Skip to comments.Five reasons why Mitt Romney’s Michigan and Arizona wins are a big deal
Posted on 02/28/2012 9:31:06 PM PST by SmithL
Weve been reading for weeks about Mitt Romneys demise as a presidential candidate.
For a candidate whos been declared dead more often than Mark Twain, hes showing surprising life.
In his victory speech in suburban Detroit, the Michigan native called his twin victories a giant step toward a brighter future.
Here are five reasons why the former Massachusetts governors wins in Michigan and Arizona are significant:
1. Considering how many mistakes Romney has made, he still won.
It was a rough week with a bushel of bad press. Remember the trees being the right size. And the multiple Cadillacs in the family garage. He still won.
2. He is resilient.
Romney dug himself a hole in Michigan. He was trailing in the polls. And he came from behind. If hes going to beat President Obama, hell need to follow that same path.
3. His negative ads have been effective.
He outspent rival Rick Santorum and buried him with a barrage of negative ads. Santorum damaged himself with a weak debate performance in Arizona and a couple of campaign-trail gaffes. But Romney proved once again that he can shape public images of his rivals through skillful attack ads. Barack Obama: beware.
(Excerpt) Read more at blog.sfgate.com ...
He will never go after Obama like he has the Republican candidates. I bet he calls him a decent man and shares a beer with him.
Michigan Republican Delegate count Santorum 13 - Romney 15 - 2 available - http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P12/MI-R
I didn’t read 4 and 5 was either one that he gives a good speech? Because he does. Santorum sadly does not. Newt is pretty good but he comes and goes. Ron Paul speaks with the conviction of a zealot but ....
Romney will become a scared dog against Obama. The tactics he is using will not work against someone who has 5x the money and a sleze machine that makes Romney’s look like amateur hour.
Yep, we lose again...there’s not much difference between the two.............sigh
Mark Twain was only declared dead once, IIRC.
Mitt is not my fav, but McCain was a horrible candidate. He looked terribly old in 2000: At least Mitt is telegenic.
Yep, they’ll destroy him as a cult polygamist incarcerator and for his record of saying things about Corporations being people, when they are the hallmark of image of conformity business.
And, unlike McCain, when Mitt insults the base, it's not intentional; it's by accident.
well, I guess there’s nothing like having a “pretty president”...huh?
Thanks for mentioning Obama’s money. The linked article praises Mitt’s allegedly skillful ads but all he did (to Gingrich and now to Santorum) was bury them under a money advantage.
If he’s the nominee he’ll find out what being buried feels like.
Oh, yeah, Barky and the LSM are just shaking in their boots, lol.
This is like watching people shoot kittens in a barrel.
And he smiles so sweetly when he insults...we just misunderstand.
“He will never go after Obama like he has the Republican candidates. I bet he calls him a decent man and shares a beer with him.”
You betcha - Juan McCain all over again. And Santorum won’t have the cajones (or the poise) to pull it off either. This is just sickening.
Newt is the ONLY one who can face off utterly, fearlessly and effectively against the SOB in Chief. It kills me how smug (and WRONG!) all the GOP elites and “conservative” pundits are about Romney and his supposed electability. When he loses to BHO, they’ll be clueless but have all kinds of excuses why.
For all those that so intently contributed to the Circular Firing Squad here you are now free to have your own circle jerk, you should take deep pride in you roll in helpking kill the Republic, you get to live in it.
Me, I am old, to old to care anymore.
“He looked terribly old in 2000: At least Mitt is telegenic.”
And it’s that kind of deep thinking that reflects all the voters who’re saddling us with BHO Lite - Mittens Obomney.
Too darn bad, people were not angry enough to want bold
changes of how our corrupt government works. (Go Newt)
I'll vote for whomever gets the nod at the GOP convention...
NO THIRD PARTY SPOILERS!
Santorum probably wasn’t really that close, either.
It was probably more like a 9 point win for Romney without the open primary.
This is the only part of the piece that had any real truth. A one trick pony. This is all Milt has because he has no issues and after all that money and destruction, he could only get a 3% advantage on Rick. This stooge is going to be a disaster in the General if he makes it unscathed next Tuesday.
“Too darn bad, people were not angry enough to want bold
changes of how our corrupt government works. (Go Newt)”
Human beings can be very short-sighted.
Although we are already in the toilet socially and morally, in order for real Americans to be spurred into action, PALPABLE economic conditions will have to get much worse.
Dem crossovers were no different this year than in other years in MI. There is no way to tell anyone that Milt actually got 9% there.
This article is such B.S. Mitt is the “underdog” or “comeback kid” now? He won his home state and another southwest state with a heavily Mormon population. BFD!!
The reality is he should have had MI sown up weeks ago. The fact that he had to fight like hell just to squeak out a 3 point victory in his HOME STATE speaks volumes about how weak a candidate he is.
So it is a big deal that he won tonight, ONLY because losing would have meant a possible campaign implosion. And for that reason, I see it as a missed opportunity for those of us fighting to preserve the integrity of the conservative movement.
Obama is already campaigning as "the only candidate for the middle class." (Barf, yes. But the class warfare has only just begun.)
Gingrich could beat Obama just by hoisting him on his own petard. Romney can't do that. I don't see it in him. So what does Romney have? "I'm a good man and a good business man." I don't see that one captivating the nation.
Yes, Mitt will be a much better candidate than grumpy McCain was, even tho’ that is damning with faint praise. For one, the 2012 candidates can actually articulate sound arguments for what they believe in. It’s been a long time since we nominated a Republican like that.
“This despite the fact that, according to exit polls, around 10% of the voters in the GOP primary are Democrats. In an echo of Rush Limbaughs 2008 Operation Chaos, Democrats and union officials have urged their followers to vote for Santorum so as to promote a weak Republican nominee. Michael Moore advised his fans to vote for Santorum, which probably produced six or seven ballots. Still, if 10% of the voters in the primary were Democrats, and if 80% of them voted for Santoruma conservative estimateit added 6% to his total. If my arithmetic is correct, that means that if Romney wins by, say, five points, he actually won by 11 points among Republicans. Right? No doubt a reader will correct my math, but that should be in the ballpark.”
I think it’s likely a fair estimate, unfortunately...
What will it take to get people to wake up? This is very frustrating. If we could unite, we could have a person to bring real changes. Has to be a real desire for a battle to have a change.
From what I saw on TV, Doug Schoen was saying he wanted “centrists” and “moderates” on the Americans Elect ticket. I know he name-dropped a few but I can’t recall who. They sounded like they were leaning more to the liberal side though, as “moderates” as defined by the media tend to. Schoen and Pat Cadell were the ones who wrote this editorial saying Obama should step down and let Hillary take over this year:
They may act just as much as a spoiler against Obama as against the Republican. In fact, Hillary is probably their dream candidate. They may really have this dream that a “moderate” can win the election. But at this point I think it’s just as likely they pick someone who takes away votes from Obama as much as from the Republican.
Mitt gives an OK speech if you consider reminding the world that your wife drives a couple of Cadillacs is OK. Obama is going to have a field day with his melanin deficient twin.
Mitt Romney was a moderate governor in Massachusetts with an unimpressive record of governance. He left office with an approval rating in the thirties and his signature achievement, Romneycare, was a Hurricane Katrina style disaster for the state. Since that's the case, it's fair to ask what a Republican who's not conservative and can't even carry his own state brings to the table for GOP primary voters. The answer is always the same: Mitt Romney is supposed to be "the most electable" candidate. This is a baffling argument because many people just seem to assume it's true, despite the plethora of evidence to the contrary.
1) People just don't like Mitt: The entire GOP primary process so far has consisted of Republican voters desperately trying to find an alternative to Mitt Romney. Doesn't it say something that GOP primary voters have, at one time or another, preferred Donald Trump, Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry, Newt Gingrich, and now even Ron Paul (In Iowa) to Mitt Romney?
To some people, this is a plus. They think that if conservatives don't like Mitt Romney, that means moderates will like him. This misunderstands how the process of attracting independent voters works in a presidential race. While it's true the swayable moderates don't want to support a candidate they view as an extremist, they also don't just automatically gravitate towards the most "moderate" candidate. To the contrary, independent voters tend to be moved by the excitement of the candidate's base (See John McCain vs. Barack Obama for an example of how this works). This is how a very conservative candidate like Ronald Reagan could win landslide victories. He avoided being labeled an extremist as Goldwater was; yet his supporters were incredibly enthusiastic and moderates responded to it.
Let's be perfectly honest: Mitt Romney excites no one except for Mormons, political consultants, and Jennifer Rubin. To everybody else on the right, Mitt Romney vs. Barack Obama would be a "lesser of two evils" election where we'd grudgingly back Mitt because we wouldnt lose as badly with him in the White House as we would with Obama. That's not the sort of thing that gets people fired up to make phone calls, canvass neighborhoods, or even put up "I heart Mitt" signs in their yards.
2) He's a proven political loser: There's a reason Mitt Romney has been able to say that he's "not a career politician." It's because he's not very good at politics. He lost to Ted Kennedy in 1994. Although he did win the governorship of Massachusetts in 2002, he did it without cracking 50% of the vote. Worse yet, he left office as the 48th most popular governor in America and would have lost if he had run again in 2006. Then, to top that off, he failed to capture the GOP nomination in 2008. This time around, despite having almost every advantage over what many people consider to be a weak field of candidates, Romney is still desperately struggling. Choosing Romney as the GOP nominee after running up that sort of track record would be like promoting a first baseman hitting .225 in AAA to the majors.
3) Running weak in the southern states: Barack Obama won North Carolina, Virginia, and Florida in 2008 and you can be sure that he will be targeting all three of those states again. This is a problem for Romney because he would be much less likely than either Gingrich or Perry to carry any of those states. Moderate northern Republicans have consistently performed poorly in the south and Romney won't be any exception. That was certainly the case in 2008 when both McCain and Huckabee dominated Romney in primaries across the south. Mitt didn't win a single primary in a southern state and although he finished second in Florida, he wasn't even competitive in North Carolina or Virginia. Since losing any one of those states could be enough to hand the election to Obama in a close race, Mitt's weakness there is no small matter.
4) His advantages disappear in a general election: It's actually amazing that Mitt Romney isn't lapping the whole field by 50 points because he has every advantage. Mitt has been running for President longer than the other contenders. He has more money and a better organization than the other candidates. The party establishment and inside the beltway media are firmly in his corner. That's why the other nominees have been absolutely savaged while Romney, like John McCain before him, has been allowed to skate through the primaries without receiving serious scrutiny.
Yet, every one of those advantages disappears if he becomes the nominee. Suddenly Obama will be the more experienced candidate in the race for the presidency. He will also have more money and a better organization than Mitt. Moreover, in a general election, the establishment and beltway media will be aligned against Romney, not for him. Suddenly, Romney will go from getting a free pass to being public enemy #1 for the entire mainstream media.
If you took all those advantages away from Romney in the GOP primary, he'd be fighting with Jon Huntsman to stay out of last place. So, what happens when he's the nominee and suddenly, all the pillars that have barely kept him propped up in SECOND place so far are suddenly removed? It may not be pretty.
5) Bain Capital: Mitt Romney became rich working for Bain Capital. This has been a plus for Romney in the Republican primaries where the grassroots tend to be dominated by people who love capitalism and the free market. However, in a year when Obama will be running a populist campaign and Occupy Wall Street is demonizing the "1%," Mitt Romney will be a TAILOR MADE villain for them. Did you know that Bain Capital gutted companies and made a lot of money, in part, by laying off a lot of poor and middle class Americans? Do you know that Bain Capital got a federal bailout and Mitt Romney made lots of money off of it?
The way the company was rescued was with a federal bailout of $10 million, the ad says. The rest of us had to absorb the loss Romney? He and others made $4 million in this deal. Mitt Romney: Maybe hes just against government when it helps working men and women.
The facts of the Bain & Co. turnaround are a little more complicated, but a Boston Globe report from 1994 confirms that Bain saw several million dollars in loans forgiven by the FDIC, which had taken over Bains failed creditor, the Bank of New England.
Did you know Ted Kennedy beat Romney in 1994 by hammering Mitt relentlessly on his time at Bain Capital? No wonder. The ads write themselves.
Imagine pictures of dilapidated, long since closed factories. They trot out scruffy looking workers talking about how bad life has been since Mitt Romney crushed their dreams and cost them their jobs. Then they show a clip of Mitt making his $10,000 bet and posing with money in his clothes. All Mitt needs is a monocle and a sniveling Waylon Smithers type character to follow him around shining his shoes to make him into the prototypical bad guy the Democrats are trying to create.
Now, the point of this isn't to say that what Mitt did at Bain Capital was dishonorable. It certainly wasn't. To the contrary, as a conservative, I find his work in the private sector to be just about the only thing he has going for him. But, people should realize that in a general election, Mitt's time at Bain Capital will probably end up being somewhere between a small asset and a large liability, depending on which side does a better job of defining it.
6) The Mormon Factor: This is a sensitive topic; so I am going to handle it much, much more gently than Hollywood and the mainstream media will if Mitt gets the nomination. Mormons do believe in Jesus Christ, the Mormon Church does a lot of good work, the ones I've met seem to be good people, and two of my best friends are Mormons. That being said, Mormons are not considered to be a mainstream Christian religion in large swathes of the country. There will be Protestants who will have deep reservations about voting a Mormon into the White House because they'll be afraid it will help promote what they believe to be a false religion. There have also been a number of polls that show that significant numbers of Americans won't vote for a Mormon as President.
Just look at a couple of the more recent polls and consider how much of an impact this issue could have in a close election.
The poll found 67 percent of Americans want the president to be Christian and 52 percent said they consider Mormons to be Christian. Twenty-two percent of those polled said they don't think Mormons are Christians and 26 percent are unsure.
"I do believe they are moral people, but again there is a difference between being moral and being saved," Linda Dameron, an evangelical Republican in Independence, Mo., told the Tribune.
More than 40 percent of Americans would be uncomfortable with a Mormon as president, according to a new survey that also suggests that as more white evangelical voters have learned White House hopeful Mitt Romney is Mormon, the less they like him.
A survey by the Public Religion Research Institute released late Monday also shows that nearly half of white evangelical Protestant voters a key demographic in the Republican primary race dont believe that Mormonism is a Christian faith, and about two-thirds of adults say the LDS faith is somewhat or very different than their own.
You should also keep in mind that if Mitt Romney gets the nomination, Hollywood and the mainstream media will conduct a vicious, months long hate campaign against the Mormon Church. They will take every opportunity to make Mormons look weird, racist, kooky, scary, and different. Would this be a decisive factor? I'd like to say no, but by the time all is said and done, it's very easy to see Romney potentially losing hundreds of thousands of votes across the country because of his religion.
7) He's a flip-flopper. Maybe my memory is failing me, but didnt George Bush beat John Kerry's brains in with the "flip flopper" charge back in 2004? So now, just eight years later, the GOP is going to run someone that even our own side agrees is a flip-flopper right out of the gate? Romney doesn't even handle the charge well. When Brett Baier at Fox pointed out the obvious, Romney's response was to get huffy and deny that he was flip flopping, which is kind of like Lady Gaga denying that she likes to get attention. If Mitt can't even handle run-of-the-mill questions from FOX NEWS about his flip flopping, what makes anyone think he can deal with the rest of the press in a general election?
There are a lot of issues with trying to run a candidate who doesn't seem to have any core principles. It makes it impossible for his supporters to get excited about him because you can't fall in love with a weathervane. Even worse, since politicians tend to be such liars anyway and you know Romney has no firm beliefs, it's very easy for everyone to assume the worst. Democrats will feel that Romney will be a right wing death-beast. Republicans will think that Romney will screw them over. Independents won't know what to believe, which will make the hundreds of millions that Obama will spend on attack ads particularly effective. Ronald Reagan famously said the GOP needed "a banner of no pale pastels, but bold colors." That's particularly relevant when it comes to Mitt Romney who has proven to be a pasty grey pile of formless mush.
“The media is gonna love him, right until he gets the nomination.”
Yep. McCain without a service record or pro-life credentials. McCain crashed and burned. Bishop Willard will not even get off the runway.
“At least Mitt is telegenic.”
In a rigid, mortician kind of way.
Your calculus is in accord with mine. Crash, burn, clear the rubbish, build anew.
The republican party is not worth a hill of beans anymore. It is looking more and more like it needs to die out.
I dunno, I think this whole contraception and religious liberty blow up will act as a prophylactic against media criticism of his Mormon background. As much as I personally think Mormonism is a cult, Mitt will likely not have to suffer too much media ridicule, though Mormonism will be put under the microscope.
In a rigid, mortician kind of way.
LOL. You nailed it!
Inclusive in all of those posted—is the fact that Romney divides the GOP as much as Obama has divided America. If I want Obama I will vote for Obama not the paler shade of Obama.
I’m not pimping anyone Romney is the better speech maker of the group hands down. It’s a little thing called reality.
Some people have a hard time acepting reality. We’ve been through many candidates and this is what we’re left with. Newt’s numbers just aren’t there and Santorum will never win the general. Newt and Rick are going to split the votes in the south. Who is that going to help? I’m guessing people didn’t even listen to Romney’s speech last night. He took it to obama pretty darn good. When you consider that he’s taken incoming from the left and the right and in spite of splitting the vote four ways is still surviving. At what point do we stop dismissing the actual voters who are keeping him in? He even took a nice chunk of the senior vote. At this point I’m going with a reality.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.