Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

WTF?
1 posted on 03/01/2012 1:50:47 PM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Sub-Driver

The bishop in DC has to tell that woman she can not recieve. This is a disgrace.


2 posted on 03/01/2012 1:53:54 PM PST by mware (By all that you hold dear on this good earth, I bid you stand, Men of the West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

if that were true the insurance companies would have made them free years ago


3 posted on 03/01/2012 1:58:32 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE? WHERE DO THEY REALLY COME FROM?


4 posted on 03/01/2012 2:00:43 PM PST by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

So it is government policy to minimize the number of pregnancies in the US population? When did our government turn against us?


6 posted on 03/01/2012 2:02:18 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

I always pay close attention whenever Tiller The Killer’s very best friend speaks about morality.

(end contemptuous sarcasm)


8 posted on 03/01/2012 2:03:23 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Massachusetts...proud home of *two* of Obama's illegal alien relatives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

In a free country children are considered a blessing.

In socialist countries they are a burden.


9 posted on 03/01/2012 2:03:38 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

What a stupid premise! The increase of the use of birth-control alone will result in a higher percentage of unplanned pregnancies. If you miss a day, you’ve just set back your ability to protect against pregnancy. Condoms are a poor source of protection, and even the pill is not 100%. This is outrageous positing on this!


10 posted on 03/01/2012 2:05:42 PM PST by Shery (in APO Land)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
I guess we now know why Obama wants to save money on Mammograms for Mature Women.
So he can buy pills and condoms for bitches and hoe's.

11 posted on 03/01/2012 2:07:41 PM PST by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

The assumption that there is anyone out there who would use contraception but can’t afford to is totally false, so the contention that “free” contraception (sterilization, abortion) would result in fewer pregnancies/births is also totally false.


12 posted on 03/01/2012 2:09:44 PM PST by Tax-chick ("If I want someone without merit, I'll simply vote for the Muslim ferret!" ~Da Coyote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

We’re turning into China with this bunch of morons! Two children per family and no females.


13 posted on 03/01/2012 2:10:12 PM PST by Bushbacker1 (I miss President Bush! 2012 - The End Of An Error! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Sebelius is nuts ~ most folks have probably realized that by now.

Alternatively she's an alien from outerspace ~ but that's not likely.

Here's something that would save a lot more money ~ that she go walk off the roof of the HHS building ~ just like that she is no longer our problem ~ just that of her god ~

14 posted on 03/01/2012 2:11:01 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Think of how much more money could be saved with vigorous death panel’s applied to nursing homes.


19 posted on 03/01/2012 2:20:45 PM PST by jesseam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Nothing that Frau Goebbels utters surprises me anymore.


21 posted on 03/01/2012 2:24:58 PM PST by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Population control nut!


23 posted on 03/01/2012 2:29:37 PM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

I look at an evil woman like Sebelius, still wasting skin and air.

Then I look at Andrew Breitbart, gone too soon.

And then I ask, WHY?


25 posted on 03/01/2012 2:40:23 PM PST by GracieOMalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

good grief. Econ 101.

Somebody is putting research into the pills.
They cost money to produce.
Therefore - it takes money to purchase them, and the cost will be passed onto the consumer.

This is nothing but Pelosi’s “stimulus” idea from a few years back...let’s stimulate the economy by having fewer kids.

Yeah right....how much money are parents spending on their kids?
Who is going to grow up and pay for our nursing home bills?

Lawdy be these people are morons!


27 posted on 03/01/2012 2:52:05 PM PST by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Fewer pregnancies means fewer future adults. And if they have jobs, it means more tax payers. And a growing population. fewer pregnancies means fewer future taxpayers to provide the free health care and paying for abortions and contraceptives the planned parenthood folks want.


30 posted on 03/01/2012 3:41:08 PM PST by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

If all babies were aborted medical costs would eventually drop to zero.


32 posted on 03/01/2012 4:36:35 PM PST by Richard from IL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson