man making $100,000.


11 posted on 02/27/2012 5:47:43 PM PST by muir_redwoods (No wonder this administration favors abortion; everything they have done is an abortion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

And which party’s nomination is Romney running for?


12 posted on 02/27/2012 5:59:29 PM PST by BfloGuy (The final outcome of the credit expansion is general impoverishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

“I have never understood the “logic” behind progressive taxes. $1,000 to a man making $10,000 is the same impact as $10,000 is to a man making $100,000.”

You have never understood the “logic” of it because you are a rational, thinking person. In other words, not a Democrat.


13 posted on 02/27/2012 5:59:57 PM PST by FerociousRabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

how could anyone confuse this guy for a fiscal conservative?


14 posted on 02/27/2012 6:04:44 PM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1
Whatta...


15 posted on 02/27/2012 6:06:56 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

I will never vote for Romney. If we are going to have a gun grabbing socialist empty suit in office, I would rather him be a Democrat.


16 posted on 02/27/2012 6:14:02 PM PST by vmivol00 (I won't be reconstructed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

Romney....just another Morman nincompoop


17 posted on 02/27/2012 6:14:11 PM PST by ptsal (E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1
At one of my former employers their were a couple of guys who would save all the office jokes, one had a pile of them all Xeroxed.

Another had a photo in his office.

He was an engineer so it was even funnier.

It was a picture of a man in a suit ( He looked like a fat Omar Sharif ), in a suit with a blindfold with a smile. He had one foot sock-less and was about to pull the trigger of a hand gun pointed at his foot.

I am beginning to think this Photo is the E-GOP's motus-operundi

18 posted on 02/27/2012 6:14:29 PM PST by taildragger (( Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
how could anyone confuse this guy for a fiscal conservative?

Oh now, you know that! He SAYS he is, his lackeys in the media and GOP Establishment say he is, so he is! He's SEVERELY conservative! Just ask Ann Coulter, or Governor Krispy Kreme...

19 posted on 02/27/2012 6:14:32 PM PST by COBOL2Java (Mitt Romney is SEVERELY conservative - and I'm SEVERELY against giving him my vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1
Dear Mitt:

F.U.

End of message.

20 posted on 02/27/2012 6:16:55 PM PST by elkfersupper ( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

The guy who pays 15 percent on millions wants to maintain “the progressivity” of the tax code.


21 posted on 02/27/2012 6:18:22 PM PST by evilC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

I hope Newt wears romneys ass out over this.


22 posted on 02/27/2012 6:20:07 PM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

What a loser! This is straight out of the communist manifesto and he does not care! We should never be taxed on our income! Never! THe founders would have never allowed it.


23 posted on 02/27/2012 6:21:26 PM PST by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo with laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

To hell with that. To hell with him.


24 posted on 02/27/2012 6:27:32 PM PST by surely_you_jest (Mitt Romney is the latter day incarnation of Joe Isuzu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

The truth is Mitt doesn’t want to give up the ability the income tax provides the truly rich, who can arrange their affairs such that they have little in the way of “income”, for avoidance, nor the opportunities it (the income tax) provides government for it’s social engineering projects!

NO income tax can be fair for those reasons! Who get’s to decide what is , or is not, “income”?

What we need is a point of retail sale only sales tax which would make individual taxpayers anonymous to the tax collector! ONLY then will we be a TRULY free people!

http://www.fairtax.org


25 posted on 02/27/2012 6:28:19 PM PST by Bigun ("The most fearsome words in the English language are I'm from the government and I'm here to help!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker

26 posted on 02/27/2012 6:39:39 PM PST by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker

27 posted on 02/27/2012 6:39:59 PM PST by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

I heard him say that. It was what he said & the way he said it. How can “conservatives” call him conservative?


28 posted on 02/27/2012 6:56:59 PM PST by outofstyle (Down All the Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

The goal of the progressive tax is to 1) keep up and comers from getting big enough to challenge the elite, and 2) limit income for everybody. As Obama said, “at some point, you’ve made enough money.”


29 posted on 02/27/2012 7:00:58 PM PST by Clock King (Ellisworth Toohey was right: My head's gonna explode.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Mitt wants to make sure that he is all things to all people. He is no more for a progressive tax than he is for a regressive tax.

Mitt is for Mitt.


30 posted on 02/27/2012 7:03:40 PM PST by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Again, Mittens is WRONG!

Obama is HALF right when he says: There is no reason a working person should pay a higher percentage of his income in taxes than someone making much more. (He forgets to mention that many “working people” pay no income taxes.)

The other HALF of that statement would be: There is no reason a working person should pay a LOWER percentage of his income in taxes than someone making much more.

Our current tax code in the name of “progressivity” allows a bit more than half of the population to avoid paying any income taxes. That half of the population are the ones who want more goods and services from “the government”. They would be unlikely to do so if they had to pay income taxes.

My proposal would be to set taxes at about 18% of income with the first $36,000.00 a person pays going into social security. (Yes, I would eliminate the slight of hand that the employer pays half of social security taxes. All taxes above $36,000.00 paid goes into the general fund.

While that proposal would lower the RATE which fat cats pay, it would eliminate ways to avoid paying taxes or reducing tax rates.

It would also downsize the Internal Revenue Service from an heir of the SS into a tax collection agency. The SS portion of the IRS would go after the underground economy populated by people who do not report their income.

But I guess Mittens does not get it.


31 posted on 02/27/2012 7:03:58 PM PST by MIchaelTArchangel (Romney ruined Massachusetts. Now he wants to ruin the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

No. Santorum nearly won Michigan and established himself as a solid conservative, something Mittens can never do.

Having made his mark with conservatives, Santorum has the political skills (many years as a Republican in Democratic Pennsylvania) to reach out to the rest.

Anything slick Romney tries will not be taken seriously, unless he somehow convinces the public that he is a real, genuine “man of the people.” That would be tough.


32 posted on 03/01/2012 3:51:18 PM PST by heye2monn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson