No they're not. The findings of The Arpaio Report are nonetheless valuable because if Arizona had an honest governor or AG, they could use Joe's info to take Obama off the state ballot.
What has been forgotten is that every state AG, Governor, or election authority can take anyone off any ballot in order to force them to prove their bona fides. They don't need a court order. They need not take ANY candidate's word and can challenge any provided documentation. It is actually a discretionary power!
It is extremely simple. In all the legal cases to date, Team Obama has been the DEFENDANT. The trick is to make them the PLAINTIFFS. That way no court in the land can dismiss the case "for lack of standing."
One state. One AG. And this mess is in front of the SCOTUS where ... win, lose, or draw ... it belongs. Now. That's what Sheriff Joe has done for us ... but ONLY if the Arizona authorities take action.
If Sheriff Joe's info is not used by the Arizona authorities ... and there is no law that says it has to be ... the whole issue is just another WND "Birther" Tempest in a teapot.
BTW, are we sure this really happened out in Arizona? I mean wouldn't Rush or Hannity said something ... anything ... about it?
Could it be that Rush raised the idiotic, nonsensical Fluke issue to obfuscate and head off what Arpaio released? Rush = a double-agent?