Skip to comments.Palin open to presidential run in 2016
Posted on 03/06/2012 6:01:14 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY
Sarah Palin teases on CNN tonight.
"I don't discount any idea or plan that, at this point, isn't in my control. Anything's possible.
.... I would seriously consider whatever I can do to help our country."
(Excerpt) Read more at gop12.thehill.com ...
That doesn’t do much for us now, does it?
I don’t think people will be fooled by her running for president again.
I watched it. She didn’t tease, she simply answered the damn question.
Sorry.... I’ll use a kicking T from now on....
Staying relevant Sarah? Going to endorse?
I hope that she’ll be elected to the U.S. Senate, in 2014 and ‘20. She could be elected president in 2024 or ‘28.
You’re piling on for no reason, because you didn’t watch the vid. She was asked a question, and as is typical for Sarah P. she didn’t give a canned non-response. What exactly would you do if you had a mic stuck in your face and you wanted to remain irrelevant? Hate on Sarah P., but be fair occasionally, she will be crucial in the coming months, regardless of whether she runs or not.
Right, absolutely right. If Obama wins re-election, America will be completely changed by 2016. The whole country will be on the dole, and a conservative won't have a chance.
She had her chance and left everyone high and dry. Im tired of her popping up on tv every few months to stay relevant. You turned your back on the country when it needed you most. So dont do us any more favors.
In what country?
Another four years of Idi Obama, there won’t be a United States of America to run in.
Well, there you go again...
I do not believe Palin is a Romney supporter. She could have changed the course of these primaries and decided to not endorse.
Seems to me she did just endorse, why is this the first time she’s effectively throwing herself in? Because she doesn’t like the way these primaries came out and has little confidence in Romney and Santorum. Just the way I see it, so bots don’t bother if you’re just going to be nasty.
Palin in 2016 implies that Zerodamus will win in 2012..
Pretty accurate to be honest..
NO NEWT in 2012 is a Zerodamus WIN... UNless
Santo picks Newt as VeeP..
Which probably won’t happen because Santo and Willard are owned by the Unions.. even tho Newt is such a whore..
Newt has pissed off the Union parasites..
Which Union members are parasites?...
ALL OF THEM...
I think it is premature for any person to look at 2016
She’s plenty relevant now, IMHO.
There was no better speech at CPAC this year. She’s a fighter, with more guts than most “conservative” men.
She’s been taking the fight to the libs since she came out as a VP candidate in ‘08. She didn’t hide when everyone else was licking wounds after ‘08.
She and Gingrich both know how to fight, unlike the panty-waists.
In 2016, against an incumbent Republican. It would be a good thing to for an elected RINO to have a Palin threatening to challenge if he betrays the people that elected him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.