Posted on 03/01/2012 10:39:59 AM PST by VU4G10
That is what they use to flame Santorum, so far to no avail because they can’t explain why Newt still hasn’t been rising.
You see when Newt had negative ads against him, his loss was not because of him, but all because of the negative ads.
When Santorum has negative ads ran against him, he lost and it was all his fault and he should get out and turn the race over to a guy who scored 6.5% in Michigan.
Odd how that works. LOL
The media only focuses on the social issues with Santorum because that is all they want people to hear.
And if Romney becomes the Republican nominee, you will vote for Barry Soros?
That essentially none of the lost Santorum support in the polls has gone to Gingrich does not bode well for Gingrich ever increasing his numbers.
“The media only focuses on the social issues with Santorum because that is all they want people to hear.”
You are exactly right! That’s why Santorum should be learning how to turn the interviews back to the critical issues we are facing. The fact he doesn’t (or can’t) says something about his personality. He needs to stop being a “tool” of the media!
And you’ve heard every word Santorum has said on the campaign trail and you know about the “always”?
Did it never occur to you that you get your picture of all the candidates through a media filter?
Did it never occur to you that a variety of people, both right and left, have a vested interest in highlighting and ignore other things he says?
No. It never occurred to you because you already had your mind made up. So you take this media-filtered image uncritically while you take a media-filtered negative portrait of, say, Newt, critically and figure out to what degree it’s accurate, to what degree it’s misleading.
But your mind’s made up, so, enjoy your tunnel.
Point #1: There is no essential difference between Obama and your liberal candidate.
Point #2: As a Christian, I cannot and will not cast a vote for someone who voted abortion into law and panders to homosexuals. I have a responsibility to my country, but my responsibility to my God has to come first. I won’t be a party to such things. On top of that, Romney is such a disgustingly vicious, underhanded, and dishonest individual that I can’t imagine being FOR him.
If all that is acceptable to you, knock yourself out. But that idiot, who says he will not even attack Obama, and who says Obama is merely “misguided”, doesn’t even understand the nature of what we are up against. There is no WAY he can win. And when Obama gets another four years to finish his destruction of the country, you will have to share in the blame for getting behind Romney instead of putting your support behind a conservative.
Still pimping Mitt Romney, VU4G10?
He is a sure loser, he goes nowhere if he is nominated because of his Progressive Liberal record as Governor and because he is a serial liar.
Maybe an opening for NEWT?
No, but I won't vote for Mitt.
Even if he wanted to, Mitt won't be able to pull us off the path we're on, but he won't get the chance to try.
An electorate stupid enough to put Zero in the White House remains stupid enough to re-elect him. Throw in the 10 to 15 percent edge his propoganda machine in the media provides, and it's a done deal.
When it hits the fan, I want a Rat in charge.
"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton
I won’t be voting for Romney, troll.
You can take all your pro-Romney threads and stick it.
I second that motion.
As long as people stop using the word “conservative” with “romney” in the same sentence then I’m ok...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.