Posted on 03/07/2012 6:27:20 AM PST by Sen Jack S. Fogbound
Is this why Sandra Fluke went public?
Look which groups behind Obama's contraception strategy
Published: 11 hours ago
by Aaron Klein Email
Aaron Klein is WND's senior staff reporter and Jerusalem bureau chief. He also hosts "Aaron Klein Investigative Radio" on New York's WABC Radio. His latest book is the N.Y. Times best-selling, "The Manchurian President: Barack Obama's Ties to Communists, Socialists and Other Anti-American Extremists
Prior to her statements to congressional Democrats, did Georgetown University law student Sandra Fluke have any prior connection to Obama administration officials?
Did the congresswomen who pushed Fluke’s testimony coordinate with a marketing and polling outfit that recently conducted a survey to determine whether contraception mandates can become a possible presidential election issue?
According to some reports, it was Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., who pushed for Fluke’s testimony. Maloney also initiated the call for Fluke to sue Rush Limbaugh for his on-air derogatory remark about Fluke, according to the Daily Beast.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
For instance, I've been reading that she might own a house in Georgetown that's assessed for $450K. Is this true? Where did she get that kind of money--brokering condoms?
And the first time I saw her photo, I thought--That's a man!! But her voice is maddeningly screechy, so I don't think so.
Could she be transgendered?
Who's her Dad? What's her family?
Fluke is so much the personification of liberalism—
Unattractive, unfeminine, pro-abortion, absolutely no sense of responsibility, in favor other paying for herself, and biggest of all, she so fully embraces her VICTIMHOOD.
No. Fluke was a willing participant and as one tied to liberal positions is eager to help the cause. This definately was no accidental person who just stumbled in off the street.
Like another poster said, the dem/libs are well known for over-playing. This will probably be no exception.
Everything about her screams Hillary follower.
She is a rabid liberal feminist with a chip on her shoulder (deep seated hatred of men in general).
NO ONE participates in the vagina monologues that isn’t as described by at least one of the above (most likely all of the above).
Look at her credentials and notice the causes she champions and the associations she has - that makes it perfectly clear even to the laziest of observers...
A couple of weeks ago George Stephanopolous asked Rick Santorum in a debate his standing on contraception. This was weird and “out of the clear blue sky”. A week or so later on Meet the Press David Gregory did the same thing. Then up pops Ms. Fluke with her “testimony” to a panel of Democrats only about the evil Georgetown not paying for her contraceptives and abortifacients Only a fool would consider this scenario a coincidence. It was organized by the DNC, the White House or both.
I've always wondered about the Dred Scott case. Irene Emerson, his owner, may have been a hard case ... but by 1850 she had moved to Massachusetts and had remarried ... to an abolitionist(!!!) She also seems to have permitted Dred Scott and his family to travel freely and move and mix in some pretty high powered abolitionist circles. Scott's case was partially financed by the son of his first owner, the son having by now become anti-slavery. Irene transferred Scott's ownership to him after the Supreme Court ruling; Scott was then freed. Smells like a setup job to me but I've never researched it closely and have not seen the suspicion confirmed.
I’m with you on that, but, more than likely the Dem’s will find some other Useful Idiot for the next ‘issue’ they want to bring up, when its time to deflect criticism from the them or the moron in chief. Basically, she’s the flavor of the day for now. But I doubt she will be tomorrow.
Unfortunately, the only reason this is still an issue is because of the stuff w/ Rush. Which I fully support, by the way.
[ This is how Libs win. They control a vast empire of propogandists with national and international reach, funded largely by taxpayer money. Conservatives operate as individuals, or at best, small groups crying into rain barrels, funded locally with private money. Of course the Libs win every national issue. We still haven’t learned. ]
When you control all of the messengers it is trivial to control the message....
We need to make/build more messengers on our side, and the internet has helped and this is why they are going to be clamping down on the internet. Be wary of ANYTHING that seeks to restrict the internet.
what is this V monologues? I’ve heard it’s name pop up many times before.
Somebody should ask David and George their prophylactic policy ~ do they practice safe sex?
Thanks for your post. I did not know the history & background behind the Rosa Parks bus ride.
Tammy Bruce cuts to the chase. I like the way she presents the left.
According to some reports, it was Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., who pushed for Fluke’s testimony. Maloney also initiated the call for Fluke to sue Rush Limbaugh for his on-air derogatory remark about Fluke, according to the Daily Beast.
All this AFTER her original testimony at the hearing on Obamacare was rejected because the 'Rats in charge of the congressional hearing found she lacked expertise on the subject of the hearing: Obamacare.
You mind telling us how that worked out for Monica?
Quite sure the dem/libs will try this War on Women until they finally figure out no one is listening, then will try to gen up another thing. Because of the real dire straits nobama is on on re-election, their tactics will become both hilarious and alarming.
If we ever get pure control (House, Senate and POTUS) there are two very primal things we must do. One is make it a crime to intentionally lie in political campaigning, , punishable if proven just like in court, punishable with hard time plus loss of voting for 4 years and two to make it a “hard time” crime plus loss of vote for 4 years to commit or enlist voter fraud.
When those tow things are cleared up, a heck of a lot of other anti-Constitution things will clear up.
Quite sure the dem/libs will try this War on Women until they finally figure out no one is listening, then will try to gen up another thing. Because of the real dire straits nobama is on on re-election, their tactics will become both hilarious and alarming.
If we ever get pure control (House, Senate and POTUS) there are two very primal things we must do. One is make it a crime to intentionally lie in political campaigning, , punishable if proven just like in court, punishable with hard time plus loss of voting for 4 years and two to make it a “hard time” crime plus loss of vote for 4 years to commit or enlist voter fraud.
When those tow things are cleared up, a heck of a lot of other anti-Constitution things will clear up.
Monica was never an advocate for leftist causes (even Pelosi didn't push for funding for more oral sex). She was a bit of an embarrassment to the left. She was never held out as an example of a woman assaulted by the right, she's not an a law school graduate, she never could have testified before Congress.
You didn't see Monica being invited on talk shows; Fluke was immediately invited.
Does that make sense?
Her father is Richard B Fluke, II, who is a machinist and a pastor at a Methodist church from a small town in Pennsylvania, Saxton.
Her mother, Betty Kay Fluke, is a school counselor.
Sandra graduated from Tussey Mountain High School in Saxton and was salutatorian in 1999.
Sandra has been living "part-time" in -- shudder -- West Hollywood, California.
I wouldn't be surprised if the general theme "Republican War on Women" came from the White House and the Obama campaign.
But the original choice to testify at the hearing was a man. Somebody there, among the congressional Democrats and staffers, saw that it would have to be a woman, and picked Fluck.
Anything is possible, but I suspect she was too low down on the food chain for Obama or his people to have noticed her on their own.
FWIW, there's a little bit of a backlash or backwash or blowback on the left. Nothing really important, but some bloggers and commenters complain about Obama's "your parents should be proud of you" as patronizing and infantilizing a 30-year old woman.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.